Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

From pure to mixed: Altermagnets as intrinsic symmetry-breaking indicators

Aline Ramires*,†

  • Laboratory for Theoretical and Computational Physics, PSI Center for Scientific Computing, Theory, and Data, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland

  • *Contact author: aline.ramires@tuwien.ac.at
  • †Present address: Institute of Solid State Physics, TU Wien, 1040 Wien, Austria.

Phys. Rev. Research 8, L012025 – Published 26 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jr65-4273

Abstract

We investigate the impact of the presence of altermagnetism on physical observables in the presence of explicit or spontaneous symmetry-breaking fields. We focus on unconventional superconductivity as a potential source of spontaneous symmetry-breaking fields and derive the symmetry considerations for the transmutation of altermagnets from pure to mixed, which can give rise to unusual phenomena. Based on this analysis, we put forward scenarios that could explain the apparent onset of time-reversal symmetry breaking at the superconducting critical temperature in Sr2RuO4, and the hidden magnetic phase and magnetic memory in 4Hb-TaS2.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (44)

  1. L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022).
  2. L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022).
  3. L. Šmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakatsuji, and T. Jungwirth, Anomalous Hall antiferromagnets, Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 482 (2022).
  4. R. M. Fernandes, V. S. de Carvalho, T. Birol, and R. G. Pereira, Topological transition from nodal to nodeless Zeeman splitting in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 109, 024404 (2024).
  5. L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020).
  6. Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. Šmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. González-Hernández, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin, X. Zhang, H. Wu, H. Chen, Z. Meng, L. Liu, Z. Xia, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and Z. Liu, An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron. 5, 735 (2022).
  7. Y. Maeno, S. Yonezawa, and A. Ramires, Still mystery after all these years—Unconventional superconductivity of Sr2RuO4, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 93, 062001 (2024).
  8. J. Xia, Y. Maeno, P. T. Beyersdorf, M. M. Fejer, and A. Kapitulnik, High resolution polar Kerr effect measurements of Sr2RuO4: Evidence for broken time-reversal symmetry in the superconducting state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 167002 (2006).
  9. G. M. Luke, Y. Fudamoto, K. M. Kojima, M. I. Larkin, J. Merrin, B. Nachumi, Y. J. Uemura, Y. Maeno, Z. Q. Mao, Y. Mori, H. Nakamura, and M. Sigrist, Time-reversal symmetry-breaking superconductivity in Sr2RuO4, Nature (London) 394, 558–561 (1998).
  10. V. Grinenko, S. Ghosh, R. Sarkar, J.-C. Orain, A. Nikitin, M. Elender, D. Das, Z. Guguchia, F. Brückner, M. E. Barber, J. Park, N. Kikugawa, D. A. Sokolov, J. S. Bobowski, T. Miyoshi, Y. Maeno, A. P. Mackenzie, H. Luetkens, C. W. Hicks, and H.-H. Klauss, Split superconducting and time-reversal symmetry-breaking transitions in Sr2RuO4 under stress, Nat. Phys. 17, 748 (2021).
  11. V. Grinenko, R. Sarkar, S. Ghosh, D. Das, Z. Guguchia, H. Luetkens, I. Shipulin, A. Ramires, N. Kikugawa, Y. Maeno, K. Ishida, C. W. Hicks, and H.-H. Klauss, μSr measurements on Sr2RuO4 under 〈110〉 uniaxial stress, Phys. Rev. B 107, 024508 (2023).
  12. R. Fittipaldi, R. Hartmann, M. T. Mercaldo, S. Komori, A. Bjørlig, W. Kyung, Y. Yasui, T. Miyoshi, L. A. B. Olde Olthof, C. M. Palomares Garcia et al., Unveiling unconventional magnetism at the surface of Sr2RuO4, Nat. Commun. 12, 5792 (2021).
  13. R. Matzdorf, Z. Fang, Ismail, J. Zhang, T. Kimura, Y. Tokura, K. Terakura, and E. W. Plummer, Ferromagnetism stabilized by lattice distortion at the surface of the p-wave superconductor Sr2RuO4, Science 289, 746–748 (2000).
  14. R. Matzdorf, Ismail, T. Kimura, Y. Tokura, and E. W. Plummer, Surface structural analysis of the layered perovskite Sr2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B 65, 085404 (2002).
  15. C. W. Hicks, D. O. Brodsky, E. A. Yelland, A. S. Gibbs, J. A. N. Bruin, M. E. Barber, S. D. Edkins, K. Nishimura, S. Yonezawa, Y. Maeno, and A. P. Mackenzie, Strong increase of Tc of Sr2RuO4 under both tensile and compressive strain, Science 344, 283–285 (2014).
  16. V. Sunko, E. Abarca Morales, I. Marković, M. E. Barber, D. Milosavljević, F. Mazzola, D. A. Sokolov, N. Kikugawa, C. Cacho, P. Dudin, H. Rosner, C. W. Hicks, P. D. C. King, and A. P. Mackenzie, Direct observation of a uniaxial stress-driven Lifshitz transition in Sr2RuO4, npj Quantum Mater. 4, 46 (2019).
  17. Y. Luo, A. Pustogow, P. Guzman, A. Dioguardi, S. Thomas, F. Ronning, N. Kikugawa, D. Sokolov, F. Jerzembeck, A. Mackenzie, C. Hicks, E. Bauer, I. Mazin, and S. Brown, Normal state O17 NMR studies of Sr2RuO4 under uniaxial stress, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021044 (2019).
  18. M. E. Barber, F. Lechermann, S. V. Streltsov, S. L. Skornyakov, S. Ghosh, B. J. Ramshaw, N. Kikugawa, D. A. Sokolov, A. P. Mackenzie, C. W. Hicks, and I. I. Mazin, Role of correlations in determining the Van Hove strain in Sr2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B 100, 245139 (2019).
  19. F. Jerzembeck, H. S. Røising, A. Steppke, H. Rosner, D. A. Sokolov, N. Kikugawa, T. Scaffidi, S. H. Simon, A. P. Mackenzie, and C. W. Hicks, The superconductivity of Sr2RuO4 under c axis uniaxial stress, Nat. Commun. 13, 4596 (2022).
  20. F. Jerzembeck, A. Steppke, A. Pustogow, Y. Luo, A. Chronister, D. A. Sokolov, N. Kikugawa, Y.-S. Li, M. Nicklas, S. E. Brown, A. P. Mackenzie, and C. W. Hicks, Upper critical field of Sr2RuO4 under in-plane uniaxial pressure, Phys. Rev. B 107, 064509 (2023).
  21. A. Ramires and M. Sigrist, A note on the upper critical field of Sr2RuO4 under strain, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 807, 052011 (2017).
  22. A. T. Rømer, A. Kreisel, M. A. Müller, P. J. Hirschfeld, I. M. Eremin, and B. M. Andersen, Theory of strain-induced magnetic order and splitting of tc and ttrsb in Sr2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B 102, 054506 (2020).
  23. S. Acharya, D. Pashov, E. Chachkarova, M. v. Schilfgaarde, and C. Weber, Electronic structure correspondence of singlet-triplet scale separation in strained Sr2RuO4, Appl. Sci. 11, 508 (2021).
  24. H. S. Røising, G. Wagner, M. Roig, A. T. Rømer, and B. M. Andersen, Heat capacity double transitions in time-reversal symmetry broken superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 106, 174518 (2022).
  25. S. Beck, A. Hampel, M. Zingl, C. Timm, and A. Ramires, Effects of strain in multiorbital superconductors: The case of Sr2RuO4, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023060 (2022).
  26. A. C. Yuan, E. Berg, and S. A. Kivelson, Multiband mean-field theory of the d+ig superconductivity scenario in Sr2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B 108, 014502 (2023).
  27. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/jr65-4273 for symmetry requirements for the transmutation of altermagnets from pure to mixed. It also highlights all cases in which explicit or spontaneous symmetry breaking would lead to such transmutation for all point groups in three dimensions.
  28. S. Demokritov, E. Tsymbal, P. Grünberg, W. Zinn, and I. K. Schuller, Magnetic-dipole mechanism for biquadratic interlayer coupling, Phys. Rev. B 49, 720 (1994).
  29. E. Tsymbal, Evaluation of the magnetic dipolar fields from layered systems on atomic scale, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 130, L6–L12 (1994).
  30. Y. Pennec, N. J. C. Ingle, I. S. Elfimov, E. Varene, Y. Maeno, A. Damascelli, and J. V. Barth, Cleaving-temperature dependence of layered-oxide surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 216103 (2008).
  31. C. Kallin and J. Berlinsky, Chiral superconductors, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 054502 (2016).
  32. C. A. Marques, L. C. Rhodes, R. Fittipaldi, V. Granata, C. M. Yim, R. Buzio, A. Gerbi, A. Vecchione, A. W. Rost, and P. Wahl, Magnetic-field tunable intertwined checkerboard charge order and nematicity in the surface layer of Sr2RuO4, Adv. Mater. 33, 2100593 (2021).
  33. Y.-S. Li, M. Garst, J. Schmalian, S. Ghosh, N. Kikugawa, D. A. Sokolov, C. W. Hicks, F. Jerzembeck, M. S. Ikeda, Z. Hu, B. J. Ramshaw, A. W. Rost, M. Nicklas, and A. P. Mackenzie, Elastocaloric determination of the phase diagram of Sr2RuO4, Nature (London) 607, 276 (2022).
  34. F. Jerzembeck, Y.-S. Li, G. Palle, Z. Hu, M. Biderang, N. Kikugawa, D. A. Sokolov, S. Ghosh, B. J. Ramshaw, T. Scaffidi, M. Nicklas, J. Schmalian, A. P. Mackenzie, and C. W. Hicks, Tc and the elastocaloric effect of Sr2RuO4 under 〈110〉 uniaxial stress: No indications of transition splitting, Phys. Rev. B 110, 064514 (2024).
  35. C. Autieri, G. Cuono, D. Chakraborty, P. Gentile, and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Conditions for orbital-selective altermagnetism in Sr2RuO4: Tight-binding model, similarities with cuprates, and implications for superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 112, 014412 (2025).
  36. G. Cuono, F. Forte, A. Romano, and C. Noce, Emerging new phases in correlated Mott insulator Ca2RuO4, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 37, 053002 (2025).
  37. J. W. González, A. M. León, C. González-Fuentes, and R. A. Gallardo, Altermagnetism in two-dimensional Ca2RuO4 perovskite, Nanoscale 17, 4796–4807 (2025).
  38. C. Lane, J. W. Furness, I. G. Buda, Y. Zhang, R. S. Markiewicz, B. Barbiellini, J. Sun, and A. Bansil, Antiferromagnetic ground state of La2CuO4: A parameter-free ab initio description, Phys. Rev. B 98, 125140 (2018).
  39. E. Persky, A. V. Bjørlig, I. Feldman, A. Almoalem, E. Altman, E. Berg, I. Kimchi, J. Ruhman, A. Kanigel, and B. Kalisky, Magnetic memory and spontaneous vortices in a van der Waals superconductor, Nature (London) 607, 692–696 (2022).
  40. A. Ribak, R. M. Skiff, M. Mograbi, P. K. Rout, M. H. Fischer, J. Ruhman, K. Chashka, Y. Dagan, and A. Kanigel, Chiral superconductivity in the alternate stacking compound 4Hb-TaS2, Sci. Adv. 6, eaax9480 (2020).
  41. I. Silber, S. Mathimalar, I. Mangel, A. K. Nayak, O. Green, N. Avraham, H. Beidenkopf, I. Feldman, A. Kanigel, A. Klein, M. Goldstein, A. Banerjee, E. Sela, and Y. Dagan, Two-component nematic superconductivity in 4hHb-TaS2, Nat. Commun. 15, 824 (2024).
  42. C. Liu, S. Chatterjee, T. Scaffidi, E. Berg, and E. Altman, Magnetization amplification in the interlayer pairing superconductor 4Hb-TaS2, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024502 (2024).
  43. E. J. König, Type-II heavy fermi liquids and the magnetic memory of 4Hb−TaS2, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L012058 (2024).
  44. S.-Z. Lin, Kondo enabled transmutation between spinons and superconducting vortices: Origin of magnetic memory in 4Hb-TaS2, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023224 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation