- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Testing bath correlation functions for open quantum dynamics simulations

Masaaki Tokieda*

  • Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

  • *Contact author: tokieda.masaaki.4e@kyoto-u.ac.jp
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043178 – Published 18 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/bv19-dtb1

Abstract

Accurate simulations of thermalization in open quantum systems require a reliable representation of the bath correlation function (BCF). Numerical approaches, such as the hierarchical equations of motion and the pseudomode method, inherently approximate the BCF using a finite set of functions, which can impact simulation accuracy. In this work, we propose a practical and rigorous testing framework to assess the validity of approximate BCFs in open quantum dynamics simulations. Our approach employs a harmonic oscillator system, where the computed dynamics can be benchmarked against known exact solutions. To enable practical testing, we make two key methodological advancements. First, we develop numerical techniques to efficiently evaluate these exact solutions across a wide range of BCFs, ensuring broad applicability. Second, we introduce a moment-based state representation that significantly simplifies computations by exploiting the Gaussian nature of the system. Applications to a two-spin system and a transmon-resonator system demonstrate that our testing procedure provides error estimates that capture the qualitative trends observed in thermalization simulations. Using this methodology, we assess the performance of recently proposed BCF construction methods, highlighting both their strengths and a notable challenge posed by sub-Ohmic spectral densities at finite temperatures.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (91)

  1. C. Schinabeck, R. Härtle, and M. Thoss, Hierarchical quantum master equation approach to electronic-vibrational coupling in nonequilibrium transport through nanosystems: Reservoir formulation and application to vibrational instabilities, Phys. Rev. B 97, 235429 (2018).
  2. Y. Tanimura, Numerically “exact” approach to open quantum dynamics: The hierarchical equations of motion (HEOM), J. Chem. Phys. 153, 020901 (2020).
  3. L. P. Lindoy, A. Mandal, and D. R. Reichman, Quantum dynamical effects of vibrational strong coupling in chemical reactivity, Nat. Commun. 14, 2733 (2023).
  4. V. Janković, Holstein polaron transport from numerically “exact” real-time quantum dynamics simulations, J. Chem. Phys. 159, 094113 (2023).
  5. S. Hilt, S. Shabbir, J. Anders, and E. Lutz, Landauer’s principle in the quantum regime, Phys. Rev. E 83, 030102(R) (2011).
  6. M. Perarnau-Llobet, H. Wilming, A. Riera, R. Gallego, and J. Eisert, Strong coupling corrections in quantum thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 120602 (2018).
  7. P. Talkner and P. Hänggi, Colloquium: Statistical mechanics and thermodynamics at strong coupling: Quantum and classical, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 041002 (2020).
  8. S. Koyanagi and Y. Tanimura, Classical and quantum thermodynamics described as a system–bath model: The dimensionless minimum work principle, J. Chem. Phys. 160, 234112 (2024).
  9. S. Koyanagi and Y. Tanimura, Classical and quantum thermodynamics in a nonequilibrium regime: Application to thermostatic Stirling engine, J. Chem. Phys. 161, 114113 (2024).
  10. R. P. Feynman and F. L. Vernon, Jr., The theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system, Ann. Phys. 24, 118 (1963).
  11. P. Ullersma, An exactly solvable model for Brownian motion: I. Derivation of the Langevin equation, Physica 32, 27 (1966).
  12. A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett, Quantum in a dissipative system, Ann. Phys. 149, 374 (1983).
  13. G. W. Ford, J. T. Lewis, and R. F. O’Connell, Quantum Langevin equation, Phys. Rev. A 37, 4419 (1988).
  14. U. Weiss, Quantum Dissipative Systems (World Scientific, Singapore, 2008).
  15. S. Chandrasekhar, Stochastic problems in physics and astronomy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 15, 1 (1943).
  16. A. S. Trushechkin, M. Merkli, J. D. Cresser, and J. Anders, Open quantum system dynamics and the mean force Gibbs state, AVS Quantum Sci. 4, 012301 (2022).
  17. H. Grabert, P. Schramm, and G.-L. Ingold, Quantum Brownian motion: The functional integral approach, Phys. Rep. 168, 115 (1988).
  18. Y. Tanimura, Reduced hierarchical equations of motion in real and imaginary time: Correlated initial states and thermodynamic quantities, J. Chem. Phys. 141, 044114 (2014).
  19. S. Koyanagi (private communication).
  20. Y. Tanimura and R. Kubo, Time evolution of a quantum system in contact with a nearly Gaussian-Markoffian noise bath, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 58, 101 (1989).
  21. Y. Yan, F. Yang, Y. Liu, and J. Shao, Hierarchical approach based on stochastic decoupling to dissipative systems, Chem. Phys. Lett. 395, 216 (2004).
  22. A. Ishizaki and Y. Tanimura, Quantum dynamics of system strongly coupled to low-temperature colored noise bath: Reduced hierarchy equations approach, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 74, 3131 (2005).
  23. Y. Tanimura, Stochastic Liouville, and Langevin, Fokker–Planck, and master equation approaches to quantum dissipative systems, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75, 082001 (2006).
  24. A. Imamoglu, Stochastic wave-function approach to non-Markovian systems, Phys. Rev. A 50, 3650 (1994).
  25. B. M. Garraway, Nonperturbative decay of an atomic system in a cavity, Phys. Rev. A 55, 2290 (1997).
  26. D. Tamascelli, A. Smirne, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Non-perturbative treatment of non-Markovian dynamics of open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 030402 (2018).
  27. A. Smirne, D. Tamascelli, J. Lim, M. B. Plenio, and S. F. Huelga, Non-perturbative treatment of open-system multi-time expectation values in Gaussian bosonic environments, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 29, 2250019 (2022).
  28. N. Makri and D. E. Makarov, Tensor propagator for iterative quantum time evolution of reduced density matrices. I. Theory, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 4600 (1995).
  29. N. Makri and D. E. Makarov, Tensor propagator for iterative quantum time evolution of reduced density matrices. II. Numerical methodology, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 4611 (1995).
  30. A. Strathearn, P. Kirton, D. Kilda, J. Keeling, and B. W. Lovett, Efficient non-Markovian quantum dynamics using time-evolving matrix product operators, Nat. Commun. 9, 3322 (2018).
  31. M. R. Jørgensen and F. A. Pollock, Exploiting the causal tensor network structure of quantum processes to efficiently simulate non-Markovian path integrals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 240602 (2019).
  32. G. E. Fux, P. Fowler-Wright, J. Beckles, E. P. Butler, P. R. Eastham, D. Gribben, J. Keeling, D. Kilda, P. Kirton, E. D. C. Lawrence, B. W. Lovett, E. O’ Neill, A. Strathearn, and R. de Wit, OQuPy: A Python package to efficiently simulate non-Markovian open quantum systems with process tensors, J. Chem. Phys. 161, 124108 (2024).
  33. V. Link, H.-H. Tu, and W. T. Strunz, Open quantum system dynamics from infinite tensor network contraction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 200403 (2024).
  34. M. H. Beck, A. Jäckle, G. A. Worth, and H.-D. Meyer, The multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree (MCTDH) method: A highly efficient algorithm for propagating wavepackets, Phys. Rep. 324, 1 (2000).
  35. H. Wang and M. Thoss, Multilayer formulation of the multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree theory, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 1289 (2003).
  36. A. W. Chin, Á. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Exact mapping between system-reservoir quantum models and semi-infinite discrete chains using orthogonal polynomials, J. Math. Phys. 51, 092109 (2010).
  37. J. Prior, A. W. Chin, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Efficient simulation of strong system-environment interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 050404 (2010).
  38. D. Tamascelli, A. Smirne, J. Lim, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Efficient simulation of finite-temperature open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 090402 (2019).
  39. T. Lacroix, B. Le Dé, A. Riva, A. J. Dunnett, and A. W. Chin, MPSDynamics.jl: Tensor network simulations for finite-temperature (non-Markovian) open quantum system dynamics, J. Chem. Phys. 161, 084116 (2024).
  40. J. T. Stockburger and C. H. Mak, Stochastic Liouvillian algorithm to simulate dissipative quantum dynamics with arbitrary precision, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 4983 (1999).
  41. L. Diósi, N. Gisin, and W. T. Strunz, Non-Markovian quantum state diffusion, Phys. Rev. A 58, 1699 (1998).
  42. R. Hartmann and W. T. Strunz, Exact open quantum system dynamics using the hierarchy of pure states (HOPS), J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 5834 (2017).
  43. V. Link, K. Müller, R. G. Lena, K. Luoma, F. Damanet, W. T. Strunz, and A. J. Daley, Non-Markovian quantum dynamics in strongly coupled multimode cavities conditioned on continuous measurement, PRX Quantum 3, 020348 (2022).
  44. M. Xu, V. Vadimov, M. Krug, J. T. Stockburger, and J. Ankerhold, A universal framework for quantum dissipation: Minimally extended state space and exact time-local dynamics, arXiv:2307.16790.
  45. M. Tokieda, Moment expansion method for composite open quantum systems including a damped oscillator mode, Phys. Rev. A 109, 062228 (2024).
  46. J. Feist, A. I. Fernández-Domínguez, and F. J. García-Vidal, Macroscopic QED for quantum nanophotonics: Emitter-centered modes as a minimal basis for multiemitter problems, Nanophotonics 10, 477 (2020).
  47. S. Ueno and Y. Tanimura, Modeling and simulating the excited-state dynamics of a system with condensed phases: A machine learning approach, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 3618 (2021).
  48. K. Nakamura and J. Ankerhold, Gate operations for superconducting qubits and non-Markovianity, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033215 (2024).
  49. N. Lorenzoni, T. Lacroix, J. Lim, D. Tamascelli, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Full microscopic simulations uncover persistent quantum effects in primary photosynthesis, Sci. Adv. 11, eady6751 (2025).
  50. F. Mascherpa, A. Smirne, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Open systems with error bounds: Spin-boson model with spectral density variations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 100401 (2017).
  51. Z. Huang, L. Lin, G. Park, and Y. Zhu, Unified analysis of non-Markovian open quantum systems in Gaussian environment using superoperator formalism, arXiv:2411.08741.
  52. H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, New York, 2002).
  53. Y. Tanimura, Real-time and imaginary-time quantum hierarchal Fokker-Planck equations, J. Chem. Phys. 142, 144110 (2015).
  54. S. Koyanagi and Y. Tanimura, Thermodynamic quantum Fokker–Planck equations and their application to thermostatic Stirling engine, J. Chem. Phys. 161, 112501 (2024).
  55. T. Ikeda and G. D. Scholes, Generalization of the hierarchical equations of motion theory for efficient calculations with arbitrary correlation functions, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 204101 (2020).
  56. M. Schröder, M. Schreiber, and U. Kleinekathöfer, Reduced dynamics of coupled harmonic and anharmonic oscillators using higher-order perturbation theory, J. Chem. Phys. 126, 114102 (2007).
  57. D. Zhang, L. Zuo, L. Ye, Z.-H. Chen, Y. Wang, R.-X. Xu, X. Zheng, and Y. Yan, Hierarchical equations of motion approach for accurate characterization of spin excitations in quantum impurity systems, J. Chem. Phys. 158, 014106 (2023).
  58. C. Meier and D. J. Tannor, Non-Markovian evolution of the density operator in the presence of strong laser fields, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 3365 (1999).
  59. Y. Nakatsukasa, O. Sète, and L. N. Trefethen, The AAA algorithm for rational approximation, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 40, A1494 (2018).
  60. M. Xu, Y. Yan, Q. Shi, J. Ankerhold, and J. T. Stockburger, Taming quantum noise for efficient low temperature simulations of open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 230601 (2022).
  61. I. Medina, F. J. García-Vidal, A. I. Fernández-Domínguez, and J. Feist, Few-mode field quantization of arbitrary electromagnetic spectral densities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 093601 (2021).
  62. M. Lednev, F. J. García-Vidal, and J. Feist, Lindblad master equation capable of describing hybrid quantum systems in the ultrastrong coupling regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 106902 (2024).
  63. L. Diósi and L. Ferialdi, General non-Markovian structure of Gaussian master and stochastic Schrödinger equations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 200403 (2014).
  64. N. Lambert, M. Cirio, J.-d. Lin, P. Menczel, P. Liang, and F. Nori, Fixing detailed balance in ancilla-based dissipative state engineering, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043229 (2024).
  65. K. Sun, M. Kang, H. Nuomin, G. Schwartz, D. N. Beratan, K. R. Brown, and J. Kim, Quantum simulation of spin-boson models with structured bath, Nat. Commun. 16, 4042 (2025).
  66. D. Potts and M. Tasche, Parameter estimation for nonincreasing exponentialsums by prony-like methods, Linear Algebra Appl. 439, 1024 (2013).
  67. H. Takahashi, S. Rudge, C. Kaspar, M. Thoss, and R. Borrelli, High accuracy exponential decomposition of bath correlation functions for arbitrary and structured spectral densities: Emerging methodologies and new approaches, J. Chem. Phys. 160, 204105 (2024).
  68. B. Le Dé, A. Jaouadi, E. Mangaud, A. W. Chin, and M. Desouter-Lecomte, Managing temperature in open quantum systems strongly coupled with structured environments, J. Chem. Phys. 160, 244102 (2024).
  69. N. Lambert, S. Ahmed, M. Cirio, and F. Nori, Modelling the ultra-strongly coupled spin-boson model with unphysical modes, Nat. Commun. 10, 3721 (2019).
  70. A. Trushechkin, Long-term in an exactly solvable model of pure decoherence and the problem of Markovian embedding, Mathematics 12, 1 (2024).
  71. To fully determine the equilibrium correlation functions in harmonic oscillator systems, we require Cpq(t)≡〈exp(iHtot×t/ℏ)(p)q〉eq, in addition to Cqq(t) and Cpp(t). They are related as ω0Cpq(t)=(d/dt)Cqq(t) and ω02Cpp(t)=−(d2/dt2)Cqq(t). From these relations, we assume that accurately describing Coo(t) (o=q,p) ensures an accurate description of Cpq(t).
  72. A. G. Redfield, On the theory of relaxation processes, IBM J. Res. Dev. 1, 19 (1957).
  73. I. S. Dunn, R. Tempelaar, and D. R. Reichman, Removing instabilities in the hierarchical equations of motion: Exact and approximate projection approaches, J. Chem. Phys. 150, 184109 (2019).
  74. M. Krug and J. Stockburger, On stability issues of the HEOM method, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 232, 3219 (2023).
  75. T. Ikeda and A. Nakayama, Collective bath coordinate mapping of “hierarchy” in hierarchical equations of motion, J. Chem. Phys. 156, 104104 (2022).
  76. M. D. Reed, B. R. Johnson, A. A. Houck, L. DiCarlo, J. M. Chow, D. I. Schuster, L. Frunzio, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Fast reset and suppressing spontaneous emission of a superconducting qubit, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 203110 (2010).
  77. L. Cui, H.-D. Zhang, X. Zheng, R.-X. Xu, and Y. Yan, Highly efficient and accurate sum-over-poles expansion of Fermi and Bose functions at near zero temperatures: Fano spectrum decomposition scheme, J. Chem. Phys. 151, 024110 (2019).
  78. H.-D. Zhang, L. Cui, H. Gong, R.-X. Xu, X. Zheng, and Y. Yan, Hierarchical equations of motion method based on Fano spectrum decomposition for low temperature environments, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 064107 (2020).
  79. M. Tokieda, Testing bath correlation functions for open quantum dynamics simulations—Data and code, Zenodo (2025), doi:10.5281/zenodo.15354105.
  80. V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems, J. Math. Phys. 17, 821 (1976).
  81. G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun. Math. Phys. 48, 119 (1976).
  82. G. Park, Z. Huang, Y. Zhu, C. Yang, G. K.-L. Chan, and L. Lin, Quasi-Lindblad pseudomode theory for open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B 110, 195148 (2024).
  83. S. Luo, N. Lambert, P. Liang, and M. Cirio, Quantum-classical decomposition of Gaussian quantum environments: A stochastic pseudomode model, PRX Quantum 4, 030316 (2023).
  84. P. Menczel, K. Funo, M. Cirio, N. Lambert, and F. Nori, Non-Hermitian pseudomodes for srongly coupled open quantum systems: Unravelings, correlations and thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033237 (2024).
  85. Y. Yan, Theory of open quantum systems with bath of electrons and phonons and spins: Many-dissipaton density approach, J. Chem. Phys. 140, 054105 (2014).
  86. Y. Yan, J. Jin, R.-X. Xu, and X. Zheng, Dissipation equation of motion approach to open quantum systems, Front. Phys. 11, 110306 (2016).
  87. F. Mascherpa, A. Smirne, A. D. Somoza, P. Fernández-Acebal, S. Donadi, D. Tamascelli, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Optimized auxiliary oscillators for the simulation of general open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 101, 052108 (2020).
  88. A. D. Somoza, O. Marty, J. Lim, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Dissipation-assisted matrix product factorization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 100502 (2019).
  89. J. Feist, Spectral density fitter for few-mode quantization, https://github.com/jfeist/spectral_density_fit.
  90. C. H. Fleming, A. Roura, and B. L. Hu, Exact analytical solutions to the master equation of quantum Brownian motion for a general environment, Ann. Phys. 326, 1207 (2011).
  91. J. Barr, G. Zicari, A. Ferraro, and M. Paternostro, J. Barr, G. Zicari, and A. Ferraro, Spectral density classification for environment spectroscopy, Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 5, 015043 (2024).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043178– Published 18 November, 2025
  • Received 7 May 2025
  • Accepted 23 October 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation