Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Automated discovery of nonlocal photonic gates

Sören Arlt*

Mario Krenn†

Xuemei Gu‡

  • Machine Learning in Science Cluster, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

  • *Contact author: soeren.arlt@uni-tuebingen.de
  • †Contact author: mario.krenn@uni-tuebingen.de
  • ‡Contact author: xuemei.gu@uni-jena.de

Phys. Rev. Research 8, L022031 – Published 18 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/f415-kgwr

Abstract

Interactions between quantum systems enable quantum gates, the building blocks of quantum information processing. In photonics, direct photon-photon interactions are too weak to be practically useful, so effective interactions are engineered using linear optics and measurement. A central challenge is to realize such interactions nonlocally, i.e., between photons that remain spatially separated. We present experimental proposals for several essential nonlocal multiphoton quantum gates acting on spatially separated photons, in both qubit and high-dimensional qudit systems. Rather than relying on preshared entanglement or Bell-state measurements, our gates use quantum indistinguishability via path identity as a resource, exploiting coherent superpositions of photon-pair origins. The mechanisms of the solutions share many properties with quantum teleportation, but do not require shared entanglement or Bell-state measurements. The underlying idea was generated by the multiagent large language model (LLM) system AI-Mandel, which autonomously implemented its proposed idea using the AI-driven discovery system PyTheus. The human authors then interpreted, generalized, and contextualized the resulting solutions. Technically, our results establish path indistinguishability as a practical resource for distributed quantum information processing; conceptually, they demonstrate how automated discovery systems can contribute ideas and techniques in physics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (74)

  1. H. G. Rinderknecht, E. Dill, A. MacLeod, B. King, K. Sow, S.-W. Bahk, I. Begishev, F. Karbstein, J. Schreiber, M. Zepf, et al., On measuring stimulated photon–photon scattering using multiple ultraintense lasers, Phys. Plasmas 32, 083301 (2025).
  2. N. K. Langford, S. Ramelow, R. Prevedel, W. J. Munro, G. J. Milburn, and A. Zeilinger, Efficient quantum computing using coherent photon conversion, Nature (London) 478, 360 (2011).
  3. B. Hacker, S. Welte, G. Rempe, and S. Ritter, A photon–photon quantum gate based on a single atom in an optical resonator, Nature (London) 536, 193 (2016).
  4. S. Gasparoni, J.-W. Pan, P. Walther, T. Rudolph, and A. Zeilinger, Realization of a photonic controlled-not gate sufficient for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 020504 (2004).
  5. X. Gao, M. Erhard, A. Zeilinger, and M. Krenn, Computer-inspired concept for high-dimensional multipartite quantum gates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 050501 (2020).
  6. X.-H. Bao, T.-Y. Chen, Q. Zhang, J. Yang, H. Zhang, T. Yang, and J.-W. Pan, Optical nondestructive controlled-not gate without using entangled photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 170502 (2007).
  7. J.-P. Li, X. Gu, J. Qin, D. Wu, X. You, H. Wang, C. Schneider, S. Höfling, Y.-H. Huo, C.-Y. Lu, et al., Heralded nondestructive quantum entangling gate with single-photon sources, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 140501 (2021).
  8. X. Liu, X.-M. Hu, T.-X. Zhu, C. Zhang, Y.-X. Xiao, J.-L. Miao, Z.-W. Ou, P.-Y. Li, B.-H. Liu, Z.-Q. Zhou, et al., Nonlocal photonic quantum gates over 7.0 km, Nat. Commun. 15, 8529 (2024).
  9. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics, Nature (London) 409, 46 (2001).
  10. S. Barz, I. Kassal, M. Ringbauer, Y. O. Lipp, B. Dakić, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and P. Walther, A two-qubit photonic quantum processor and its application to solving systems of linear equations, Sci. Rep. 4, 6115 (2014).
  11. M. Krenn, A. Hochrainer, M. Lahiri, and A. Zeilinger, Entanglement by path identity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 080401 (2017).
  12. M. Krenn, X. Gu, and A. Zeilinger, Quantum experiments and graphs: Multiparty states as coherent superpositions of perfect matchings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 240403 (2017).
  13. A. Hochrainer, M. Lahiri, M. Erhard, M. Krenn, and A. Zeilinger, Quantum indistinguishability by path identity and with undetected photons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 025007 (2022).
  14. X. Gu, M. Erhard, A. Zeilinger, and M. Krenn, Quantum experiments and graphs II: Quantum interference, computation, and state generation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 4147 (2019).
  15. X. Gu, L. Chen, A. Zeilinger, and M. Krenn, Quantum experiments and graphs. III. high-dimensional and multiparticle entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 99, 032338 (2019).
  16. S. Arlt, M. Krenn, and X. Gu, Automated discovery of high-dimensional multipartite entanglement with photons that never interacted, arXiv:2510.10707.
  17. J. Kysela, M. Erhard, A. Hochrainer, M. Krenn, and A. Zeilinger, Path identity as a source of high-dimensional entanglement, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 26118 (2020).
  18. J. Bao, Z. Fu, T. Pramanik, J. Mao, Y. Chi, Y. Cao, C. Zhai, Y. Mao, T. Dai, X. Chen, et al., Very-large-scale integrated quantum graph photonics, Nat. Photon. 17, 573 (2023).
  19. X.-M. Hu, C.-X. Huang, N. d’Alessandro, G. Cobucci, C. Zhang, Y. Guo, Y.-F. Huang, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, X. Gao, et al., Observation of genuine high-dimensional multi-partite non-locality in entangled photon states, Nat. Commun. 16, 5017 (2025).
  20. K. Wang, Z. Hou, K. Qian, L. Chen, M. Krenn, S. Zhu, and X.-S. Ma, Entangling independent particles by path identity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 233601 (2024).
  21. K. Qian, K. Wang, L. Chen, Z. Hou, M. Krenn, S. Zhu, and X.-S. Ma, Multiphoton non-local quantum interference controlled by an undetected photon, Nat. Commun. 14, 1480 (2023).
  22. L.-T. Feng, M. Zhang, D. Liu, Y.-J. Cheng, G.-P. Guo, D.-X. Dai, G.-C. Guo, M. Krenn, and X.-F. Ren, On-chip quantum interference between the origins of a multi-photon state, Optica 10, 105 (2023).
  23. K. Wang, Z. Hou, K. Qian, L. Chen, M. Krenn, M. Aspelmeyer, A. Zeilinger, S. Zhu, and X.-S. Ma, Violation of Bell inequality with unentangled photons, Sci. Adv. 11, eadr1794 (2025).
  24. S. Arlt, X. Gu, and M. Krenn, Towards autonomous quantum physics research using LLM agents with access to intelligent tools, arXiv:2511.11752.
  25. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
  26. D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Experimental quantum teleportation, Nature (London) 390, 575 (1997).
  27. C. Ruiz-Gonzalez, S. Arlt, J. Petermann, S. Sayyad, T. Jaouni, E. Karimi, N. Tischler, X. Gu, and M. Krenn, Digital discovery of 100 diverse quantum experiments with Pytheus, Quantum 7, 1204 (2023).
  28. X. Gu and M. Krenn, Interesting scientific idea generation using knowledge graphs and LLMs: Evaluations with 100 research group leaders, arXiv:2405.17044.
  29. X. Gu and M. Krenn, Forecasting high-impact research topics via machine learning on evolving knowledge graphs, Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 6, 025041 (2025).
  30. A. U. Siddiqui and M. M. Wilde, The swap imposter: Bidirectional quantum teleportation and its performance, AVS Quantum Sci. 5, 011407 (2023).
  31. X. Gu, L. Chen, and M. Krenn, Quantum experiments and hypergraphs: Multiphoton sources for quantum interference, quantum computation, and quantum entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 101, 033816 (2020).
  32. X.-Y. Zou, L. J. Wang, and L. Mandel, Induced coherence and indistinguishability in optical interference, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 318 (1991).
  33. D. Klyshko, A simple method of preparing pure states of an optical field, of implementing the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen experiment, and of demonstrating the complementarity principle, Sov. Phys. Usp. 31, 74 (1988).
  34. R. S. Aspden, D. S. Tasca, A. Forbes, R. W. Boyd, and M. J. Padgett, Experimental demonstration of Klyshko’s advanced-wave picture using a coincidence-count based, camera-enabled imaging system, J. Mod. Opt. 61, 547 (2014).
  35. M.-D. Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices, Linear Algebra Appl. 10, 285 (1975).
  36. A. Jamiołkowski, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Rep. Math. Phys. 3, 275 (1972).
  37. M. J. Bayerbach, S. E. D’Aurelio, P. Van Loock, and S. Barz, Bell-state measurement exceeding 50% success probability with linear optics, Sci. Adv. 9, eadf4080 (2023).
  38. S. E. D'Aurelio, M. J. Bayerbach, and S. Barz, Boosted quantum teleportation, npj Quantum Inf. 11, 37 (2025).
  39. N. Hauser, M. J. Bayerbach, S. E. D’Aurelio, R. Weber, M. Santandrea, S. P. Kumar, I. Dhand, and S. Barz, Boosted Bell-state measurements for photonic quantum computation, npj Quantum Inf. 11, 41 (2025).
  40. M. Erhard, M. Krenn, and A. Zeilinger, Advances in high-dimensional quantum entanglement, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 365 (2020).
  41. Y.-H. Luo, H.-S. Zhong, M. Erhard, X.-L. Wang, L.-C. Peng, M. Krenn, X. Jiang, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, C.-Y. Lu, et al., Quantum teleportation in high dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 070505 (2019).
  42. X.-M. Hu, C. Zhang, B.-H. Liu, Y. Cai, X.-J. Ye, Y. Guo, W.-B. Xing, C.-X. Huang, Y.-F. Huang, C.-F. Li, et al., Experimental high-dimensional quantum teleportation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 230501 (2020).
  43. X.-M. Hu, Y. Guo, B.-H. Liu, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Progress in quantum teleportation, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 339 (2023).
  44. L. J. Wang, X. Y. Zou, and L. Mandel, Induced coherence without induced emission, Phys. Rev. A 44, 4614 (1991).
  45. A. Barenco, C. H. Bennett, R. Cleve, D. P. DiVincenzo, N. Margolus, P. Shor, T. Sleator, J. A. Smolin, and H. Weinfurter, Elementary gates for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A 52, 3457 (1995).
  46. A. Babazadeh, M. Erhard, F. Wang, M. Malik, R. Nouroozi, M. Krenn, and A. Zeilinger, High-dimensional single-photon quantum gates: Concepts and experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180510 (2017).
  47. F. Brandt, M. Hiekkamäki, F. Bouchard, M. Huber, and R. Fickler, High-dimensional quantum gates using full-field spatial modes of photons, Optica 7, 98 (2020).
  48. Z. Meng, W.-Q. Liu, B.-W. Song, X.-Y. Wang, A.-N. Zhang, and Z.-Q. Yin, Experimental realization of high-dimensional quantum gates with ultrahigh fidelity and efficiency, Phys. Rev. A 109, 022612 (2024).
  49. Z. Zhao, A.-N. Zhang, Y.-A. Chen, H. Zhang, J.-F. Du, T. Yang, and J.-W. Pan, Experimental demonstration of a nondestructive controlled-not quantum gate for two independent photon qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 030501 (2005).
  50. Y.-F. Huang, X.-F. Ren, Y.-S. Zhang, L.-M. Duan, and G.-C. Guo, Experimental teleportation of a quantum controlled-not gate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 240501 (2004).
  51. W.-B. Gao, A. M. Goebel, C.-Y. Lu, H.-N. Dai, C. Wagenknecht, Q. Zhang, B. Zhao, C.-Z. Peng, Z.-B. Chen, Y.-A. Chen, et al., Teleportation-based realization of an optical quantum two-qubit entangling gate, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 20869 (2010).
  52. J. Zeuner, A. N. Sharma, M. Tillmann, R. Heilmann, M. Gräfe, A. Moqanaki, A. Szameit, and P. Walther, Integrated-optics heralded controlled-NOT gate for polarization-encoded qubits, npj Quantum Inf. 4, 13 (2018).
  53. K.-C. Chang, X. Cheng, F. Ribuot-Hirsch, M. C. Sarihan, Y. Chen, J. G. F. Flores, M. Yu, P. G.-Q. Lo, D.-L. Kwong, and C. W. Wong, Quantum teleportation of a silicon nanophotonic CNOT gate, Optica Quantum 3, 381 (2025).
  54. H. W. De Regt and D. Dieks, A contextual approach to scientific understanding, Synthese 144, 137 (2005).
  55. H. W. de Regt, Understanding Scientific Understanding (Oxford university Press, New York, 2017).
  56. M. Krenn, R. Pollice, S. Y. Guo, M. Aldeghi, A. Cervera-Lierta, P. Friederich, G. dos Passos Gomes, F. Häse, A. Jinich, A. Nigam, et al., On scientific understanding with artificial intelligence, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 761 (2022).
  57. S. Arlt, M. Krenn, and X. Gu, Non-local gates analysis scripts, Github (2026), github.com/artificial-scientist-lab/nonlocalgates.
  58. M. Li, C. Li, Y. Chen, L.-T. Feng, L. Yan, Q. Zhang, J. Bao, B.-H. Liu, X.-F. Ren, J. Wang, et al., On-chip path encoded photonic quantum Toffoli gate, Photon. Res. 10, 1533 (2022).
  59. Y. Li, L. Wan, H. Zhang, H. Zhu, Y. Shi, L. K. Chin, X. Zhou, L. C. Kwek, and A. Q. Liu, Quantum Fredkin and Toffoli gates on a versatile programmable silicon photonic chip, npj Quantum Inf. 8, 112 (2022).
  60. X. Dong, S. Liu, Y.-L. Mao, B. Guo, S. Xu, H. Chen, Y. Guo, Z.-D. Li, and J. Fan, Experimental quantum teleportation of a Toffoli gate across three spatially distributed parties in a photonic quantum network, Opt. Express 32, 39675 (2024).
  61. J. A. Smolin and D. P. DiVincenzo, Five two-bit quantum gates are sufficient to implement the quantum Fredkin gate, Phys. Rev. A 53, 2855 (1996).
  62. R. B. Patel, J. Ho, F. Ferreyrol, T. C. Ralph, and G. J. Pryde, A quantum Fredkin gate, Sci. Adv. 2, e1501531 (2016).
  63. A. Barenco, A. Berthiaume, D. Deutsch, A. Ekert, R. Jozsa, and C. Macchiavello, Stabilization of quantum computations by symmetrization, SIAM J. Comput. 26, 1541 (1997).
  64. H. Buhrman, R. Cleve, J. Watrous, and R. De Wolf, Quantum fingerprinting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 167902 (2001).
  65. D. Weiss, S. Puri, and S. Girvin, Quantum random access memory architectures using 3D superconducting cavities, PRX Quantum 5, 020312 (2024).
  66. Y.-J. Wang, S. Zhang, T.-P. Sun, Z.-A. Zhao, X.-F. Xu, X.-N. Zhuang, H.-Y. Liu, C. Xue, P. Duan, Y.-C. Wu, et al., Hardware-efficient quantum random access memory design with a native gate set on superconducting platforms, Adv. Quantum Technol. 8, 2400519 (2025).
  67. G. Chiribella, G. M. D’Ariano, P. Perinotti, and B. Valiron, Quantum computations without definite causal structure, Phys. Rev. A 88, 022318 (2013).
  68. L. M. Procopio, A. Moqanaki, M. Araújo, F. Costa, I. Alonso Calafell, E. G. Dowd, D. R. Hamel, L. A. Rozema, Č. Brukner, and P. Walther, Experimental superposition of orders of quantum gates, Nat. Commun. 6, 7913 (2015).
  69. L. A. Rozema, T. Strömberg, H. Cao, Y. Guo, B.-H. Liu, and P. Walther, Experimental aspects of indefinite causal order in quantum mechanics, Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 483 (2024).
  70. Y. Deng, S. Liu, X. Chen, Z. Fu, J. Bao, Y. Zheng, Q. Gong, Q. He, and J. Wang, Generalized indefinite causal orders in an integrated quantum switch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 160202 (2025).
  71. R. Lo Franco and G. Compagno, Indistinguishability of elementary systems as a resource for quantum information processing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 240403 (2018).
  72. K. Mahdavipour, F. Nosrati, S. Sciara, R. Morandotti, and R. Lo Franco, Generation of genuine multipartite entangled states via indistinguishability of identical particles, PRX Quantum 5, 040350 (2024).
  73. M. Piccolini, M. Karczewski, A. Winter, and R. Lo Franco, Robust generation of N-partite N-level singlet states by identical particle interferometry, Quantum Sci. Technol. 10, 015013 (2025).
  74. S. Arlt, H. Duan, F. Li, S. M. Xie, Y. Wu, and M. Krenn, Meta-designing quantum experiments with language models, Nat. Mach. Intell. 8, 148 (2026).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation