- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Scaling of pseudospectra in exponentially sensitive lattices

Ioannis Kiorpelidis and Konstantinos G. Makris

PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 7, L032043 – Published 22 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.L032043

Abstract

One of the important features of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians is the existence of a unique type of singularities, the so-called exceptional points (EPs). When the corresponding systems operate around such singularities, they exhibit ultrasensitive behavior that has no analog in conservative systems. An alternative way to realize such ultra-sensitivity relies on asymmetric couplings. Here we provide a comprehensive analysis based on pseudospectra, that shows the origin of exponential sensitivity, without relying on topological zero modes or the localization of all eigenstates (skin effect), but on the underlying extreme lattice non-normality. In particular, we consider four different types of lattices (Hatano-Nelson, Sylvester-Kac, non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger and a non-Hermitian random lattice) and identify the conditions for exponential sensitivity as a function of the lattice size. Complex and structured pseudospectra reveal the signatures of exponential sensitivity both on the eigenvalue spectra and on the underlying dynamics. Our study, may open new directions on studies related to the exploitation of non-normality for constructing ultra-sensitive systems that do not rely on the existence of EPs.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (64)

  1. N. Moiseyev, Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2011).
  2. W. D. Heiss, Exceptional points of non-Hermitian operators, J. Phys. A 37, 2455 (2004).
  3. M. V. Berry, Physics of nonHermitian degeneracies, Czech. J. Phys. 54, 1039 (2004).
  4. T. Stehmann, W. D. Heiss, and F. G. Scholtz, Observation of exceptional points in electronic circuits, J. Phys. A 37, 7813 (2004).
  5. C. Dembowski, H. D. Gräf, H. L. Harney, A. Heine, W. D. Heiss, H. Rehfeld, and A. Richter, Experimental observation of the topological structure of exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 787 (2001).
  6. C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non-Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998).
  7. R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, D. N. Christodoulides, and Z. H. Musslimani, Theory of coupled optical PT-symmetric structures, Opt. Lett. 32, 2632 (2007).
  8. K. G. Makris, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and Z. H. Musslimani, Beam dynamics in PT symmetric optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 103904 (2008).
  9. Z. H. Musslimani, K. G. Makris, R. El-Ganainy, and D. N. Christodoulides, Optical solitons in PT periodic potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 030402 (2008).
  10. K. G. Makris, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and Z. H. Musslimani, PT-symmetric optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A 81, 063807 (2010).
  11. A. Guo, G. J. Salamo, D. Duchesne, R. Morandotti, M. Volatier-Ravat, V. Aimez, G. A. Siviloglou, and D. N. Christodoulides, Observation of PT-symmetry breaking in complex optical potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 093902 (2009).
  12. C. E. Rüter, K. G. Makris, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, M. Segev, and D. Kip, Observation of parity-time symmetry in optics, Nat. Phys. 6, 192 (2010).
  13. J. Wiersig, Sensors operating at exceptional points: General theory, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033809 (2016).
  14. J. Wiersig, Enhancing the sensitivity of frequency and energy splitting detection by using exceptional points: Application to microcavity sensors for single-particle detection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 203901 (2014).
  15. H. Hodaei, A. U. Hassan, S. Wittek, H. Garcia-Gracia, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points, Nature (London) 548, 187 (2017).
  16. W. Chen, Ş. K. Özdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity, Nature (London) 548, 192 (2017).
  17. M. P. Hokmabadi, A. Schumer, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Non-Hermitian ring laser gyroscopes with enhanced Sagnac sensitivity, Nature (London) 576, 70 (2019).
  18. H. Hodaei, M. A. Miri, M. Heinrich, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Parity-time–symmetric microring lasers, Science 346, 975 (2014).
  19. T. E. Lee, Anomalous edge state in a non-Hermitian lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 133903 (2016).
  20. X. Zhang, T. Zhang, M. H. Lu, and Y. F. Chen, A review on non-Hermitian skin effect, Adv. Phys. 7, 2109431 (2022).
  21. V. M. Martinez Alvarez, J. E. Barrios Vargas, and L. E. F. Foa Torres, Non-Hermitian robust edge states in one dimension: Anomalous localization and eigenspace condensation at exceptional points, Phys. Rev. B 97, 121401(R) (2018).
  22. N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization transitions in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 570 (1996).
  23. N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Vortex pinning and non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. B 56, 8651 (1997).
  24. S. Weidemann, M. Kremer, T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, A. Stegmaier, M. Greiter, R. Thomale, and A. Szameit, Topological funneling of light, Science 368, 311 (2020).
  25. Y. G. N. Liu, Y. Wei, O. Hemmatyar, G. G. Pyrialakos, P. S. Jung, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Complex skin modes in non-Hermitian coupled laser arrays, Light Sci. Appl. 11, 336 (2022).
  26. Z. Gao, X. Qiao, M. Pan, S. Wu, J. Yim, K. Chen, B. Midya, L. Ge, and L. Feng, Two-dimensional reconfigurable non-Hermitian gauged laser array, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 263801 (2023).
  27. C. R. Leefmans, M. Parto, J. Williams, G. H. Y. Li, A. Dutt, F. Nori, and A. Marandi, Topological temporally mode-locked laser, Nat. Phys. 20, 852 (2024).
  28. Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Higashikawa, and M. Ueda, Topological phases of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031079 (2018).
  29. K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Symmetry and topology in non-Hermitian physics, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041015 (2019).
  30. S. Weimann, M. Kremer, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, S. Nolte, K. G. Makris, M. Segev, M. Rechtsman, and A. Szameit, Topologically protected bound states in photonic parity–time-symmetric crystals, Nat. Mater. 16, 433 (2017).
  31. M. Bandres, S. Wittek, G. Harari, M. Parto, J. Ren, M. Segev, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Topological insulator laser: Experiments, Science 359, eaar4005 (2018).
  32. S. Xia, D. Kaltsas, D. Song, I. Komis, J. Xu, A. Szameit, H. Buljan, K. G. Makris, and Z. Chen, Nonlinear tuning of PT symmetry and non-Hermitian topological states, Science 372, 72 (2021).
  33. N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Topological origin of non-Hermitian skin effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 086801 (2020).
  34. J. C. Budich and E. J. Bergholtz, Non-Hermitian topological sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 180403 (2020).
  35. A. McDonald and A. A. Clerk, Exponentially-enhanced quantum sensing with non-Hermitian lattice dynamics, Nat. Commun. 11, 5382 (2020).
  36. F. Koch and J. C. Budich, Quantum non-Hermitian topological sensors, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013113 (2022).
  37. L. Bao, B. Qi, and D. Dong, Exponentially enhanced quantum non-Hermitian sensing via optimized coherent drive, Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 014034 (2022).
  38. R. Zhang and T. Chen, True exponentially enhanced sensing in the non-Hermitian topological phase, Appl. Phys. Lett. 124, 174002 (2024).
  39. Y. O. Nakai, N. Okuma, D. Nakamura, K. Shimomura, and M. Sato, Topological enhancement of non-normality in non-Hermitian skin effects, Phys. Rev. B 109, 144203 (2024).
  40. H. Yuan, W. Zhang, Z. Zhou, W. Wang, N. Pan, Y. Feng, H. Sun, and X. Zhang, Non-Hermitian topolectrical circuit sensor with high sensitivity, Adv. Sci. 10, 2301128 (2023).
  41. M. Parto, C. Leefmans, J. Williams, and A. Marandi, Enhanced sensitivity via non-Hermitian topology, Light Sci. Appl. 14, 6 (2025).
  42. L. Bao, B. Qi, F. Nori, and D. Dong, Exponential sensitivity revival of noisy non-Hermitian quantum sensing with two-photon drives, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023216 (2024).
  43. A. Maddi, Y. Aurégan, G. Penelet, V. Pagneux, and V. Achilleos, Exact analog of the Hatano-Nelson model in one-dimensional continuous nonreciprocal systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L012061 (2024).
  44. L. N. Trefethen and M. Embree, Spectra and Pseudospectra (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2005).
  45. L. N. Trefethen, A. E. Trefethen, S. C. Reddy, and T. A. Driscoll, Hydrodynamic stability without eigenvalues, Science 261, 578 (1993).
  46. P. J. Schmid, Nonmodal stability theory, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39, 129 (2007).
  47. S. Longhi and P. Laporta, Excess noise in intracavity laser frequency modulation, Phys. Rev. E 61, R989 (2000).
  48. F. Papoff, G. D'Alessandro, and G. L. Oppo, State dependent pseudoresonances and excess noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 123905 (2008).
  49. K. G. Makris, L. Ge, and H. E. Türeci, Anomalous transient amplification of waves in non-normal photonic media, Phys. Rev. X 4, 041044 (2014).
  50. K. G. Makris, Transient amplification due to non-Hermitian interference of dissipative supermodes, Appl. Phys. Lett. 125, 011102 (2024).
  51. K. G. Makris, Transient growth and dissipative exceptional points, Phys. Rev. E 104, 054218 (2021).
  52. I. Komis, D. Kaltsas, S. Xia, H. Buljan, Z. Chen, and K. G. Makris, Robustness versus sensitivity in non-Hermitian topological lattices probed by pseudospectra, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043219 (2022).
  53. N. Okuma and M. Sato, Non-Hermitian topological phenomena: A review, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 83 (2023).
  54. N. Okuma and M. Sato, Hermitian zero modes protected by nonnormality: Application of pseudospectra, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014203 (2020).
  55. I. Kiorpelidis, F. K. Diakonos, G. Theocharis, and V. Pagneux, Transient amplification in stable Floquet media, Phys. Rev. B 110, 134315 (2024).
  56. O. Taussky and J. Todd, Another look at a matrix of Mark Kac, Linear Algebra Appl. 150, 341 (1991).
  57. G. M. L. Gladwell, T. H. Jones, and N. B. Willms, A test matrix for an inverse eigenvalue problem, J. Appl. Math. 2014, 1 (2014).
  58. S. Lieu, Topological phases in the non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model, Phys. Rev. B 97, 045106 (2018).
  59. S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invariants of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018).
  60. N. Guglielmi and C. Lubich, Transient dynamics under structured perturbations: Bridging unstructured and structured pseudospectra, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 63, 908 (2025).
  61. A. Böttcher, M. Embree, and V. I. Sokolov, The spectra of large Toeplitz band matrices with a randomly perturbed entry, Math. Comput. 72, 1329 (2003).
  62. S. Graillat, A note on structured pseudospectra, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 191, 68 (2006).
  63. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.L032043 for details on the models and additional results and figures supporting the main text.
  64. The matrix 2-norm is defined as ||A||=maxψ0||Aψ0||||ψ0|| where ||ψ0|| is the Euclidean norm of the vector ψ0.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 7, L032043– Published 22 August, 2025
  • Received 11 September 2024
  • Revised 24 January 2025
  • Accepted 1 May 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation