Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Stimulated emission tomography for efficient characterization of spatial entanglement

Yang Xu*

Saumya Choudhary

Robert W. Boyd

  • *Contact author: yxu100@ur.rochester.edu

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L042047 – Published 22 November, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L042047

Abstract

Stimulated-emission tomography (SET) is an excellent tool for characterizing the process of spontaneous parametric down conversion (SPDC), which is commonly used to create pairs of entangled photons for use in quantum information protocols. The use of stimulated emission increases the average number of detected photons by several orders of magnitude compared to the spontaneous process. In a SET measurement, the parametric down conversion is seeded by an intense signal field prepared with specified mode properties rather than by broadband multimodal vacuum fluctuations, as is the case for the spontaneous process. The SET process generates an intense idler field in a mode that is the complex conjugate to the signal mode. In this work we use SET to estimate the joint spatial mode distribution (JSMD) in the Laguerre-Gaussian (LG) basis of the two photons of an entangled photon pair. The pair is produced by parametric down conversion in a beta barium borate (BBO) crystal with type-II phase matching pumped at a wavelength of 405 nm along with a 780 nm seed signal beam prepared in a variety of LG modes to generate an 842 nm idler beam of which the spatial mode distribution is measured. We observe strong idler production and good agreement with the theoretical prediction of its spatial mode distribution. Our experimental procedure should enable the efficient determination of the photon-pair wavefunctions produced by low-brightness SPDC sources and the characterization of high-dimensional entangled-photon pairs.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (44)

  1. R. S. Bennink, S. J. Bentley, R. W. Boyd, and J. C. Howell, Quantum and classical coincidence imaging, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 033601 (2004).
  2. A. N. Black, E. Giese, B. Braverman, N. Zollo, S. M. Barnett, and R. W. Boyd, Quantum nonlocal aberration cancellation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 143603 (2019).
  3. M. I. Kolobov, Quantum Imaging (Springer Science & Business Media, 2007).
  4. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2010).
  5. M. Murao, M. B. Plenio, and V. Vedral, Quantum-information distribution via entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 61, 032311 (2000).
  6. V. Karimipour, A. Bahraminasab, and S. Bagherinezhad, Quantum key distribution for d-level systems with generalized Bell states, Phys. Rev. A 65, 052331 (2002).
  7. B. Jack, A. M. Yao, J. Leach, J. Romero, S. Franke-Arnold, D. G. Ireland, S. M. Barnett, and M. J. Padgett, Entanglement of arbitrary superpositions of modes within two-dimensional orbital angular momentum state spaces, Phys. Rev. A 81, 043844 (2010).
  8. A. Aiello, S. S. R. Oemrawsingh, E. R. Eliel, and J. P. Woerdman, Nonlocality of high-dimensional two-photon orbital angular momentum states, Phys. Rev. A 72, 052114 (2005).
  9. J. Leach, B. Jack, J. Romero, A. K. Jha, A. M. Yao, S. Franke-Arnold, D. G. Ireland, R. W. Boyd, S. M. Barnett, and M. J. Padgett, Quantum correlations in optical angle–orbital angular momentum variables, Science 329, 662 (2010).
  10. M. Erhard, M. Krenn, and A. Zeilinger, Advances in high-dimensional quantum entanglement, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 365 (2020).
  11. M. Erhard, R. Fickler, M. Krenn, and A. Zeilinger, Twisted photons: New quantum perspectives in high dimensions, Light: Sci. Appl. 7, 17146 (2018).
  12. Y. Ren, C. Liu, K. Pang, J. Zhao, Y. Cao, G. Xie, L. Li, P. Liao, Z. Zhao, M. Tur et al., Spatially multiplexed orbital-angular-momentum-encoded single photon and classical channels in a free-space optical communication link, Opt. Lett. 42, 4881 (2017).
  13. F. M. Miatto, A. M. Yao, and S. M. Barnett, Full characterization of the quantum spiral bandwidth of entangled biphotons, Phys. Rev. A 83, 033816 (2011).
  14. C. I. Osorio, G. Molina-Terriza, and J. P. Torres, Correlations in orbital angular momentum of spatially entangled paired photons generated in parametric down-conversion, Phys. Rev. A 77, 015810 (2008).
  15. J. Torres, A. Alexandrescu, and L. Torner, Quantum spiral bandwidth of entangled two-photon states, Phys. Rev. A 68, 050301 (2003).
  16. G. Kulkarni, R. Sahu, O. S. Magaña-Loaiza, R. W. Boyd, and A. K. Jha, Single-shot measurement of the orbital-angular-momentum spectrum of light, Nat. Commun. 8, 1054 (2017).
  17. L. Beltran, G. Frascella, A. M. Perez, R. Fickler, P. R. Sharapova, M. Manceau, O. V. Tikhonova, R. W. Boyd, G. Leuchs, and M. V. Chekhova, Orbital angular momentum modes of high-gain parametric down-conversion, J. Opt. 19, 044005 (2017).
  18. R. Fickler, R. Lapkiewicz, W. N. Plick, M. Krenn, C. Schaeff, S. Ramelow, and A. Zeilinger, Quantum entanglement of high angular momenta, Science 338, 640 (2012).
  19. M. Krenn, M. Malik, M. Erhard, and A. Zeilinger, Orbital angular momentum of photons and the entanglement of Laguerre–Gaussian modes, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 375, 20150442 (2017).
  20. R. F. Offer, D. Stulga, E. Riis, S. Franke-Arnold, and A. S. Arnold, Spiral bandwidth of four-wave mixing in Rb vapour, Commun. Phys. 1, 84 (2018).
  21. G. Kulkarni, L. Taneja, S. Aarav, and A. K. Jha, Angular schmidt spectrum of entangled photons: Derivation of an exact formula and experimental characterization for noncollinear phase matching, Phys. Rev. A 97, 063846 (2018).
  22. A. Mair, A. Vaziri, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, Entanglement of the orbital angular momentum states of photons, Nature (London) 412, 313 (2001).
  23. K. Pang, C. Liu, G. Xie, Y. Ren, Z. Zhao, R. Zhang, Y. Cao, J. Zhao, H. Song, H. Song et al., Demonstration of a 10 Mbit/s quantum communication link by encoding data on two Laguerre–Gaussian modes with different radial indices, Opt. Lett. 43, 5639 (2018).
  24. H. Larocque, D. Sugic, D. Mortimer, A. J. Taylor, R. Fickler, R. W. Boyd, M. R. Dennis, and E. Karimi, Reconstructing the topology of optical polarization knots, Nat. Phys. 14, 1079 (2018).
  25. J. Leach, M. R. Dennis, J. Courtial, and M. J. Padgett, Vortex knots in light, New J. Phys. 7, 55 (2005).
  26. M. R. Dennis, R. P. King, B. Jack, K. Oholleran, and M. J. Padgett, Isolated optical vortex knots, Nat. Phys. 6, 118 (2010).
  27. M. Liscidini and J. Sipe, Stimulated emission tomography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 193602 (2013).
  28. Y. Yang, P. Zhang, and X.-S. Ma, Stimulated emission tomography for entangled photon pairs with different detection spectral ranges, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 37, 2071 (2020).
  29. B. Fang, M. Liscidini, J. Sipe, and V. Lorenz, Multidimensional characterization of an entangled photon-pair source via stimulated emission tomography, Opt. Express 24, 10013 (2016).
  30. L. A. Rozema, C. Wang, D. H. Mahler, A. Hayat, A. M. Steinberg, J. E. Sipe, and M. Liscidini, Characterizing an entangled-photon source with classical detectors and measurements, Optica 2, 430 (2015).
  31. A. Keller, A. Z. Khoury, N. Fabre, M. Amanti, F. Baboux, S. Ducci, and P. Milman, Reconstructing the full modal structure of photonic states by stimulated-emission tomography in the low-gain regime, Phys. Rev. A 106, 063709 (2022).
  32. Y. Xu, S. Tang, A. N. Black, and R. W. Boyd, Orthogonal spatial coding with stimulated parametric down-conversion, Opt. Express 31, 42723 (2023).
  33. D. P. Caetano, M. P. Almeida, P. H. Ribeiro, J. A. O. Huguenin, B. C. dos Santos, and A. Z. Khoury, Conservation of orbital angular momentum in stimulated down-conversion, Phys. Rev. A 66, 041801 (2002).
  34. A. de Oliveira, G. Santos, N. R. da Silva, L. Pereira, G. B. Alves, A. Z. Khoury, and P. S. Ribeiro, Beyond conservation of orbital angular momentum in stimulated parametric down-conversion, Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 044019 (2021).
  35. S. P. Walborn, C. Monken, S. Pádua, and P. S. Ribeiro, Spatial correlations in parametric down-conversion, Phys. Rep. 495, 87 (2010).
  36. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L042047 for the data of the experiments.
  37. V. Arrizón, U. Ruiz, R. Carrada, and L. A. González, Pixelated phase computer holograms for the accurate encoding of scalar complex fields, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, 3500 (2007).
  38. Y. Miyamoto, D. Kawase, M. Takeda, K. Sasaki, and S. Takeuchi, Detection of superposition in the orbital angular momentum of photons without excess components and its application in the verification of non-classical correlation, J. Opt. 13, 064027 (2011).
  39. A. Nicolas, L. Veissier, E. Giacobino, D. Maxein, and J. Laurat, Quantum state tomography of orbital angular momentum photonic qubits via a projection-based technique, New J. Phys. 17, 033037 (2015).
  40. B. Baghdasaryan, F. Steinlechner, and S. Fritzsche, Justifying the thin-crystal approximation in spontaneous parametric down-conversion for collinear phase matching, Phys. Rev. A 103, 063508 (2021).
  41. T. Santiago-Cruz, A. Fedotova, V. Sultanov, M. A. Weissflog, D. Arslan, M. Younesi, T. Pertsch, I. Staude, F. Setzpfandt, and M. Chekhova, Photon pairs from resonant metasurfaces, Nano Lett. 21, 4423 (2021).
  42. Y. Zhou, M. Mirhosseini, D. Fu, J. Zhao, S. M. Hashemi Rafsanjani, A. E. Willner, and R. W. Boyd, Sorting photons by radial quantum number, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 263602 (2017).
  43. S. Choudhary, R. Sampson, Y. Miyamoto, O. S. Magaña-Loaiza, S. M. H. Rafsanjani, M. Mirhosseini, and R. W. Boyd, Measurement of the radial mode spectrum of photons through a phase-retrieval method, Opt. Lett. 43, 6101 (2018).
  44. Y. Zhang and N. K. Fontaine, Multi-plane light conversion: A practical tutorial, arXiv:2304.11323.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation