Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Mixed-state topological order parameters for symmetry-protected fermion matter

Ze-Min Huang1,2 and Sebastian Diehl1

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 033028 – Published 7 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/h1qg-96kw

Abstract

We construct an observable mixed-state topological order parameter for symmetry-protected free-fermion matter. It resolves the entire table of topological insulators and superconductors, relying exclusively on the symmetry class, but not on unitary symmetries. It provides a robust, quantized signal not only for pure ground states, but also for mixed states in or out of thermal equilibrium. Key ingredient is a unitary probe operator, whose phase can be related to spectral asymmetry, in turn revealing the topological properties of the underlying state. This is demonstrated analytically in the continuum limit, and validated numerically on the lattice. The order parameter is experimentally accessible via either interferometry or full counting statistics, for example, in cold-atom experiments.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (89)

  1. I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and S. Nascimbène, Quantum simulations with ultracold quantum gases, Nat. Phys. 8, 267 (2012).
  2. J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Goals and opportunities in quantum simulation, Nat. Phys. 8, 264 (2012).
  3. N. Goldman, J. C. Budich, and P. Zoller, Topological quantum matter with ultracold gases in optical lattices, Nat. Phys. 12, 639 (2016).
  4. E. Altman, K. R. Brown, G. Carleo, L. D. Carr, E. Demler, C. Chin, B. DeMarco, S. E. Economou, M. A. Eriksson, K.-M. C. Fu, M. Greiner, K. R. Hazzard, R. G. Hulet, A. J. Kollár, B. L. Lev, M. D. Lukin, R. Ma, X. Mi, S. Misra, C. Monroe et al., Quantum simulators: Architectures and opportunities, PRX Quantum 2, 017003 (2021).
  5. J. C. Halimeh, M. Aidelsburger, F. Grusdt, P. Hauke, and B. Yang, Cold-atom quantum simulators of gauge theories, Nat. Phys. 21, 25 (2025).
  6. G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kalinowski, R. Samajdar, A. Omran, S. Sachdev, A. Vishwanath, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator, Science 374, 1242 (2021).
  7. K. J. Satzinger, Y.-J. Liu, A. Smith, C. Knapp, M. Newman, C. Jones, Z. Chen, C. Quintana, X. Mi, A. Dunsworth, C. Gidney, I. Aleiner, F. Arute, K. Arya, J. Atalaya, Babbush et al., Realizing topologically ordered states on a quantum processor, Science 374, 1237 (2021).
  8. J. Preskill, Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond, Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
  9. X. Mi, A. Michailidis, S. Shabani, K. Miao, P. Klimov, J. Lloyd, E. Rosenberg, R. Acharya, I. Aleiner, T. Andersen et al., Stable quantum-correlated many body states via engineered dissipation, Science 383, 1332 (2024).
  10. A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, Nonstandard symmetry classes in mesoscopic normal-superconducting hybrid structures, Phys. Rev. B 55, 1142 (1997).
  11. C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083 (2008).
  12. S. Ryu, A. P. Schnyder, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Topological insulators and superconductors: Tenfold way and dimensional hierarchy, New J. Phys. 12, 065010 (2010).
  13. A. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Ann. Phys. 303, 2 (2003).
  14. A. Kitaev, Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors, AIP Conf. Proc. 1134, 22 (2009).
  15. X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011).
  16. M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010).
  17. X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, Z.-X. Liu, and X.-G. Wen, Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group, Phys. Rev. B 87, 155114 (2013).
  18. A. W. W. Ludwig, Topological phases: Classification of topological insulators and superconductors of non-interacting fermions, and beyond, Phys. Scr. 2016, 014001 (2015).
  19. C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classification of topological quantum matter with symmetries, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016).
  20. S. Diehl, A. Micheli, A. Kantian, B. Kraus, H. P. Büchler, and P. Zoller, Quantum states and phases in driven open quantum systems with cold atoms, Nat. Phys. 4, 878 (2008).
  21. S. Diehl, E. Rico, M. A. Baranov, and P. Zoller, Topology by dissipation in atomic quantum wires, Nat. Phys. 7, 971 (2011).
  22. L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, J. Marino, and S. Diehl, Universality in driven open quantum matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 025004 (2025).
  23. X. Cao, A. Tilloy, and A. D. Luca, Entanglement in a fermion chain under continuous monitoring, SciPost Phys. 7, 024 (2019).
  24. O. Alberton, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Entanglement transition in a monitored free-fermion chain: From extended criticality to area law, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 170602 (2021).
  25. M. P. Fisher, V. Khemani, A. Nahum, and S. Vijay, Random quantum circuits, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 335 (2023).
  26. I. Poboiko, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Measurement-induced phase transition for free fermions above one dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 110403 (2024).
  27. A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond, Ann. Phys. 321, 2 (2006).
  28. S. Bravyi, M. Englbrecht, R. König, and N. Peard, Correcting coherent errors with surface codes, npj Quantum Inf. 4, 55 (2018).
  29. F. Venn, J. Behrends, and B. Béri, Coherent-error threshold for surface codes from Majorana delocalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 060603 (2023).
  30. Z.-M. Huang, L. Colmenarez, M. Müller, and S. Diehl, Coherent information as a mixed-state topological order parameter of fermions, arXiv:2412.12279.
  31. O. Viyuela, A. Rivas, and M. A. Martin-Delgado, Uhlmann phase as a topological measure for one-dimensional fermion systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 130401 (2014).
  32. O. Viyuela, A. Rivas, and M. A. Martin-Delgado, Two-dimensional density-matrix topological fermionic phases: Topological Uhlmann numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 076408 (2014).
  33. Z. Huang and D. P. Arovas, Topological indices for open and thermal systems via Uhlmann's phase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 076407 (2014).
  34. J. C. Budich and S. Diehl, Topology of density matrices, Phys. Rev. B 91, 165140 (2015).
  35. C.-E. Bardyn, L. Wawer, A. Altland, M. Fleischhauer, and S. Diehl, Probing the topology of density matrices, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011035 (2018).
  36. L. Wawer and M. Fleischhauer, Z2 topological invariants for mixed states of fermions in time-reversal invariant band structures, Phys. Rev. B 104, 214107 (2021).
  37. Z.-M. Huang, X.-Q. Sun, and S. Diehl, Topological gauge theory for mixed Dirac stationary states in all dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 106, 245204 (2022).
  38. E. Sjöqvist, A. K. Pati, A. Ekert, J. S. Anandan, M. Ericsson, D. K. L. Oi, and V. Vedral, Geometric phases for mixed states in interferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2845 (2000).
  39. L. S. Levitov and G. B. Lesovik, Charge distribution in quantum shot noise, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 58, 225 (1993) [JETP Lett. 58, 230 (1993)].
  40. W. S. Bakr, J. I. Gillen, A. Peng, S. Fölling, and M. Greiner, A quantum gas microscope for detecting single atoms in a Hubbard-regime optical lattice, Nature (London) 462, 74 (2009).
  41. J. F. Sherson, C. Weitenberg, M. Endres, M. Cheneau, I. Bloch, and S. Kuhr, Single-atom-resolved fluorescence imaging of an atomic Mott insulator, Nature (London) 467, 68 (2010).
  42. E. Haller, J. Hudson, A. Kelly, D. A. Cotta, B. Peaudecerf, G. D. Bruce, and S. Kuhr, Single-atom imaging of fermions in a quantum-gas microscope, Nat. Phys. 11, 738 (2015).
  43. A. Mazurenko, C. S. Chiu, G. Ji, M. F. Parsons, M. Kanász-Nagy, R. Schmidt, F. Grusdt, E. Demler, D. Greif, and M. Greiner, A cold-atom Fermi–Hubbard antiferromagnet, Nature (London) 545, 462 (2017).
  44. S. Humeniuk and H. P. Büchler, Full counting statistics for interacting fermions with determinantal quantum Monte Carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 236401 (2017).
  45. M. Aidelsburger, S. Nascimbene, and N. Goldman, Artificial gauge fields in materials and engineered systems, C. R. Phys. 19, 394 (2018).
  46. R. Citro and M. Aidelsburger, Thouless pumping and topology, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 87 (2023).
  47. C.-E. Bardyn, M. A. Baranov, C. V. Kraus, E. Rico, A. İmamoğlu, P. Zoller, and S. Diehl, Topology by dissipation, New J. Phys. 15, 085001 (2013).
  48. A. Altland, M. Fleischhauer, and S. Diehl, Symmetry classes of open fermionic quantum matter, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021037 (2021).
  49. For example, w can be 2πxαNα with xα the coordinate and Nα the site number along the αth spatial dimension.
  50. The wording “particle-hole symmetry” is standard but abusive; see [10] for the construction of a true particle-hole symmetry.
  51. X.-L. Qi, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Chiral topological superconductor from the quantum Hall state, Phys. Rev. B 82, 184516 (2010).
  52. Complex fermions in odd spatial dimension belonging to the second descendant states require the following modification: W→12(I+W), which singles out the eigenvectors with positive eigenvalues. This stems from eiϕW=+1 for W, reflecting an even Chern number for its parent state. Instead, ultilizing 12(I+W) results in eiϕW=±1, revealing the underlying topology (for details, see Appendix  pp4. For superconductors in the same class, such modification is not needed since they contain only half the degree of freedom compared to their complex fermion counterpart.
  53. O. Knill, On Atiyah-Singer and Atiyah-Bott for finite abstract simplicial complexes, arXiv:1708.06070.
  54. M. F. Atiyah, V. K. Patodi, and I. M. Singer, Spectral asymmetry and Riemannian geometry. I, in Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Vol. 77 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1975), pp. 43–69.
  55. M. F. Atiyah, V. K. Patodi, and I. M. Singer, Spectral asymmetry and Riemannian geometry. III, in Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Vol. 79 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1976), pp. 71–99.
  56. We have neglected a term trW. This is because 1. for W=I, it gives a state-independent phase factor; 2. in the presence of time-reversal or particle-hole symmetry, it vanishes. Let us make this explicit for time-reversal symmetry: 1 and 2 imply that TrW=−TrW=0.
  57. G. E. Volovik, The Universe in a Helium Droplet (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003).
  58. Z.-M. Huang and S. Diehl, Interaction-induced topological phase transition at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 053002 (2025).
  59. A. J. Niemi and G. W. Semenoff, Spectral asymmetry on an open space, Phys. Rev. D 30, 809 (1984).
  60. F. Wilczek and A. Zee, Linking numbers, spin, and statistics of solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 2250 (1983).
  61. J. Goldstone and F. Wilczek, Fractional quantum numbers on solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 986 (1981).
  62. A. Niemi and G. Semenoff, Fermion number fractionization in quantum field theory, Phys. Rep. 135, 99 (1986).
  63. X.-L. Qi, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological field theory of time-reversal invariant insulators, Phys. Rev. B 78, 195424 (2008).
  64. M. Stone, C.-K. Chiu, and A. Roy, Symmetries, dimensions and topological insulators: The mechanism behind the face of the bott clock, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 44, 045001 (2011).
  65. A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Classification of topological insulators and superconductors in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 78, 195125 (2008).
  66. A. Karch, D. Tong, and C. Turner, A web of 2d dualities: Z2 gauge fields and Arf invariants, SciPost Phys. 7, 007 (2019).
  67. B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin Hall effect and topological phase transition in HgTe quantum wells, Science 314, 1757 (2006).
  68. We keep results obtained from gapped QW so as to ensure ϕW well defined.
  69. A. A. Zvyagin, Dynamical quantum phase transitions (Review Article), Low Temp. Phys. 42, 971 (2016).
  70. M. Heyl, Dynamical quantum phase transitions: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 054001 (2018).
  71. U. Bhattacharya, S. Bandyopadhyay, and A. Dutta, Mixed state dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 96, 180303 (2017).
  72. M. Heyl and J. C. Budich, Dynamical topological quantum phase transitions for mixed states, Phys. Rev. B 96, 180304 (2017).
  73. J. I. Cirac, D. Pérez-García, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete, Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 045003 (2021).
  74. E. Dennis, A. Kitaev, A. Landahl, and J. Preskill, Topological quantum memory, J. Math. Phys. 43, 4452 (2002).
  75. M. B. Hastings, Topological order at nonzero temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 210501 (2011).
  76. Y. Bao, R. Fan, A. Vishwanath, and E. Altman, Mixed-state topological order and the errorfield double formulation of decoherence-induced transitions, arXiv:2301.05687.
  77. R. Fan, Y. Bao, E. Altman, and A. Vishwanath, Diagnostics of mixed-state topological order and breakdown of quantum memory, PRX Quantum 5, 020343 (2024).
  78. J. Y. Lee, Y.-Z. You, and C. Xu, Symmetry protected topological phases under decoherence, Quantum 9, 1607 (2025).
  79. I. Klich, A note on the full counting statistics of paired fermions, J. Stat. Mech. (2014) P11006.
  80. D. N. Sheng, Z. Y. Weng, L. Sheng, and F. D. M. Haldane, Quantum spin-Hall effect and topologically invariant Chern numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 036808 (2006).
  81. R. Roy, Z2 classification of quantum spin Hall systems: An approach using time-reversal invariance, Phys. Rev. B 79, 195321 (2009).
  82. E. Prodan, Robustness of the spin-Chern number, Phys. Rev. B 80, 125327 (2009).
  83. A. N. Redlich, Gauge noninvariance and parity nonconservation of three-dimensional fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 18 (1984).
  84. S. Ryu, J. E. Moore, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Electromagnetic and gravitational responses and anomalies in topological insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 85, 045104 (2012).
  85. X.-L. Qi, Y.-S. Wu, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological quantization of the spin Hall effect in two-dimensional paramagnetic semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 74, 085308 (2006).
  86. L. Mao, F. Yang, and H. Zhai, Symmetry-preserving quadratic Lindbladian and dissipation driven topological transitions in Gaussian states, Rep. Prog. Phys. 87, 070501 (2024).
  87. A. Grabsch, Y. Cheipesh, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Pfaffian formula for fermion parity fluctuations in a superconductor and application to Majorana fusion detection, Ann. Phys. 531, 1900129 (2019).
  88. A. Y. Kitaev, Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires, Phys. Usp. 44, 131 (2001).
  89. P. Ghosh, J. D. Sau, S. Tewari, and S. Das Sarma, Non-Abelian topological order in noncentrosymmetric superconductors with broken time-reversal symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 82, 184525 (2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation