- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Precise quantum control of molecular rotation toward a desired orientation

Qian-Qian Hong1, Daoyi Dong2, Niels E. Henriksen3, Franco Nori4,5, Jun He1,*, and Chuan-Cun Shu1,†

  • *Contact author: junhe@csu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: cc.shu@csu.edu.cn
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 7, L012049 – Published 28 February, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.L012049

Abstract

The lack of a direct map between control fields and desired control objectives poses a significant challenge in applying quantum control theory to quantum technologies. Here, we propose an analytical framework to precisely control a limited set of quantum states and construct desired coherent superpositions using a well-designed laser pulse sequence with optimal amplitudes, phases, and delays. This theoretical framework that corresponds to a multilevel pulse-area theorem establishes a straightforward mapping between the control parameters of the pulse sequence and the amplitudes and phases of rotational states within a specific subspace. As an example, we utilize this approach to generate 15 distinct and desired rotational superpositions of ultracold polar molecules, leading to 15 desired field-free molecular orientations. By optimizing the superposition of the lowest 16 rotational states, we demonstrate that this approach can achieve a maximum orientation value of |〈cosθ〉|max above 0.99, which is very close to the global optimal value of 1 that could be achieved in an infinite-dimensional state space. This work marks a significant advancement in achieving precise control over multilevel subsystems within molecules. It holds potential applications in molecular alignment and orientation, as well as in various interdisciplinary fields related to the precise quantum control of ultracold polar molecules, opening up considerable opportunities in molecular-based quantum techniques.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (99)

  1. D. DeMille, Quantum computation with trapped polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 067901 (2002).
  2. I. Manai, R. Horchani, H. Lignier, P. Pillet, D. Comparat, A. Fioretti, and M. Allegrini, Rovibrational cooling of molecules by optical pumping, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 183001 (2012).
  3. K. Wang, C. P. Williams, L. R. B. Picard, N. Y. Yao, and K.-K. Ni, Enriching the quantum toolbox of ultracold molecules with Rydberg atoms, PRX Quantum 3, 030339 (2022).
  4. Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, L. Anderegg, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Dipolar spin-exchange and entanglement between molecules in an optical tweezer array, Science 382, 1138 (2023).
  5. A. S. Chatterley, C. Schouder, L. Christiansen, B. Shepperson, M. H. Rasmussen, and H. Stapelfeldt, Long-lasting field-free alignment of large molecules inside helium nanodroplets, Nat. Commun. 10, 133 (2019).
  6. C. P. Koch, M. Lemeshko, and D. Sugny, Quantum control of molecular rotation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 035005 (2019).
  7. E. J. Zak, A. Yachmenev, and J. Küpper, Controlling rotation in the molecular frame with an optical centrifuge, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023188 (2021).
  8. T. Mullins, E. T. Karamatskos, J. Wiese, J. Onvlee, A. Rouzée, A. Yachmenev, S. Trippel, and J. Küpper, Picosecond pulse-shaping for strong three-dimensional field-free alignment of generic asymmetric-top molecules, Nat. Commun. 13, 1431 (2022).
  9. J. Qiang, L. Zhou, P. Lu, K. Lin, Y. Ma, S. Pan, C. Lu, W. Jiang, F. Sun, W. Zhang et al., Femtosecond rotational dynamics of D2 molecules in superfluid helium nanodroplets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 243201 (2022).
  10. A. A. Milner, I. MacPhail-Bartley, K. Preocanin, S. Dasgupta, X. Peng, and V. Milner, Coherent control of molecular rotation in superfluid helium, Phys. Rev. A 109, 013110 (2024).
  11. M. Machholm and N. E. Henriksen, Field-free orientation of molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 193001 (2001).
  12. K. Oda, M. Hita, S. Minemoto, and H. Sakai, All-optical molecular orientation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 213901 (2010).
  13. S. Fleischer, Y. Zhou, R. W. Field, and K. A. Nelson, Molecular orientation and alignment by intense single-cycle THz pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 163603 (2011).
  14. K. N. Egodapitiya, S. Li, and R. R. Jones, Terahertz-induced field-free orientation of rotationally excited molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 103002 (2014).
  15. K. Lin, I. Tutunnikov, J. Qiang, J. Ma, Q. Song, Q. Ji, W. Zhang, H. Li, F. Sun, X. Gong et al., All-optical field-free three-dimensional orientation of asymmetric-top molecules, Nat. Commun. 9, 5134 (2018).
  16. L. Xu, I. Tutunnikov, E. Gershnabel, Y. Prior, and I. S. Averbukh, Long-lasting molecular orientation induced by a single terahertz pulse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 013201 (2020).
  17. L.-B. Fan, C.-C. Shu, D. Dong, J. He, N. E. Henriksen, and F. Nori, Quantum coherent control of a single molecular-polariton rotation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 043604 (2023).
  18. S. A. Moses, J. P. Covey, M. T. Miecnikowski, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye, New frontiers for quantum gases of polar molecules, Nat. Phys. 13, 13 (2017).
  19. S. Fukahori, T. Otobe, H. Akagi, K. Yamanouchi, and R. Itakura, Orientation-angle-resolved photoelectron angular distribution in dissociative ionization of methanol induced by an intense ultraviolet laser pulse, Phys. Rev. A 107, 053118 (2023).
  20. I. D. Leroux, M. H. Schleier-Smith, and V. Vuletić, Orientation-dependent entanglement lifetime in a squeezed atomic clock, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 250801 (2010).
  21. S. Alighanbari, M. G. Hansen, V. Korobov, and S. Schiller, Rotational spectroscopy of cold and trapped molecular ions in the Lamb–Dicke regime, Nat. Phys. 14, 555 (2018).
  22. W. Siu, F. Kelkensberg, G. Gademann, A. Rouzée, P. Johnsson, D. Dowek, M. Lucchini, F. Calegari, U. De Giovannini, A. Rubio et al., Attosecond control of dissociative ionization of O2 molecules, Phys. Rev. A 84, 063412 (2011).
  23. J. Li, Q. Zhang, L. Li, X. Zhu, T. Huang, P. Lan, and P. Lu, Orientation dependence of high-order harmonic generation in nanowire, Phys. Rev. A 99, 033421 (2019).
  24. J. Zhou, C. He, M.-M. Liu, E. Wang, S. Jia, A. Dorn, X. Ren, and Y. Liu, Real-time observation of ultrafast molecular rotation in weakly bound dimers, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023050 (2021).
  25. D. V. Rezvan, K. Klyssek, S. Grundmann, A. Pier, N. M. Novikovskiy, N. Strenger, D. Tsitsonis, M. Kircher, I. Vela-Peréz, K. Fehre, F. Trinter, M. S. Schöffler, T. Jahnke, R. Dörner, and P. V. Demekhin, Observation of nondipole-induced asymmetry in the angular emission distribution of photoelectrons from fixed-in-space CO molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 253201 (2022).
  26. J. D. Pickering, B. Shepperson, B. A. K. Hübschmann, F. Thorning, and H. Stapelfeldt, Alignment and imaging of the CS2 dimer inside helium nanodroplets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 113202 (2018).
  27. D. Qi, F. Cao, S. Xu, Y. Yao, Y. He, J. Yao, P. Ding, C. Jin, L. Deng, T. Jia, J. Liang, Z. Sun, and S. Zhang, 100-trillion-frame-per-second single-shot compressed ultrafast photography via molecular alignment, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 024051 (2021).
  28. T. K. Begzjav, Z. Zhang, M. O. Scully, and G. S. Agarwal, Enhanced signals from chiral molecules via molecular coherence, Opt. Express 27, 13965 (2019).
  29. E. A. Shapiro, M. Spanner, and M. Y. Ivanov, Quantum logic in coarse grained control of wavepackets, J. Mod. Opt. 52, 897 (2005).
  30. C. Wu, A. B. Khanikaev, R. Adato, N. Arju, A. A. Yanik, H. Altug, and G. Shvets, Fano-resonant asymmetric metamaterials for ultrasensitive spectroscopy and identification of molecular monolayers, Nat. Mater. 11, 69 (2012).
  31. V. Karle, A. Ghazaryan, and M. Lemeshko, Topological charges of periodically kicked molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 103202 (2023).
  32. J. Zhang, Y.-x. Liu, R.-B. Wu, K. Jacobs, and F. Nori, Quantum feedback: Theory, experiments, and applications, Phys. Rep. 679, 1 (2017).
  33. V. V. Albert, J. P. Covey, and J. Preskill, Robust encoding of a qubit in a molecule, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031050 (2020).
  34. K. Mishima and K. Yamashita, Quantum computing using rotational modes of two polar molecules, Chem. Phys. 361, 106 (2009).
  35. I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Quantum simulation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153 (2014).
  36. M. Hughes, M. D. Frye, R. Sawant, G. Bhole, J. A. Jones, S. L. Cornish, M. R. Tarbutt, J. M. Hutson, D. Jaksch, and J. Mur-Petit, Robust entangling gate for polar molecules using magnetic and microwave fields, Phys. Rev. A 101, 062308 (2020).
  37. P. O. Kofman, S. N. Shevchenko, and F. Nori, Tuning the initial phase to control the final state of a driven qubit, Phys. Rev. A 109, 022409 (2024).
  38. Q. Wei, S. Kais, B. Friedrich, and D. Herschbach, Entanglement of polar symmetric top molecules as candidate qubits, J. Chem. Phys. 135, 154102 (2011).
  39. J. A. Blackmore, L. Caldwell, P. D. Gregory, E. M. Bridge, R. Sawant, J. Aldegunde, J. Mur-Petit, D. Jaksch, J. M. Hutson, B. Sauer et al., Ultracold molecules for quantum simulation: Rotational coherences in CaF and RbCs, Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 014010 (2018).
  40. K.-K. Ni, T. Rosenband, and D. D. Grimes, Dipolar exchange quantum logic gate with polar molecules, Chem. Sci. 9, 6830 (2018).
  41. P. Yu, L. W. Cheuk, I. Kozyryev, and J. M. Doyle, A scalable quantum computing platform using symmetric-top molecules, New J. Phys. 21, 093049 (2019).
  42. Z.-Y. Wang and R.-B. Liu, Extending quantum control of time-independent systems to time-dependent systems, Phys. Rev. A 83, 062313 (2011).
  43. S. J. Glaser, U. Boscain, T. Calarco, C. P. Koch, W. Köckenberger, R. Kosloff, I. Kuprov, B. Luy, S. Schirmer, T. Schulte-Herbrüggen et al., Training Schrödinger's cat: Quantum optimal control: Strategic report on current status, visions and goals for research in Europe, Eur. Phys. J. D 69, 279 (2015).
  44. C.-W. Chou, C. Kurz, D. B. Hume, P. N. Plessow, D. R. Leibrandt, and D. Leibfried, Preparation and coherent manipulation of pure quantum states of a single molecular ion, Nature (London) 545, 203 (2017).
  45. S. Kallush, R. Dann, and R. Kosloff, Controlling the uncontrollable: Quantum control of open-system dynamics, Sci. Adv. 8, eadd0828 (2022).
  46. D. Dong and I. R. Petersen, Learning and Robust Control in Quantum Technology (Springer Nature, London, 2023).
  47. L. Dominici, D. Colas, S. Donati, J. P. Restrepo Cuartas, M. De Giorgi, D. Ballarini, G. Guirales, J. C. López Carreño, A. Bramati, G. Gigli, E. del Valle, F. P. Laussy, and D. Sanvitto, Ultrafast control and Rabi oscillations of polaritons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 226401 (2014).
  48. K. A. Fischer, L. Hanschke, M. Kremser, J. J. Finley, K. Müller, and J. Vučković, Pulsed Rabi oscillations in quantum two-level systems: Beyond the area theorem, Quantum Sci. Technol. 3, 014006 (2018).
  49. Z.-C. Shi, Y.-H. Chen, W. Qin, Y. Xia, X. X. Yi, S.-B. Zheng, and F. Nori, Two-level systems with periodic n-step driving fields: Exact dynamics and quantum state manipulations, Phys. Rev. A 104, 053101 (2021).
  50. O. V. Ivakhnenko, S. N. Shevchenko, and F. Nori, Nonadiabatic Landau–Zener–Stückelberg–Majorana transitions, dynamics, and interference, Phys. Rep. 995, 1 (2023).
  51. Y. Guo, X. Gong, S. Ma, and C.-C. Shu, Cyclic three-level-pulse-area theorem for enantioselective state transfer of chiral molecules, Phys. Rev. A 105, 013102 (2022).
  52. R. Judson, K. Lehmann, H. Rabitz, and W. Warren, Optimal design of external fields for controlling molecular motion: Application to rotation, J. Mol. Struct. 223, 425 (1990).
  53. J. Ortigoso, Design of tailored microwave pulses to create rotational coherent states for an asymmetric-top molecule, Phys. Rev. A 57, 4592 (1998).
  54. J. Salomon, C. M. Dion, and G. Turinici, Optimal molecular alignment and orientation through rotational ladder climbing, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 144310 (2005).
  55. C.-C. Shu, T.-S. Ho, and H. Rabitz, Monotonic convergent quantum optimal control method with exact equality constraints on the optimized control fields, Phys. Rev. A 93, 053418 (2016).
  56. Y. Guo, X. Luo, S. Ma, and C.-C. Shu, All-optical generation of quantum entangled states with strictly constrained ultrafast laser pulses, Phys. Rev. A 100, 023409 (2019).
  57. M. Montesinos and A. Pérez-Lorenzana, Exact solutions of n-level systems and gauge theories, Phys. Rev. A 60, 2554 (1999).
  58. E. Groves, B. Clader, and J. Eberly, Multipulse quantum control: Exact solutions, Opt. Lett. 34, 2539 (2009).
  59. Y. Guo, C.-C. Shu, D. Dong, and F. Nori, Vanishing and revival of resonance Raman scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 223202 (2019).
  60. Q.-Q. Hong, L.-B. Fan, C.-C. Shu, and N. E. Henriksen, Generation of maximal three-state field-free molecular orientation with terahertz pulses, Phys. Rev. A 104, 013108 (2021).
  61. L.-B. Fan and C.-C. Shu, Pulse-area theorem for precision control of the rotational motions of a single molecule in a cavity, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 56, 365302 (2023).
  62. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.L012049 for the detailed derivations and additional simulations.
  63. D. Sugny, A. Keller, O. Atabek, D. Daems, C. M. Dion, S. Guérin, and H. R. Jauslin, Reaching optimally oriented molecular states by laser kicks, Phys. Rev. A 69, 033402 (2004).
  64. S. Wang and N. E. Henriksen, Optimal field-free molecular orientation with nonresonant two-color adiabatic-turn-on and sudden-turn-off laser pulses, Phys. Rev. A 102, 063120 (2020).
  65. E. S. Shuman, J. F. Barry, and D. DeMille, Laser cooling of a diatomic molecule, Nature (London) 467, 820 (2010).
  66. C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1225 (2010).
  67. M. Guo, B. Zhu, B. Lu, X. Ye, F. Wang, R. Vexiau, N. Bouloufa-Maafa, G. Quéméner, O. Dulieu, and D. Wang, Creation of an ultracold gas of ground-state dipolar Na23Rb87 molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 205303 (2016).
  68. C.-C. Shu, K.-J. Yuan, W.-H. Hu, and S.-L. Cong, Field-free molecular orientation with terahertz few-cycle pulses, J. Chem. Phys. 132, 244311 (2010).
  69. S. Trippel, T. Mullins, N. L. M. Müller, J. S. Kienitz, R. González-Férez, and J. Küpper, Two-state wave packet for strong field-free molecular orientation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 103003 (2015).
  70. R. Tehini, M. Z. Hoque, O. Faucher, and D. Sugny, Field-free molecular orientation of Σ1 and Π2 molecules at high temperature, Phys. Rev. A 85, 043423 (2012).
  71. C.-C. Shu and N. E. Henriksen, Field-free molecular orientation induced by single-cycle THz pulses: The role of resonance and quantum interference, Phys. Rev. A 87, 013408 (2013).
  72. P. M. Kraus, D. Baykusheva, and H. J. Wörner, Two-pulse field-free orientation reveals anisotropy of molecular shape resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 023001 (2014).
  73. J.-P. Zhang, S. Wang, and N. E. Henriksen, Optimal field-free orientation of molecules with resonant tailored multicolor fields, Phys. Rev. A 107, 033118 (2023).
  74. J. Ortigoso, Conservation of molecular alignment for cyclic rotational wave packets in periodic pulse trains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 073001 (2004).
  75. K. Nakajima, H. Abe, and Y. Ohtsuki, Optimal control simulation of field-free molecular orientation: Alignment-enhanced molecular orientation, J. Phys. Chem. A 116, 11219 (2012).
  76. S.-L. Liao, T.-S. Ho, H. Rabitz, and S.-I. Chu, Maximum attainable field-free molecular orientation of a thermal ensemble with near–single-cycle THz pulses, Phys. Rev. A 87, 013429 (2013).
  77. C. K. M. Ndong and D. Sugny, Time optimization and state-dependent constraints in the quantum optimal control of molecular orientation, J. Mod. Opt. 61, 857 (2014).
  78. S. Luo, R. Zhu, L. He, W. Hu, X. Li, P. Ma, C. Wang, F. Liu, W. G. Roeterdink, S. Stolte, and D. Ding, Nonadiabatic laser-induced orientation and alignment of rotational-state-selected CH3Br molecules, Phys. Rev. A 91, 053408 (2015).
  79. L. Xu, I. Tutunnikov, Y. Prior, and I. S. Averbukh, Enhanced persistent orientation of asymmetric-top molecules induced by cross-polarized terahertz pulses, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013201 (2024).
  80. M. Spanner, S. Patchkovskii, E. Frumker, and P. Corkum, Mechanisms of two-color laser-induced field-free molecular orientation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 113001 (2012).
  81. I. Znakovskaya, M. Spanner, S. De, H. Li, D. Ray, P. Corkum, I. V. Litvinyuk, C. L. Cocke, and M. F. Kling, Transition between mechanisms of laser-induced field-free molecular orientation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 113005 (2014).
  82. R. Damari, S. Kallush, and S. Fleischer, Rotational control of asymmetric molecules: Dipole- versus polarizability-driven rotational dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 103001 (2016).
  83. Q.-Q. Hong, Z.-Z. Lian, C.-C. Shu, and N. E. Henriksen, Quantum control of field-free molecular orientation, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25, 32763 (2023).
  84. D. Goswami, Optical pulse shaping approaches to coherent control, Phys. Rep. 374, 385 (2003).
  85. J. Yao, Photonic generation of microwave arbitrary waveforms, Opt. Commun. 284, 3723 (2011).
  86. S. Zhdanovich, A. A. Milner, C. Bloomquist, J. Floß, I. S. Averbukh, J. W. Hepburn, and V. Milner, Control of molecular rotation with a chiral train of ultrashort pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 243004 (2011).
  87. J. T. Merrill and K. R. Brown, Progress in compensating pulse sequences for quantum computation, Adv. Chem. Phys. 154, 241 (2014).
  88. Z. Zeng, L. Zhang, Y. Zhang, H. Tian, Z. Zhang, S. Zhang, H. Li, and Y. Liu, Microwave pulse generation via employing an electric signal modulator to achieve time-domain mode locking in an optoelectronic oscillator, Opt. Lett. 46, 2107 (2021).
  89. J. E. Nkeck, L.-P. Béliveau, X. Ropagnol, D. Deslandes, D. Morris, and F. Blanchard, Parallel generation and coding of a terahertz pulse train, APL Photonics 7, 126105 (2022).
  90. X. Zhou, Y. Lin, Y. Chan, F. Deng, and J. Zhang, Coherent generation and control of tunable narrowband THz radiation from a laser-induced air-plasma filament, Opt. Lett. 48, 2881 (2023).
  91. F. Seeßelberg, N. Buchheim, Z.-K. Lu, T. Schneider, X.-Y. Luo, E. Tiemann, I. Bloch, and C. Gohle, Modeling the adiabatic creation of ultracold polar Na23K40 molecules, Phys. Rev. A 97, 013405 (2018).
  92. H. Yang, J. Cao, Z. Su, J. Rui, B. Zhao, and J.-W. Pan, Creation of an ultracold gas of triatomic molecules from an atom–diatomic molecule mixture, Science 378, 1009 (2022).
  93. T. Langen, G. Valtolina, D. Wang, and J. Ye, Quantum state manipulation and cooling of ultracold molecules, Nat. Phys. 20, 702 (2024).
  94. L. Yuan, S. W. Teitelbaum, A. Robinson, and A. S. Mullin, Dynamics of molecules in extreme rotational states, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6872 (2011).
  95. D. Daems, S. Guérin, D. Sugny, and H. R. Jauslin, Efficient and long-lived field-free orientation of molecules by a single hybrid short pulse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 153003 (2005).
  96. Y. Wang, Z. Hu, B. C. Sanders, and S. Kais, Qudits and high-dimensional quantum computing, Front. Phys. 8, 589504 (2020).
  97. L. Neves, G. Lima, J. G. Aguirre Gómez, C. H. Monken, C. Saavedra, and S. Pádua, Generation of entangled states of qudits using twin photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 100501 (2005).
  98. R. Sawant, J. A. Blackmore, P. D. Gregory, J. Mur-Petit, D. Jaksch, J. Aldegunde, J. M. Hutson, M. R. Tarbutt, and S. L. Cornish, Ultracold polar molecules as qudits, New J. Phys. 22, 013027 (2020).
  99. M. Ringbauer, M. Meth, L. Postler, R. Stricker, R. Blatt, P. Schindler, and T. Monz, A universal qudit quantum processor with trapped ions, Nat. Phys. 18, 1053 (2022).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 7, L012049– Published 28 February, 2025
  • Received 9 April 2024
  • Revised 17 June 2024
  • Accepted 13 February 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation