Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Strict hierarchy of optimal strategies for global estimations: Linking global estimations with local ones

Zhao-Yi Zhou, Jing-Tao Qiu, and Da-Jian Zhang*

  • *Contact author: zdj@sdu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L032048 – Published 30 August, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L032048

Abstract

A crucial yet challenging issue in quantum metrology is to ascertain the ultimate precision achievable in estimation strategies. While there are two paradigms of estimations, local and global, current research is largely confined to local estimations, which are useful once the parameter of interest is approximately known. In this Letter we target a paradigm shift towards global estimations, which can operate reliably even with a few measurement data and no substantial prior knowledge about the parameter. The key innovation here is to develop a technique, dubbed virtual imaginary-time evolution, which establishes an equality between the information gained in a global estimation and the quantum Fisher information for a virtual local estimation. This offers an intriguing pathway to surmount challenges in the realm of global estimations by leveraging powerful tools tailored for local estimations. We explore our technique to reveal a strict hierarchy of achievable precision for different global estimation strategies and uncover unexpected results contrary to conventional wisdom in local estimations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (53)

  1. K. E. Dorfman, F. Schlawin, and S. Mukamel, Nonlinear optical signals and spectroscopy with quantum light, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 045008 (2016).
  2. C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017).
  3. L. Pezzè, A. Smerzi, M. K. Oberthaler, R. Schmied, and P. Treutlein, Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 035005 (2018).
  4. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Advances in quantum metrology, Nat. Photonics 5, 222 (2011).
  5. R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański, M. Jarzyna, and J. Kołodyński, Quantum limits in optical interferometry, Prog. Opt. 60, 345 (2015).
  6. S. Pirandola, B. R. Bardhan, T. Gehring, C. Weedbrook, and S. Lloyd, Advances in photonic quantum sensing, Nat. Photonics 12, 724 (2018).
  7. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 010401 (2006).
  8. X. Zhao, Y. Yang, and G. Chiribella, Quantum metrology with indefinite causal order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 190503 (2020).
  9. Q. Liu, Z. Hu, H. Yuan, and Y. Yang, Optimal strategies of quantum metrology with a strict hierarchy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 070803 (2023).
  10. M. G. A. Paris, Quantum estimation for quantum technology, Int. J. Quantum Inf. 07, 125 (2009).
  11. R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański, J. Koıodyński, and M. Guţă, The elusive Heisenberg limit in quantum-enhanced metrology, Nat. Commun. 3, 1063 (2012).
  12. R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański and L. Maccone, Using entanglement against noise in quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 250801 (2014).
  13. Y. Yang, Memory effects in quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 110501 (2019).
  14. W. Cheng, S. C. Hou, Z. Wang, and X. X. Yi, Quantum metrology enhanced by coherence-induced driving in a cavity-QED setup, Phys. Rev. A 100, 053825 (2019).
  15. A. Altherr and Y. Yang, Quantum metrology for non-Markovian processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 060501 (2021).
  16. J. Liu, M. Zhang, H. Chen, L. Wang, and H. Yuan, Optimal scheme for quantum metrology, Adv. Quantum Technol. 5, 2100080 (2022).
  17. D.-J. Zhang and D. M. Tong, Approaching Heisenberg-scalable thermometry with built-in robustness against noise, npj Quantum Inf. 8, 81 (2022).
  18. A. Ullah, M. T. Naseem, and O. E. Müstecaplioğlu, Low-temperature quantum thermometry boosted by coherence generation, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043184 (2023).
  19. S. Kurdziałek, W. Górecki, F. Albarelli, and R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański, Using adaptiveness and causal superpositions against noise in quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 090801 (2023).
  20. S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3439 (1994).
  21. D.-J. Zhang and J. Gong, Dissipative adiabatic measurements: Beating the quantum Cramér-Rao bound, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023418 (2020).
  22. W. Górecki, R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański, H. M. Wiseman, and D. W. Berry, π-corrected Heisenberg limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 030501 (2020).
  23. W. Górecki and R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański, Multiple-phase quantum interferometry: Real and apparent gains of measuring all the phases simultaneously, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 040504 (2022).
  24. O. E. Barndorff-Nielsen and R. D. Gill, Fisher information in quantum statistics, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33, 4481 (2000).
  25. R. D. Gill and S. Massar, State estimation for large ensembles, Phys. Rev. A 61, 042312 (2000).
  26. M. Valeri, E. Polino, D. Poderini, I. Gianani, G. Corrielli, A. Crespi, R. Osellame, N. Spagnolo and F. Sciarrino, Experimental adaptive Bayesian estimation of multiple phases with limited data, npj Quantum Inf. 6, 92 (2020).
  27. V. Montenegro, U. Mishra, and A. Bayat, Global sensing and its impact for quantum many-body probes with criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 200501 (2021).
  28. J. Rubio, J. Anders, and L. A. Correa, Global quantum thermometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 190402 (2021).
  29. W.-K. Mok, K. Bharti, L.-C. Kwek, and A. Bayat, Optimal probes for global quantum thermometry, Commun. Phys. 4, 62 (2021).
  30. J. Preskill, Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond, Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
  31. L. Jiao, W. Wu, S.-Y. Bai, and J.-H. An, Quantum metrology in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum era, Adv. Quantum Technol. 2023, 2300218 (2023).
  32. J. J. Meyer, S. Khatri, D. S. França, J. Eisert, and P. Faist, Quantum metrology in the finite-sample regime, arXiv:2307.06370.
  33. J. Bavaresco, P. Lipka-Bartosik, P. Sekatski, and M. Mehboudi, Designing optimal protocols in Bayesian quantum parameter estimation with higher-order operations, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023305 (2024).
  34. J. Bavaresco, M. Murao, and M. T. Quintino, Strict hierarchy between parallel, sequential, and indefinite-causal-order strategies for channel discrimination, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 200504 (2021).
  35. C. W. Helstrom, Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory (Academic, New York, 1976).
  36. S. Personick, Application of quantum estimation theory to analog communication over quantum channels, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 17, 240 (1971).
  37. K. Macieszczak, M. Fraas, and R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański, Bayesian quantum frequency estimation in presence of collective dephasing, New J. Phys. 16, 113002 (2014).
  38. J. Rubio and J. Dunningham, Quantum metrology in the presence of limited data, New J. Phys. 21, 043037 (2019).
  39. R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański, W. Górecki, and M. Guţă, Multi-parameter estimation beyond quantum Fisher information, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53, 363001 (2020).
  40. J. S. Sidhu and P. Kok, Geometric perspective on quantum parameter estimation, AVS Quantum Sci. 2, 014701 (2020).
  41. J. Rubio, First-principles construction of symmetry-informed quantum metrologies, arXiv:2402.16410.
  42. A. Jamiołkowski, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Rep. Math. Phys. 3, 275 (1972).
  43. M.-D. Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices, Linear Algebra Appl. 10, 285 (1975).
  44. G. Chiribella, G. M. D'Ariano, and P. Perinotti, Transforming quantum operations: Quantum supermaps, Europhys. Lett. 83, 30004 (2008).
  45. M. Araújo, A. Feix, M. Navascués, and C. Brukner, A purification postulate for quantum mechanics with indefinite causal order, Quantum 1, 10 (2017).
  46. G. Chiribella, G. M. D'Ariano, and P. Perinotti, Theoretical framework for quantum networks, Phys. Rev. A 80, 022339 (2009).
  47. M. Motta, C. Sun, A. T. K. Tan, M. J. O'Rourke, E. Ye, A. J. Minnich, F. G. S. L. Brandão, and G. K.-L. Chan, Determining eigenstates and thermal states on a quantum computer using quantum imaginary time evolution, Nat. Phys. 16, 205 (2020).
  48. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L032048 for miscellaneous proofs, the two algorithms, characterizations of X̃(k), and some auxiliary numerical results.
  49. A. Fujiwara and H. Imai, A fibre bundle over manifolds of quantum channels and its application to quantum statistics, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41, 255304 (2008).
  50. M. Araújo, C. Branciard, F. Costa, A. Feix, C. Giarmatzi, and Č. Brukner, Witnessing causal nonseparability, New J. Phys. 17, 102001 (2015).
  51. A. Bisio, G. M. D'Ariano, P. Perinotti, and G. Chiribella, Minimal computational-space implementation of multiround quantum protocols, Phys. Rev. A 83, 022325 (2011).
  52. J. Wechs, H. Dourdent, A. A. Abbott, and C. Branciard, Quantum circuits with classical versus quantum control of causal order, PRX Quantum 2, 030335 (2021).
  53. https://github.com/zhaoyizhou98/global_estimation_metrology.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation