- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Nonlinear viscoelastoplastic rheology of a viscous vertex model

Shalabh K. Anand1,2,* and Matthias Merkel1,†

  • *Contact author: shalabh.anand@uibk.ac.at
  • †Contact author: matthias.merkel@univ-amu.fr
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 033263 – Published 2 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jyn1-dl6s

Abstract

Morphogenesis involves complex shape changes of biological tissues. Yet, tissue shape changes depend on tissue rheology, which in turn arises from the interplay of large numbers of cells. Here, we link cell- and tissue-scale mechanics by constructing mean-field rheological relations for the vertex model. In contrast to past work in the field, we study a vertex model with an explicit viscous friction. We also include two different cellular mechanisms creating active, anisotropic stresses. Our mean-field model accounts for cell shape and the nonlinear elastic and viscoplastic regimes. We validate our results by predicting the response to large-amplitude oscillatory shear. There are several vertex model variants, and comparing to results from the literature, we show that their rheology depends on a number of model details. Our approach should be sufficiently general to construct nonlinear mean-field constitutive relations for any cell-based tissue model.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (83)

  1. A. R. Harris, L. Peter, J. Bellis, B. Baum, A. J. Kabla, and G. T. Charras, Characterizing the mechanics of cultured cell monolayers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16449 (2012).
  2. F. Serwane, A. Mongera, P. Rowghanian, D. A. Kealhofer, A. A. Lucio, Z. M. Hockenbery, and O. Campàs, In vivo quantification of spatially varying mechanical properties in developing tissues, Nat. Methods 14, 181 (2017).
  3. A. Mongera, P. Rowghanian, H. J. Gustafson, E. Shelton, D. A. Kealhofer, E. K. Carn, F. Serwane, A. A. Lucio, J. Giammona, and O. Campàs, A fluid-to-solid jamming transition underlies vertebrate body axis elongation, Nature (London) 561, 401 (2018).
  4. N. Khalilgharibi, J. Fouchard, N. Asadipour, R. Barrientos, M. Duda, A. Bonfanti, A. Yonis, A. Harris, P. Mosaffa, Y. Fujita, A. Kabla, Y. Mao, B. Baum, J. J. Muñoz, M. Miodownik, and G. Charras, Stress relaxation in epithelial monolayers is controlled by the actomyosin cortex, Nat. Phys. 15, 839 (2019).
  5. M. Gómez-González, E. Latorre, M. Arroyo, and X. Trepat, Measuring mechanical stress in living tissues, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 300 (2020).
  6. S. L. Tlili, F. Graner, and H. Delanoë-Ayari, A microfluidic platform to investigate the role of mechanical constraints on tissue reorganization, Development 149, dev200774 (2022).
  7. P. Guillamat, W. Mirza, P. K. Bal, M. Gómez-González, P. Roca-Cusachs, M. Arroyo, and X. Trepat, Guidance of cellular nematic elastomers into shape-programmable living surfaces, Science 392, 317 (2026).
  8. D. Bi, J. H. Lopez, J. M. Schwarz, and M. L. Manning, A density-independent rigidity transition in biological tissues, Nat. Phys. 11, 1074 (2015).
  9. M. Popović, A. Nandi, M. Merkel, R. Etournay, S. Eaton, F. Jülicher, and G. Salbreux, Active dynamics of tissue shear flow, New J. Phys. 19, 033006 (2017).
  10. M. Merkel, K. Baumgarten, B. P. Tighe, and M. L. Manning, A minimal-length approach unifies rigidity in underconstrained materials, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 6560 (2019).
  11. A. Bonfanti, J. Fouchard, N. Khalilgharibi, G. Charras, and A. Kabla, A unified rheological model for cells and cellularised materials, R. Soc. Open Sci. 7, 190920 (2020).
  12. R. Etournay, M. Popović, M. Merkel, A. Nandi, C. Blasse, B. Aigouy, H. Brandl, G. Myers, G. Salbreux, F. Jülicher, and S. Eaton, Interplay of cell dynamics and epithelial tension during morphogenesis of the Drosophila pupal wing, eLife 4, e07090 (2015).
  13. N. I. Petridou, B. Corominas-Murtra, C.-P. Heisenberg, and E. Hannezo, Rigidity percolation uncovers a structural basis for embryonic tissue phase transitions, Cell 184, 1914 (2021).
  14. M. Serra, G. S. Nájera, M. Chuai, A. M. Plum, S. Santhosh, V. Spandan, C. J. Weijer, and L. Mahadevan, A mechanochemical model recapitulates distinct vertebrate gastrulation modes, Sci. Adv. 9, eadh8152 (2023).
  15. C. A. Dessalles, N. Cuny, A. Boutillon, P. F. Salipante, A. Babataheri, A. I. Barakat, and G. Salbreux, Interplay of actin nematodynamics and anisotropic tension controls endothelial mechanics, Nat. Phys. 21, 999 (2025).
  16. M. Merkel and M. L. Manning, Using cell deformation and motion to predict forces and collective behavior in morphogenesis, Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 67, 161 (2017).
  17. D. A. Matoz-Fernandez, K. Martens, R. Sknepnek, J. L. Barrat, and S. Henkes, Cell division and death inhibit glassy behaviour of confluent tissues, Soft Matter 13, 3205 (2017).
  18. P. Germann, M. Marin-Riera, and J. Sharpe, ya||a: GPU-powered spheroid models for mesenchyme and epithelium, Cell Syst. 8, 261 (2019).
  19. F. Graner and J. A. Glazier, Simulation of biological cell sorting using a two-dimensional extended Potts model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2013 (1992).
  20. R. Belousov, S. Savino, P. Moghe, T. Hiiragi, L. Rondoni, and A. Erzberger, Poissonian cellular Potts models reveal nonequilibrium kinetics of cell sorting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 248401 (2024).
  21. H. Honda, R. Kodama, T. Takeuchi, H. Yamanaka, K. Watanabe, and G. Eguchi, Cell behaviour in a polygonal cell sheet, Development 83, 313 (1984).
  22. R. Farhadifar, J. C. Röper, B. Aigouy, S. Eaton, and F. Jülicher, The influence of cell mechanics, cell-cell interactions, and proliferation on epithelial packing, Curr. Biol. 17, 2095 (2007).
  23. S. Alt, P. Ganguly, and G. Salbreux, Vertex models: From cell mechanics to tissue morphogenesis, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 372, 20150520 (2017).
  24. R. Mueller, J. M. Yeomans, and A. Doostmohammadi, Emergence of active nematic behavior in monolayers of isotropic cells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 048004 (2019).
  25. B. Loewe, M. Chiang, D. Marenduzzo, and M. C. Marchetti, Solid-liquid transition of deformable and overlapping active particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 038003 (2020).
  26. C. Duclut, J. Paijmans, M. M. Inamdar, C. D. Modes, and F. Jülicher, Active T1 transitions in cellular networks, Eur. Phys. J. E 45, 29 (2022).
  27. O. K. Damavandi, S. Arzash, E. Lawson-Keister, and M. L. Manning, Universality in the mechanical behavior of vertex models for biological tissues, PRX Life 3, 033001 (2025).
  28. S. Tong, N. K. Singh, R. Sknepnek, and A. Košmrlj, Linear viscoelastic properties of the vertex model for epithelial tissues, PLoS Comput. Biol. 18, e1010135 (2022).
  29. S. Tong, R. Sknepnek, and A. Košmrlj, Linear viscoelastic response of the vertex model with internal and external dissipation: Normal modes analysis, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013143 (2023).
  30. S. Henkes, K. Kostanjevec, J. M. Collinson, R. Sknepnek, and E. Bertin, Dense active matter model of motion patterns in confluent cell monolayers, Nat. Commun. 11, 1405 (2020).
  31. D. B. Staple, R. Farhadifar, J.-C. Röper, B. Aigouy, S. Eaton, and F. Jülicher, Mechanics and remodelling of cell packings in epithelia, Eur. Phys. J. E 33, 117 (2010).
  32. M. Moshe, M. J. Bowick, and M. C. Marchetti, Geometric frustration and solid-solid transitions in model 2D tissue, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 268105 (2018).
  33. D. M. Sussman and M. Merkel, No unjamming transition in a Voronoi model of biological tissue, Soft Matter 14, 3397 (2018).
  34. M. Merkel and M. L. Manning, A geometrically controlled rigidity transition in a model for confluent 3D tissues, New J. Phys. 20, 022002 (2018).
  35. X. Wang, M. Merkel, L. B. Sutter, G. Erdemci-Tandogan, M. L. Manning, and K. E. Kasza, Anisotropy links cell shapes to tissue flow during convergent extension, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 13541 (2020).
  36. J. Huang, J. O. Cochran, S. M. Fielding, M. C. Marchetti, and D. Bi, Shear-driven solidification and nonlinear elasticity in epithelial tissues, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 178001 (2022).
  37. A. Hernandez, M. F. Staddon, M. J. Bowick, M. C. Marchetti, and M. Moshe, Anomalous elasticity of a cellular tissue vertex model, Phys. Rev. E 105, 064611 (2022).
  38. C.-T. Lee and M. Merkel, Generic elasticity of thermal, underconstrained systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 268201 (2024).
  39. C.-T. Lee and M. Merkel, Partition sum of thermal, underconstrained systems, Phys. Rev. E 110, 064147 (2024).
  40. K. Kim, T. Zhang, and J. M. Schwarz, Mean-field elastic moduli of a three-dimensional, cell-based vertex model, New J. Phys. 26, 043009 (2024).
  41. S. Kim, R. Amini, S.-T. Yen, P. Pospíšil, A. Boutillon, I. A. Deniz, and O. Campàs, A nuclear jamming transition in vertebrate organogenesis, Nat. Mater. 23, 1592 (2024).
  42. S. Gsell, S. Tlili, M. Merkel, and P.-F. Lenne, Marangoni-like tissue flows enhance symmetry breaking of embryonic organoids, Nat. Phys. 21, 644 (2025).
  43. S. Okuda, Y. Inoue, M. Eiraku, T. Adachi, and Y. Sasai, Vertex dynamics simulations of viscosity-dependent deformation during tissue morphogenesis, Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 14, 413 (2015).
  44. S. Tlili, J. Yin, J.-F. Rupprecht, M. A. Mendieta-Serrano, G. Weissbart, N. Verma, X. Teng, Y. Toyama, J. Prost, and T. E. Saunders, Shaping the zebrafish myotome by intertissue friction and active stress, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 25430 (2019).
  45. J. Rozman, K. V. S. Chaithanya, J. M. Yeomans, and R. Sknepnek, Vertex model with internal dissipation enables sustained flows, Nat. Commun. 16, 530 (2025).
  46. H. Koyama and Y. Inoue, Modeling of viscous frictional force in multicellular morphogenesis, Biophys. Physicobiol. 23, e230007 (2026).
  47. G. W. Brodland, D. Viens, and J. H. Veldhuis, A new cell-based FE model for the mechanics of embryonic epithelia, Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 10, 121 (2007).
  48. D. B. Staple, Understanding mechanics and polarity in two-dimensional tissues, Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität Dresden, 2012.
  49. A. Nestor-Bergmann, E. Johns, S. Woolner, and O. E. Jensen, Mechanical characterization of disordered and anisotropic cellular monolayers, Phys. Rev. E 97, 052409 (2018).
  50. C. Fu, F. Dilasser, S.-Z. Lin, M. Karnat, A. Arora, H. Rajendiran, H. T. Ong, N. M. H. Brenda, S. W. Phow, T. Hirashima, M. Sheetz, J.-F. Rupprecht, S. Tlili, and V. Viasnoff, Regulation of intercellular viscosity by E-cadherin-dependent phosphorylation of EGFR in collective cell migration, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2405560121 (2024).
  51. S.-Z. Lin, S. Tlili, and J.-F. Rupprecht, Viscous vertex model for active epithelial tissues, Acta Mech. Sin. 42, 760213 (2026).
  52. M. Merkel, From cells to tissues: Tissue remodeling and polarity reorientation in shearing epithelia, Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität Dresden, 2014.
  53. C. Duclut, J. Paijmans, M. M. Inamdar, C. D. Modes, and F. Jülicher, Nonlinear rheology of cellular networks, Cells Dev. 168, 203746 (2021).
  54. D. Bi, J. H. Lopez, J. M. Schwarz, and M. L. Manning, Energy barriers and cell migration in densely packed tissues, Soft Matter 10, 1885 (2014).
  55. M. Popović, V. Druelle, N. A. Dye, F. Jülicher, and M. Wyart, Inferring the flow properties of epithelial tissues from their geometry, New J. Phys. 23, 033004 (2021).
  56. S. Kim, M. Pochitaloff, G. A. Stooke-Vaughan, and O. Campàs, Embryonic tissues as active foams, Nat. Phys. 17, 859 (2021).
  57. Q. Guigue, M. Besse, R. Voituriez, A. M. Prevost, E. Wandersman, M. Merkel, and L.-L. Pontani, Adhesion differentials control the rheology of biomimetic emulsions, Biophys. J. 125, 1686 (2026).
  58. D. Bi, X. Yang, M. C. Marchetti, and M. L. Manning, Motility-driven glass and jamming transitions in biological tissues, Phys. Rev. X 6, 021011 (2016).
  59. D. M. Sussman, M. Paoluzzi, M. Cristina Marchetti, and M. Lisa Manning, Anomalous glassy dynamics in simple models of dense biological tissue, Europhy. Lett. 121, 36001 (2018).
  60. Y.-W. Li, L. L. Y. Wei, M. Paoluzzi, and M. P. Ciamarra, Softness, anomalous dynamics, and fractal-like energy landscape in model cell tissues, Phys. Rev. E 103, 022607 (2021).
  61. C. Li, M. Merkel, and D. M. Sussman, Connecting anomalous elasticity and sub-Arrhenius structural dynamics in a cell-based model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 048203 (2025).
  62. S. Pandey, S. Kolya, P. Devendran, S. Sadhukhan, T. Das, and S. K. Nandi, The structure-dynamics feedback mechanism governs the glassy dynamics in epithelial monolayers, Soft Matter 21, 269 (2025).
  63. C. Li, M. Merkel, and D. M. Sussman, A model of 3D confluent tissue behaves as an under-constrained glass, Soft Matter 22, 4101 (2026).
  64. M. Merkel, R. Etournay, M. Popović, G. Salbreux, S. Eaton, and F. Jülicher, Triangles bridge the scales: Quantifying cellular contributions to tissue deformation, Phys. Rev. E 95, 032401 (2017).
  65. D. L. Barton, S. Henkes, C. J. Weijer, and R. Sknepnek, Active vertex model for cell-resolution description of epithelial tissue mechanics, PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005569 (2017).
  66. M. Krajnc, S. Dasgupta, P. Ziherl, and J. Prost, Fluidization of epithelial sheets by active cell rearrangements, Phys. Rev. E 98, 022409 (2018).
  67. R. Sknepnek, I. Djafer-Cherif, M. Chuai, C. Weijer, and S. Henkes, Generating active T1 transitions through mechanochemical feedback, eLife 12, e79862 (2023).
  68. S.-Z. Lin, M. Merkel, and J.-F. Rupprecht, Structure and rheology in vertex models under cell-shape-dependent active stresses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 058202 (2023).
  69. J. Rozman and J. M. Yeomans, Cell sorting in an active nematic vertex model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 248401 (2024).
  70. K. Barrett, S. Anand, V. Thome, L. Kodjabachian, M. Merkel, and P.-F. Lenne, Epithelial-mesenchymal interface guides cell shapes and axis elongation in embryonic explants, Development 152, dev204344 (2025).
  71. A. Shindo, Models of convergent extension during morphogenesis, WIREs Dev. Biol. 7, e293 (2018).
  72. G. K. Batchelor, The stress system in a suspension of force-free particles, J. Fluid Mech. 41, 545 (1970).
  73. Different definitions of cell shape are possible, e.g., definitions that explicitly depend on the polygonal shape of cells. Yet, they usually relate to the triangle-based Qαβ through a unique nonlinear relation, at least approximately. In other words, they contain the same information as the triangle-based Qαβ.
  74. N. Noll, M. Mani, I. Heemskerk, S. J. Streichan, and B. I. Shraiman, Active tension network model suggests an exotic mechanical state realized in epithelial tissues, Nat. Phys. 13, 1221 (2017).
  75. D. Grossman and J.-F. Joanny, Instabilities and geometry of growing tissues, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 048102 (2022).
  76. D. Grossman and J.-F. Joanny, Rheology of the vertex model of tissues: Simple shear and oscillatory geometries, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013039 (2025).
  77. B. Guirao, S. U. Rigaud, F. Bosveld, A. Bailles, J. López-Gay, S. Ishihara, K. Sugimura, F. Graner, and Y. Bellaïche, Unified quantitative characterization of epithelial tissue development, eLife 4, e08519 (2015).
  78. S. Tlili, M. Durande, C. Gay, B. Ladoux, F. Graner, and H. Delanoë-Ayari, Migrating epithelial monolayer flows like a Maxwell viscoelastic liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 088102 (2020).
  79. R. A. Simha and S. Ramaswamy, Hydrodynamic fluctuations and instabilities in ordered suspensions of self-propelled particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 058101 (2002).
  80. R. Voituriez, J. F. Joanny, and J. Prost, Spontaneous flow transition in active polar gels, Europhys. Lett. 70, 404 (2005).
  81. M. C. Marchetti, J. F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrodynamics of soft active matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1143 (2013).
  82. M. Ibrahimi and M. Merkel, Deforming polar active matter in a scalar field gradient, New J. Phys. 25, 013022 (2023).
  83. M. Ibrahimi and M. Merkel, Stabilization of active tissue deformation by a dynamic signaling gradient, PRX Life 3, 043013 (2025).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 033263– Published 2 September, 2026
  • Received 27 February 2026
  • Accepted 29 July 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation