- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Multipoles as quantitative order parameters for altermagnetic spin splitting

Francesco Martinelli*, Anouk Droux, and Claude Ederer†

  • Materials Theory, ETH Zürich, Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 27, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland

  • *Contact author: fmartinelli@ethz.ch
  • †Contact author: edererc@ethz.ch
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 023357 – Published 29 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jnh8-kmcw

Abstract

We establish a quantitative relation between the altermagnetic spin splitting and different higher-order multipoles of the charge and magnetization density around the magnetic atoms. Magnetic multipoles such as octupoles or triakontadipoles have been suggested as potential ferroic order parameters for d- and g-wave altermagnetism, respectively, based mainly on qualitative symmetry arguments. We use first-principles-based electronic structure calculations to establish a clear quantitative relation between the strength of the altermagnetic spin splitting and the magnitude of certain local multipoles. We vary the magnitude of these multipoles either by applying an appropriate constraint on the charge density or by varying a corresponding structural distortion mode, using two simple perovskite materials, SrCrO3 and LaVO3, as model systems. Our analysis indicates that in general the altermagnetic spin splitting is not exclusively determined by the lowest-order nonzero magnetic multipole, but results from a superposition of contributions from different multipoles with comparable strength, suggesting the need for a multicomponent order parameter to describe altermagnetism. We also discuss different measures to quantify the overall spin splitting of a material, without relying on features that might be specific to only individual bands.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (89)

  1. S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum-dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 123702 (2019).
  2. K.-H. Ahn, A. Hariki, K.-W. Lee, and J. Kuneš, Antiferromagnetism in RuO2 as d-wave Pomeranchuk instability, Phys. Rev. B 99, 184432 (2019).
  3. L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-z antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020).
  4. S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Bottom-up design of spin-split and reshaped electronic band structures in antiferromagnets without spin-orbit coupling: Procedure on the basis of augmented multipoles, Phys. Rev. B 102, 144441 (2020).
  5. L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020).
  6. L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, and A. Zunger, Prediction of low-Z collinear and noncollinear antiferromagnetic compounds having momentum-dependent spin splitting even without spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 014409 (2021).
  7. L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022).
  8. L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022).
  9. L.-D. Yuan and A. Zunger, Degeneracy removal of spin bands in collinear antiferromagnets with non-interconvertible spin-structure motif pair, Adv. Mater. 35, 2211966 (2023).
  10. L.-D. Yuan, X. Zhang, C. M. Acosta, and A. Zunger, Uncovering spin-orbit coupling-independent hidden spin polarization of energy bands in antiferromagnets, Nat. Commun. 14, 5301 (2023).
  11. Y. Guo, H. Liu, O. Janson, I. C. Fulga, J. van den Brink, and J. I. Facio, Spin-split collinear antiferromagnets: A large-scale ab-initio study, Mater. Today Phys. 32, 100991 (2023).
  12. S. Zeng and Y.-J. Zhao, Description of two-dimensional altermagnetism: Categorization using spin group theory, Phys. Rev. B 110, 054406 (2024).
  13. S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. Šmejkal, C.-J. Kang, and C. Kim, Broken Kramers degeneracy in altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036702 (2024).
  14. J. Krempaský, L. Šmejkal, S. W. D’Souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhlířová, F. Alarab, P. C. Constantinou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov, et al., Altermagnetic lifting of Kramers spin degeneracy, Nature (London) 626, 517 (2024).
  15. S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. Šmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty, T. Denneulin, W. Shi, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, S. Das, M. Kläui, J. Sinova, and M. Jourdan, Direct observation of altermagnetic band splitting in CrSb thin films, Nat. Commun. 15, 2116 (2024).
  16. T. Aoyama and K. Ohgushi, Piezomagnetic properties in altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, L041402 (2024).
  17. Z. Lin, D. Chen, W. Lu, X. Liang, S. Feng, K. Yamagami, J. Osiecki, M. Leandersson, B. Thiagarajan, J. Liu, C. Felser, and J. Ma, Observation of giant spin splitting and d-wave spin texture in room temperature altermagnet RuO2, arXiv:2402.04995.
  18. P. A. McClarty and J. G. Rau, Landau theory of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 176702 (2024).
  19. L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. Šmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring new frontiers in magnetism and spintronics, Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2409327 (2024).
  20. T. Jungwirth, R. M. Fernandes, J. Sinova, and L. Smejkal, Altermagnets and beyond: Nodal magnetically-ordered phases, arXiv:2409.10034.
  21. S.-W. Cheong and F.-T. Huang, Altermagnetism with non-collinear spins, npj Quantum Mater. 9, 13 (2024).
  22. P. G. Radaelli and G. Gurung, Color symmetry and altermagneticlike spin textures in noncollinear antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 112, 014431 (2025).
  23. M. Hu, X. Cheng, Z. Huang, and J. Liu, Catalog of c-paired spin-momentum locking in antiferromagnetic systems, Phys. Rev. X 15, 021083 (2025).
  24. I. Mazin and The PRX Editors, Editorial: Altermagnetism—A new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040002 (2022).
  25. M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets, Nat. Commun. 10, 4305 (2019).
  26. H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nat. Commun. 12, 2846 (2021).
  27. R. González-Hernández, L. Šmejkal, K. Výborný, Y. Yahagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. Železný, Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativistic collinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127701 (2021).
  28. D.-F. Shao, S.-H. Zhang, M. Li, C.-B. Eom, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Spin-neutral currents for spintronics, Nat. Commun. 12, 7061 (2021).
  29. A. Bose, N. J. Schreiber, R. Jain, D.-F. Shao, H. P. Nair, J. Sun, X. S. Zhang, D. A. Muller, E. Y. Tsymbal, D. G. Schlom, and D. C. Ralph, Tilted spin current generated by the collinear antiferromagnet ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron. 5, 267 (2022).
  30. J. Lai, T. Yu, P. Liu, L. Liu, G. Xing, X.-Q. Chen, and Y. Sun, D-wave flat Fermi surface in altermagnets enables maximum charge-to-spin conversion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 256702 (2025).
  31. L. Zhiheng, C. Jiangtao, M. Dengpan, X. Yan, and L. Zhifeng, Spin-axis dynamic locking, arXiv:2509.18476.
  32. L. Šmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakatsuji, and T. Jungwirth, Anomalous Hall antiferromagnets, Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 482 (2022).
  33. H. Reichlová, R. L. Seeger, R. González-Hernández, I. Kounta, R. Schlitz, D. Kriegner, P. Ritzinger, M. Lammel, M. Leiviskä, V. Petříček, P. Doležal, E. Schmoranzerová, A. Bad'ura, A. Thomas, V. Baltz, L. Michez, J. Sinova, S. T. B. Goennenwein, T. Jungwirth, and L. Šmejkal, Observation of a spontaneous anomalous Hall response in the Mn5Si3 d-wave altermagnet candidate, Nat. Commun. 15, 4961 (2024).
  34. Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. Šmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. González-Hernández, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin, X. Zhang, H. Wu, H. Chen, Z. Meng, L. Liu, Z. Xia, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and Z. Liu, An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron. 5, 735 (2022).
  35. R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, J. Zubáč, R. Gonzalez-Hernandez, K. Geishendorf, Z. Šobáň, G. Springholz, K. Olejník, L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, S. T. B. Goennenwein, A. Thomas, H. Reichlová, J. Železný, and D. Kriegner, Spontaneous anomalous Hall effect arising from an unconventional compensated magnetic phase in a semiconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 036702 (2023).
  36. T. Sato, S. Haddad, I. C. Fulga, F. F. Assaad, and J. Van Den Brink, Altermagnetic anomalous Hall effect emerging from electronic correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 086503 (2024).
  37. H.-W. Ko and K.-J. Lee, Magnetic octupole Hall effect in d-wave altermagnets, arXiv:2508.00794.
  38. S. Han, D. Jo, I. Baek, S. Cheon, P. M. Oppeneer, and H.-W. Lee, Harnessing magnetic octupole Hall effect to induce torque in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 076705 (2025).
  39. I. Baek, S. Han, and H.-W. Lee, Magnetic octupole Hall effect in heavy transition metals, Phys. Rev. B 112, 064421 (2025).
  40. S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin, Ferroically ordered magnetic octupoles in d-wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011019 (2024).
  41. P. G. Radaelli, Tensorial approach to altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 110, 214428 (2024).
  42. L. Šmejkal, A. Marmodoro, K.-H. Ahn, R. González-Hernández, I. Turek, S. Mankovsky, H. Ebert, S. W. D’Souza, O. Šipr, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Chiral magnons in altermagnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 256703 (2023).
  43. Z. Liu, M. Ozeki, S. Asai, S. Itoh, and T. Masuda, Chiral split magnon in altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 156702 (2024).
  44. I. I. Mazin, Notes on altermagnetism and superconductivity, AAPPS Bull. 35, 18 (2025).
  45. D. Chakraborty and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Zero-field finite-momentum and field-induced superconductivity in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 110, L060508 (2024).
  46. S.-B. Zhang, L.-H. Hu, and T. Neupert, Finite-momentum Cooper pairing in proximitized altermagnets, Nat. Commun. 15, 1801 (2024).
  47. D. Zhu, Z.-Y. Zhuang, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Topological superconductivity in two-dimensional altermagnetic metals, Phys. Rev. B 108, 184505 (2023).
  48. S. Banerjee and M. S. Scheurer, Altermagnetic superconducting diode effect, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024503 (2024).
  49. I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. González-Hernández, and L. Šmejkal, Prediction of unconventional magnetism in doped FeSb2, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2108924118 (2021).
  50. X. H. Verbeek, D. Voderholzer, S. Schären, Y. Gachnang, N. A. Spaldin, and S. Bhowal, Nonrelativistic ferromagnetotriakontadipolar order and spin splitting in hematite, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043157 (2024).
  51. K. V. Yershov, V. P. Kravchuk, M. Daghofer, and J. Van Den Brink, Fluctuation-induced piezomagnetism in local moment altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 110, 144421 (2024).
  52. G. Yang, Z. Li, S. Yang, J. Li, H. Zheng, W. Zhu, Z. Pan, Y. Xu, S. Cao, W. Zhao, et al., Three-dimensional mapping of the altermagnetic spin splitting in CrSb, Nat. Commun. 16, 1442 (2025).
  53. L. Šmejkal, Altermagnetic multiferroics and altermagnetoelectric effect, arXiv:2411.19928.
  54. M. Gu, Y. Liu, H. Zhu, K. Yananose, X. Chen, Y. Hu, A. Stroppa, and Q. Liu, Ferroelectric switchable altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 106802 (2025).
  55. J. Nag, B. Das, S. Bhowal, Y. Nishioka, B. Bandyopadhyay, S. Sarker, S. Kumar, K. Kuroda, V. Gopalan, A. Kimura, K. G. Suresh, and A. Alam, GdAlSi: An antiferromagnetic topological Weyl semimetal with nonrelativistic spin splitting, Phys. Rev. B 110, 224436 (2024).
  56. D. B. Litvin and W. Opechowski, Spin groups, Physica 76, 538 (1974).
  57. D. B. Litvin, Spin point groups, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 33, 279 (1977).
  58. A. Urru, D. Seleznev, Y. Teng, S. Y. Park, S. E. Reyes-Lillo, and K. M. Rabe, G-type antiferromagnetic BiFeO3 is a multiferroic g-wave altermagnet, Phys. Rev. B 112, 104411 (2025).
  59. L. Buiarelli, R. M. Fernandes, and T. Birol, Noncollinear magnetic multipoles in collinear altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 112, 224442 (2025).
  60. L. Schaufelberger, M. E. Merkel, A. M. Tehrani, N. A. Spaldin, and C. Ederer, Exploring energy landscapes of charge multipoles using constrained density functional theory, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033172 (2023).
  61. P. Bordet, C. Chaillout, M. Marezio, Q. Huang, A. Santoro, S.-W. Cheong, H. Takagi, C. S. Oglesby, and B. Batlogg, Structural aspects of the crystallographic-magnetic transition in LaVO3 around 140 K, J. Solid State Chem. 106, 253 (1993).
  62. S. Bandyopadhyay, S. Picozzi, and S. Bhowal, Designing nonrelativistic spin splitting in oxide perovskites, Phys. Rev. B 112, 064405 (2025).
  63. S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin, Revealing hidden magnetoelectric multipoles using Compton scattering, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033185 (2021).
  64. J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2020).
  65. P. Santini, S. Carretta, G. Amoretti, R. Caciuffo, N. Magnani, and G. H. Lander, Multipolar interactions in f-electron systems: The paradigm of actinide dioxides, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 807 (2009).
  66. F. Bultmark, F. Cricchio, O. Grånäs, and L. Nordström, Multipole decomposition of LDA+U energy and its application to actinide compounds, Phys. Rev. B 80, 035121 (2009).
  67. A. Urru and N. A. Spaldin, Magnetic octupole tensor decomposition and second-order magnetoelectric effect, Ann. Phys. 447, 168964 (2022).
  68. P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).
  69. G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).
  70. G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993).
  71. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
  72. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  73. D. Orobengoa, C. Capillas, M. I. Aroyo, and J. M. Perez-Mato, AMPLIMODES: Symmetry-mode analysis on the Bilbao Crystallographic Server, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 42, 820 (2009).
  74. M. E. Merkel, Multipyles v1.1.0, Zenodo, 2023, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8199391.
  75. A. Carta and C. Ederer, Evidence for Jahn–Teller-driven metal–insulator transition in strained SrCrO3 from first-principles calculations, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 075004 (2022).
  76. A. Carta, A. Panda, and C. Ederer, Emergence of a potential charge-disproportionated insulating state in SrCrO3, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023240 (2024).
  77. A. C. Komarek, T. Möller, M. Isobe, Y. Drees, H. Ulbrich, M. Azuma, M. T. Fernández-Díaz, A. Senyshyn, M. Hoelzel, G. André, Y. Ueda, M. Grüninger, and M. Braden, Magnetic order, transport and infrared optical properties in the ACrO3 system (A= Ca, Sr, and Pb), Phys. Rev. B 84, 125114 (2011).
  78. L. Ortega-San-Martin, A. J. Williams, J. Rodgers, J. P. Attfield, G. Heymann, and H. Huppertz, Microstrain sensitivity of orbital and electronic phase separation in SrCrO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 255701 (2007).
  79. K. H. L. Zhang, Y. Du, P. V. Sushko, M. E. Bowden, V. Shutthanandan, L. Qiao, G. X. Cao, Z. Gai, S. Sallis, L. F. J. Piper, and S. A. Chambers, Electronic and magnetic properties of epitaxial perovskite SrCrO3(0 0 1), J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 27, 245605 (2015).
  80. K.-W. Lee and W. E. Pickett, Orbital-ordering driven structural distortion in metallic SrCrO3, Phys. Rev. B 80, 125133 (2009).
  81. Y. Qian, G. Wang, Z. Li, C. Q. Jin, and Z. Fang, The electronic structure of a weakly correlated antiferromagnetic metal, SrCrO3: First-principles calculations, New J. Phys. 13, 053002 (2011).
  82. Q. N. Meier, A. Carta, C. Ederer, and A. Cano, Net and compensated altermagnetism from staggered orbital order: Layer-dependent spin splitting in Srn+1CrnO3n+1 Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 116705 (2026).
  83. V. Leeb, A. Mook, L. Šmejkal, and J. Knolle, Spontaneous formation of altermagnetism from orbital ordering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 236701 (2024).
  84. M. Naka, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Altermagnetic perovskites, npj Spintron. 3, 1 (2025).
  85. S. Rooj, S. Saxena, and N. Ganguli, Altermagnetism in the orthorhombic Pnma structure through group theory and DFT calculations, Phys. Rev. B 111, 014434 (2025).
  86. R. M. Fernandes, V. S. de Carvalho, T. Birol, and R. G. Pereira, Topological transition from nodal to nodeless Zeeman splitting in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 109, 024404 (2024).
  87. T. Okugawa, K. Ohno, Y. Noda, and S. Nakamura, Weakly spin-dependent band structures of antiferromagnetic perovskite LaMO3 (M = Cr, Mn, Fe), J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 30, 075502 (2018).
  88. S. Miyasaka, Y. Okimoto, M. Iwama, and Y. Tokura, Spin-orbital phase diagram of perovskite-type RVO3(R= rare-earth ion or Y), Phys. Rev. B 68, 100406(R) (2003).
  89. F. Martinelli, A. Droux, and C. Ederer, Multipoles as quantitative order parameters for altermagnetic spin splitting, Materials Cloud Archive (2026), https://doi.org/10.24435/materialscloud:m2-cw.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 023357– Published 29 June, 2026
  • Received 8 January 2026
  • Accepted 15 May 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation