Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Paramagnetic electron-nuclear spin entanglement in HoCo2Zn20

Takafumi Kitazawa1,*,†, Yasuyuki Shimura2, Takahiro Onimaru2, Shun Tsuchida3, Katsunori Kubo1, Yoshinori Haga1, Hironori Sakai1, Yoshifumi Tokiwa1, Shinsaku Kambe1 et al.

Yo Tokunaga1

  • *Contact author: kitazawa.takafumi@phys.sci.hokudai.ac.jp
  • †Present address: Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan.

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 023009 – Published 2 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/bzvk-grrv

Abstract

We investigated electron-nuclear spin entanglement in the paramagnetic ground state of the Ho-based cubic compound HoCo2Zn20. From analyses of magnetization and specific heat data, we determined the cubic crystalline electric field (CEF) parameters, the magnetic exchange constant, and the hyperfine coupling constant between the 4f magnetic moment and the Ho165 nuclear spin. Our results show that the Γ5 CEF ground state is split by the hyperfine coupling, with an energy width of 1.3 K at 0 T, and that the true paramagnetic ground state is a quasisextet arising primarily from entanglement between the f-electron effective spin S=1 and the Ho165 nuclear spin I=7/2. We further demonstrate that, depending on the CEF parameters, the paramagnetic ground state can switch to an electron-nuclear coupled dectet. These findings underscore the importance of accurately identifying the electron-nuclear level scheme for understanding the low-temperature properties of rare-earth compounds containing spin-active nuclei.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (66)

  1. P. Santini, R. Lémanski, and P. Erdős, Magnetism of actinide compounds, Adv. Phys. 48, 537 (1999).
  2. E. Gati, B. Schmidt, S. L. Bud’ko, A. P. Mackenzie, and P. C. Canfield, Controlling crystal-electric field levels through symmetry-breaking uniaxial pressure in a cubic super heavy fermion, npj Quantum Mater. 8, 69 (2023).
  3. Y. Cai, W. Ren, X. Dai, J. Kang, W. Zhuo, M. Xie, A. Zhang, J. Ji, F. Jin, Z. Zhang, and Q. Zhang, Crystalline electric field excitations and their nonlinear splitting under magnetic fields in YbOCl, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043061 (2024).
  4. E. Wang, M. Zhang, C. An, Y. Zhou, Y. Zhou, J. Zhou, and Z. Yang, Crystal electric field excitation and vibrational properties of the quantum spin liquid candidate LiYbSe2, Phys. Rev. B 109, 174101 (2024).
  5. R. Yamamoto, M. D. Le, D. T. Adroja, Y. Shimura, T. Takabatake, and T. Onimaru, Inelastic neutron scattering study of crystalline electric field excitations in the caged compounds NdT2Zn20 (T = Co, Rh, and Ir), Phys. Rev. B 107, 075114 (2023).
  6. V. K. Anand, D. T. Adroja, C. Ritter, D. Das, H. S. Nair, A. Bhattacharyya, L. Liborio, S. Sturniolo, F. L. Pratt, D. Le, G. Andre, H. Luetkens, A. D. Hillier, and Z. Hossain, Magnetic structure and crystal field states of Pr2Pd3Ge5: μSR and neutron scattering investigations, Phys. Rev. B 107, 104412 (2023).
  7. M. Tsukagoshi, S. Kishida, K. Kurauchi, D. Ito, K. Kubo, T. Matsumura, Y. Ikeda, S. Nakamura, and S. Ohara, Crystal field excitation in the chiral helimagnet YbNi3Al9, Phys. Rev. B 107, 104425 (2023).
  8. D. Ueta, Y. Iwata, R. Kobayashi, K. Kuwahara, T. Masuda, and S. Itoh, Neutron scattering study on dimerized 4f1 intermetallic compound Ce5Si3, Phys. Rev. B 109, 205127 (2024).
  9. X. Y. Zheng, D. T. Adroja, B. Chevalier, Z. Y. Shan, A. D. Hillier, H. Q. Yuan, and M. Smidman, Inelastic neutron scattering and muon spin relaxation investigations of the deuterated Kondo lattices CeNiSnDx, Phys. Rev. B 109, 064401 (2024).
  10. H. Yamauchi, N. Metoki, R. Watanuki, T. Hong, J. A. Fernandez-Baca, M. Hagihala, T. Masuda, H. Yoshizawa, and S. Itoh, Neutron spectroscopy study on crystalline electric field excitations in NdB4, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 94, 054705 (2025).
  11. G. Zhao, H. Li, W. Lin, Q. Ren, J. Denlinger, Y. D. Chuang, X. Zhang, L. A. Wray, and L. Miao, Determination of the crystal-field splitting of the 4f1 state in samarium-alloyed cerium hexaboride, Phys. Rev. B 107, 245149 (2023).
  12. A. Amorese, P. Hansmann, A. Marino, P. Körner, T. Willers, A. Walters, K.-J. Zhou, K. Kummer, N. B. Brookes, H.-J. Lin, C.-T. Chen, P. Lejay, M. W. Haverkort, L. H. Tjeng, and A. Severing, Orbital selective coupling in CeRh3B2: Coexistence of high Curie and high Kondo temperatures, Phys. Rev. B 107, 115164 (2023).
  13. D. S. Christovam, A. Marino, J. Falke, C.-E. Liu, C.-F. Chang, C.-Y. Kuo, O. Stockert, S. Wirth, M. W. Haverkort, G. Zwicknagl, A. Severing, P. F. S. Rosa, A. M. Caffer, M. H. Carvalho, and P. G. Pagliuso, X-ray spectroscopic investigation of crystal fields in Ce2Rh1−xIrxIn8 heavy fermions, Phys. Rev. B 110, 075161 (2024).
  14. Z. Dun, X. Bai, Joseph A. M. Paddison, E. Hollingworth, N. P. Butch, C. D. Cruz, M. B. Stone, T. Hong, F. Demmel, M. Mourigal, and H. Zhou, Quantum versus classical spin fragmentation in dipolar kagome ice Ho3Mg2Sb3O14, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031069 (2020).
  15. J. Gronemann, S. Chattopadhyay, T. Gottschall, E. Osmic, A. T. M. N. Islam, V. K. Anand, B. Lake, H. Kaneko, H. Suzuki, J. Wosnitza, and T. Herrmannsdörfer, Impact of hyperfine contributions on the ground state of spin-ice compounds, Phys. Rev. B 108, 214412 (2023).
  16. H. Eisenlohr and M. Vojta, Limits to magnetic quantum criticality from nuclear spins, Phys. Rev. B 103, 064405 (2021).
  17. D. Bitko, T. F. Rosenbaum, and G. Aeppli, Quantum critical behavior for a model magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 940 (1996).
  18. R. D. McKenzie and P. C. E. Stamp, Thermodynamics of a quantum Ising system coupled to a spin bath, Phys. Rev. B 97, 214430 (2018).
  19. M. Libersky, R. D. McKenzie, D. M. Silevitch, P. C. E. Stamp, and T. F. Rosenbaum, Direct observation of collective electronuclear modes about a quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 207202 (2021).
  20. J. Knapp, L. V. Levitin, J. Nyéki, A. F. Ho, B. Cowan, J. Saunders, M. Brando, C. Geibel, K. Kliemt, and C. Krellner, Electronuclear transition into a spatially modulated magnetic state in YbRh2Si2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 126802 (2023).
  21. J. Knapp, L. V. Levitin, J. Nyéki, B. Cowan, M. Brando, C. Geibel, K. Kliemt, C. Krellner, and J. Saunders, Magnetic phase diagram of YbRh2Si2: The influence of hyperfine interactions, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, L042043 (2025).
  22. L. V. Levitin, J. Knapp, P. Knappová, M. Lucas, J. Nyéki, P. Heikkinen, V. Antonov, A. Casey, A. F. Ho, P. Coleman, C. Geibel, A. Steppke, K. Kliemt, C. Krellner, M. Brando, and J. Saunders, Odd-parity superconductivity underpinned by antiferromagnetism in heavy fermion metal YbRh2Si2, arXiv:2502.06420.
  23. J. Banda, D. Hafner, J. F. Landaeta, E. Hassinger, K. Mitsumoto, M. Giovannini, J. G. Sereni, C. Geibel, and M. Brando, Electronuclear quantum criticality, arXiv:2308.15294.
  24. G. S. Shakurov, M. V. Vanyunin, B. Z. Malkin, B. Barbara, R. Y. Abdulsabirov, and S. L. Korableva, Direct measurements of anticrossings of the electron-nuclear energy levels in LiYF4:Ho3+ with submillimeter EPR spectroscopy, Appl. Magn. Reson. 28, 251 (2005).
  25. A. Beckert, M. Grimm, R. I. Hermans, J. R. Freeman, E. H. Linfield, A. G. Davies, M. Müller, H. Sigg, S. Gerber, G. Matmon, and G. Aeppli, Precise determination of the low-energy electronuclear Hamiltonian of LiY1−xHoxF4, Phys. Rev. B 106, 115119 (2022).
  26. David R. Lide, Nuclear spins, moments, and other data related to NMR spectroscopy, in CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, edited by J. R. Rumble (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2024), p. 14–55.
  27. T. Nasch, W. Jeitschko, and U. C. Rodewald, Ternary rare earth transition metal zinc compounds RT2Zn20 with T = Fe, Ru, Co, Rh, and Ni, Z. Naturforsch. B 52, 1023 (1997).
  28. T. Onimaru, K. T. Matsumoto, Y. F. Inoue, K. Umeo, T. Sakakibara, Y. Karaki, M. Kubota, and T. Takabatake, Antiferroquadrupolar ordering in a Pr-based superconductor PrIr2Zn20, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 177001 (2011).
  29. T. Onimaru, N. Nagasawa, K. T. Matsumoto, K. Wakiya, K. Umeo, S. Kittaka, T. Sakakibara, Y. Matsushita, and T. Takabatake, Simultaneous superconducting and antiferroquadrupolar transitions in PrRh2Zn20, Phys. Rev. B 86, 184426 (2012).
  30. Y. Yamane, R. J. Yamada, T. Onimaru, K. Uenishi, K. Wakiya, K. T. Matsumoto, K. Umeo, and T. Takabatake, Competing magnetic interactions in the Kramers doublet system NdIr2Zn20, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 86, 054708 (2017).
  31. R. Yamamoto, T. Onimaru, R. J. Yamada, Y. Yamane, Y. Shimura, K. Umeo, and T. Takabatake, Antiferromagnetic order of NdT2Zn20 (T = Co and Rh) with the Kramers Γ6 doublet ground state, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 044703 (2019).
  32. A. Abragam, The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism, International Series of Monographs on Physics (Oxford University Press, London, 1961), p. 166.
  33. S. Jia, Magnetic properties of RT2Zn20 (R = rare earth, T = Fe, Co, Ru, Rh, Os and Ir), Ph.D. thesis, Iowa State University, 2008, https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/entities/publication/1c133771-1dc8-4b68-a8d2-498cc9f30455.
  34. S. Jia, N. Ni, S. L. Bud’Ko, and P. C. Canfield, Magnetic properties of RFe2Zn20 and RCo2Zn20(R=Y,Nd,Sm,Gd–Lu), Phys. Rev. B 80, 104403 (2009).
  35. T. Sakakibara, H. Mitamura, T. Tayama, and H. Amitsuka, Faraday force magnetometer for high-sensitivity magnetization measurements at very low temperatures and high fields, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33, 5067 (1994).
  36. R. Yamamoto, Two-channel Kondo effect in the Nd-based caged compound Y1−xNdxCo2Zn20, Ph.D. thesis, Hiroshima University, 2023, https://hiroshima.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2002280.
  37. A. Wendl, H. Eisenlohr, F. Rucker, C. Duvinage, M. Kleinhans, M. Vojta, and C. Pfleiderer, Emergence of mesoscale quantum phase transitions in a ferromagnet, Nature (London) 609, 65 (2022).
  38. K. R. Lea, M. J. M. Leask, and W. P. Wolf, The raising of angular momentum degeneracy of f-electron terms by cubic crystal fields, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 23, 1381 (1962).
  39. K. W. H. Stevens, Matrix elements and operator equivalents connected with the magnetic properties of rare earth ions, Proc. Phys. Soc. Sect. A 65, 209 (1952).
  40. M. T. Hutchings, Point-charge calculations of energy levels of magnetic ions in crystalline electric fields, Solid State Phys. 16, 227 (1964).
  41. If the Ho 4f magnetic moment is statically polarized to 1 μB, the resulting static internal magnetic field at the Ho site due to hyperfine coupling corresponds to AHF/(gJgNμN)=43.7T.
  42. B. Bleaney, Hyperfine interactions, in Magnetic Properties of Rare Earth Metals, edited by R. J. Elliott (Springer, New York, 1972), p. 394.
  43. K. Kaneko, S. Yoshiuchi, T. Takeuchi, F. Honda, R. Settai, and Y. Ōnuki, Effect of magnetic field in heavy-fermion compound YbCo2Zn20, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 391, 012026 (2012).
  44. Y. Aoki, T. Namiki, S. R. Saha, T. Tayama, T. Sakakibara, R. Shiina, H. Shiba, H. Sugawara, and H. Sato, f-electron-nuclear hyperfine-coupled multiplets in the unconventional charge order phase of filled skutterudite PrRu4P12, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 80, 054704 (2011).
  45. This expression for the f10 configuration is obtained by substituting the azimuthal quantum number f=3, the number of holes N=4, S=2, L=6, J=8, and the Landé g factor g=5/4 into Eq. (5–21) of Ref. [46].
  46. B. G. Wybourne, Spectroscopic Properties of Rare Earths (Interscience Publishers, New York, 1965), p. 115.
  47. P. Nozières and A. Blandin, Kondo effect in real metals, J. Phys. France 41, 193 (1980).
  48. A. M. Tsvelick, The thermodynamics of multichannel Kondo problem, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 18, 159 (1985).
  49. H.-U. Desgranges, Thermodynamics of the n-channel Kondo problem (numerical solution), J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 18, 5481 (1985).
  50. P. D. Sacramento and P. Schlottmann, Low-temperature properties of a two-level system interacting with conduction electrons: An application of the overcompensated multichannel Kondo model, Phys. Rev. B 43, 13294 (1991).
  51. C. Han, Z. Iftikhar, Y. Kleeorin, A. Anthore, F. Pierre, Y. Meir, A. K. Mitchell, and E. Sela, Fractional entropy of multichannel Kondo systems from conductance-charge relations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 146803 (2022).
  52. Y. Yamane, T. Onimaru, K. Wakiya, K. T. Matsumoto, K. Umeo, and T. Takabatake, Single-site non-Fermi-liquid behaviors in a diluted 4f2 system Y1−xPrxIr2Zn20, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 077206 (2018).
  53. T. Yanagisawa, H. Hidaka, H. Amitsuka, S. Zherlitsyn, J. Wosnitza, Y. Yamane, and T. Onimaru, Evidence for the single-site quadrupolar Kondo effect in the dilute non-Kramers system Y1−xPrxIr2Zn20, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 067201 (2019).
  54. A. Wörl, M. Garst, Y. Yamane, S. Bachus, T. Onimaru, and P. Gegenwart, Divergent thermal expansion and Grüneisen ratio in a quadrupolar Kondo metal, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L022053 (2022).
  55. Y. Yamane, T. Onimaru, Y. Shimura, S. Tsuda, K. Umeo, and T. Takabatake, Single-site quadrupolar Kondo effect in a diluted non-Kramers doublet system Y1−xPrxIr2Zn20 for x=0.028 viewed from magnetization, Phys. Rev. B 111, 155104 (2025).
  56. D. L. Cox, N. E. Bickers, and J. W. Wilkins, Calculated properties of valence fluctuators, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 54-57, 333 (1986).
  57. D. L. Cox, Selection rules for two-channel Kondo models of U4+ and Ce3+ ions in metals, Physica B 186-188, 312 (1993).
  58. T. Hotta, Two-channel Kondo effect emerging from Nd ions, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 86, 083704 (2017).
  59. T. Hotta, Three-channel Kondo effect emerging from Ho ions, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 90, 113701 (2021).
  60. T. Hotta, Effect of Γ7 and Γ8 hybridizations on three-channel Kondo phase emerging from Ho ions, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 94, 114702 (2025).
  61. For W>0, if x is equal to or near x0 (∼0.64) and the first excited CEF level (Γ3) is sufficiently separated from the ground level (Γ5), the wave functions of the Γ5 state can be regarded as eigenstates of H0T=HCEFcubic+AHFI·J. This is because the 24-fold multiplet in the Γ5 subspace remains degenerate due to α(x0)=0 [see Fig. 8].
  62. O. Stockert, J.-U. Hoffmann, M. Mühlbauer, A. Senyshyn, M. M. Koza, A. A. Tsirlin, F. M. Wolf, S. Bachus, P. Gegenwart, R. Movshovich, S. Bobev, and V. Fritsch, Magnetic frustration in a metallic fcc lattice, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013183 (2020).
  63. X. Boraley, O. Stockert, J. Lass, R. Sibille, Ø. S. Fjellvåg, S. H. Moody, A. M. Läuchli, V. Fritsch, and D. G. Mazzone, Microscopic origin of reduced magnetic order in a frustrated metal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 046702 (2025).
  64. J. Zhang and A. C. Sanderson, JADE: Adaptive differential evolution with optional external archive, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 13, 945 (2009).
  65. R. Storn and K. Price, Differential evolution—A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces, J. Global Optim. 11, 341 (1997).
  66. Y. Tokiwa and P. Gegenwart, High-resolution alternating-field technique to determine the magnetocaloric effect of metals down to very low temperatures, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 013905 (2011).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation