- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Nuclear spin diffusion in dynamic nuclear polarization of crystalline nanoscale silicon particles

Gevin von Witte1,2, Konstantin Tamarov3, Neva Şahin4, Aaron Himmler2, Vera Ganz2, Jani O. Moilanen5, Vesa-Pekka Lehto3, Grzegorz Kwiatkowski1, Sebastian Kozerke1 et al.

Matthias Ernst2,*

  • *Contact author: maer@ethz.ch
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043276 – Published 9 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/cr6d-m3bf

Abstract

Hyperpolarized nanoparticles offer high polarization levels with room-temperature relaxation times exceeding half an hour. In this work, we demonstrate that the achievable hyperpolarization enhancement and relaxation (decay) time at room temperature are largely independent of the particle size contrary to previous assumptions. This is explained through first-principles spin-diffusion coefficient calculations and finite-difference polarization simulations. The simulated zero-quantum (flip-flop) linewidth governing the spin diffusion is found to agree with the experimentally accessible single-quantum (single spin flip, e.g., radio-frequency pulse) linewidth. The transport of hyperpolarization from strongly hyperfine-coupled spins toward the bulk is believed to be responsible for the slow polarization dynamics including the long room-temperature decay time. The linewidth and spin-diffusion simulations are extended to other cubic crystal structures and analytical expressions, which only require insertion of the gyromagnetic ratio, lattice constant, isotope abundance, and measured spectral density distribution (nuclear linewidth). The presented simulations can be adjusted to study spin diffusion in other materials.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (66)

  1. S. Jørgensen, N. Bøgh, E. Hansen, M. Væggemose, H. Wiggers, and C. Laustsen, Hyperpolarized MRI—An update and future perspectives, Semin. Nucl. Med. 52, 374 (2022).
  2. J. H. Ardenkjær-Larsen, B. Fridlund, A. Gram, G. Hansson, L. Hansson, M. H. Lerche, R. Servin, M. Thaning, and K. Golman, Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of >10,000 times in liquid-state NMR, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 10158 (2003).
  3. M. C. Cassidy, H. R. Chan, B. D. Ross, P. K. Bhattacharya, and C. M. Marcus, In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of hyperpolarized silicon particles, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 363 (2013).
  4. N. Whiting, J. Hu, N. M. Zacharias, G. L. R. Lokesh, D. E. Volk, D. G. Menter, R. Rupaimoole, R. Previs, A. K. Sood, and P. Bhattacharya, Developing hyperpolarized silicon particles for in vivo MRI targeting of ovarian cancer, J. Med. Imaging 3, 036001 (2016).
  5. G. Kwiatkowski, F. Jähnig, J. Steinhauser, P. Wespi, M. Ernst, and S. Kozerke, Nanometer size silicon particles for hyperpolarized MRI, Sci. Rep. 7, 7946 (2017).
  6. G. Kwiatkowski, Y. Polyhach, F. Jähnig, T. Shiroka, F. H. Starsich, M. Ernst, and S. Kozerke, Exploiting endogenous surface defects for dynamic nuclear polarization of silicon micro- and nanoparticles, J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 25668 (2018).
  7. H. Seo, D. Kim, H. S. Ahn, S. Hwang, Q. S. Luu, J. Kim, S. Lee, and Y. Lee, Efficient conversion method of bulk silicon powders into porous silicon nanoparticles, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 39, 1455 (2018).
  8. J. Hu, N. Whiting, and P. Bhattacharya, Hyperpolarization of silicon nanoparticles with TEMPO radicals, J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 10575 (2018).
  9. J. Kim, D. Jo, S. H. Yang, C. G. Joo, N. Whiting, S. Pudakalakatti, H. Seo, H. Y. Son, S. J. Min, P. Bhattacharya, Y. M. Huh, J. H. Shim, and Y. Lee, Si29 isotope-enriched silicon nanoparticles for an efficient hyperpolarized magnetic resonance imaging probe, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 56923 (2021).
  10. G. von Witte, A. Himmler, V. Hyppönen, J. Jäntti, M. M. Albannay, J. O. Moilanen, M. Ernst, V.-P. Lehto, J. Riikonen, S. Kozerke, M. I. Kettunen, and K. Tamarov, Controlled synthesis and characterization of porous silicon nanoparticles for dynamic nuclear polarization, Nanoscale 16, 19385 (2024).
  11. G. Kwiatkowski, F. Jähnig, J. Steinhauser, P. Wespi, M. Ernst, and S. Kozerke, Direct hyperpolarization of micro- and nanodiamonds for bioimaging applications—Considerations on particle size, functionalization and polarization loss, J. Magn. Reson. 286, 42 (2018).
  12. D. E. Waddington, T. Boele, E. Rej, D. R. McCamey, N. J. King, T. Gaebel, and D. J. Reilly, Phase-encoded hyperpolarized nanodiamond for magnetic resonance imaging, Sci. Rep. 9, 5950 (2019).
  13. Y. Zhu, J. Li, W. Li, Y. Zhang, X. Yang, N. Chen, Y. Sun, Y. Zhao, C. Fan, and Q. Huang, The biocompatibility of nanodiamonds and their application in drug delivery systems, Theranostics 2, 302 (2012).
  14. S. Ivanov, S. Zhuravsky, G. Yukina, V. Tomson, D. Korolev, and M. Galagudza, In vivo toxicity of intravenously administered silica and silicon nanoparticles, Materials 5, 1873 (2012).
  15. V. Vaijayanthimala, P.-Y. Cheng, S.-H. Yeh, K.-K. Liu, C.-H. Hsiao, J.-I. Chao, and H.-C. Chang, The long-term stability and biocompatibility of fluorescent nanodiamond as an in vivo contrast agent, Biomaterials 33, 7794 (2012).
  16. J. G. Croissant, Y. Fatieiev, and N. M. Khashab, Degradability and clearance of silicon, organosilica, silsesquioxane, silica mixed oxide, and mesoporous silica nanoparticles, Adv. Mater. 29, 1604634 (2017).
  17. F. C. Barone, C. Marcinkiewicz, J. Li, M. Sternberg, P. I. Lelkes, D. A. Dikin, P. J. Bergold, J. A. Gerstenhaber, and G. Feuerstein, Pilot study on biocompatibility of fluorescent nanodiamond-(NV)-Z∼800 particles in rats: Safety, pharmacokinetics, and bio-distribution (part III), Int. J. Nanomed. 13, 5449 (2018).
  18. Edited by H. Santos, Porous silicon for biomedical applications, 2nd ed. (Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, 2021).
  19. N. Priyadarshni, R. Singh, and M. K. Mishra, Nanodiamonds: Next generation nano-theranostics for cancer therapy, Cancer Lett. 587, 216710 (2024).
  20. G. Kwiatkowski, G. Von Witte, A. Däpp, J. Kocic, B. Hattendorf, M. Ernst, and S. Kozerke, In vivo MRI of hyperpolarized silicon‐29 nanoparticles, Magn. Reson. Med. 92, 2631 (2024).
  21. N. Whiting, J. Hu, J. V. Shah, M. C. Cassidy, E. Cressman, N. Z. Millward, D. G. Menter, C. M. Marcus, and P. K. Bhattacharya, Real-time MRI-guided catheter tracking using hyperpolarized silicon particles, Sci. Rep. 5, 12842 (2015).
  22. M. Xu, Y. Qi, G. Liu, Y. Song, X. Jiang, and B. Du, Size-dependent in vivo transport of nanoparticles: Implications for delivery, targeting, and clearance, ACS Nano 17, 20825 (2023).
  23. J. W. Aptekar, M. C. Cassidy, A. C. Johnson, R. A. Barton, M. Lee, A. C. Ogier, C. Vo, M. N. Anahtar, Y. Ren, S. N. Bhatia, C. Ramanathan, D. G. Cory, A. L. Hill, R. W. Mair, M. S. Rosen, R. L. Walsworth, and C. M. Marcus, Silicon nanoparticles as hyperpolarized magnetic resonance imaging agents, ACS Nano 3, 4003 (2009).
  24. E. Rej, T. Gaebel, T. Boele, D. E. Waddington, and D. J. Reilly, Hyperpolarized nanodiamond with long spin-relaxation times, Nat. Commun. 6, 8459 (2015).
  25. T. Boele, D. E. J. Waddington, T. Gaebel, E. Rej, A. Hasija, L. J. Brown, D. R. McCamey, and D. J. Reilly, Tailored nanodiamonds for hyperpolarized C13 MRI, Phys. Rev. B 101, 155416 (2020).
  26. D. Yoon, M. Soundararajan, S. Sekatski, J. Genoud, S. Alberti, and J. P. Ansermet, High-field C13 dynamic nuclear polarization in nanodiamond, J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 21237 (2019).
  27. K. Kato, H. Takahashi, H. Tamaki, T. Fujiwara, and Y. Matsuki, Nanodiamond-based hyperpolarization for in-situ magic-angle-spinning nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of proteins, ChemRxiv, https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-x9m17-v2.
  28. D. Shimon, K. A. Cantwell, L. Joseph, E. Q. Williams, Z. Peng, S. Takahashi, and C. Ramanathan, Large room temperature bulk DNP of C13 via P1 centers in diamond, J. Phys. Chem. C 126, 17777 (2022).
  29. S. Bussandri, D. Shimon, A. Equbal, Y. Ren, S. Takahashi, C. Ramanathan, and S. Han, P1 center electron spin clusters are prevalent in type Ib diamonds, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 10.1021/jacs.3c06705 146, 5088 (2024).
  30. O. Nir-Arad, D. H. Shlomi, N. Manukovsky, E. Laster, and I. Kaminker, Nitrogen substitutions aggregation and clustering in diamonds as revealed by high-field electron paramagnetic resonance, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 5100 (2023).
  31. G. von Witte, M. Ernst, and S. Kozerke, Modelling and correcting the impact of RF pulses for continuous monitoring of hyperpolarized NMR, Magn. Reson. 4, 175 (2023).
  32. G. von Witte, A. Himmler, S. Kozerke, and M. Ernst, Relaxation enhancement by microwave irradiation may limit dynamic nuclear polarization, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 26, 9578 (2024).
  33. See Supplemental Material at https://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/cr6d-m3bf for sample characterization, additional experimental, and simulation data, which includes Refs. [60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65].
  34. A. E. Dementyev, D. G. Cory, and C. Ramanathan, Dynamic nuclear polarization in silicon microparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 127601 (2008).
  35. M. Lee, M. C. Cassidy, C. Ramanathan, and C. M. Marcus, Decay of nuclear hyperpolarization in silicon microparticles, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 84, 33 (2011).
  36. M. C. Cassidy, Hyperpolarized silicon particles as in-vivo imaging agents, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, 2012.
  37. M. C. Cassidy, C. Ramanathan, D. G. Cory, J. W. Ager, and C. M. Marcus, Radical-free dynamic nuclear polarization using electronic defects in silicon, Phys. Rev. B 87, 161306 (2013).
  38. G. Kwiatkowski and S. Kozerke, Accelerating CEST MRI in the mouse brain at 9.4 T by exploiting sparsity in the Z-spectrum domain, NMR Biomed. 33, e4360 (2020).
  39. H. Hayashi, K. M. Itoh, and L. S. Vlasenko, Nuclear magnetic resonance linewidth and spin diffusion in Si29 isotopically controlled silicon, Phys. Rev. B 78, 153201 (2008).
  40. A. C. Pinon, J. Schlagnitweit, P. Berruyer, A. J. Rossini, M. Lelli, E. Socie, M. Tang, T. Pham, A. Lesage, S. Schantz, and L. Emsley, Measuring nano- to microstructures from relayed dynamic nuclear polarization NMR, J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 15993 (2017).
  41. A. C. Pinon, U. Skantze, J. Viger-Gravel, S. Schantz, and L. Emsley, Core-shell structure of organic crystalline nanoparticles determined by relayed dynamic nuclear polarization NMR, J. Phys. Chem. A 122, 8802 (2018).
  42. I. J. Lowe and S. Gade, Density-matrix derivation of the spin-diffusion equation, Phys. Rev. 156, 817 (1967).
  43. A. Kubo and C. A. McDowell, P31 spectral spin diffusion in crystalline solids, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 63 (1988).
  44. M. Ernst and B. H. Meier, Spin diffusion in solids, in Studies in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Solid State NMR of Polymers, edited by I. Ando and T. Asakura (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998), Vol. 84, pp. 83–121.
  45. N. Bloembergen, On the interaction of nuclear spins in a crystalline lattice, Physica 15, 386 (1949).
  46. G. R. Khutsishvili, Spin diffusion, Sov. Phys.-Usp. 8, 743 (1966).
  47. S. Chandrasekhar, Stochastic problems in physics and astronomy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 15, 1 (1943).
  48. C. Deng and X. Hu, Nuclear spin diffusion in quantum dots: Effects of inhomogeneous hyperfine interaction, Phys. Rev. B 72, 165333 (2005).
  49. G. Sharma, T. Gaebel, E. Rej, D. J. Reilly, S. E. Economou, and E. Barnes, Enhancement of nuclear spin coherence times by driving dynamic nuclear polarization at defect centers in solids, Phys. Rev. B 99, 205423 (2019).
  50. J. H. Van Vleck, The dipolar broadening of magnetic resonance lines in crystals, Phys. Rev. 74, 1168 (1948).
  51. A. Abragam, The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1961).
  52. M. Mehring, Principles of High Resolution NMR in Solids, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1983).
  53. F. Jähnig, G. Kwiatkowski, A. Däpp, A. Hunkeler, B. H. Meier, S. Kozerke, and M. Ernst, Dissolution DNP using trityl radicals at 7 T field, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 19196 (2017).
  54. K. Takeda, A highly integrated FPGA-based nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 033103 (2007).
  55. K. Takeda, OPENCORE NMR: Open-source core modules for implementing an integrated FPGA-based NMR spectrometer, J. Magn. Reson. 192, 218 (2008).
  56. K. Takeda, Highly customized NMR systems using an open-resource, home-built spectrometer, in Annual Reports on NMR Spectroscopy, edited by G. A. Webb (Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011), Vol. 74, pp. 355–393.
  57. A. Himmler, M. M. Albannay, G. Von Witte, S. Kozerke, and M. Ernst, Electroplated waveguides to enhance DNP and EPR spectra of silicon and diamond particles, Magn. Reson. 3, 203 (2022).
  58. M. Batel, M. Krajewski, K. Weiss, O. With, A. Däpp, A. Hunkeler, M. Gimersky, K. P. Pruessmann, P. Boesiger, B. H. Meier, S. Kozerke, and M. Ernst, A multi-sample 94 GHz dissolution dynamic-nuclear-polarization system, J. Magn. Reson. 214, 166 (2012).
  59. T. M. Atkins, M. C. Cassidy, M. Lee, S. Ganguly, C. M. Marcus, and S. M. Kauzlarich, Synthesis of long T1 silicon nanoparticles for hyperpolarized Si29 magnetic resonance imaging, ACS Nano 7, 1609 (2013).
  60. I. M. Nolden and R. J. Silbey, Simulation of spin diffusion in a disordered system, Phys. Rev. B 54, 381 (1996).
  61. G. von Witte, S. Kozerke, and M. Ernst, Two-electron two-nucleus effective Hamiltonian and the spin diffusion barrier, Sci. Adv. 11, eadr7168 (2025).
  62. V. S. Redrouthu, M. Mannai, L. Taha, W. Zia, S. V. Sadasivan, R. Jabbour, and A. Equbal, Overcoming nuclear spin diffusion barrier in DNP via electron-electron flip-flop, Phys. Rev. B 111, 104417 (2025).
  63. A. Stesmans and V. V. Afanas’ev, Electron spin resonance features of the Pb1 interface defect in thermal (100)Si/SiO2, Mater. Sci. Forum 258-263, 1713 (1997).
  64. G. Van Gorp and A. Stesmans, Dipolar interaction between [111]Pb defects at the (111)Si/SiO2 interface revealed by electron-spin resonance, Phys. Rev. B 45, 4344 (1992).
  65. V. B. Cheng, H. H. Suzukawa, and M. Wolfsberg, Investigations of a nonrandom numerical method for multidimensional integration, J. Chem. Phys. 59, 3992 (1973).
  66. ETH research collection repository containing experimental and simulation data with the corresponding matlab scripts of the presented work under https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000709810.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043276– Published 9 December, 2025
  • Received 17 December 2024
  • Accepted 31 October 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation