Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Predicting dynamics from flows of the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis

Dominik Hahn1,2,*, David M. Long3,4, Marin Bukov2, and Anushya Chandran2,5

  • *Contact author: dominik.hahn@physics.ox.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 043091 – Published 23 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/c9d7-x8gc

Abstract

Analytical treatments of far-from-equilibrium quantum dynamics are few, even in well-thermalizing systems. The celebrated eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH) provides a post hoc ansatz for the matrix elements of observables in the eigenbasis of a thermalizing Hamiltonian, given various response functions of those observables as input. However, the ETH cannot predict these response functions. We introduce a procedure, dubbed the statistical Jacobi approximation (SJA), to update the ETH ansatz after a perturbation to the Hamiltonian and predict perturbed response functions. The Jacobi algorithm diagonalizes the perturbation through a sequence of two-level rotations. The SJA implements these rotations statistically assuming the ETH throughout the diagonalization procedure and generates integrodifferential flow equations for various form factors in the ETH ansatz. We approximately solve these flow equations using statistical information about Jacobi rotations as input and predict both quench dynamics and autocorrelators in the thermal state of the perturbed Hamiltonian. The predicted dynamics agree with exact numerics in both random matrix models and spin chains, outperforming second-order time-dependent perturbation theory.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (60)

  1. R. V. Jensen and R. Shankar, Statistical behavior in deterministic quantum systems with few degrees of freedom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1879 (1985).
  2. J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991).
  3. M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994).
  4. M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems, Nature (London) 452, 854 (2008).
  5. L. D'Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, Adv. Phys. 65, 239 (2016).
  6. J. M. Deutsch, Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 082001 (2018).
  7. B. Buča, Unified theory of local quantum many-body dynamics: Eigenoperator thermalization theorems, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031013 (2023).
  8. B. Doyon, Thermalization and pseudolocality in extended quantum systems, Commun. Math. Phys. 351, 155 (2017).
  9. T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, R. Thomale, and M. Greiter, Theory of eigenstate thermalisation, arXiv:2406.01448.
  10. E. P. Wigner, Characteristic vectors of bordered matrices with infinite dimensions, Ann. Math. 62, 548 (1955).
  11. W. Beugeling, R. Moessner, and M. Haque, Finite-size scaling of eigenstate thermalization, Phys. Rev. E 89, 042112 (2014).
  12. R. Steinigeweg, J. Herbrych, and P. Prelovšek, Eigenstate thermalization within isolated spin-chain systems, Phys. Rev. E 87, 012118 (2013).
  13. H. Kim, T. N. Ikeda, and D. A. Huse, Testing whether all eigenstates obey the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Phys. Rev. E 90, 052105 (2014).
  14. A. Chandran, M. D. Schulz, and F. J. Burnell, The eigenstate thermalization hypothesis in constrained Hilbert spaces: A case study in non-Abelian anyon chains, Phys. Rev. B 94, 235122 (2016).
  15. R. Steinigeweg, A. Khodja, H. Niemeyer, C. Gogolin, and J. Gemmer, Pushing the limits of the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis towards mesoscopic quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 130403 (2014).
  16. E. Khatami, M. Rigol, A. Relaño, and A. M. García-García, Quantum quenches in disordered systems: Approach to thermal equilibrium without a typical relaxation time, Phys. Rev. E 85, 050102(R) (2012).
  17. A. Khodja, R. Steinigeweg, and J. Gemmer, Relevance of the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis for thermal relaxation, Phys. Rev. E 91, 012120 (2015).
  18. W. Beugeling, R. Moessner, and M. Haque, Off-diagonal matrix elements of local operators in many-body quantum systems, Phys. Rev. E 91, 012144 (2015).
  19. S. Genway, A. F. Ho, and D. K. K. Lee, Thermalization of local observables in small Hubbard lattices, Phys. Rev. A 86, 023609 (2012).
  20. G. Biroli, C. Kollath, and A. M. Läuchli, Effect of rare fluctuations on the thermalization of isolated quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 250401 (2010).
  21. G. Roux, Finite-size effects in global quantum quenches: Examples from free bosons in a harmonic trap and the one-dimensional Bose-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. A 81, 053604 (2010).
  22. S. Sorg, L. Vidmar, L. Pollet, and F. Heidrich-Meisner, Relaxation and thermalization in the one-dimensional Bose-Hubbard model: A case study for the interaction quantum quench from the atomic limit, Phys. Rev. A 90, 033606 (2014).
  23. C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papić, Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum many-body scars, Nat. Phys. 14, 745 (2018).
  24. A. Chandran, T. Iadecola, V. Khemani, and R. Moessner, Quantum many-body scars: A quasiparticle perspective, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 443 (2023).
  25. P. Sala, T. Rakovszky, R. Verresen, M. Knap, and F. Pollmann, Ergodicity breaking arising from Hilbert space fragmentation in dipole-conserving Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011047 (2020).
  26. S. Moudgalya, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Quantum many-body scars and Hilbert space fragmentation: A review of exact results, Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 086501 (2022).
  27. R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Many-body localization and thermalization in quantum statistical mechanics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 15 (2015).
  28. D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Colloquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 021001 (2019).
  29. M. Srednicki, The approach to thermal equilibrium in quantized chaotic systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32, 1163 (1999).
  30. S. Pappalardi, L. Foini, and J. Kurchan, Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis and free probability, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 170603 (2022).
  31. L. Foini and J. Kurchan, Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis and out of time order correlators, Phys. Rev. E 99, 042139 (2019).
  32. D. Hahn, D. J. Luitz, and J. T. Chalker, Eigenstate correlations, the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, and quantum information dynamics in chaotic many-body quantum systems, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031029 (2024).
  33. A. Chan, A. De Luca, and J. T. Chalker, Eigenstate correlations, thermalization, and the butterfly effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 220601 (2019).
  34. S. Jindal and P. Hosur, Generalized free cumulants for quantum chaotic systems, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 066.
  35. L. Foini, A. Dymarsky, and S. Pappalardi, Out-of-equilibrium eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, SciPost Phys. 18, 136 (2024).
  36. C. Jacobi, Über ein leichtes verfahren die in der theorie der säcularstörungen vorkommenden gleichungen numerisch aufzulösen, J. reine angew. Math. 30, 51 (1846).
  37. G. H. Golub and H. A. van der Vorst, Eigenvalue computation in the 20th century, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 123, 35 (2000).
  38. D. M. Long, P. J. Crowley, V. Khemani, and A. Chandran, Phenomenology of the prethermal many-body localized regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 106301 (2023).
  39. D. M. Long, D. Hahn, M. Bukov, and A. Chandran, Beyond Fermi's golden rule with the statistical Jacobi approximation, SciPost Phys. 15, 251 (2023).
  40. F. Wegner, Flow-equations for Hamiltonians, Ann. Phys. 506, 77 (1994).
  41. S. Kehrein, The Flow Equation Approach to Many-Particle Systems (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007), Vol. 217.
  42. M. Moeckel and S. Kehrein, Interaction quench in the Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 175702 (2008).
  43. M. Moeckel and S. Kehrein, Real-time evolution for weak interaction quenches in quantum systems, Ann. Phys. 324, 2146 (2009).
  44. J. Richter and R. Steinigeweg, Relation between far-from-equilibrium dynamics and equilibrium correlation functions for binary operators, Phys. Rev. E 99, 012114 (2019).
  45. J. Richter, J. Gemmer, and R. Steinigeweg, Impact of eigenstate thermalization on the route to equilibrium, Phys. Rev. E 99, 050104(R) (2019).
  46. L. Dabelow and P. Reimann, Relaxation theory for perturbed many-body quantum systems versus numerics and experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 120602 (2020).
  47. L. Dabelow and P. Reimann, Typical relaxation of perturbed quantum many-body systems, J. Stat. Mech. (2021) 013106.
  48. M. Bellitti, S. Morampudi, and C. R. Laumann, Hamiltonian dynamics of a sum of interacting random matrices, Phys. Rev. B 100, 184201 (2019).
  49. A. Schönhage, Zur quadratischen konvergenz des Jacobi-verfahrens, Numer. Math. 6, 410 (1964).
  50. H. Kim and D. A. Huse, Ballistic spreading of entanglement in a diffusive nonintegrable system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 127205 (2013).
  51. G. Vidal, Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 040502 (2004).
  52. S. R. White and A. E. Feiguin, Real-time evolution using the density matrix renormalization group, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 076401 (2004).
  53. J. Haegeman, J. Ignacio Cirac, T. J. Osborne, I. Pižorn, H. Verschelde, and F. Verstraete, Time-dependent variational principle for quantum lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 070601 (2011).
  54. U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys. 326, 96 (2011).
  55. C. Vanoni, D. M. Long, and A. Chandran, Resonance proliferation across localization transitions, arXiv:2605.05445.
  56. D. Hahn, D. M. Long, M. Bukov, and A. Chandran (unpublished).
  57. D. Abanin, W. De Roeck, W. W. Ho, and F. Huveneers, A rigorous theory of many-body prethermalization for periodically driven and closed quantum systems, Commun. Math. Phys. 354, 809 (2017).
  58. D. A. Abanin, W. De Roeck, W. W. Ho, and F. Huveneers, Effective Hamiltonians, prethermalization, and slow energy absorption in periodically driven many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B 95, 014112 (2017).
  59. A. Morningstar, D. A. Huse, and V. Khemani, Universality classes of thermalization for mesoscopic Floquet systems, Phys. Rev. B 108, 174303 (2023).
  60. M. Bukov, M. Heyl, D. A. Huse, and A. Polkovnikov, Heating and many-body resonances in a periodically driven two-band system, Phys. Rev. B 93, 155132 (2016).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation