Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Giant counter-rotating oscillations on the attosecond timescale

Jakob Nicolai Bruhnke, Edvin Olofsson, Axel Stenquist, and Jan Marcus Dahlström*

  • *Contact author: marcus.dahlstrom@fysik.lu.se

Phys. Rev. Research 7, L042019 – Published 20 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jx8n-775g

Abstract

We predict an unexplored type of ultrastrong coupling between atoms and intense ultraviolet light that leads to giant population oscillations on the attosecond timescale. These counter-rotating oscillations stem from the interference of energy-conserving and nonconserving photon absorption and emission processes via Rydberg states. They can be of similar amplitude as the elementary femtosecond Rabi oscillations between the two strongly coupled states. The effect, which is beyond the two-level atom, is nonreciprocal: It only affects the excited state, while the ground state is unaffected. We propose that two-photon Rabi oscillations (1s2–1s3d) in helium are suitable for the generation of this type of ultrastrong coupling with realistic pulses. We use a combination of Floquet theory and effective Hamiltonian theory to test our predictions against ab initio simulations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (73)

  1. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, G. Grynberg, and J. Dupont-Roc, Atom-Photon Interactions: Basic Processes and Applications (Wiley-VCH, New York, 1998).
  2. F. Krausz and M. Ivanov, Attosecond physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 163 (2009).
  3. A. Frisk Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter, Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 19 (2019).
  4. P. London, P. Balasubramanian, B. Naydenov, L. P. McGuinness, and F. Jelezko, Strong driving of a single spin using arbitrarily polarized fields, Phys. Rev. A 90, 012302 (2014).
  5. D. M. Kennes, N. Müller, M. Pletyukhov, C. Weber, C. Bruder, F. Hassler, J. Klinovaja, D. Loss, and H. Schoeller, Chiral one-dimensional Floquet topological insulators beyond the rotating wave approximation, Phys. Rev. B 100, 041103 (2019).
  6. K. D. Barajas and W. C. Campbell, Multi-timescale coherent control via quantum averaging theory for high-fidelity gate operations, arXiv:2503.08886.
  7. F. Bloch and A. Siegert, Magnetic resonance for nonrotating fields, Phys. Rev. 57, 522 (1940).
  8. S. H. Autler and C. H. Townes, Stark effect in rapidly varying fields, Phys. Rev. 100, 703 (1955).
  9. J. H. Shirley, Solution of the Schrödinger equation with a Hamiltonian periodic in time, Phys. Rev. 138, B979 (1965).
  10. K. J. LaGattuta, Above-threshold ionization of atomic hydrogen via resonant intermediate states, Phys. Rev. A 47, 1560 (1993).
  11. M. Dörr, O. Latinne, and C. J. Joachain, Time evolution of two-photon population transfer between the 1s and 2s states of a hydrogen atom, Phys. Rev. A 55, 3697 (1997).
  12. B. Kaiser, A. Brand, M. Glässl, A. Vagov, V. M. Axt, and U. Pietsch, Photoionization of resonantly driven atomic states by an extreme ultraviolet-free-electron laser: Intensity dependence and renormalization of Rabi frequencies, New J. Phys. 15, 093016 (2013).
  13. A. de las Heras, C. Hernández-García, J. Serrano, A. Prodanov, D. Popmintchev, T. Popmintchev, and L. Plaja, Attosecond Rabi oscillations in high harmonic generation resonantly driven by extreme ultraviolet laser fields, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023268 (2025).
  14. Q. Xie, H. Zhong, M. T. Batchelor, and C. Lee, The quantum Rabi model: Solution and dynamics, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50, 113001 (2017).
  15. E. Jaynes and F. Cummings, Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser, Proc. IEEE 51, 89 (1963).
  16. P. Forn-Díaz, L. Lamata, E. Rico, J. Kono, and E. Solano, Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 025005 (2019).
  17. D. Z. Rossatto, C. J. Villas-Bôas, M. Sanz, and E. Solano, Spectral classification of coupling regimes in the quantum Rabi model, Phys. Rev. A 96, 013849 (2017).
  18. W. Qin, A. F. Kockum, C. S. Muñoz, A. Miranowicz, and F. Nori, Quantum amplification and simulation of strong and ultrastrong coupling of light and matter, Phys. Rep. 1078, 1 (2024).
  19. K. Akbari, F. Nori, and S. Hughes, Floquet engineering the quantum Rabi model in the ultrastrong coupling regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 063602 (2025).
  20. M. Lewenstein, Ph. Balcou, M. Yu. Ivanov, A. L’Huillier, and P. B. Corkum, Theory of high-harmonic generation by low-frequency laser fields, Phys. Rev. A 49, 2117 (1994).
  21. P. M. Paul, E. S. Toma, P. Breger, G. Mullot, F. Augé, Ph. Balcou, H. G. Muller, and P. Agostini, Observation of a train of attosecond pulses from high harmonic generation, Science 292, 1689 (2001).
  22. J. M. Dahlström, A. L’Huillier, and A. Maquet, Introduction to attosecond delays in photoionization, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 45, 183001 (2012).
  23. F. Calegari, A. Trabattoni, A. Palacios, D. Ayuso, M. C. Castrovilli, J. B. Greenwood, P. Decleva, F. Martín, and M. Nisoli, Charge migration induced by attosecond pulses in bio-relevant molecules, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 49, 142001 (2016).
  24. G. Vampa, C. R. McDonald, G. Orlando, D. D. Klug, P. B. Corkum, and T. Brabec, Theoretical analysis of high-harmonic generation in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 073901 (2014).
  25. L. Yue and M. B. Gaarde, Introduction to theory of high-harmonic generation in solids: Tutorial, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 39, 535 (2022).
  26. R. Pazourek, S. Nagele, and J. Burgdörfer, Attosecond chronoscopy of photoemission, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 765 (2015).
  27. M. Chini, B. Zhao, H. Wang, Y. Cheng, S. X. Hu, and Z. Chang, Subcycle ac Stark shift of helium excited states probed with isolated attosecond pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 073601 (2012).
  28. M. Reduzzi, J. Hummert, A. Dubrouil, F. Calegari, M. Nisoli, F. Frassetto, L. Poletto, S. Chen, M. Wu, M. B. Gaarde, K. Schafer, and G. Sansone, Polarization control of absorption of virtual dressed states in helium, Phys. Rev. A 92, 033408 (2015).
  29. M. Anand, S. Pabst, O. Kwon, and D. E. Kim, Attosecond counter-rotating-wave effect in xenon driven by strong fields, Phys. Rev. A 95, 053420 (2017).
  30. P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, A. Maxwell, T. Lamprou, A. Ordóñez, M. F. Ciappina, P. Tzallas, and M. Lewenstein, Quantum electrodynamics of intense laser-matter interactions: A tool for quantum state engineering, PRX Quantum 4, 010201 (2023).
  31. M. Lewenstein, M. F. Ciappina, E. Pisanty, J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, T. Lamprou, and P. Tzallas, Generation of optical Schrödinger cat states in intense laser–matter interactions, Nat. Phys. 17, 1104 (2021).
  32. N. Tsatrafyllis, I. K. Kominis, I. A. Gonoskov, and P. Tzallas, High-order harmonics measured by the photon statistics of the infrared driving-field exiting the atomic medium, Nat. Commun. 8, 15170 (2017).
  33. A. Gorlach, O. Neufeld, N. Rivera, O. Cohen, and I. Kaminer, The quantum-optical nature of high harmonic generation, Nat. Commun. 11, 4598 (2020).
  34. J. Kumlin, C. Braun, C. Tresp, N. Stiesdal, S. Hofferberth, and A. Paris-Mandoki, Quantum optics with Rydberg superatoms, J. Phys. Commun. 7, 052001 (2023).
  35. B. L. Beers and L. Armstrong, Exact solution of a realistic model for two-photon ionization, Phys. Rev. A 12, 2447 (1975).
  36. C. R. Holt, M. G. Raymer, and W. P. Reinhardt, Time dependences of two-, three-, and four-photon ionization of atomic hydrogen in the ground 12S and metastable 22S states, Phys. Rev. A 27, 2971 (1983).
  37. P. Emma et al., First lasing and operation of an Ångstrom-wavelength free-electron laser, Nat. Photon. 4, 641 (2010).
  38. E. Allaria et al., Highly coherent and stable pulses from the FERMI seeded free-electron laser in the extreme ultraviolet, Nat. Photon. 6, 699 (2012).
  39. N. S. Mirian et al., Generation and measurement of intense few-femtosecond superradiant extreme-ultraviolet free-electron laser pulses, Nat. Photon. 15, 523 (2021).
  40. S. Nandi et al., Observation of Rabi dynamics with a short-wavelength free-electron laser, Nature (London) 608, 488 (2022).
  41. F. Richter et al., Strong-field quantum control in the extreme ultraviolet domain using pulse shaping, Nature (London) 636, 337 (2024).
  42. E. Olofsson and J. M. Dahlström, Photoelectron signature of dressed-atom stabilization in an intense XUV field, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043017 (2023).
  43. While we will not present results on the following, we should briefly mention that we have found that 2-PROs can indeed be driven in hydrogen between the 1s and 3d. The degeneracy of the 3s and 3d is lifted by the field, allowing one to selectively target the 3d state [73].
  44. S.-I. Chu and D. A. Telnov, Beyond the Floquet theorem: Generalized Floquet formalisms and quasienergy methods for atomic and molecular multiphoton processes in intense laser fields, Phys. Rep. 390, 1 (2004).
  45. S.-I. Chu and W. P. Reinhardt, Intense field multiphoton ionization via complex dressed states: Application to the H atom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1195 (1977).
  46. A. Maquet, S.-I. Chu, and W. P. Reinhardt, Stark ionization in dc and ac fields: An L2 complex-coordinate approach, Phys. Rev. A 27, 2946 (1983).
  47. N. Moiseyev, Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2011).
  48. K. Suzuki and R. Okamoto, Degenerate perturbation theory in quantum mechanics, Prog. Theor. Phys. 70, 439 (1983).
  49. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/jx8n-775g for derivations of the effective Hamiltonian, a brief introduction to Floquet theory and its application to the semiclassical two-level system, analytical expressions for the dynamics of the damped effective two-level system, and simulations for giant nonreciprocal counter-rotating oscillations in one-photon Rabi oscillations in helium (1s2−1s2p), which includes Refs. [50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 64, 65].
  50. E. Brion, L. H. Pedersen, and K. Mølmer, Adiabatic elimination in a lambda system, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40, 1033 (2007).
  51. V. Paulisch, H. Rui, H. K. Ng, and B.-G. Englert, Beyond adiabatic elimination: A hierarchy of approximations for multi-photon processes, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 129, 12 (2014).
  52. K. Suzuki and S. Y. Lee, Convergent theory for effective interaction in nuclei, Prog. Theor. Phys. 64, 2091 (1980).
  53. E. M. Krenciglowa and T. T. S. Kuo, Convergence of effective hamiltonian expansion and partial summations of folded diagrams, Nucl. Phys. A 235, 171 (1974).
  54. P. Virtanen et al., SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in python, Nat. Methods 17, 261 (2020).
  55. A. Weiser and S. E. Zarantonello, A note on piecewise linear and multilinear table interpolation in many dimensions, Math. Comput. 50, 189 (1988).
  56. K. Suzuki, Construction of Hermitian effective interaction in nuclei: General relation between Hermitian and non-Hermitian forms, Prog. Theor. Phys. 68, 246 (1982).
  57. J. B. Foresman, M. Head-Gordon, J. A. Pople, and M. J. Frisch, Toward a systematic molecular orbital theory for excited states, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 135 (1992).
  58. A. Dreuw and M. Head-Gordon, Single-Reference ab initio methods for the calculation of excited states of large molecules, Chem. Rev. 105, 4009 (2005).
  59. B. Simon, The definition of molecular resonance curves by the method of exterior complex scaling, Phys. Lett. A 71, 211 (1979).
  60. N. Rohringer, A. Gordon, and R. Santra, Configuration-interaction-based time-dependent orbital approach for ab initio treatment of electronic dynamics in a strong optical laser field, Phys. Rev. A 74, 043420 (2006).
  61. L. Greenman, P. J. Ho, S. Pabst, E. Kamarchik, D. A. Mazziotti, and R. Santra, Implementation of the time-dependent configuration-interaction singles method for atomic strong-field processes, Phys. Rev. A 82, 023406 (2010).
  62. M. Bertolino, S. Carlström, J. Peschel, F. Zapata, E. Lindroth, and J. M. Dahlström, Thomas–Reiche–Kuhn correction for truncated configuration-interaction spaces: Case of laser-assisted dynamical interference, Phys. Rev. A 106, 043108 (2022).
  63. D. H. Kobe and A. L. Smirl, Gauge invariant formulation of the interaction of electromagnetic radiation and matter, Am. J. Phys. 46, 624 (1978).
  64. S. Guérin, F. Monti, J.-M. Dupont, and H. R. Jauslin, On the relation between cavity-dressed states, Floquet states, RWA and semiclassical models, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 30, 7193 (1997).
  65. B. W. Shore, The Theory of Coherent Atomic Excitation (Wiley-VCH, New York, 1990).
  66. J. P. Killingbeck and G. Jolicard, The Bloch wave operator: Generalizations and applications: Part I. The time-independent case, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36, R105 (2003).
  67. I. Lindgren and J. Morrison, in Atomic Many-Body Theory, Springer Series in Chemical Physics, edited by V. I. Goldanskii, R. Gomer, F. P. Schäfer, and J. P. Toennies (Springer, Berlin, 1982), Vol. 13.
  68. E. Allaria et al., Two-stage seeded soft-x-ray free-electron laser, Nat. Photon. 7, 913 (2013).
  69. P. Finetti et al., Pulse duration of seeded free-electron lasers, Phys. Rev. X 7, 021043 (2017).
  70. P. K. Maroju et al., Attosecond pulse shaping using a seeded free-electron laser, Nature (London) 578, 386 (2020).
  71. M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner, Band structure engineering and non-equilibrium dynamics in Floquet topological insulators, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 229 (2020).
  72. T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Floquet engineering of quantum materials, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 387 (2019).
  73. J. Bruhnke, Two-photon Rabi oscillations in hydrogen: A theoretical study of effective Hamiltonian approaches, Master's thesis, Lund University, 2024.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation