Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Collective mode across the BCS-BEC crossover in Holstein model

Tae-Ho Park1,* and Han-Yong Choi1,2,†

  • *Contact author: thpark@skku.edu
  • †Contact author: hychoi@skku.edu

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L042059 – Published 9 December, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L042059

Abstract

We investigate the emergence of the collective mode in the phonon spectra of the superconducting state within the Holstein model by varying the electron-phonon coupling. Using dynamical mean field theory combined with the numerical renormalization group technique, we calculate the phonon spectra. In the superconducting state with a pairing gap (ΔP), the peak position of the collective mode (ωcol) evolves from the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) regime, manifesting near 2ΔP and increasing with coupling, to the Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) regime, where ωcol decreases with increasing coupling. The decrease of ωcol matches well with the reduction of superfluid stiffness, which originates from the increasing phase fluctuations of local pairs with coupling strength. In the crossover regime with intermediate coupling, ωcol aligns with the soft phonon mode (ωs) of the normal state and decreases with increasing coupling when ωs<2ΔP. Additionally, comparing the collective mode weight to ΔP suggests that the collective mode predominantly stems from U(1) gauge symmetry breaking across all coupling strengths.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (53)

  1. N. R. Poniatowski, J. B. Curtis, A. Yacoby, and P. Narang, Spectroscopic signatures of time-reversal symmetry breaking superconductivity, Commun. Phys. 5, 44 (2022).
  2. D. Pekker and C.M. Varma, Amplitude/Higgs modes in condensed matter physics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 269 (2015).
  3. R. Shimano and N. Tsuji, Higgs mode in superconductors, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 103 (2020).
  4. J. Léonard, A. Morales, P. Zupancic, T. Donner, and T. Esslinger, Monitoring and manipulating Higgs and Goldstone modes in a supersolid quantum gas, Science 358, 1415 (2017).
  5. M. Endres, T. Fukuhara, D. Pekker, M. Cheneau, P. Schauß, C. Gross, E. Demler, S. Kuhr, and I. Bloch, The “Higgs” amplitude mode at the two-dimensional superfluid/Mott insulator transition, Nature (London) 487, 454 (2012).
  6. W. J. Elion, M. Matters, U. Geigenmüller, and J. E. Mooij, Direct demonstration of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle in a superconductor, Nature (London) 371, 594 (1994).
  7. V. J. Emery and S. A. Kivelson, Importance of phase fluctuations in superconductors with small superfluid density, Nature (London) 374, 434 (1995).
  8. P. W. Anderson, Coherent excited states in the theory of superconductivity: Gauge invariance and the Meissner effect, Phys. Rev. 110, 827 (1958).
  9. P. W. Anderson, Random-phase approximation in the theory of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. 112, 1900 (1958).
  10. Y. Nambu, Quasi-particles and gauge invariance in the theory of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. 117, 648 (1960).
  11. P. W. Anderson, Plasmons, gauge invariance, and mass, Phys. Rev. 130, 439 (1963).
  12. P. W. Higgs, Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 508 (1964).
  13. A. Griffin, D. Snoke, and S. Stringari, Bose-Einstein Condensation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994).
  14. M. Randeria and E. Taylor, Crossover from Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer to Bose-Einstein condensation and the unitary Fermi gas, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 5, 209 (2014).
  15. P. Nozières and S. Schmitt-Rink, Bose condensation in an attractive fermion gas: From weak to strong coupling superconductivity, J. Low Temp. Phys. 59, 195 (1985).
  16. A. J. Leggett, Diatomic molecules and Cooper pairs, in Modern Trends in the Theory of Condensed Matter: Proceedings of the XVIth Karpacz Winter School of Theoretical Physics, Karpacz, Poland (Springer-Verlag, 1980), pp. 13–27.
  17. R. Micnas, J. Ranninger, and S. Robaszkiewicz, Superconductivity in narrow-band systems with local nonretarded attractive interactions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 113 (1990).
  18. T. Kostyrko and R. Micnas, Collective modes of the extended Hubbard model with negative U and arbitrary electron density, Phys. Rev. B 46, 11025 (1992).
  19. L. Belkhir and M. Randeria, Collective excitations and the crossover from Cooper pairs to composite bosons in the attractive Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 45, 5087 (1992).
  20. L. Belkhir and M. Randeria, Crossover from Cooper pairs to composite bosons: A generalized RPA analysis of collective excitations, Phys. Rev. B 49, 6829 (1994).
  21. J. O. Sofo, C. A. Balseiro, and H. E. Castillo, Collective excitations in superconductors: From Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer theory to Bose condensation, Phys. Rev. B 45, 9860 (1992).
  22. B. Liu, H. Zhai, and S. Zhang, Evolution of the Higgs mode in a fermion superfluid with tunable interactions, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033641 (2016).
  23. D. Phan and A. V. Chubukov, Following the Higgs mode across the BCS-BEC crossover in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 107, 134519 (2023).
  24. P. B. Littlewood and C. M. Varma, Gauge-invariant theory of the dynamical interaction of charge density waves and superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 811 (1981).
  25. P. B. Littlewood and C. M. Varma, Amplitude collective modes in superconductors and their coupling to charge-density waves, Phys. Rev. B 26, 4883 (1982).
  26. R. Sooryakumar and M. V. Klein, Raman scattering by superconducting-gap excitations and their coupling to charge-density waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 660 (1980).
  27. M.-A. Méasson, Y. Gallais, M. Cazayous, B. Clair, P. Rodière, L. Cario, and A. Sacuto, Amplitude Higgs mode in the 2H-NbSe2 superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 89, 060503(R) (2014).
  28. R. Grasset, Y. Gallais, A. Sacuto, M. Cazayous, S. Mañas Valero, E. Coronado, and M.-A. Méasson, Pressure-induced collapse of the charge density wave and Higgs mode visibility in 2H-TaS2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 127001 (2019).
  29. R. Matsunaga and R. Shimano, Nonequilibrium BCS state dynamics induced by intense terahertz pulses in a superconducting NbN film, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 187002 (2012).
  30. R. Matsunaga, Y. I. Hamada, K. Makise, Y. Uzawa, H. Terai, Z. Wang, and R. Shimano, Higgs amplitude mode in the BCS superconductors Nb1−xTixN induced by terahertz pulse excitation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 057002 (2013).
  31. R. Matsunaga, N. Tsuji, H. Fujita, A. Sugioka, K. Makise, Y. Uzawa, H. Terai, Z. Wang, H. Aoki, and R. Shimano, Light-induced collective pseudospin precession resonating with Higgs mode in a superconductor, Science 345, 1145 (2014).
  32. S. Hoinka, P. Dyke, M. G. Lingham, J. J. Kinnunen, G. M. Bruun, and C. J. Vale, Goldstone mode and pair-breaking excitations in atomic Fermi superfluids, Nat. Phys. 13, 943 (2017).
  33. A. Toschi, M. Capone, and C. Castellani, Energetic balance of the superconducting transition across the BCS–Bose Einstein crossover in the attractive Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 72, 235118 (2005).
  34. A. Toschi, P. Barone, M. Capone, and C. Castellani, Pairing and superconductivity from weak to strong coupling in the attractive Hubbard model, New J. Phys. 7, 7 (2005).
  35. A. Garg, H. R. Krishnamurthy, and M. Randeria, BCS-BEC crossover at t=0: A dynamical mean-field theory approach, Phys. Rev. B 72, 024517 (2005).
  36. A. Koga and P. Werner, Low-temperature properties of the infinite-dimensional attractive Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. A 84, 023638 (2011).
  37. J. Bauer, A. C. Hewson, and N. Dupuis, Dynamical mean-field theory and numerical renormalization group study of superconductivity in the attractive Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 79, 214518 (2009).
  38. J. Bauer and A. C. Hewson, Quasiparticle excitations and dynamic susceptibilities in the BCS-BEC crossover, EPL 85, 27001 (2009).
  39. B. Kyung, A. Georges, and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Potential-energy-driven (BCS) to kinetic-energy-driven (BEC) pairing in the two-dimensional attractive Hubbard model: Cellular dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B 74, 024501 (2006).
  40. T.-H. Park and H.-Y. Choi, Dynamical effects on superconductivity in a BCS-BEC crossover: Dynamical mean field theory and numerical renormalization group study of the Holstein model in infinite dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 99, 174503 (2019).
  41. J. E. Hirsch and E. Fradkin, Phase diagram of one-dimensional electron-phonon systems. II. The molecular-crystal model, Phys. Rev. B 27, 4302 (1983).
  42. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L042059 for (I) derivation of effective electron-electron interaction from electron-phonon coupling; (II) phonon spectral function and density-density correlation function; (III) superfluid stiffness, pairing gap, and superconducting critical temperature; (IV) expectation values.
  43. A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozenberg, Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13 (1996).
  44. R. Bulla, T. A. Costi, and T. Pruschke, Numerical renormalization group method for quantum impurity systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 395 (2008).
  45. H. R. Krishna-murthy, J. W. Wilkins, and K. G. Wilson, Renormalization-group approach to the Anderson model of dilute magnetic alloys. I. Static properties for the symmetric case, Phys. Rev. B 21, 1003 (1980).
  46. D. Meyer, A. C. Hewson, and R. Bulla, Gap formation and soft phonon mode in the Holstein model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 196401 (2002).
  47. M. Capone and S. Ciuchi, Polaron crossover and bipolaronic metal-insulator transition in the half-filled Holstein model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 186405 (2003).
  48. G. S. Jeon, T.-H. Park, J. H. Han, H. C. Lee, and H.-Y. Choi, Dynamical mean-field theory of the Hubbard-Holstein model at half filling: Zero temperature metal-insulator and insulator-insulator transitions, Phys. Rev. B 70, 125114 (2004).
  49. W. Koller, D. Meyer, and A. C. Hewson, Dynamic response functions for the Holstein-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 70, 155103 (2004).
  50. M. Oh, D. Nuckolls, Wong, R. L. Lee, X. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and A. Yazdani, Evidence for unconventional superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature (London) 600, 240 (2021).
  51. J. M. Park, Y. Cao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Tunable strongly coupled superconductivity in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene, Nature (London) 590, 249 (2021).
  52. Y. Mizukami, M. Haze, O. Tanaka, K. Matsuura, D. Sano, J. Böker, I. Eremin, S. Kasahara, Y. Matsuda, and T. Shibauchi, Unusual crossover from Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer to Bose-Einstein-Condensate superconductivity in iron chalcogenides, Commun. Phys. 6, 183 (2023).
  53. Q. Chen, Z. Wang, R. Boyack, S. Yang, and K. Levin, When superconductivity crosses over: From BCS to BEC, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 025002 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation