- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Predicting friction under vastly different lubrication scenarios

Yulong Li1,2,*, Peter Gumbsch1,3, and Christian Greiner1,2,†

  • 1Institute for Applied Materials (IAM), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Kaiserstrasse 12, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 2MicroTribology Center (μTC), Strasse am Forum 5, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 3Fraunhofer IWM, Wohlerstrasse 11, 79108 Freiburg, Germany

  • *Contact author: yulong.li@kit.edu
  • †Contact author: christian.greiner@kit.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 023068 – Published 22 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/bx4g-8647

Abstract

Friction is ubiquitous in daily life, from nanoscale machines to large engineering components. By probing the intricate interplay between system parameters and frictional behavior, scientists seek to unveil the underlying mechanisms that enable prediction and control of friction—an essential step toward carbon neutrality. Yet, reproducing frictional behavior in experiments is notoriously difficult. Here, we experimentally show that this challenge stems from the extreme sensitivity of tribological systems to tiny variations, e.g., in surface topography, typically presumed well controlled. Even after meticulous surface preparation to semiconductor industry standards and curtailing misalignment-induced oscillations, subtle variations remain and interact. In turn, such minute initial differences lead to statistically significant variations in friction and wear, giving rise to system-level chaotic behavior. Yet, by leveraging mid-scale features of surface topography and misalignment-induced oscillations—information often filtered out or overlooked—we established a predictive framework for high-friction regions under vastly different lubrication scenarios. While no single identified descriptor robustly predicts high friction, their combined occurrence provides strong predictive ability, which is further enhanced by machine learning.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (34)

  1. K. Holmberg and A. Erdemir, Influence of tribology on global energy consumption, costs and emissions, Friction 5, 263 (2017).
  2. R. W. Carpick, A. Jackson, W. G. Sawyer, N. Argibay, P. Lee, A. Pachon, and R. M. Gresham, The tribology opportunities study: Can tribology save a quad? Tribol. Lubr. Technol. 72, 44 (2016).
  3. M. Watson et al., An analysis of the quality of experimental design and reliability of results in tribology research, Wear 426–427, 1712 (2019).
  4. C. E. Morstein, A. Klemenz, M. Dienwiebel, and M. Moseler, Humidity-dependent lubrication of highly loaded contacts by graphite and a structural transition to turbostratic carbon, Nat. Commun. 13, 5958 (2022).
  5. C. Haug, F. Ruebeling, A. Kashiwar, P. Gumbsch, C. Kübel, and C. Greiner, Early deformation mechanisms in the shear affected region underneath a copper sliding contact, Nat. Commun. 11, 839 (2020).
  6. V. Slesarenko and L. Pastewka, The bumpy road to friction control, Science 383, 150 (2024).
  7. A. Aymard, E. Delplanque, D. Dalmas, and J. Scheibert, Designing metainterfaces with specified friction laws, Science 383, 200 (2024).
  8. H. Czichos, S. Becker, and J. Lexow, Multilaboratory tribotesting: Results from the Versailles Advanced Materials and Standards programme on wear test methods, Wear 114, 109 (1987).
  9. T. D. B. Jacobs, L. Pastewka, and Guest Editors, Surface topography as a material parameter, MRS Bull. 47, 1205 (2022).
  10. A. R. Hinkle, W. G. Nöhring, R. Leute, T. Junge, and L. Pastewka, The emergence of small-scale self-affine surface roughness from deformation, Sci. Adv. 6, eaax0847 (2020).
  11. R. Aghababaei, E. E. Brodsky, J.-F. Molinari, and S. Chandrasekar, How roughness emerges on natural and engineered surfaces, MRS Bull. 47, 1229 (2022).
  12. S. Iida, T. Nagai, and T. Uchiyama, Standard wafer with programed defects to evaluate the pattern inspection tools for 300-mm wafer fabrication for 7-nm node and beyond, J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS 18, 023505 (2019).
  13. L. Pastewka and M. O. Robbins, Contact between rough surfaces and a criterion for macroscopic adhesion, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3298 (2014).
  14. H. Yue, J. Schneider, B. Frohnapfel, and P. Gumbsch, The influence of pin inclination on frictional behaviour in pin-on-disc sliding and its implications for test reliability, Tribol. Int. 200, 110083 (2024).
  15. I. Garcia-Prieto, M. D. Faulkner, and J. R. Alcock, The influence of specimen misalignment on wear in conforming pin on disk tests, Wear 257, 157 (2004).
  16. M. A. Chowdhury and M. Helali, The effect of amplitude of vibration on the coefficient of friction for different materials, Tribol. Int. 41, 307 (2008).
  17. M. Marian, M. Bartz, S. Wartzack, and A. Rosenkranz, Non-dimensional groups, film thickness equations and correction factors for elastohydrodynamic lubrication: A review, Lubricants 8, 95 (2020).
  18. J. A. Greenwood and J. B. P. Williamson, Contact of nominally flat surfaces, Proc. R. Soc. London. A 295, 300 (1966).
  19. M. T. Rosenstein, J. J. Collins, and C. J. De Luca, A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets, Physica D 65, 117 (1993).
  20. C. Ding, H. Zhu, G. Sun, Y. Zhou, and X. Zuo, Chaotic characteristics and attractor evolution of friction noise during friction process, Friction 6, 47 (2018).
  21. G. Licskó and G. Csernák, On the chaotic behaviour of a simple dry-friction oscillator, Math. Comput. Simul. 95, 55 (2014).
  22. A. Pradhan et al., The Surface-topography challenge: A multi-laboratory benchmark study to advance the characterization of topography, Tribol. Lett. 73, 110 (2025).
  23. T. Dimond, A. Younan, and P. Allaire, A review of tilting pad bearing theory, Int. J. Rotating Mach. 2011, 1 (2011).
  24. E. Riedo, F. Lévy, and H. Brune, Kinetics of capillary condensation in nanoscopic sliding friction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 185505 (2002).
  25. A. J. Weymouth, E. Riegel, O. Gretz, and F. J. Giessibl, Strumming a single chemical bond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 196101 (2020).
  26. A. Vanossi, N. Manini, M. Urbakh, S. Zapperi, and E. Tosatti, Colloquium: Modeling friction: From nanoscale to mesoscale, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 529 (2013).
  27. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/bx4g-8647 for materials, methods, and evaluation details, which includes Refs.  [13, 19, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34].
  28. Y. Li, Raw data and codes to manuscript “Forecasting friction behavior despite its chaotic nature,’’ (2025), https://doi.org/10.35097/75SEAWP9105YJV6J.
  29. M. D. Weir, J. Hass, and G. B. Thomas, Thomas’ Calculus: Early Transcendentals, (Pearson, Boston, 2014), 13th ed.
  30. Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics, edited by N. J. Salkind and K. Rasmussen (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif, 2007).
  31. E. N. Lorenz, Deterministic nonperiodic flow, J. Atmos. Sci. 20, 130 (1963).
  32. F. Takens, Detecting strange attractors in turbulence, in Dynamical Systems and Turbulence, Warwick 1980, edited by D. Rand and L.-S. Young (Springer, Berlin, 1981), Vol. 898, pp. 366–381.
  33. Z. Zhang, Introduction to machine learning: K-nearest neighbors, Ann. Transl. Med. 4, 218 (2016).
  34. Y. Li, N. Garabedian, J. Schneider, and C. Greiner, Waviness affects friction and abrasive wear, Tribol. Lett. 71, 64 (2023).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 023068– Published 22 April, 2026
  • Received 8 November 2025
  • Accepted 30 March 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation