- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Magnetogenesis via the canonical battery effect

Modhuchandra Laishram1, Gunsu S. Yun2,3, and Young Dae Yoon1,2,*

  • *Contact author: youngdae.yoon@apctp.org
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L032052 – Published 3 September, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L032052

Abstract

We show by analyzing the time evolution of canonical vorticity that spontaneous generation of magnetic fields within an initially unmagnetized, vorticity-free plasma must be achieved through the canonical battery effect. This effect generalizes well-known magnetogenesis mechanisms across different regimes such as the Biermann battery in the isotropic regime and the Weibel instability in the kinetic regime, the latter of which is further verified by particle-in-cell simulations. Using the canonical battery term, a general prediction of any configuration of the pressure tensor that allows for magnetogenesis can be established. One such configuration—a two-dimensionally localized pressure anisotropy—that does not correspond to either of the mechanisms is derived and numerically verified. The advantage of using this term in magnetogenesis analyses is discussed.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (56)

  1. E. N. Parker, Cosmical Magnetic Fields: Their Origin and Their Activity (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1979).
  2. A. Bonafede, L. Feretti, M. Murgia, F. Govoni, G. Giovannini, D. Dallacasa, K. Dolag, and G. B. Taylor, The coma cluster magnetic field from Faraday rotation measures, Astron. Astrophys. 513, A30 (2010).
  3. A. Brandenburg and K. Subramanian, Astrophysical magnetic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory, Phys. Rep. 417, 1 (2005).
  4. T. Vachaspati, Progress on cosmological magnetic fields, Rep. Prog. Phys. 84, 074901 (2021).
  5. M. Vogelsberger, F. Marinacci, P. Torrey, and E. Puchwein, Cosmological simulations of galaxy formation, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 42 (2020).
  6. H. Li, O. Y. Gnedin, and N. Y. Gnedin, Star cluster formation in cosmological simulations. II. Effects of star formation efficiency and stellar feedback, Astrophys. J. 861, 107 (2018).
  7. G. Bertone, C. Isola, M. Lemoine, and G. Sigl, Ultrahigh energy heavy nuclei propagation in extragalactic magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 66, 103003 (2002).
  8. A. Neronov and I. Vovk, Evidence for strong extragalactic magnetic fields from Fermi observations of TeV blazars, Science 328, 73 (2010).
  9. J. M. Griebmeier, F. Tabataba-Vakili, A. Stadelmann, J. L. Grenfell, and D. Atri, Galactic cosmic rays on extrasolar earth-like planets: I. Cosmic ray flux, Astron. Astrophys. 581, A44 (2015).
  10. I. P. Pakhotin, I. R. Mann, K. Xie, J. K. Burchill, and D. J. Knudsen, Northern preference for terrestrial electromagnetic energy input from space weather, Nat. Commun. 12, 199 (2021).
  11. M. S. Turner and L. M. Widrow, Inflation-produced, large-scale magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 37, 2743 (1988).
  12. K. Jedamzik and A. Saveliev, Stringent limit on primordial magnetic fields from the cosmic microwave background radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 021301 (2019).
  13. K. Jedamzik and L. Pogosian, Relieving the Hubble tension with primordial magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 181302 (2020).
  14. A. Brandenburg, D. Sokoloff, and K. Subramanian, Current status of turbulent dynamo theory: From large-scale to small-scale dynamos, Space Sci. Rev. 169, 123 (2012).
  15. J. Mason, L. Malyshkin, S. Boldyrev, and F. Cattaneo, Magnetic dynamo action in random flows with zero and finite correlation times, Astrophys. J. 730, 86 (2011).
  16. A. Schlüter, Über den ursprung der magnetfelder auf sternen und im interstellaren raum, Z. Naturforsch. A 5, 65 (1950).
  17. E. S. Weibel, Spontaneously growing transverse waves in a plasma due to an anisotropic velocity distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 83 (1959).
  18. R. M. Kulsrud, R. Cen, J. P. Ostriker, and D. Ryu, The protogalactic origin for cosmic magnetic fields, Astrophys. J. 480, 481 (1997).
  19. N. Y. Gnedin, A. Ferrara, and E. G. Zweibel, Generation of the primordial magnetic fields during cosmological reionization, Astrophys. J. 539, 505 (2000).
  20. P. M. Nilson, L. Willingale, M. C. Kaluza, C. Kamperidis, S. Minardi, M. S. Wei, P. Fernandes, M. Notley, S. Bandyopadhyay, M. Sherlock, R. J. Kingham, M. Tatarakis, Z. Najmudin, W. Rozmus, R. G. Evans, M. G. Haines, A. E. Dangor, and K. Krushelnick, Magnetic reconnection and plasma dynamics in two-beam laser-solid interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 255001 (2006).
  21. J. Matteucci, W. Fox, A. Bhattacharjee, D. B. Schaeffer, C. Moissard, K. Germaschewski, G. Fiksel, and S. X. Hu, Biermann-battery-mediated magnetic reconnection in 3D colliding plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 095001 (2018).
  22. A. Grassi, M. Grech, F. Amiranoff, F. Pegoraro, A. Macchi, and C. Riconda, Electron Weibel instability in relativistic counterstreaming plasmas with flow-aligned external magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. E 95, 023203 (2017).
  23. J. A. Stamper, K. Papadopoulos, R. N. Sudan, S. O. Dean, E. A. McLean, and J. M. Dawson, Spontaneous magnetic fields in laser-produced plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 1012 (1971).
  24. N. L. Kugland, D. D. Ryutov, P. Y. Chang, R. P. Drake, G. Fiksel, D. H. Froula, S. H. Glenzer, G. Gregori, M. Grosskopf, M. Koenig, Y. Kuramitsu, C. Kuranz, M. C. Levy, E. Liang, J. Meinecke, F. Miniati, T. Morita, A. Pelka, C. Plechaty, R. Presura et al., Self-organized electromagnetic field structures in laser-produced counter-streaming plasmas, Nat. Phys. 8, 809 (2012).
  25. J. Zhong, Y. Li, X. Wang, J. Wang, Q. Dong, C. Xiao, S. Wang, X. Liu, L. Zhang, L. An, F. Wang, J. Zhu, Y. Gu, X. He, G. Zhao, and J. Zhang, Modelling loop-top x-ray source and reconnection outflows in solar flares with intense lasers, Nat. Phys. 6, 984 (2010).
  26. S. Mondal, V. Narayanan, W. J. Ding, A. D. Lad, B. Hao, S. Ahmad, W. M. Wang, Z. M. Sheng, S. Sengupta, P. Kaw, A. Das, and G. R. Kumar, Direct observation of turbulent magnetic fields in hot, dense laser produced plasmas, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 8011 (2012).
  27. W. Fox, G. Fiksel, A. Bhattacharjee, P.-Y. Chang, K. Germaschewski, S. X. Hu, and P. M. Nilson, Filamentation instability of counterstreaming laser-driven plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 225002 (2013).
  28. C. M. Huntington, F. Fiuza, J. S. Ross, A. B. Zylstra, R. P. Drake, D. H. Froula, G. Gregori, N. L. Kugland, C. C. Kuranz, M. C. Levy, C. K. Li, J. Meinecke, T. Morita, R. Petrasso, C. Plechaty, B. A. Remington, D. D. Ryutov, Y. Sakawa, A. Spitkovsky, H. Takabe et al., Observation of magnetic field generation via the Weibel instability in interpenetrating plasma flows, Nat. Phys. 11, 173 (2015).
  29. F. Pucci, M. Viviani, F. Valentini, G. Lapenta, W. H. Matthaeus, and S. Servidio, Turbulent magnetogenesis in a collisionless plasma, Astrophys. J. Lett. 922, L18 (2021).
  30. M. Zhou, V. Zhdankin, M. W. Kunz, N. F. Loureiro, and D. A. Uzdensky, Magnetogenesis in a collisionless plasma: From Weibel instability to turbulent dynamo, Astrophys. J. 960, 12 (2024).
  31. S. V. Bulanov, F. Pegoraro, and A. S. Sakharov, Magnetic reconnection in electron magnetohydrodynamics, Phys. Fluids B 4, 2499 (1992).
  32. D. Biskamp, E. Schwarz, and J. F. Drake, Two-fluid theory of collisionless magnetic reconnection, Phys. Plasmas 4, 1002 (1997).
  33. E. Cafaro, D. Grasso, F. Pegoraro, F. Porcelli, and A. Saluzzi, Invariants and geometric structures in nonlinear Hamiltonian magnetic reconnection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4430 (1998).
  34. D. Grasso, F. Califano, F. Pegoraro, and F. Porcelli, Phase mixing and island saturation in Hamiltonian reconnection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5051 (2001).
  35. Y. D. Yoon and P. M. Bellan, A generalized two-fluid picture of non-driven collisionless reconnection and its relation to whistler waves, Phys. Plasmas 24, 052114 (2017).
  36. Y. D. Yoon and P. M. Bellan, An intuitive two-fluid picture of spontaneous 2D collisionless magnetic reconnection and whistler wave generation, Phys. Plasmas 25, 055704 (2018).
  37. Y. D. Yoon and P. M. Bellan, Fast ion heating in transient collisionless magnetic reconnection via an intrinsic stochastic mechanism, Astrophys. J. Lett. 868, L31 (2018).
  38. S. M. Mahajan and F. A. Asenjo, General connected and reconnected fields in plasmas, Phys. Plasmas 25, 022116 (2018).
  39. Y. D. Yoon and P. M. Bellan, The electron canonical battery effect in magnetic reconnection: Completion of the electron canonical vorticity framework, Phys. Plasmas 26, 100702 (2019).
  40. S. You, A field theory approach to the evolution of canonical helicity and energy, Phys. Plasmas 23, 072108 (2016).
  41. J. V. D. Linden, J. Sears, T. Intrator, and S. You, Measurements of the canonical helicity of a gyrating kink, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 035001 (2018).
  42. A. V. Gordeev, A. S. Kingsep, and L. I. Rudakov, Electron magnetohydrodynamics, Phys. Rep. 243, 215 (1994).
  43. J. Derouillat, A. Beck, F. Pérez, T. Vinci, M. Chiaramello, A. Grassi, M. Flé, G. Bouchard, I. Plotnikov, N. Aunai, J. Dargent, C. Riconda, and M. Grech, Smilei: A collaborative, open-source, multi-purpose particle-in-cell code for plasma simulation, Comput. Phys. Commun. 222, 351 (2018).
  44. K. M. Schoeffler, N. F. Loureiro, R. A. Fonseca, and L. O. Silva, Magnetic-field generation and amplification in an expanding plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 175001 (2014).
  45. A. A. Schekochihin, S. C. Cowley, W. Dorland, G. W. Hammett, G. G. Howes, E. Quataert, and T. Tatsuno, Astrophysical gyrokinetics: Kinetic and fluid turbulent cascades in magnetized weakly collisional plasmas, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 182, 310 (2009).
  46. Y. Kuramitsu, Y. Sakawa, T. Morita, S. Dono, H. Aoki, H. Tanji, C. D. Gregory, J. N. Waugh, B. Loupias, M. Koenig, N. Woolsey, T. Ide, T. Sano, and H. Takabe, Formation of density inhomogeneity in laser produced plasmas for a test bed of magnetic field amplification in supernova remnants, Astrophys. Space Sci. 336, 269 (2011).
  47. S. Jinno, M. Kanasaki, T. Asai, R. Matsui, A. S. Pirozhkov, K. Ogura, A. Sagisaka, Y. Miyasaka, N. Nakanii, M. Kando, N. Kitagawa, K. Morishima, S. Kodaira, Y. Kishimoto, T. Yamauchi, M. Uesaka, H. Kiriyama, and Y. Fukuda, Laser-driven multi-MeV high-purity proton acceleration via anisotropic ambipolar expansion of micron-scale hydrogen clusters, Sci. Rep. 12, 16753 (2022).
  48. C. Zhang, C.-K. Huang, K. A. Marsh, C. E. Clayton, W. B. Mori, and C. Joshi, Ultrafast optical field-ionized gases—A laboratory platform for studying kinetic plasma instabilities, Sci. Adv. 5, eaax4545 (2019).
  49. L. Sironi, L. Comisso, and R. Golant, Generation of near-equipartition magnetic fields in turbulent collisionless plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 055201 (2023).
  50. G. L. Eyink, A. Lazarian, and E. T. Vishniac, Fast magnetic reconnection and spontaneous stochasticity, Astrophys. J. 743, 51 (2011).
  51. G. L. Eyink, Stochastic flux freezing and magnetic dynamo, Phys. Rev. E 83, 056405 (2011).
  52. J. Egedal, A. Le, and W. Daughton, A review of pressure anisotropy caused by electron trapping in collisionless plasma, and its implications for magnetic reconnection, Phys. Plasmas 20, 061201 (2013).
  53. S. Kumar, A. Prasad, S. S. Nayak, S. Agarwal, and R. Bhattacharyya, Magnetohydrodynamics simulation of magnetic flux rope formation in a quadrupolar magnetic field configuration, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 65, 085008 (2023).
  54. A. Bohdan, M. Pohl, J. Niemiec, P. J. Morris, Y. Matsumoto, T. Amano, M. Hoshino, and A. Sulaiman, Magnetic field amplification by the Weibel instability at planetary and astrophysical shocks with high Mach number, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 095101 (2021).
  55. M. Iwamoto, T. Amano, M. Hoshino, Y. Matsumoto, J. Niemiec, A. Ligorini, O. Kobzar, and M. Pohl, Precursor wave amplification by ion-electron coupling through wakefield in relativistic shocks, Astrophys. J. Lett. 883, L35 (2019).
  56. M. Iwamoto, Y. Matsumoto, T. Amano, S. Matsukiyo, and M. Hoshino, Linearly polarized coherent emission from relativistic magnetized ion-electron shocks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 035201 (2024).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L032052– Published 3 September, 2024
  • Received 25 March 2024
  • Revised 7 June 2024
  • Accepted 17 August 2024
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation