Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Why Fe3GaTe2 has higher Curie temperature than Fe3GeTe2

Bomin Kim1, Tumentsereg Ochirkhuyag2, Dorj Odkhuu2,*, and S. H. Rhim1,†

  • *Contact author: odkhuu@inu.ac.kr
  • †Contact author: sonny@ulsan.ac.kr

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 023333 – Published 24 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/g4v8-mrnd

Abstract

Physics of Fe3GaTe2 having higher Curie temperature (TC) than Fe3GeTe2 is explored theoretically in the framework of magnetic exchange interactions. Fe3GaTe2 and Fe3GeTe2 are isostructural, with Fe3GaTe2 having one less valence electron and smaller nearest-neighbor exchange coefficients (J1 and J2), challenging the conventional notion that larger J1 or J2 leads to a higher TC. Based on the hybridization exchange, we show that higher-order exchange coefficients (J3 or higher) are positive for Fe3GaTe2 but negative for Fe3GeTe2, due to a one-electron difference. As a consequence, total sum of all possible exchange coefficients in Fe3GaTe2 are larger than that for Fe3GeTe2, which accounts for higher TC. To validate these findings, TC values are computed using both mean-field theory and Monte Carlo simulation. Indeed, higher-order exchange interactions, when properly accounting for the number of neighbors, confirm the higher TC of Fe3GaTe2.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (45)

  1. L. Onsager, Crystal statistics. I. A two-dimensional model with an order-disorder transition, Phys. Rev. 65, 117 (1944).
  2. J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems, J. Phys. C 6, 1181 (1973).
  3. M. Gibertini, M. Koperski, A. F. Morpurgo, and K. S. Novoselov, Magnetic 2D materials and heterostructures, Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 408 (2019).
  4. K. S. Burch, D. Mandrus, and J.-G. Park, Magnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals materials, Nature (London) 563, 47 (2018).
  5. B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, et al., Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit, Nature (London) 546, 270 (2017).
  6. C. Gong, L. Li, Z. Li, H. Ji, A. Stern, Y. Xia, T. Cao, W. Bao, C. Wang, Y. Wang, et al., Discovery of intrinsic ferromagnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals crystals, Nature (London) 546, 265 (2017).
  7. D. Li, S. Haldar, T. Drevelow, and S. Heinze, Tuning the magnetic interactions in van der Waals Fe3GeTe2 heterostructures: A comparative study of ab initio methods, Phys. Rev. B 107, 104428 (2023).
  8. W. Jin, G. Zhang, H. Wu, L. Yang, W. Zhang, and H. Chang, Room-temperature and tunable tunneling magnetoresistance in Fe3GaTe2-based 2D van der Waals heterojunctions, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 36519 (2023).
  9. C. Wang, J. Wang, W.-Q. Xie, G. Zhang, H. Wu, J. Zhou, X. Zhu, W. Ning, G. Wang, C. Tan, et al., Sign-tunable exchange bias effect in proton-intercalated Fe3GaTe2 nanoflakes, Phys. Rev. B 107, L140409 (2023).
  10. G. Zhang, F. Guo, H. Wu, X. Wen, L. Yang, W. Jin, W. Zhang, and H. Chang, Above-room-temperature strong intrinsic ferromagnetism in 2D van der Waals Fe3GaTe2 with large perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, Nat. Commun. 13, 5067 (2022).
  11. H.-J. Deiseroth, K. Aleksandrov, C. Reiner, L. Kienle, and R. K. Kremer, Fe3GeTe2 and Ni3GeTe2-two new layered transition-metal compounds: Crystal structures, HRTEM investigations, and magnetic and electrical properties, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 1561 (2006).
  12. B. Marfoua and J. Hong, Large anomalous transverse transport properties in atomically thin 2D Fe3GaTe2, NPG Asia Mater. 16, 6 (2024).
  13. H. Wu, C. Hu, Y. Xie, B. G. Jang, J. Huang, Y. Guo, S. Wu, C. Hu, Z. Yue, Y. Shi, et al., Spectral evidence for local-moment ferromagnetism in the van der Waals metals Fe3GaTe2 and Fe3GeTe2, Phys. Rev. B 109, 104410 (2024).
  14. J.-E. Lee, S. Yan, S. Oh, J. Hwang, J. D. Denlinger, C. Hwang, H. Lei, S.-K. Mo, S. Y. Park, and H. Ryu, Electronic structure of above-room-temperature van der Waals ferromagnet Fe3GaTe2, Nano Lett. 23, 11526 (2023).
  15. A. M. Ruiz, D. L. Esteras, D. López-Alcalá, and J. J. Baldoví, On the origin of the above-room-temperature magnetism in the 2D van der Waals ferromagnet Fe3GaTe2, Nano Lett. 24, 7886 (2024).
  16. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
  17. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  18. S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu, J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).
  19. T. Ozaki, Variationally optimized atomic orbitals for large-scale electronic structures, Phys. Rev. B 67, 155108 (2003).
  20. T. Ozaki and H. Kino, Numerical atomic basis orbitals from H to Kr, Phys. Rev. B 69, 195113 (2004).
  21. A. I. Liechtenstein, M. Katsnelson, V. Antropov, and V. Gubanov, Local spin density functional approach to the theory of exchange interactions in ferromagnetic metals and alloys, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 67, 65 (1987).
  22. H. Yoon, T. J. Kim, J.-H. Sim, S. W. Jang, T. Ozaki, and M. J. Han, Reliability and applicability of magnetic-force linear response theory: Numerical parameters, predictability, and orbital resolution, Phys. Rev. B 97, 125132 (2018).
  23. H. Yoon, T. J. Kim, J.-H. Sim, and M. J. Han, Jx: An open-source software for calculating magnetic interactions based on magnetic force theory, Comput. Phys. Commun. 247, 106927 (2020).
  24. https://kaist-elst.github.io/Jx.jl/.
  25. N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953).
  26. R. F. L. Evans, W. J. Fan, P. Chureemart, T. A. Ostler, M. O. A. Ellis, and R. W. Chantrell, Atomistic spin model simulations of magnetic nanomaterials, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26, 103202 (2014).
  27. P. Asselin, R. F. L. Evans, J. Barker, R. W. Chantrell, R. Yanes, O. Chubykalo-Fesenko, D. Hinzke, and U. Nowak, Constrained Monte Carlo method and calculation of the temperature dependence of magnetic anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B 82, 054415 (2010).
  28. https://vampire.york.ac.uk/.
  29. X. Li, M. Zhu, Y. Wang, F. Zheng, J. Dong, Y. Zhou, L. You, and J. Zhang, Tremendous tunneling magnetoresistance effects based on van der Waals room-temperature ferromagnet Fe3GaTe2 with highly spin-polarized Fermi surfaces, Appl. Phys. Lett. 122, 082404 (2023).
  30. H. L. Zhuang, P. R. C. Kent, and R. G. Hennig, Strong anisotropy and magnetostriction in the two-dimensional Stoner ferromagnet Fe3GeTe2, Phys. Rev. B 93, 134407 (2016).
  31. Y.-P. Wang, X.-Y. Chen, and M.-Q. Long, Modifications of magnetic anisotropy of Fe3GeTe2 by the electric field effect, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 092404 (2020).
  32. B. Kim, Q. ul ain, and S. H. Rhim, Strain tunability of magnetocrystalline anisotropy in Fe3GeTe2 thin films, Phys. Rev. B 109, 174434 (2024).
  33. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics (Pearson, Boston, 2010).
  34. M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio, Group Theory: Application to the Physics of Condensed Matter (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, 2007).
  35. D. S. Wang, R. Wu, and A. J. Freeman, First-principles theory of surface magnetocrystalline anisotropy and the diatomic-pair model, Phys. Rev. B 47, 14932 (1993).
  36. D. Odkhuu, W. S. Yun, S. H. Rhim, and S. C. Hong, Theory of perpendicular magnetocrystalline anisotropy in Fe/MgO (001), J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 414, 126 (2016).
  37. T. H. Ho, D. Odkhuu, S. H. Rhim, and S. C. Hong, First-principles study on magnetocrystalline anisotropy of cobalt films: Hcp vs fcc, Curr. Appl. Phys. 41, 148 (2022).
  38. Q.-ul-ain, D. Odkhuu, S. H. Rhim, and S. C. Hong, Enhanced voltage-controlled magnetic anisotropy via magnetoelasticity in FePt/MgO(001), Phys. Rev. B 101, 214436 (2020).
  39. P. Weiss, L’hypothèse du champ moléculaire et la propriété ferromagnétique, J. Phys. Theor. Appl. 6, 661 (1907).
  40. R. Skomski, Simple Models of Magnetism (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008).
  41. J. S. Smart and J. H. Van Vleck, Effective field theories of magnetism, Phys. Today 19(8), 77 (1966).
  42. C. Binek, Ising-Type Antiferromagnets: Model Systems in Statistical Physics and in the Magnetism of Exchange Bias (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, 2003).
  43. J. M. D. Coey, Rare-Earth Iron Permanent Magnets (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996).
  44. N. Goldenfeld, Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1992).
  45. B. Liu, Y. Zou, S. Zhou, L. Zhang, Z. Wang, H. Li, Z. Qu, and Y. Zhang, Critical behavior of the van der Waals bonded high TC ferromagnet Fe3GeTe2, Sci. Rep. 7, 6184 (2017).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation