Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

In pursuit of the tetratic phase in hard rectangles

Denis Dertli and Thomas Speck

Phys. Rev. Research 7, L012034 – Published 13 February, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.L012034

Abstract

We numerically investigate two-dimensional systems of hard rectangles at constant pressure through extensive hard-particle Monte Carlo simulations. We determine the complete phase diagram as a function of packing fraction and aspect ratio, which consists of four distinct phases. At very high packing fractions, particles assemble into a smectic phase for all aspect ratios. Rodlike particles with large aspect ratio assemble into an intervening nematic phase, which is displaced by a “tetratic” phase (also called biaxial nematic) for moderately elongated rectangles. Surprisingly, we find evidence that the transition from tetratic to smectic is weakly discontinuous at variance with previously proposed two-step scenarios for the melting of hard particles.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (48)

  1. B. J. Alder and T. E. Wainwright, Phase transition for a hard sphere system, J. Chem. Phys. 27, 1208 (1957).
  2. W. Wood and J. Jacobson, Preliminary results from a recalculation of the Monte Carlo equation of state of hard spheres, J. Chem. Phys. 27, 1207 (1957).
  3. P. N. Pusey and W. van Megen, Phase behaviour of concentrated suspensions of nearly hard colloidal spheres, Nature (London) 320, 340 (1986).
  4. C. P. Royall, P. Charbonneau, M. Dijkstra, J. Russo, F. Smallenburg, T. Speck, and C. Valeriani, Colloidal hard spheres: Triumphs, challenges, and mysteries, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 045003 (2024).
  5. L. Onsager, The effects of shape on the interaction of colloidal particles, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 51, 627 (1949).
  6. P. Bolhuis and D. Frenkel, Tracing the phase boundaries of hard spherocylinders, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 666 (1997).
  7. A. Haji-Akbari, M. Engel, and S. C. Glotzer, Phase diagram of hard tetrahedra, J. Chem. Phys. 135, 194101 (2011).
  8. P. F. Damasceno, M. Engel, and S. C. Glotzer, Predictive self-assembly of polyhedra into complex structures, Science 337, 453 (2012).
  9. R. Ni, A. P. Gantapara, J. De Graaf, R. Van Roij, and M. Dijkstra, Phase diagram of colloidal hard superballs: From cubes via spheres to octahedra, Soft Matter 8, 8826 (2012).
  10. A. Haji-Akbari and S. C. Glotzer, Strong orientational coordinates and orientational order parameters for symmetric objects, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 48, 485201 (2015).
  11. J. A. Anderson, J. Antonaglia, J. A. Millan, M. Engel, and S. C. Glotzer, Shape and symmetry determine two-dimensional melting transitions of hard regular polygons, Phys. Rev. X 7, 021001 (2017).
  12. N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism in one- or two-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1133 (1966).
  13. P. C. Hohenberg, Existence of long-range order in one and two dimensions, Phys. Rev. 158, 383 (1967).
  14. K. J. Strandburg, Two-dimensional melting, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 161 (1988).
  15. A. L. Thorneywork, J. L. Abbott, D. G. A. L. Aarts, and R. P. A. Dullens, Two-dimensional melting of colloidal hard spheres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 158001 (2017).
  16. E. P. Bernard and W. Krauth, Two-step melting in two dimensions: First-order liquid-hexatic transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 155704 (2011).
  17. M. Engel, J. A. Anderson, S. C. Glotzer, M. Isobe, E. P. Bernard, and W. Krauth, Hard-disk equation of state: First-order liquid-hexatic transition in two dimensions with three simulation methods, Phys. Rev. E 87, 042134 (2013).
  18. S. C. Kapfer and W. Krauth, Two-dimensional melting: From liquid-hexatic coexistence to continuous transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 035702 (2015).
  19. T. Schilling, S. Pronk, B. Mulder, and D. Frenkel, Monte Carlo study of hard pentagons, Phys. Rev. E 71, 036138 (2005).
  20. K. Zhao and T. G. Mason, Frustrated rotator crystals and glasses of Brownian pentagons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 208302 (2009).
  21. J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 6, 1181 (1973).
  22. B. I. Halperin and D. R. Nelson, Theory of two-dimensional melting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 121 (1978).
  23. L. Walsh and N. Menon, Ordering and dynamics of vibrated hard squares, J. Stat. Mech. (2016) 083302.
  24. Z. Hou, Y. Zong, Z. Sun, F. Ye, T. G. Mason, and K. Zhao, Emergent tetratic order in crowded systems of rotationally asymmetric hard kite particles, Nat. Commun. 11, 2064 (2020).
  25. K. Zhao, R. Bruinsma, and T. G. Mason, Entropic crystal-crystal transitions of Brownian squares, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 2684 (2011).
  26. C. Avendaño and F. A. Escobedo, Phase behavior of rounded hard-squares, Soft Matter 8, 4675 (2012).
  27. M. A. Bates and D. Frenkel, Phase behavior of two-dimensional hard rod fluids, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 10034 (2000).
  28. R. L. Vink, The isotropic-to-nematic transition in a two-dimensional fluid of hard needles: A finite-size scaling study, Eur. Phys. J. B 72, 225 (2009).
  29. Y. Martínez-Ratón, E. Velasco, and L. Mederos, Effect of particle geometry on phase transitions in two-dimensional liquid crystals, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 064903 (2005).
  30. Y. Martínez-Ratón, E. Velasco, and L. Mederos, Orientational ordering in hard rectangles: The role of three-body correlations, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 014501 (2006).
  31. C. E. Sitta, F. Smallenburg, R. Wittkowski, and H. Löwen, Liquid crystals of hard rectangles on flat and cylindrical manifolds, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 5285 (2018).
  32. T. Müller, D. de las Heras, I. Rehberg, and K. Huang, Ordering in granular-rod monolayers driven far from thermodynamic equilibrium, Phys. Rev. E 91, 062207 (2015).
  33. K. Wojciechowski and D. Frenkel, Tetratic phase in the planar hard square system? Comput. Methods Sci. Technol. 10, 235 (2004).
  34. A. Donev, J. Burton, F. H. Stillinger, and S. Torquato, Tetratic order in the phase behavior of a hard-rectangle system, Phys. Rev. B 73, 054109 (2006).
  35. K. Zhao, C. Harrison, D. Huse, W. B. Russel, and P. M. Chaikin, Nematic and almost-tetratic phases of colloidal rectangles, Phys. Rev. E 76, 040401(R) (2007).
  36. M. González-Pinto, J. Renner, D. de las Heras, Y. Martínez-Ratón, and E. Velasco, Defects in vertically vibrated monolayers of cylinders, New J. Phys. 21, 033002 (2019).
  37. A. Khmelinskaia, H. G. Franquelim, R. Yaadav, E. P. Petrov, and P. Schwille, Membrane-mediated self-organization of rod-like DNA origami on supported lipid bilayers, Adv. Mater. Interf. 8, 2101094 (2021).
  38. H. G. Franquelim, H. Dietz, and P. Schwille, Reversible membrane deformations by straight DNA origami filaments, Soft Matter 17, 276 (2021).
  39. P. Zhan, A. Peil, Q. Jiang, D. Wang, S. Mousavi, Q. Xiong, Q. Shen, Y. Shang, B. Ding, C. Lin, Y. Ke, and N. Liu, Recent advances in DNA origami-engineered nanomaterials and applications, Chem. Rev. 123, 3976 (2023).
  40. D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2023).
  41. J. A. Anderson, C. D. Lorenz, and A. Travesset, General purpose molecular dynamics simulations fully implemented on graphics processing units, J. Comput. Phys. 227, 5342 (2008).
  42. J. Glaser, T. D. Nguyen, J. A. Anderson, P. Lui, F. Spiga, J. A. Millan, D. C. Morse, and S. C. Glotzer, Strong scaling of general-purpose molecular dynamics simulations on GPUs, Comput. Phys. Commun. 192, 97 (2015).
  43. J. A. Anderson, M. Eric Irrgang, and S. C. Glotzer, Scalable metropolis Monte Carlo for simulation of hard shapes, Comput. Phys. Commun. 204, 21 (2016).
  44. J. A. Anderson, J. Glaser, and S. C. Glotzer, HOOMD-blue: A Python package for high-performance molecular dynamics and hard particle Monte Carlo simulations, Comput. Mater. Sci. 173, 109363 (2020).
  45. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.L012034 for additional information on the simulations.
  46. M. R. Shirts and J. D. Chodera, Statistically optimal analysis of samples from multiple equilibrium states, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 124105 (2008).
  47. M. R. Shirts and A. L. Ferguson, Statistically optimal continuous free energy surfaces from biased simulations and multistate reweighting, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16, 4107 (2020).
  48. J. Toner and D. R. Nelson, Smectic, cholesteric, and Rayleigh-Benard order in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 23, 316 (1981).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation