- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Magnon spectra of cuprates beyond spin wave theory

Jiahui Bao1,*, Matthias Gohlke1, Jeffrey G. Rau2, and Nic Shannon1

  • *Contact author: jiahui.bao@oist.jp
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 7, L012053 – Published 4 March, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.L012053

Abstract

The usual starting point for understanding magnons in cuprate antiferromagnets such as La2CuO4 is a spin model incorporating cyclic exchange, which descends from a one-band Hubbard model, and has parameters taken from fits based on non-interacting spin wave theory. Here we explore whether this provides a reliable description of experiment, using matrix product states (MPS) to calculate magnon spectra beyond spin wave theory. We find that analysis based on low orders of spin wave theory leads to systematic overestimates of exchange parameters, with corresponding errors in estimates of Hubbard t/U. Once these are corrected, the “standard” model provides a good account of magnon dispersion and lineshape in La2CuO4, but fails to fully capture the continuum observed at high energies. The extension of this analysis to CaCuO2 and Sr2IrO4 is also discussed.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (83)

  1. S. Chakravarty, B. I. Halperin, and D. R. Nelson, Two-dimensional quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet at low temperatures, Phys. Rev. B 39, 2344 (1989).
  2. J. G. Bednorz and K. A. Müller, Possible high Tc superconductivity in the Ba-La-Cu-O system, Z. Phys. B 64, 189 (1986).
  3. P. W. Anderson, The resonating valence bond state in La2CuO4 and superconductivity, Science 235, 1196 (1987).
  4. S. M. Hayden, G. Aeppli, R. Osborn, A. D. Taylor, T. G. Perring, S.-W. Cheong, and Z. Fisk, High-energy spin waves in La2CuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3622 (1991).
  5. C. Gros, R. Joynt, and T. M. Rice, Antiferromagnetic correlations in almost-localized Fermi liquids, Phys. Rev. B 36, 381 (1987).
  6. R. Coldea, S. M. Hayden, G. Aeppli, T. G. Perring, C. D. Frost, T. E. Mason, S.-W. Cheong, and Z. Fisk, Spin waves and electronic interactions in La2CuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5377 (2001).
  7. A. A. Katanin and A. P. Kampf, Spin excitations in La2CuO4: Consistent description by inclusion of ring exchange, Phys. Rev. B 66, 100403(R) (2002).
  8. A. M. Toader, J. P. Goff, M. Roger, N. Shannon, J. R. Stewart, and M. Enderle, Spin correlations in the paramagnetic phase and ring exchange in La2CuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 197202 (2005).
  9. N. S. Headings, S. M. Hayden, R. Coldea, and T. G. Perring, Anomalous high-energy spin excitations in the high-Tc superconductor-parent antiferromagnet La2CuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 247001 (2010).
  10. M. P. M. Dean, R. S. Springell, C. Monney, K. J. Zhou, J. Pereiro, I. Božović, B. Dalla Piazza, H. M. Rønnow, E. Morenzoni, J. Van Den Brink et al., Spin excitations in a single La2CuO4 layer, Nat. Mater. 11, 850 (2012).
  11. S. Yamamoto and Y. Noriki, Spin-wave thermodynamics of square-lattice antiferromagnets revisited, Phys. Rev. B 99, 094412 (2019).
  12. H. C. Robarts, M. García-Fernández, J. Li, A. Nag, A. C. Walters, N. E. Headings, S. M. Hayden, and K.-J. Zhou, Dynamical spin susceptibility in La2CuO4 studied by resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. B 103, 224427 (2021).
  13. M. Takahashi, Half-filled Hubbard model at low temperature, J. Phys. C 10, 1289 (1977).
  14. A. H. MacDonald, S. M. Girvin, and D. Yoshioka, tU expansion for the Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 37, 9753 (1988).
  15. M. Roger and J. M. Delrieu, Cyclic four-spin exchange on a two-dimensional square lattice: Possible applications in high-Tc superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 39, 2299 (1989).
  16. A. H. MacDonald, S. M. Girvin, and D. Yoshioka, Reply to “Comment on ‘t/u expansion for the Hubbard model”', Phys. Rev. B 41, 2565 (1990).
  17. L. Martinelli, D. Betto, K. Kummer, R. Arpaia, L. Braicovich, D. Di Castro, N. B. Brookes, M. Moretti Sala, and G. Ghiringhelli, Fractional spin excitations in the infinite-layer cuprate CaCuO2, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021041 (2022).
  18. Y. Y. Peng, G. Dellea, M. Minola, M. Conni, A. Amorese, D. Di Castro, G. M. De Luca, K. Kummer, M. Salluzzo, X. Sun et al., Influence of apical oxygen on the extent of in-plane exchange interaction in cuprate superconductors, Nat. Phys. 13, 1201 (2017).
  19. Q. Wang, S. Mustafi, E. Fogh, N. Astrakhantsev, Z. He, I. Biało, Y. Chan, L. Martinelli, M. Horio et al., Magnon interactions in a moderately correlated Mott insulator, Nat. Commun. 15, 5348 (2024).
  20. J. Bertinshaw, Y. K. Kim, G. Khaliullin, and B. J. Kim, Square lattice iridates, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 315 (2019).
  21. C. Lu and J.-M. Liu, The Jeff = 1/2 antiferromagnet Sr2IrO4: A golden avenue toward new physics and functions, Adv. Mater. 32, 1904508 (2020).
  22. J. Kim, D. Casa, M. H. Upton, T. Gog, Y.-J. Kim, J. F. Mitchell, M. van Veenendaal, M. Daghofer, J. van den Brink, G. Khaliullin, and B. J. Kim, Magnetic excitation spectra of Sr2IrO4 probed by resonant inelastic x-ray scattering: Establishing links to cuprate superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 177003 (2012).
  23. J. G. Vale, S. Boseggia, H. C. Walker, R. Springell, Z. Feng, E. C. Hunter, R. S. Perry, D. Prabhakaran, A. T. Boothroyd, S. P. Collins, H. M. Rønnow, and D. F. McMorrow, Importance of XY anisotropy in Sr2IrO4 revealed by magnetic critical scattering experiments, Phys. Rev. B 92, 020406(R) (2015).
  24. D. Pincini, J. G. Vale, C. Donnerer, A. de la Torre, E. C. Hunter, R. Perry, M. Moretti Sala, F. Baumberger, and D. F. McMorrow, Anisotropic exchange and spin-wave damping in pure and electron-doped Sr2IrO4, Phys. Rev. B 96, 075162 (2017).
  25. R. Chi, Y. Liu, Y. Wan, H.-J. Liao, and T. Xiang, Spin excitation spectra of anisotropic spin-1/2 triangular lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 227201 (2022).
  26. R. R. P. Singh and M. P. Gelfand, Spin-wave excitation spectra and spectral weights in square lattice antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 52, R15695 (1995).
  27. O. F. Syljuåsen and H. M. Rønnow, Quantum renormalization of high-energy excitations in the 2D Heisenberg model, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 12, L405 (2000).
  28. A. W. Sandvik and R. R. P. Singh, High-energy magnon dispersion and multimagnon continuum in the two-dimensional Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 528 (2001).
  29. A. Lüscher and A. M. Läuchli, Exact diagonalization study of the antiferromagnetic spin-12 Heisenberg model on the square lattice in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 79, 195102 (2009).
  30. M. Powalski, G. S. Uhrig, and K. P. Schmidt, Roton minimum as a fingerprint of magnon-Higgs scattering in ordered quantum antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 207202 (2015).
  31. H. Shao, Y. Q. Qin, S. Capponi, S. Chesi, Z. Y. Meng, and A. W. Sandvik, Nearly deconfined spinon excitations in the square-lattice spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041072 (2017).
  32. A. Masaki-Kato, Quantum Monte Carlo study of bosonic quantum liquid (2017), https://www.hpci-office.jp/output/hp170213/resume_e.pdf?1624071169.
  33. R. Verresen, F. Pollmann, and R. Moessner, Quantum dynamics of the square-lattice Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. B 98, 155102 (2018).
  34. H. M. Rønnow, D. F. McMorrow, R. Coldea, A. Harrison, I. D. Youngson, T. G. Perring, G. Aeppli, O. Syljuåsen, K. Lefmann, and C. Rischel, Spin dynamics of the 2D spin-12 quantum antiferromagnet copper deuteroformate tetradeuterate (CFTD), Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037202 (2001).
  35. N. B. Christensen, H. M. Rønnow, D. F. McMorrow, A. Harrison, T. G. Perring, M. Enderle, R. Coldea, L. P. Regnault, and G. Aeppli, Quantum dynamics and entanglement of spins on a square lattice, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15264 (2007).
  36. B. D. Piazza, M. Mourigal, N. B. Christensen, G. J. Nilsen, P. L. W. Tregenna-Piggott, T. G. Perring, M. Enderle, D. F. McMorrow, D. A. Ivanov, and H. M. Rønnow, Fractional excitations in the square lattice quantum antiferromagnet, Nat. Phys. 11, 62 (2015).
  37. M. Hirayama, Y. Yamaji, T. Misawa, and M. Imada, Ab initio effective Hamiltonians for cuprate superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 98, 134501 (2018).
  38. M. Hirayama, T. Misawa, T. Ohgoe, Y. Yamaji, and M. Imada, Effective Hamiltonian for cuprate superconductors derived from multiscale ab initio scheme with level renormalization, Phys. Rev. B 99, 245155 (2019).
  39. M. T. Schmid, J.-B. Morée, R. Kaneko, Y. Yamaji, and M. Imada, Superconductivity studied by solving ab initio low-energy effective Hamiltonians for carrier doped CaCuO2, Bi2Sr2CuO6, Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8, and HgBa2CuO4, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041036 (2023).
  40. N. Kowalski, S. S. Dash, P. Sémon, D. Sénéchal, and A.-M. Tremblay, Oxygen hole content, charge-transfer gap, covalency, and cuprate superconductivity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2106476118 (2021).
  41. S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
  42. U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys. 326, 96 (2011).
  43. J. Haegeman, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, I. Pižorn, H. Verschelde, and F. Verstraete, Time-dependent variational principle for quantum lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 070601 (2011).
  44. J. Haegeman, C. Lubich, I. Oseledets, B. Vandereycken, and F. Verstraete, Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 94, 165116 (2016).
  45. M. Gohlke, R. Verresen, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Dynamics of the Kitaev-Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 157203 (2017).
  46. L. Vanderstraeten, J. Haegeman, and F. Verstraete, Tangent-space methods for uniform matrix product states, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes, 7 (2019).
  47. J. Hauschild and F. Pollmann, Efficient numerical simulations with Tensor Networks: Tensor Network Python (TeNPy), SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes, 5 (2018).
  48. P. Dirac, Quantum mechanics of many electron systems, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 123, 714 (1929).
  49. D. J. Thouless, Exchange in solid 3he and the Heisenberg Hamiltonian, Proc. Phys. Soc. 86, 893 (1965).
  50. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.L012053 for a derivation of the spin model from the Hubbard model; a description of the numerical simulations along with convergence checks; and an extended spin wave theory analysis.
  51. J.-Y. P. Delannoy, M. J. P. Gingras, P. C. W. Holdsworth, and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Néel order, ring exchange, and charge fluctuations in the half-filled Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 72, 115114 (2005).
  52. B. Lake, D. A. Tennant, J.-S. Caux, T. Barthel, U. Schollwöck, S. E. Nagler, and C. D. Frost, Multispinon continua at zero and finite temperature in a near-ideal Heisenberg chain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 137205 (2013).
  53. H. N. Phien, G. Vidal, and I. P. McCulloch, Infinite boundary conditions for matrix product state calculations, Phys. Rev. B 86, 245107 (2012).
  54. H.-C. Jiang, H. Yao, and L. Balents, Spin liquid ground state of the spin-12 square J1−J2 Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. B 86, 024424 (2012).
  55. C. B. Larsen, A. T. Rømer, S. Janas, F. Treue, B. Mønsted, N. E. Shaik, H. M. Rønnow, and K. Lefmann, Exact diagonalization study of the Hubbard-parametrized four-spin ring exchange model on a square lattice, Phys. Rev. B 99, 054432 (2019).
  56. R. R. P. Singh, Thermodynamic parameters of the T = 0, spin-1/2 square-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 39, 9760 (1989).
  57. J.-I. Igarashi, 1/S expansion for thermodynamic quantities in a two-dimensional Heisenberg antiferromagnet at zero temperature, Phys. Rev. B 46, 10763 (1992).
  58. M. Reehuis, C. Ulrich, K. Prokeš, A. Gozar, G. Blumberg, S. Komiya, Y. Ando, P. Pattison, and B. Keimer, Crystal structure and high-field magnetism of La2CuO4, Phys. Rev. B 73, 144513 (2006).
  59. Downfolding from the Hubbard model to an effective spin model, both the Hamiltonian and the physical observables acquire corrections in powers of t/U [14, 82] due to charge fluctuations. These operator corrections can modify the expected value of observables such as the staggered magnetization [51] and vary with t/U. For the static or dynamical structure factor S(q,ω), an overall renormalization factor (1−4γq(1)(t/U)2) has been reported [83]. However, given the small effect on the intensities (≲5%) such a factor has at the t/U values of interest, we have not included it in our calculations.
  60. L. Braicovich, J. van den Brink, V. Bisogni, M. M. Sala, L. J. P. Ament, N. B. Brookes, G. M. De Luca, M. Salluzzo, T. Schmitt, V. N. Strocov, and G. Ghiringhelli, Magnetic excitations and phase separation in the underdoped La2−xSrxCuO4 superconductor measured by resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 077002 (2010).
  61. D. Betto, R. Fumagalli, L. Martinelli, M. Rossi, R. Piombo, K. Yoshimi, D. Di Castro, E. Di Gennaro, A. Sambri, D. Bonn, G. A. Sawatzky, L. Braicovich, N. B. Brookes, J. Lorenzana, and G. Ghiringhelli, Multiple-magnon excitations shape the spin spectrum of cuprate parent compounds, Phys. Rev. B 103, L140409 (2021).
  62. C.-M. Ho, V. N. Muthukumar, M. Ogata, and P. W. Anderson, Nature of spin excitations in two-dimensional Mott insulators: Undoped cuprates and other materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1626 (2001).
  63. M. Powalski, K. P. Schmidt, and G. S. Uhrig, Mutually attracting spin waves in the square-lattice quantum antiferromagnet, SciPost Phys. 4, 001 (2018).
  64. L. Braicovich, L. J. P. Ament, V. Bisogni, F. Forte, C. Aruta, G. Balestrino, N. B. Brookes, G. M. De Luca, P. G. Medaglia, F. M. Granozio, M. Radovic, M. Salluzzo, J. van den Brink, and G. Ghiringhelli, Dispersion of magnetic excitations in the cuprate La2CuO4 and CaCuO2 compounds measured using resonant x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 167401 (2009).
  65. S. Fujiyama, H. Ohsumi, T. Komesu, J. Matsuno, B. J. Kim, M. Takata, T. Arima, and H. Takagi, Two-dimensional Heisenberg behavior of Jeff=1/2 isospins in the paramagnetic state of the spin-orbital Mott insulator Sr2IrO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 247212 (2012).
  66. B. J. Kim, H. Jin, S. J. Moon, J.-Y. Kim, B.-G. Park, C. S. Leem, J. Yu, T. W. Noh, C. Kim, S.-J. Oh, J.-H. Park, V. Durairaj, G. Cao, and E. Rotenberg, Novel Jeff=1/2 Mott state induced by relativistic spin-orbit coupling in Sr2IrO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 076402 (2008).
  67. G. Jackeli and G. Khaliullin, Mott insulators in the strong spin-orbit coupling limit: From Heisenberg to a quantum compass and Kitaev models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 017205 (2009).
  68. F. Wang and T. Senthil, Twisted Hubbard model for Sr2IrO4: Magnetism and possible high temperature superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 136402 (2011).
  69. C. J. Hamer, Z. Weihong, and P. Arndt, Third-order spin-wave theory for the Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 46, 6276 (1992).
  70. Z. Weihong and C. J. Hamer, Spin-wave theory and finite-size scaling for the Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 47, 7961 (1993).
  71. J.-I. Igarashi and T. Nagao, 1/S-expansion study of spin waves in a two-dimensional Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 72, 014403 (2005).
  72. M. E. Zhitomirsky and A. L. Chernyshev, Colloquium: Spontaneous magnon decays, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 219 (2013).
  73. J.-Y. P. Delannoy, M. J. P. Gingras, P. C. W. Holdsworth, and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Low-energy theory of the t−t′−t″−U Hubbard model at half-filling: Interaction strengths in cuprate superconductors and an effective spin-only description of La2CuO4, Phys. Rev. B 79, 235130 (2009).
  74. M. Qin, C.-M. Chung, H. Shi, E. Vitali, C. Hubig, U. Schollwöck, S. R. White, and S. Zhang, Absence of superconductivity in the pure two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031016 (2020).
  75. H. Xu, C.-M. Chung, M. Qin, U. Schollwöck, S. R. White, and S. Zhang, Coexistence of superconductivity with partially filled stripes in the Hubbard model, Science 384, eadh7691 (2024).
  76. T. Thio, T. R. Thurston, N. W. Preyer, P. J. Picone, M. A. Kastner, H. P. Jenssen, D. R. Gabbe, C. Y. Chen, R. J. Birgeneau, and A. Aharony, Antisymmetric exchange and its influence on the magnetic structure and conductivity of La2CuO4, Phys. Rev. B 38, 905 (1988).
  77. D. Coffey, K. S. Bedell, and S. A. Trugman, Effective spin Hamiltonian for the CuO planes in La2CuO4 and metamagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 42, 6509 (1990).
  78. L. Shekhtman, O. Entin-Wohlman, and A. Aharony, Moriya's anisotropic superexchange interaction, frustration, and Dzyaloshinsky's weak ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 836 (1992).
  79. V. V. Mazurenko and V. I. Anisimov, Weak ferromagnetism in antiferromagnets: α−Fe2O3 and La2CuO4, Phys. Rev. B 71, 184434 (2005).
  80. F. C. Zhang and T. M. Rice, Effective Hamiltonian for the superconducting Cu oxides, Phys. Rev. B 37, 3759 (1988).
  81. A. A. Aligia, Calculation of the four-spin cyclic exchange in cuprates, Phys. Rev. B 98, 125118 (2018).
  82. C. Knetter, K. P. Schmidt, and G. S. Uhrig, The structure of operators in effective particle-conserving models, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36, 7889 (2003).
  83. J.-Y. Delannoy, La2CuO4 Magnétisme et Dilution, Ph.D. thesis, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, 2005.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 7, L012053– Published 4 March, 2025
  • Received 31 July 2024
  • Accepted 7 February 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation