Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Ultrastrong linear optomechanical interaction

Kahan Dare1,2, Jannek J. Hansen1, Iurie Coroli1, Aisling Johnson1, Markus Aspelmeyer1,2, and Uroš Delić1,*

  • 1University of Vienna, Faculty of Physics, Vienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
  • 2Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI) Vienna, Austrian Academy of Sciences, A-1090 Vienna, Austria

  • *Contact author: uros.delic@univie.ac.at

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L042025 – Published 25 October, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L042025

Abstract

Light-matter interaction in the ultrastrong coupling regime can be used to generate exotic ground states with two-mode squeezing and may be useful for quantum-enhanced sensing. Current demonstrations of ultrastrong coupling have been performed in fundamentally nonlinear systems. We report a cavity optomechanical system that operates in the linear coupling regime, reaching a maximum coupling of gx/Ωx=0.55±0.02. Such a system is inherently unstable, which may in the future enable strong mechanical squeezing.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (63)

  1. E. T. Jaynes and F. W. Cummings, Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser, Proc. IEEE 51, 89 (1963).
  2. P. Forn-Díaz, L. Lamata, E. Rico, J. Kono, and E. Solano, Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 025005 (2019).
  3. A. Frisk Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter, Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 19 (2019).
  4. C. Ciuti, G. Bastard, and I. Carusotto, Quantum vacuum properties of the intersubband cavity polariton field, Phys. Rev. B 72, 115303 (2005).
  5. P. Nataf and C. Ciuti, Vacuum degeneracy of a circuit QED system in the ultrastrong coupling regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 023601 (2010).
  6. D. Vitali, S. Gigan, A. Ferreira, H. R. Böhm, P. Tombesi, A. Guerreiro, V. Vedral, A. Zeilinger, and M. Aspelmeyer, Optomechanical entanglement between a movable mirror and a cavity field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 030405 (2007).
  7. D. Marković, S. Jezouin, Q. Ficheux, S. Fedortchenko, S. Felicetti, T. Coudreau, P. Milman, Z. Leghtas, and B. Huard, Demonstration of an effective ultrastrong coupling between two oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 040505 (2018).
  8. S.-P. Wang, A. Ridolfo, T. Li, S. Savasta, F. Nori, Y. Nakamura, and J. Q. You, Probing the symmetry breaking of a light-matter system by an ancillary qubit, Nat. Commun. 14, 4397 (2023).
  9. G. Vacanti, S. Pugnetti, N. Didier, M. Paternostro, G. M. Palma, R. Fazio, and V. Vedral, Photon production from the vacuum close to the superradiant transition: Linking the dynamical Casimir effect to the Kibble-Zurek mechanism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 093603 (2012).
  10. R. Stassi, A. Ridolfo, O. Di Stefano, M. J. Hartmann, and S. Savasta, Spontaneous conversion from virtual to real photons in the ultrastrong-coupling regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 243601 (2013).
  11. L. Garziano, A. Ridolfo, R. Stassi, O. Di Stefano, and S. Savasta, Switching on and off of ultrastrong light-matter interaction: Photon statistics of quantum vacuum radiation, Phys. Rev. A 88, 063829 (2013).
  12. A. Baust, E. Hoffmann, M. Haeberlein, M. J. Schwarz, P. Eder, J. Goetz, F. Wulschner, E. Xie, L. Zhong, F. Quijandría, D. Zueco, J. J. G. Ripoll, L. García-Álvarez, G. Romero, E. Solano, K. G. Fedorov, E. P. Menzel, F. Deppe, A. Marx, and R. Gross, Ultrastrong coupling in two-resonator circuit QED, Phys. Rev. B 93, 214501 (2016).
  13. F. Yoshihara, T. Fuse, S. Ashhab, K. Kakuyanagi, S. Saito, and K. Semba, Superconducting qubit-oscillator circuit beyond the ultrastrong-coupling regime, Nat. Phys. 13, 44 (2017).
  14. A. Vasanelli, Y. Todorov, and C. Sirtori, Ultra-strong light–matter coupling and superradiance using dense electron gases, C. R. Phys. 17, 861 (2016).
  15. B. Askenazi, A. Vasanelli, Y. Todorov, E. Sakat, J.-J. Greffet, G. Beaudoin, I. Sagnes, and C. Sirtori, Midinfrared ultrastrong light–matter coupling for THz thermal emission, ACS Photonics 4, 2550 (2017).
  16. A. Bayer, M. Pozimski, S. Schambeck, D. Schuh, R. Huber, D. Bougeard, and C. Lange, Terahertz Light-matter interaction beyond unity coupling strength, Nano Lett. 17, 6340 (2017).
  17. N. S. Mueller, Y. Okamura, B. G. M. Vieira, S. Juergensen, H. Lange, E. B. Barros, F. Schulz, and S. Reich, Deep strong light-matter coupling in plasmonic nanoparticle crystals, Nature (London) 583, 780 (2020).
  18. F. Benz, M. K. Schmidt, A. Dreismann, R. Chikkaraddy, Y. Zhang, A. Demetriadou, C. Carnegie, H. Ohadi, B. de Nijs, R. Esteban, J. Aizpurua, and J. J. Baumberg, Single-molecule optomechanics in “picocavities,” Science 354, 726 (2016).
  19. G. A. Peterson, S. Kotler, F. Lecocq, K. Cicak, X. Y. Jin, R. W. Simmonds, J. Aumentado, and J. D. Teufel, Ultrastrong parametric coupling between a superconducting cavity and a mechanical resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 247701 (2019).
  20. J. George, S. Wang, T. Chervy, A. Canaguier-Durand, G. Schaeffer, J.-M. Lehn, J. A. Hutchison, C. Genet, and T. W. Ebbesen, Ultra-strong coupling of molecular materials: spectroscopy and dynamics, Faraday Discuss. 178, 281 (2015).
  21. S. Gambino, M. Mazzeo, A. Genco, O. Di Stefano, S. Savasta, S. Patanè, D. Ballarini, F. Mangione, G. Lerario, D. Sanvitto, and G. Gigli, Exploring light–matter interaction phenomena under ultrastrong coupling regime, ACS Photonics 1, 1042 (2014).
  22. S. R. Das, S. Majumder, S. K. Sahu, U. Singhal, T. Bera, and V. Singh, Instabilities near ultrastrong coupling in a microwave optomechanical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 067001 (2023).
  23. M. L. Cai, Z. D. Liu, W. D. Zhao, Y. K. Wu, Q. X. Mei, Y. Jiang, L. He, X. Zhang, Z. C. Zhou, and L. M. Duan, Observation of a quantum phase transition in the quantum Rabi model with a single trapped ion, Nat. Commun. 12, 1126 (2021).
  24. L. Garbe, O. Abah, S. Felicetti, and R. Puebla, Critical quantum metrology with fully-connected models: from Heisenberg to Kibble-Zurek scaling, Quantum Sci. Technol. 7, 035010 (2022).
  25. T. Ilias, D. Yang, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Criticality-enhanced quantum sensing via continuous measurement, PRX Quantum 3, 010354 (2022).
  26. K. Gietka, L. Ruks, and T. Busch, Understanding and improving critical metrology: Quenching superradiant light-matter systems beyond the critical point, Quantum 6, 700 (2022).
  27. L. Garbe, O. Abah, S. Felicetti, and R. Puebla, Exponential time-scaling of estimation precision by reaching a quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043061 (2022).
  28. S. Felicetti and A. Le Boité, Universal spectral features of ultrastrongly coupled systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 040404 (2020).
  29. F. Bibak, U. Delić, M. Aspelmeyer, and B. Dakić, Dissipative phase transitions in optomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. A 107, 053505 (2023).
  30. V. Sudhir, M. G. Genoni, J. Lee, and M. S. Kim, Critical behavior in ultrastrong-coupled oscillators, Phys. Rev. A 86, 012316 (2012).
  31. T. Weiss, M. Roda-Llordes, E. Torrontegui, M. Aspelmeyer, and O. Romero-Isart, Large quantum delocalization of a levitated nanoparticle using optimal control: Applications for force sensing and entangling via weak forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 023601 (2021).
  32. F. Cosco, J. S. Pedernales, and M. B. Plenio, Enhanced force sensitivity and entanglement in periodically driven optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A 103, L061501 (2021).
  33. M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014).
  34. F. Marquardt, J. P. Chen, A. A. Clerk, and S. M. Girvin, Quantum theory of cavity-assisted sideband cooling of mechanical motion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 093902 (2007).
  35. I. Wilson-Rae, N. Nooshi, W. Zwerger, and T. J. Kippenberg, Theory of ground state cooling of a mechanical oscillator using dynamical backaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 093901 (2007).
  36. C. Genes, D. Vitali, P. Tombesi, S. Gigan, and M. Aspelmeyer, Ground-state cooling of a micromechanical oscillator: Comparing cold damping and cavity-assisted cooling schemes, Phys. Rev. A 77, 033804 (2008).
  37. S. Gröblacher, K. Hammerer, M. R. Vanner, and M. Aspelmeyer, Observation of strong coupling between a micromechanical resonator and an optical cavity field, Nature (London) 460, 724 (2009).
  38. J. D. Teufel, D. Li, M. S. Allman, K. Cicak, A. J. Sirois, J. D. Whittaker, and R. W. Simmonds, Circuit cavity electromechanics in the strong-coupling regime, Nature (London) 471, 204 (2011).
  39. E. Verhagen, S. Deléglise, S. Weis, A. Schliesser, and T. J. Kippenberg, Quantum-coherent coupling of a mechanical oscillator to an optical cavity mode, Nature (London) 482, 63 (2012).
  40. G. Enzian, M. Szczykulska, J. Silver, L. Del Bino, S. Zhang, I. A. Walmsley, P. Del'Haye, and M. R. Vanner, Observation of Brillouin optomechanical strong coupling with an 11 GHz mechanical mode, Optica 6, 7 (2019).
  41. A. de los Ríos Sommer, N. Meyer, and R. Quidant, Strong optomechanical coupling at room temperature by coherent scattering, Nat. Commun. 12, 276 (2021).
  42. A. Ranfagni, P. Vezio, M. Calamai, A. Chowdhury, F. Marino, and F. Marin, Vectorial polaritons in the quantum motion of a levitated nanosphere, Nat. Phys. 17, 1120 (2021).
  43. R. Leijssen, G. R. La Gala, L. Freisem, J. T. Muhonen, and E. Verhagen, Nonlinear cavity optomechanics with nanomechanical thermal fluctuations, Nat. Commun. 8, ncomms16024 (2017).
  44. F. Fogliano, B. Besga, A. Reigue, P. Heringlake, L. Mercier de Lépinay, C. Vaneph, J. Reichel, B. Pigeau, and O. Arcizet, Mapping the cavity optomechanical interaction with subwavelength-sized ultrasensitive nanomechanical force sensors, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021009 (2021).
  45. U. Delić, M. Reisenbauer, D. Grass, N. Kiesel, V. Vuletić, and M. Aspelmeyer, Cavity cooling of a levitated nanosphere by coherent scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 123602 (2019).
  46. D. Windey, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, P. Maurer, L. Novotny, O. Romero-Isart, and R. Reimann, Cavity-based 3D cooling of a levitated nanoparticle via coherent scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 123601 (2019).
  47. C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, P. Maurer, D. Windey, L. Novotny, R. Reimann, and O. Romero-Isart, Theory for cavity cooling of levitated nanoparticles via coherent scattering: Master equation approach, Phys. Rev. A 100, 013805 (2019).
  48. U. Delić, M. Reisenbauer, K. Dare, D. Grass, V. Vuletić, N. Kiesel, and M. Aspelmeyer, Cooling of a levitated nanoparticle to the motional quantum ground state, Science 367, 892 (2020).
  49. A. Ranfagni, K. Børkje, F. Marino, and F. Marin, Two-dimensional quantum motion of a levitated nanosphere, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033051 (2022).
  50. J. Piotrowski, D. Windey, J. Vijayan, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, A. de los Rios Sommer, N. Meyer, R. Quidant, O. Romero-Isart, R. Reimann, and L. Novotny, Simultaneous ground-state cooling of two mechanical modes of a levitated nanoparticle, Nat. Phys. 19, 1009 (2023).
  51. A. Dechant, N. Kiesel, and E. Lutz, All-optical nanomechanical heat engine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 183602 (2015).
  52. A. Dechant, N. Kiesel, and E. Lutz, Underdamped stochastic heat engine at maximum efficiency, Europhys. Lett. 119, 50003 (2017).
  53. M. A. Ciampini, T. Wenzl, M. Konopik, G. Thalhammer, M. Aspelmeyer, E. Lutz, and N. Kiesel, Experimental nonequilibrium memory erasure beyond Landauer's bound, arXiv:2107.04429.
  54. O. Černotík and R. Filip, Strong mechanical squeezing for a levitated particle by coherent scattering, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013052 (2020).
  55. O. Romero-Isart, A. C. Pflanzer, F. Blaser, R. Kaltenbaek, N. Kiesel, M. Aspelmeyer, and J. I. Cirac, Large quantum superpositions and interference of massive nanometer-sized objects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 020405 (2011).
  56. L. Neumeier, M. A. Ciampini, O. Romero-Isart, M. Aspelmeyer, and N. Kiesel, Fast quantum interference of a nanoparticle via optical potential control, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2306953121 (2024).
  57. K. Kustura, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, A. R. Sommer, N. Meyer, R. Quidant, and O. Romero-Isart, Mechanical squeezing via unstable dynamics in a microcavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 143601 (2022).
  58. D. E. Chang, C. A. Regal, S. B. Papp, D. J. Wilson, J. Ye, O. Painter, H. J. Kimble, and P. Zoller, Cavity opto-mechanics using an optically levitated nanosphere, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1005 (2010).
  59. O. Romero-Isart, M. L. Juan, R. Quidant, and J. I. Cirac, Toward quantum superposition of living organisms, New J. Phys. 12, 033015 (2010).
  60. U. Delić, D. Grass, M. Reisenbauer, T. Damm, M. Weitz, N. Kiesel, and M. Aspelmeyer, Levitated cavity optomechanics in high vacuum, Quantum Sci. Technol. 5, 025006 (2020).
  61. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L042025 for the full description of the experimental setup, the solution of the eigenfrequencies, and details about data evaluation.
  62. M. Konopik and E. Lutz, Local master equations may fail to describe dissipative critical behavior, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013171 (2022).
  63. P. Pilar, D. De Bernardis, and P. Rabl, Thermodynamics of ultrastrongly coupled light-matter systems, Quantum 4, 335 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation