Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Hydrodynamic hovering of swimming bacteria above surfaces

Pyae Hein Htet1, Debasish Das2,*, and Eric Lauga1,†

  • 1Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0WA, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, 26 Richmond St, Glasgow G1 1XH, Scotland, United Kingdom

  • *Contact author: debasish.das@strath.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: e.lauga@damtp.cam.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L032070 – Published 19 September, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L032070

Abstract

Flagellated bacteria are hydrodynamically attracted to rigid walls, yet past work shows a “hovering” state where they swim stably at a finite height above surfaces. We use numerics and theory to reveal the physical origin of hovering. Simulations first show that hovering requires an elongated cell body and results from a tilt away from the wall. Theoretical models then identify two essential asymmetries: the response of width-asymmetric cells to active flows created by length-asymmetric cells. A minimal model reconciles near- and far-field hydrodynamics, capturing all key features of hovering.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (40)

  1. D. Dykhuizen, Species numbers in bacteria, Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 56, 62 (2005).
  2. N. Wadhwa and H. C. Berg, Bacterial motility: Machinery and mechanisms, Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20, 161 (2022).
  3. H. C. Berg, E. coli in Motion (Springer, Berlin, 2004).
  4. E. Lauga, Bacterial hydrodynamics, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 48, 105 (2016).
  5. G. H. Wadhams and J. P. Armitage, Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 1024 (2004).
  6. T. K. Wood, A. F. González Barrios, M. Herzberg, and J. Lee, Motility influences biofilm architecture in escherichia coli, Appl. Microbial Cell Physiol. 72, 361 (2006).
  7. S. B. Guttenplan and D. B. Kearns, Regulation of flagellar motility during biofilm formation, FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 37, 849 (2013).
  8. K. Drescher, R. E. Goldstein, N. Michel, M. Polin, and I. Tuval, Direct measurement of the flow field around swimming microorganisms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 168101 (2010).
  9. C. Dombrowski, L. Cisneros, S. Chatkaew, R. E. Goldstein, and J. O. Kessler, Self-concentration and large-scale coherence in bacterial dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 098103 (2004).
  10. D. Saintillan and M. J. Shelley, Instabilities and pattern formation in active particle suspensions: kinetic theory and continuum simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 178103 (2008).
  11. S. E. Spagnolie, G. R. Moreno-Flores, D. Bartolo, and E. Lauga, Geometric capture and escape of a microswimmer colliding with an obstacle, Soft Matter 11, 3396 (2015).
  12. A. Creppy, E. Clément, C. Douarche, M. V. D'Angelo, and H. Auradou, Effect of motility on the transport of bacteria populations through a porous medium, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 013102 (2019).
  13. A. P. Berke, L. Turner, H. C. Berg, and E. Lauga, Hydrodynamic attraction of swimming microorganisms by surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 038102 (2008).
  14. S. E. Spagnolie and E. Lauga, Hydrodynamics of self-propulsion near a boundary: Predictions and accuracy of far-field approximations, J. Fluid Mech. 700, 105 (2012).
  15. P. D. Frymier, R. M. Ford, H. C. Berg, and P. T. Cummings, Three-dimensional tracking of motile bacteria near a solid planar surface, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 6195 (1995).
  16. E. Lauga, W. R. DiLuzio, G. M. Whitesides, and H. A. Stone, Swimming in circles: Motion of bacteria near solid boundaries, Biophys. J. 90, 400 (2006).
  17. D. Lopez and E. Lauga, Dynamics of swimming bacteria at complex interfaces, Phys. Fluids 26, 071902 (2014).
  18. A. P. Petroff, X.-L. Wu, and A. Libchaber, Fast-moving bacteria self-organize into active two-dimensional crystals of rotating cells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 158102 (2015).
  19. N. Phan-Thien, T. Tran-Cong, and M. Ramia, A boundary-element analysis of flagellar propulsion, J. Fluid Mech. 184, 533 (1987).
  20. D. Giacché, T. Ishikawa, and T. Yamaguchi, Hydrodynamic entrapment of bacteria swimming near a solid surface, Phys. Rev. E 82, 056309 (2010).
  21. N. Watari and R. G. Larson, The hydrodynamics of a run-and-tumble bacterium propelled by polymorphic helical flagella, Biophys. J. 98, 12 (2010).
  22. H. Shum, E. A. Gaffney, and D. J. Smith, Modelling bacterial behaviour close to a no-slip plane boundary: the influence of bacterial geometry, Proc. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 466, 1725 (2010).
  23. J. Hu, M. Yang, G. Gompper, and R. G. Winkler, Modelling the mechanics and hydrodynamics of swimming E.coli, Soft Matter 11, 7867 (2015).
  24. D. Das and E. Lauga, Computing the motor torque of Escherichia coli, Soft Matter 14, 5955 (2018).
  25. D. Das and E. Lauga, Transition to bound states for bacteria swimming near surfaces, Phys. Rev. E 100, 043117 (2019).
  26. G. Li, L.-K. Tam, and J. X. Tang, Amplified effect of brownian motion in bacterial near-surface swimming, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18355 (2008).
  27. S. Bianchi, F. Saglimbeni, and R. Di Leonardo, Holographic imaging reveals the mechanism of wall entrapment in swimming bacteria, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011010 (2017).
  28. S. Bianchi, F. Saglimbeni, G. Frangipane, D. Dell'Arciprete, and R. Di Leonardo, 3d dynamics of bacteria wall entrapment at a water–air interface, Soft Matter 15, 3397 (2019).
  29. C. Pozrikidis, Boundary Integral and Singularity Methods for Linearized Viscous Flow (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1992).
  30. C. Pozrikidis, A Practical Guide to Boundary Element Methods with the Software Library BEMLIB (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2002).
  31. N. C. Darnton, L. Turner, S. Rojevsky, and H. C. Berg, On torque and tumbling in swimming Escherichia coli, J. Bacteriol. 189, 1756 (2007).
  32. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L032070 for details of boundary element simulations, slender body theory near a wall, asymptotic analytical solutions, and dependence of equilibrium height and angle on geometry.
  33. G. J. Hancock and M. H. A. Newman, The self-propulsion of microscopic organisms through liquids, Proc. R. Soc. London A 217, 96 (1953).
  34. G. K. Batchelor, Slender-body theory for particles of arbitrary cross-section in stokes flow, J. Fluid Mech. 44, 419 (1970).
  35. R. E. Johnson, An improved slender-body theory for stokes flow, J. Fluid Mech. 99, 411 (1980).
  36. J. R. Blake, A note on the image system for a stokeslet in a no-slip boundary, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 70, 303 (1971).
  37. J. R. Blake and A. T. Chwang, Fundamental singularities of viscous flow, J. Eng. Math. 8, 23 (1974).
  38. W. B. Russel, E. J. Hinch, L. G. Leal, and G. Tieffenbruck, Rods falling near a vertical wall, J. Fluid Mech. 83, 273 (1977).
  39. E. J. Hinch, Integrals, in Perturbation Methods, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991), pp. 27–45.
  40. K. Drescher, J. Dunkel, L. H. Cisneros, S. Ganguly, and R. E. Goldstein, Fluid dynamics and noise in bacterial cell–cell and cell–surface scattering, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 10940 (2011).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation