Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Stochastic multistability of clonal-like states in the Eigen model: A fidelity catastrophe

Emanuele Crosato1,2,3,*, Richard E. Spinney1,2,*, and Richard G. Morris1,2,4,†

  • 1School of Physics, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia
  • 2EMBL Australia Node in Single Molecule Science, School of Biomedical Sciences, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia
  • 3Living Systems Institute and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, United Kingdom
  • 4ARC Centre of Excellence for the Mathematical Analysis of Cellular Systems, UNSW Node, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • Contact author: r.g.morris@unsw.edu.au

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 033325 – Published 16 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/dltj-jrj6

Abstract

The Eigen model is a prototypical toy model of evolution that is synonymous with the so-called error catastrophe: When mutation rates are sufficiently high, the genetic variant with the largest replication rate does not occupy the largest fraction of the total population because it acts as a source for the other variants. Here, we show that, in the stochastic version of the Eigen model, there is also a fidelity catastrophe. This arises due to the state-dependence of fluctuations and occurs when rates of mutation fall beneath a certain threshold, which we calculate. The result is a type of noise-induced multistability in which the system stochastically switches between short-lived regimes of effectively clonal behavior by different genetic variants. Most notably, when the number of possible variants—potentially 4L, with L1 the length of the genome—is significantly larger than the population size, there is only a vanishingly small interval of mutation rates for which the Eigen model is neither in the fidelity- nor error-catastrophe regimes.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (49)

  1. B. Alberts, R. Heald, A. Johnson, D. Morgan, M. Raff, K. Roberts, and P. Walter, Molecular Biology of the Cell, 7th ed. (W. W. Norton, 2022).
  2. B. Tippin, P. Pham, and M. F. Goodman, Error-prone replication for better or worse, Trends Microbiol. 12, 288 (2004).
  3. J. W. Drake, B. Charlesworth, D. Charlesworth, and J. F. Crow, Rates of spontaneous mutation, Genetics 148, 1667 (1998).
  4. P. D. Sniegowski, P. J. Gerrish, T. Johnson, and A. Shaver, The evolution of mutation rates: Separating causes from consequences, Bioessays 22, 1057 (2000).
  5. S. Duffy, L. A. Shackelton, and E. C. Holmes, Rates of evolutionary change in viruses: Patterns and determinants, Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 267 (2008).
  6. A. E. Eiben and J. E. Smith, Introduction to Evolutionary Computing (Springer, Berlin, 2015).
  7. F. Silva, M. Duarte, L. Correia, S. M. Oliveira, and A. L. Christensen, Open issues in evolutionary robotics, Evol. Comput. 24, 205 (2016).
  8. P. Adamski, M. Eleveld, A. Sood, Á. Kun, A. Szilágyi, T. Czárán, E. Szathmáry, and S. Otto, From self-replication to replicator systems en route to de novo life, Nat. Rev. Chem. 4, 386 (2020).
  9. M. Eigen, Selforganization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules, Naturwissenschaften 58, 465 (1971).
  10. M. Eigen and P. Schuster, A principle of natural self-organization: Part A: Emergence of the hypercycle, Naturwissenschaften 64, 541 (1977).
  11. D. B. Saakian and C.-K. Hu, Exact solution of the Eigen model with general fitness functions and degradation rates, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 4935 (2006).
  12. M. Eigen, Viral quasispecies, Sci. Am. 269, 42 (1993).
  13. E. Domingo, J. Sheldon, and C. Perales, Viral quasispecies evolution, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 76, 159 (2012).
  14. E. Domingo, C. García-Crespo, and C. Perales, Historical perspective on the discovery of the quasispecies concept, Ann. Rev. Virol. 8, 51 (2021).
  15. D. Alves and J. F. Fontanari, Error threshold in finite populations, Phys. Rev. E 57, 7008 (1998).
  16. Y. Bakhtin, M. I. Katsnelson, Y. I. Wolf, and E. V. Koonin, Evolution in the weak-mutation limit: Stasis periods punctuated by fast transitions between saddle points on the fitness landscape, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2015665118 (2021).
  17. D. Bonnaz and A. J. Koch, Stochastic model of evolving populations, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31, 417 (1998).
  18. P. R. A. Campos and J. F. Fontanari, Finite-size scaling of the error threshold transition in finite populations, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32, L1 (1999).
  19. L. Demetrius, P. Schuster, and K. Sigmund, Polynucleotide evolution and branching processes, Bull. Math. Biol. 47, 239 (1985).
  20. B. L. Jones and H. K. Leung, Stochastic analysis of a nonlinear model for selection of biological macromolecules, Bull. Math. Biol. 43, 665 (1981).
  21. J. S. McCaskill, A stochastic theory of macromolecular evolution, Biol. Cybern. 50, 63 (1984).
  22. M. Nowak and P. Schuster, Error thresholds of replication in finite populations mutation frequencies and the onset of Muller's ratchet, J. Theor. Biol. 137, 375 (1989).
  23. Y.-C. Zhang, Quasispecies evolution of finite populations, Phys. Rev. E 55, R3817 (1997).
  24. F. Musso, A stochastic version of the Eigen model, Bull. Math. Biol. 73, 151 (2011).
  25. W. Horsthemke and R. Lefever, Noise-Induced Transitions, Springer Series in Synergetics (Springer, Berlin. 2006), Vol. 15.
  26. T. Biancalani, T. Rogers, and A. J. McKane, Noise-induced metastability in biochemical networks, Phys. Rev. E 86, 010106(R) (2012).
  27. R. G. Morris and T. Rogers, Growth-induced breaking and unbreaking of ergodicity in fully-connected spin systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 342003 (2014).
  28. F. Jafarpour, T. Biancalani, and N. Goldenfeld, Noise-induced symmetry breaking far from equilibrium and the emergence of biological homochirality, Phys. Rev. E 95, 032407 (2017).
  29. T. Biancalani, L. Dyson, and A. J. McKane, Noise-induced bistable states and their mean switching time in foraging colonies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 038101 (2014).
  30. J. Jhawar, R. G. Morris, U. R. Amith-Kumar, M. D. Raj, T. Rogers, H. Rajendran, and V. Guttal, Noise-induced schooling of fish, Nat. Phys. 16, 488 (2020).
  31. A. J. Bladon, T. Galla, and A. J. McKane, Evolutionary dynamics, intrinsic noise, and cycles of cooperation, Phys. Rev. E 81, 066122 (2010).
  32. G. W. A. Constable, T. Rogers, A. J. McKane, and C. E. Tarnita, Demographic noise can reverse the direction of deterministic selection, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, E4745 (2016).
  33. P. Ashcroft, C. E. R. Smith, M. Garrod, and T. Galla, Effects of population growth on the success of invading mutants, J. Theor. Biol. 420, 232 (2017).
  34. E. Crosato, J. N. Philippson, S. Thutupalli, and R. G. Morris, Dynamical demographic phases explain how population growth and mutation control the evolutionary impact of bottlenecks, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013093 (2023).
  35. F. Musso, On the relation between the Eigen model and the asexual Wright–Fisher model, Bull. Math. Biol. 74, 103 (2012).
  36. M. Kimura and J. F. Crow, An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory (Scientific Publishers, 2017).
  37. E. Baake and W. Gabriel, Biological evolution through mutation, selection, and drift: An introductory review, Annu. Rev. Comput. Phys. 7, 203 (2000).
  38. R. A. Blythe and A. J. McKane, Stochastic models of evolution in genetics, ecology and linguistics, J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P07018.
  39. N. Godfried and V. Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry (Elsevier, North-Holland, 1992), Vol. 1.
  40. C. Gardiner, Stochastic Methods (Springer, Berlin, 2009), Vol. 4.
  41. D. T. Gillespie, A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions, J. Comput. Phys. 22, 403 (1976).
  42. P. G. Hufton, Y. T. Lin, T. Galla, and A. J. McKane, Intrinsic noise in systems with switching environments, Phys. Rev. E 93, 052119 (2016).
  43. P. G. Hufton, Y. T. Lin, and T. Galla, Model reduction methods for population dynamics with fast-switching environments: Reduced master equations, stochastic differential equations, and applications, Phys. Rev. E 99, 032122 (2019).
  44. J. R. Worsfold and R. G. Morris, Stochastically bistable growth and decay in the Togashi-Kaneko model, Phys. Rev. E 112, 014131 (2025).
  45. H. J. Muller, The relation of recombination to mutational advance, Mutat. Res. 1, 2 (1964).
  46. J. Felsenstein, The evolutionary advantage of recombination, Genetics 78, 737 (1974).
  47. J. Haigh, The accumulation of deleterious genes in a population—Muller's ratchet, Theor. Popul Biol. 14, 251 (1978).
  48. J. J. Metzger and S. Eule, Distribution of the fittest individuals and the rate of Muller's ratchet in a model with overlapping generations, PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003303 (2013).
  49. E. Crosato, R. E. Spinney, and R. G. Morris, Fidelity Catastrophe - Simulation Code and Dataset, Version 1, Zenodo, 2025, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16910145.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation