Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Emergence of unidirectionality and phase separation in optically dense emitter ensembles

Kasper J. Kusmierek1, Max Schemmer2,3, Sahand Mahmoodian4,5, and Klemens Hammerer1,*

  • *Contact author: Klemens.Hammerer@uibk.ac.at

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043267 – Published 8 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/dzpg-9wv3

Abstract

The transmission of light through an ensemble of two-level emitters in a one-dimensional geometry is commonly described by one of two emblematic models of quantum electrodynamics (QED): the driven-dissipative Dicke model or the Maxwell-Bloch equations. Both exhibit distinct features of phase transitions and phase separations, depending on system parameters such as optical depth and external drive strength. Here, we explore the crossover between these models via a parent spin model from bidirectional waveguide QED, by varying positional disorder among emitters. Solving mean-field equations and employing a second-order cumulant expansion for the unidirectional model—equivalent to the Maxwell-Bloch equations—we study phase diagrams, the emitter's inversion, and transmission depending on optical depth, drive strength, and spatial disorder. We find in the thermodynamic limit the emergence of phase separation with a critical value that depends on the degree of spatial order but is independent of Doppler broadening effects. Even far from the thermodynamic limit, this critical value marks a special point in the emitter's correlation landscape of the unidirectional model and is also observed as a maximum in the magnitude of inelastically transmitted photons. We conclude that a large class of effective one-dimensional systems without tight control of the emitters spatial ordering can be effectively modeled using a unidirectional waveguide approach.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (73)

  1. S. L. McCall and E. L. Hahn, Self-induced transparency, Phys. Rev. 183, 457 (1969).
  2. S. Mahmoodian, M. Čepulkovskis, S. Das, P. Lodahl, K. Hammerer, and A. S. Sørensen, Strongly correlated photon transport in waveguide quantum electrodynamics with weakly coupled emitters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 143601 (2018).
  3. R. Veyron, V. Mancois, J.-B. Gerent, G. Baclet, P. Bouyer, and S. Bernon, Quantitative absorption imaging: The role of incoherent multiple scattering in the saturating regime, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033033 (2022).
  4. K. J. Kusmierek, S. Mahmoodian, M. Cordier, J. Hinney, A. Rauschenbeutel, M. Schemmer, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, and K. Hammerer, Higher-order mean-field theory of chiral waveguide QED, SciPost Phys. Core 6, 041 (2023).
  5. K. J. Kusmierek and K. Hammerer, Higher-order mean-field theory of chiral waveguide QED [Data set], LUIS (2025), https://doi.org/10.25835/hbni054l.
  6. S. Agarwal, E. Chaparro, D. Barberena, A. P. n. Orioli, G. Ferioli, S. Pancaldi, I. Ferrier-Barbut, A. Browaeys, and A. Rey, Directional superradiance in a driven ultracold atomic gas in free space, PRX Quantum 5, 040335 (2024).
  7. D. Goncalves, L. Bombieri, G. Ferioli, S. Pancaldi, I. Ferrier-Barbut, A. Browaeys, E. Shahmoon, and D. Chang, Driven-dissipative phase separation in free-space atomic ensembles, PRX Quantum 6, 020303 (2025).
  8. G. Ferioli, A. Glicenstein, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and A. Browaeys, A non-equilibrium superradiant phase transition in free space, Nat. Phys. 19, 1345 (2023).
  9. G. Ferioli, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and A. Browaeys, Emergence of second-order coherence in the superradiant emission from a free-space atomic ensemble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 153602 (2025).
  10. J. Ruostekoski, Superradiant phase transition in a large interacting driven atomic ensemble in free space, Opt. Quantum 315 (2025).
  11. A. Kuzmich, K. Mølmer, and E. S. Polzik, Spin squeezing in an ensemble of atoms illuminated with squeezed light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4782 (1997).
  12. J. Huber, A. M. Rey, and P. Rabl, Realistic simulations of spin squeezing and cooperative coupling effects in large ensembles of interacting two-level systems, Phys. Rev. A 105, 013716 (2022).
  13. Z. H. Lu, S. Bali, and J. E. Thomas, Observation of squeezing in the phase-dependent fluorescence spectra of two-level atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3635 (1998).
  14. S. Mahmoodian, G. Calajó, D. E. Chang, K. Hammerer, and A. S. Sørensen, Dynamics of many-body photon bound states in chiral waveguide QED, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031011 (2020).
  15. A. S. Prasad, J. Hinney, S. Mahmoodian, K. Hammerer, S. Rind, P. Schneeweiss, A. S. Sørensen, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Correlating photons using the collective nonlinear response of atoms weakly coupled to an optical mode, Nat. Photon. 14, 719 (2020).
  16. J. Hinney, A. S. Prasad, S. Mahmoodian, K. Hammerer, A. Rauschenbeutel, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, and M. Schemmer, Unraveling two-photon entanglement via the squeezing spectrum of light traveling through nanofiber-coupled atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 123602 (2021).
  17. M. Cordier, M. Schemmer, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Tailoring photon statistics with an atom-based two-photon interferometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 183601 (2023).
  18. M. Schemmer, M. Cordier, L. Pache, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Simple analytical model describing the collective nonlinear response of an ensemble of two-level emitters weakly coupled to a waveguide, arXiv:2410.21202.
  19. E. Vetsch, D. Reitz, G. Sagué, R. Schmidt, S. T. Dawkins, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Optical interface created by laser-cooled atoms trapped in the evanescent field surrounding an optical nanofiber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 203603 (2010).
  20. N. V. Corzo, B. Gouraud, A. Chandra, A. Goban, A. S. Sheremet, D. V. Kupriyanov, and J. Laurat, Large Bragg reflection from one-dimensional chains of trapped atoms near a nanoscale waveguide, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 133603 (2016).
  21. H. L. Sørensen, J.-B. Béguin, K. W. Kluge, I. Iakoupov, A. S. Sørensen, J. H. Müller, E. S. Polzik, and J. Appel, Coherent backscattering of light off one-dimensional atomic strings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 133604 (2016).
  22. T. Nieddu, V. Gokhroo, and S. N. Chormaic, Optical nanofibres and neutral atoms, J. Opt. 18, 053001 (2016).
  23. P. Solano, J. A. Grover, J. E. Hoffman, S. Ravets, F. K. Fatemi, L. A. Orozco, and S. L. Rolston, Optical nanofibers: A new platform for quantum optics, in Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, edited by E. Arimondo, C. C. Lin, and S. F. Yelin (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, 2017), Vol. 66, pp. 439–505.
  24. D. Su, X. Qin, Y. Jiang, K. Jin, Z. Ji, Y. Zhao, L. Xiao, and S. Jia, Dark state atoms trapping in a magic-wavelength optical lattice near the nanofiber surface, Chin. Opt. Lett. 20, 020201 (2022).
  25. G. Kestler, K. Ton, D. Filin, C. Cheung, P. Schneeweiss, T. Hoinkes, J. Volz, M. Safronova, A. Rauschenbeutel, and J. Barreiro, State-insensitive trapping of alkaline-earth atoms in a nanofiber-based optical dipole trap, PRX Quantum 4, 040308 (2023).
  26. M. O. Araújo, I. Krešić, R. Kaiser, and W. Guerin, Superradiance in a large and dilute cloud of cold atoms in the linear-optics regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 073002 (2016).
  27. S. V. Kashanian, A. Eloy, W. Guerin, M. Lintz, M. Fouché, and R. Kaiser, Noise spectroscopy with large clouds of cold atoms, Phys. Rev. A 94, 043622 (2016).
  28. A. Glicenstein, G. Ferioli, N. Šibalić, L. Brossard, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and A. Browaeys, Collective shift in resonant light scattering by a one-dimensional atomic chain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 253602 (2020).
  29. P. Lassègues, M. A. F. Biscassi, M. Morisse, A. Cidrim, P. G. S. Dias, H. Eneriz, R. C. Teixeira, R. Kaiser, R. Bachelard, and M. Hugbart, Transition from classical to quantum loss of light coherence, Phys. Rev. A 108, 042214 (2023).
  30. T. Salditt and M. Osterhoff, X-ray focusing and optics, in Nanoscale Photonic Imaging, edited by T. Salditt, A. Egner, and D. R. Luke (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020), pp. 71–124.
  31. L. M. Lohse, P. Andrejić, S. Velten, M. Vassholz, C. Neuhaus, A. Negi, A. Panchwanee, I. Sergeev, A. Pálffy, T. Salditt, and R. Röhlsberger, Collective nuclear excitation and pulse propagation in single-mode x-ray waveguides, arXiv:2403.06508.
  32. D. Lentrodt, C. H. Keitel, and J. Evers, Excitation of narrow x-ray transitions in thin-film cavities by focused pulses, Phys. Rev. A 112, 013711 (2025).
  33. R. Gilmore and L. M. Narducci, Relation between the equilibrium and nonequilibrium critical properties of the Dicke model, Phys. Rev. A 17, 1747 (1978).
  34. C. Emary and T. Brandes, Chaos and the quantum phase transition in the Dicke model, Phys. Rev. E 67, 066203 (2003).
  35. R. Mitsch, C. Sayrin, B. Albrecht, P. Schneeweiss, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Quantum state-controlled directional spontaneous emission of photons into a nanophotonic waveguide, Nat. Commun. 5, 5713 (2014).
  36. P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, S. Stobbe, A. Rauschenbeutel, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, H. Pichler, and P. Zoller, Chiral quantum optics, Nature (London) 541, 473 (2017).
  37. H. Pichler, T. Ramos, A. J. Daley, and P. Zoller, Quantum optics of chiral spin networks, Phys. Rev. A 91, 042116 (2015).
  38. C. W. Gardiner, Driving a quantum system with the output field from another driven quantum system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2269 (1993).
  39. P. Bouguer, Essai D'optique, sur la Gradation de la Lumière (chez Claude Jombert, 1729).
  40. J.-H. Lambert, Photometria Sive de Mensura et Gradibus Luminis, Colorum et Umbrae (Sumptibus Viduae Eberhardi Klett, typis Christophori Petri Detleffsen, 1760).
  41. Beer, Bestimmung der Absorption des rothen lichts in farbigen flüssigkeiten, Ann. Phys. 162, 78 (1852).
  42. D. Lechner, R. Pennetta, M. Blaha, P. Schneeweiss, A. Rauschenbeutel, and J. Volz, Light-matter interaction at the transition between cavity and waveguide QED, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 103603 (2023).
  43. D. E. Chang, L. Jiang, A. V. Gorshkov, and H. J. Kimble, Cavity QED with atomic mirrors, New J. Phys. 14, 063003 (2012).
  44. T. Chen and R.-B. Liu, Non-Markovian dynamics and strong coupling between atomic transitions and a waveguide continuum edge, Phys. Rev. A 85, 043830 (2012).
  45. P. Kirton, M. M. Roses, J. Keeling, and E. G. D. Torre, Introduction to the Dicke model: From equilibrium to nonequilibrium, and vice versa, Adv. Quantum Technol. 2, 1800043 (2019).
  46. K. Stannigel, P. Rabl, and P. Zoller, Driven-dissipative preparation of entangled states in cascaded quantum-optical networks, New J. Phys. 14, 063014 (2012).
  47. We note that Eq. (12) can only be used to compute the coherent part of the field. For the total photon flux, which incorporates the incoherent part as well, one needs to compute this quantity first for a single realization and then take the average over the ensemble.
  48. B. A. Chase and J. M. Geremia, Collective processes of an ensemble of spin-1/2 particles, Phys. Rev. A 78, 052101 (2008).
  49. B. Q. Baragiola, B. A. Chase, and J. Geremia, Collective uncertainty in partially polarized and partially decohered spin-12 systems, Phys. Rev. A 81, 032104 (2010).
  50. N. Shammah, S. Ahmed, N. Lambert, S. De Liberato, and F. Nori, Open quantum systems with local and collective incoherent processes: Efficient numerical simulations using permutational invariance, Phys. Rev. A 98, 063815 (2018).
  51. S. Sarkar and J. S. Satchell, Optical bistability with small numbers of atoms, Europhys. Lett. 3, 797 (1987).
  52. S. Sarkar and J. S. Satchell, Solution of master equations for small bistable systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 20, 2147 (1987).
  53. H. J. Carmichael, Analytical and numerical results for the steady state in cooperative resonance fluorescence, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 13, 3551 (1980).
  54. N. Leppenen and E. Shahmoon, Quantum bistability at the interplay between collective and individual decay, arXiv:2404.02134.
  55. K. G. Baumann, Experimental realization of the Dicke quantum phase transition, Ph.D. thesis, ETH Zürich, 2011.
  56. M. A. Armen, A. E. Miller, and H. Mabuchi, Spontaneous dressed-state polarization in the strong driving regime of cavity QED, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 173601 (2009).
  57. G. Beaulieu, F. Minganti, S. Frasca, M. Scigliuzzo, S. Felicetti, R. Di Candia, and P. Scarlino, Criticality-enhanced quantum sensing with a parametric superconducting resonator, PRX Quantum 6, 020301 (2025).
  58. G. Beaulieu, F. Minganti, S. Frasca, V. Savona, S. Felicetti, R. Di Candia, and P. Scarlino, Observation of first- and second-order dissipative phase transitions in a two-photon driven Kerr resonator, Nat. Commun. 16, 1954 (2025).
  59. R. Sett, F. Hassani, D. Phan, S. Barzanjeh, A. Vukics, and J. M. Fink, Emergent macroscopic bistability induced by a single superconducting qubit, PRX Quantum 5, 010327 (2024).
  60. M. Fitzpatrick, N. M. Sundaresan, A. C. Y. Li, J. Koch, and A. A. Houck, Observation of a dissipative phase transition in a one-dimensional circuit QED lattice, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011016 (2017).
  61. G. Y. Kim and C. H. Kwak, Comparison of Lambert W function with Adomian Decomposition Method for wave propagation in saturable absorption medium, J. Opt. 22, 095502 (2020).
  62. The Lambert W function is the solution to the equation z=W(z)eW(z).
  63. K. Sinha, P. Meystre, E. A. Goldschmidt, F. K. Fatemi, S. L. Rolston, and P. Solano, Non-Markovian collective emission from macroscopically separated emitters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 043603 (2020).
  64. B. Windt, M. Bello, D. Malz, and J. I. Cirac, Effects of retardation on many-body superradiance in chiral waveguide QED, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 173601 (2025).
  65. F. Evers and A. Mirlin, Anderson transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1355 (2008).
  66. H. T. Dung, L. Knöll, and D.-G. Welsch, Resonant dipole-dipole interaction in the presence of dispersing and absorbing surroundings, Phys. Rev. A 66, 063810 (2002).
  67. A. Asenjo-Garcia, J. D. Hood, D. E. Chang, and H. J. Kimble, Atom-light interactions in quasi-one-dimensional nanostructures: A Green's-function perspective, Phys. Rev. A 95, 033818 (2017).
  68. A. Asenjo-Garcia, M. Moreno-Cardoner, A. Albrecht, H. J. Kimble, and D. E. Chang, Exponential improvement in photon storage fidelities using subradiance and “selective radiance” in atomic arrays, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031024 (2017).
  69. M. W. Sørensen and A. S. Sørensen, Three-dimensional theory for light-matter interaction, Phys. Rev. A 77, 013826 (2008).
  70. L. Novotny and B. Hecht, Principles of Nano-Optics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012).
  71. P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, and S. Stobbe, Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 347 (2015).
  72. V. S. C. Manga Rao and S. Hughes, Single quantum-dot Purcell factor and β factor in a photonic crystal waveguide, Phys. Rev. B 75, 205437 (2007).
  73. V. S. C. M. Rao and S. Hughes, Single quantum dot spontaneous emission in a finite-size photonic crystal waveguide: Proposal for an efficient “on chip” single photon gun, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 193901 (2007).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation