Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Classical Z2 spin liquid on the generalized four-color Kitaev model

Han Yan (闫寒)1,* and Rico Pohle2,3,4,†

  • *Contact author: hanyan@issp.u-tokyo.ac.jp
  • †Contact author: rico.pohle@tohoku.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. Research 7, L012052 – Published 4 March, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.L012052

Abstract

While U(1) spin liquids have been extensively studied in both quantum and classical regimes, exact classical Z2 spin liquids arising from models with nearest-neighbor, bilinear spin interactions are still rare. In this Letter, we explore the four-color Kitaev model as a minimal model for stabilizing classical Z2 spin liquids across a broad family of tricoordinated lattices. By formulating a Z2 lattice gauge theory, we identify this spin liquid as being described by an emergent Gauss's law with effective charge-2 condensation, and deconfined fractionalized bond-charge excitations. We complement our findings with Monte Carlo simulations, revealing a crossover from a high-temperature paramagnet to a low-temperature liquid phase characterized by residual entropy, classical Z2 flux order, and diffuse spin structure factors.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (74)

  1. F. J. Wegner, Duality in generalized Ising models and phase transitions without local order parameters, J. Math. Phys. 12, 2259 (1971).
  2. A. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Ann. Phys. (NY) 303, 2 (2003).
  3. A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond, Ann. Phys. (NY) 321, 2 (2006).
  4. G. Baskaran, D. Sen, and R. Shankar, Spin-S Kitaev model: Classical ground states, order from disorder, and exact correlation functions, Phys. Rev. B 78, 115116 (2008).
  5. R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, Resonating valence bond phase in the triangular lattice quantum dimer model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1881 (2001).
  6. A. Ralko, M. Ferrero, F. Becca, D. Ivanov, and F. Mila, Zero-temperature properties of the quantum dimer model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 71, 224109 (2005).
  7. G. Misguich, D. Serban, and V. Pasquier, Quantum dimer model on the kagome lattice: Solvable dimer-liquid and Ising gauge theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 137202 (2002).
  8. C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083 (2008).
  9. T. Senthil and M. P. A. Fisher, Z2 gauge theory of electron fractionalization in strongly correlated systems, Phys. Rev. B 62, 7850 (2000).
  10. P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Doping a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 17 (2006).
  11. X.-G. Wen, Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Systems: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007).
  12. N. Davier, F. A. Gómez Albarracín, H. D. Rosales, and P. Pujol, Combined approach to analyze and classify families of classical spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B 108, 054408 (2023).
  13. H. Yan, O. Benton, R. Moessner, and A. H. Nevidomskyy, Classification of classical spin liquids: Typology and resulting landscape, Phys. Rev. B 110, L020402 (2024).
  14. H. Yan, O. Benton, A. H. Nevidomskyy, and R. Moessner, Classification of classical spin liquids: Detailed formalism and suite of examples, Phys. Rev. B 109, 174421 (2024).
  15. Y. Fang, J. Cano, A. H. Nevidomskyy, and H. Yan, Classification of classical spin liquids: Topological quantum chemistry and crystalline symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 110, 054421 (2024).
  16. L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature (London) 464, 199 (2010).
  17. L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 016502 (2017).
  18. Y. Zhou, K. Kanoda, and T.-K. Ng, Quantum spin liquid states, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 025003 (2017).
  19. M. J. Harris, S. T. Bramwell, D. F. McMorrow, T. Zeiske, and K. W. Godfrey, Geometrical frustration in the ferromagnetic pyrochlore Ho2Ti2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2554 (1997).
  20. R. Moessner and J. T. Chalker, Properties of a classical spin liquid: the Heisenberg pyrochlore antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2929 (1998).
  21. R. Moessner and J. T. Chalker, Low-temperature properties of classical geometrically frustrated antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 58, 12049 (1998).
  22. M. Udagawa and L. Jaubert, Spin Ice (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021).
  23. M. Hermele, M. P. A. Fisher, and L. Balents, Pyrochlore photons: The U(1) spin liquid in a S=12 three-dimensional frustrated magnet, Phys. Rev. B 69, 064404 (2004).
  24. N. Shannon, O. Sikora, F. Pollmann, K. Penc, and P. Fulde, Quantum ice: A quantum Monte Carlo study, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 067204 (2012).
  25. O. Benton, O. Sikora, and N. Shannon, Seeing the light: Experimental signatures of emergent electromagnetism in a quantum spin ice, Phys. Rev. B 86, 075154 (2012).
  26. A. Keesling, A. Omran, H. Levine, H. Bernien, H. Pichler, S. Choi, R. Samajdar, S. Schwartz, P. Silvi, S. Sachdev et al., Quantum Kibble-Zurek mechanism and critical dynamics on a programmable Rydberg simulator, Nature (London) 568, 207 (2019).
  27. R. Samajdar, W. W. Ho, H. Pichler, M. D. Lukin, and S. Sachdev, Quantum phases of Rydberg atoms on a kagome lattice, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2015785118 (2021).
  28. R. Verresen, M. D. Lukin, and A. Vishwanath, Prediction of toric code topological order from Rydberg blockade, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031005 (2021).
  29. G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kalinowski, R. Samajdar et al., Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator, Science 374, 1242 (2021).
  30. S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pichler, W. W. Ho et al., Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator, Nature (London) 595, 227 (2021).
  31. S. Sachdev and M. Vojta, Translational symmetry breaking in two-dimensional antiferromagnets and superconductors, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 99, 1 (1999).
  32. R. Moessner and K. S. Raman, Quantum dimer models, in Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism: Materials, Experiments, Theory, edited by C. Lacroix, P. Mendels, and F. Mila (Springer, Berlin, 2011), pp. 437–479.
  33. R. Verresen and A. Vishwanath, Unifying Kitaev magnets, kagomé dimer models, and Ruby Rydberg spin liquids, Phys. Rev. X 12, 041029 (2022).
  34. J. Rehn, A. Sen, and R. Moessner, Fractionalized Z2 classical Heisenberg spin liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 047201 (2017).
  35. J. Rehn, A. Sen, K. Damle, and R. Moessner, Classical spin liquid on the maximally frustrated honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 167201 (2016).
  36. R. Pohle, N. Shannon, and Y. Motome, Spin nematics meet spin liquids: Exotic quantum phases in the spin-1 bilinear-biquadratic model with Kitaev interactions, Phys. Rev. B 107, L140403 (2023).
  37. R. Pohle, N. Shannon, and Y. Motome, Eight-color chiral spin liquid in the S=1 bilinear-biquadratic model with Kitaev interactions, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033077 (2024).
  38. J. Ashkin and E. Teller, Statistics of two-dimensional lattices with four components, Phys. Rev. 64, 178 (1943).
  39. J. Kondev and C. L. Henley, Four-coloring model on the square lattice: A critical ground state, Phys. Rev. B 52, 6628 (1995).
  40. V. Khemani, R. Moessner, S. A. Parameswaran, and S. L. Sondhi, Bionic Coulomb phase on the pyrochlore lattice, Phys. Rev. B 86, 054411 (2012).
  41. G.-W. Chern and C. Wu, Four-coloring model and frustrated superfluidity in the diamond lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 020601 (2014).
  42. D. Lozano-Gómez, Y. Iqbal, and M. Vojta, A classical chiral spin liquid from chiral interactions on the pyrochlore lattice, Nat. Commun. 15, 10162 (2024).
  43. D. A. Huse, W. Krauth, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Coulomb and liquid dimer models in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 167004 (2003).
  44. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
  45. E. Dennis, A. Kitaev, A. Landahl, and J. Preskill, Topological quantum memory, J. Math. Phys. 43, 4452 (2002).
  46. R. H. Swendsen and J.-S. Wang, Replica Monte Carlo simulation of spin-glasses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2607 (1986).
  47. R. Pohle, O. Benton, and L. D. C. Jaubert, Reentrance of disorder in the anisotropic shuriken Ising model, Phys. Rev. B 94, 014429 (2016).
  48. P. P. Stavropoulos, D. Pereira, and H.-Y. Kee, Microscopic mechanism for a higher-spin Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 037203 (2019).
  49. A. Yoshimori and S. Inagaki, Fourth order interaction effects on the antiferromagnetic structures. II. A phenomenological model for NiS2, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 50, 769 (1981).
  50. M. Hoffmann and S. Blügel, Systematic derivation of realistic spin models for beyond-Heisenberg solids, Phys. Rev. B 101, 024418 (2020).
  51. R. Soni, N. Kaushal, C. Sen, F. A. Reboredo, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Estimation of biquadratic and bicubic Heisenberg effective couplings from multiorbital Hubbard models, New J. Phys. 24, 073014 (2022).
  52. S. Mandal and N. Surendran, Exactly solvable Kitaev model in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 79, 024426 (2009).
  53. K. O'Brien, M. Hermanns, and S. Trebst, Classification of gapless Z2 spin liquids in three-dimensional Kitaev models, Phys. Rev. B 93, 085101 (2016).
  54. T. Eschmann, P. A. Mishchenko, K. O'Brien, T. A. Bojesen, Y. Kato, M. Hermanns, Y. Motome, and S. Trebst, Thermodynamic classification of three-dimensional Kitaev spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B 102, 075125 (2020).
  55. P. A. Mishchenko, Y. Kato, K. O'Brien, T. A. Bojesen, T. Eschmann, M. Hermanns, S. Trebst, and Y. Motome, Chiral spin liquids with crystalline Z2 gauge order in a three-dimensional Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. B 101, 045118 (2020).
  56. P. S. Tarabunga, F. M. Surace, R. Andreoni, A. Angelone, and M. Dalmonte, Gauge-theoretic origin of Rydberg quantum spin liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 195301 (2022).
  57. C. Hickey, C. Berke, P. P. Stavropoulos, H.-Y. Kee, and S. Trebst, Field-driven gapless spin liquid in the spin-1 Kitaev honeycomb model, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023361 (2020).
  58. Z. Zhu, Z.-Y. Weng, and D. N. Sheng, Magnetic field induced spin liquids in S=1 Kitaev honeycomb model, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 022047(R) (2020).
  59. X.-Y. Dong and D. N. Sheng, Spin-1 Kitaev-Heisenberg model on a honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B 102, 121102(R) (2020).
  60. H.-Y. Lee, N. Kawashima, and Y. B. Kim, Tensor network wave function of S=1 Kitaev spin liquids, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033318 (2020).
  61. I. Khait, P. P. Stavropoulos, H.-Y. Kee, and Y. B. Kim, Characterizing spin-one Kitaev quantum spin liquids, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013160 (2021).
  62. K. Fukui, Y. Kato, J. Nasu, and Y. Motome, Ground-state phase diagram of spin-S Kitaev-Heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. B 106, 174416 (2022).
  63. M. Georgiou, I. Rousochatzakis, D. J. J. Farnell, J. Richter, and R. F. Bishop, Spin-S Kitaev-Heisenberg model on the honeycomb lattice: A high-order treatment via the many-body coupled cluster method, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033168 (2024).
  64. A. Ralko and J. Merino, Chiral bosonic quantum spin liquid in the integer-spin Heisenberg-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. B 110, 134402 (2024).
  65. H. Ma, Z2 spin liquids in the higher spin-S kitaev honeycomb model: An exact deconfined Z2 gauge structure in a nonintegrable model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 156701 (2023).
  66. R. Liu, H. T. Lam, H. Ma, and L. Zou, Symmetries and anomalies of Kitaev spin-S models: Identifying symmetry-enforced exotic quantum matter, SciPost Phys. 16, 100 (2024).
  67. H. Yao and S. A. Kivelson, Exact chiral spin liquid with non-Abelian anyons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 247203 (2007).
  68. S. Dusuel, K. P. Schmidt, J. Vidal, and R. L. Zaffino, Perturbative study of the Kitaev model with spontaneous time-reversal symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. B 78, 125102 (2008).
  69. J. Nasu and Y. Motome, Thermodynamics of chiral spin liquids with Abelian and non-Abelian anyons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 087203 (2015).
  70. A. Ralko and J. Merino, Novel chiral quantum spin liquids in Kitaev magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 217203 (2020).
  71. C. Hickey, M. Gohlke, C. Berke, and S. Trebst, Generic field-driven phenomena in Kitaev spin liquids: Canted magnetism and proximate spin liquid physics, Phys. Rev. B 103, 064417 (2021).
  72. P. d'Ornellas and J. Knolle, Kitaev-Heisenberg model on the star lattice: From chiral Majorana fermions to chiral triplons, Phys. Rev. B 109, 094421 (2024).
  73. L. Savary, Quantum loop states in spin-orbital models on the honeycomb lattice, Nat. Commun. 12, 3004 (2021).
  74. Y.-X. Yang, M. Cheng, and J.-Y. Chen, Chiral spin liquid in a generalized Kitaev honeycomb model with Z4 1-form symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 111, 035129 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation