Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Absence of quantum optical coherence in high harmonic generation

Philipp Stammer*

  • *Contact author: philipp.stammer@icfo.eu

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L032033 – Published 8 August, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L032033

Abstract

The optical phase of the driving field in the process of high harmonic generation and the coherence properties of the harmonics are fundamental concepts in attosecond physics. Here, we consider driving the process by incoherent classical and nonclassical light fields exhibiting an undetermined optical phase. With this, we introduce the notion of quantum optical coherence into high harmonic generation and show that high harmonics can be generated from incoherent radiation despite having a vanishing electric field. We explicitly derive the quantum state of the harmonics when driven by carrier-envelope phase unstable fields and show that the generated harmonics are incoherent and exhibit zero electric field amplitudes. We find that the quantum state of each harmonic is diagonal in its photon number basis, but nevertheless has the exact same photon statistics as the widely considered coherent harmonics. From this, we conclude that assuming coherent harmonic radiation can originate from a preferred ensemble fallacy. These findings have profound implications for attosecond experiments and how to infer the harmonic radiation properties.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (44)

  1. M. Lewenstein, Ph. Balcou, M. Yu. Ivanov, A. Lhuillier, and P. B. Corkum, Theory of high-harmonic generation by low-frequency laser fields, Phys. Rev. A 49, 2117 (1994).
  2. M. Lewenstein, M. F. Ciappina, E. Pisanty, J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, Th. Lamprou, and P. Tzallas, Generation of optical Schrödinger cat states in intense laser–matter interactions, Nat. Phys. 17, 1104 (2021).
  3. A. Gorlach, O. Neufeld, N. Rivera, O. Cohen, and I. Kaminer, The quantum-optical nature of high harmonic generation, Nat. Commun. 11, 4598 (2020).
  4. P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, T. Lamprou, E. Pisanty, M. F. Ciappina, P. Tzallas, and M. Lewenstein, High photon number entangled states and coherent state superposition from the extreme ultraviolet to the far infrared, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 123603 (2022).
  5. J. Rivera-Dean, Th. Lamprou, E. Pisanty, P. Stammer, A. F. Ordóñez, A. S. Maxwell, M. F. Ciappina, M. Lewenstein, and P. Tzallas, Strong laser fields and their power to generate controllable high-photon-number coherent-state superpositions, Phys. Rev. A 105, 033714 (2022).
  6. P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, A. Maxwell, T. Lamprou, A. Ordóñez, M. F. Ciappina, P. Tzallas, and M. Lewenstein, Quantum electrodynamics of intense laser-matter interactions: A tool for quantum state engineering, PRX Quantum 4, 010201 (2023).
  7. P. Stammer, Theory of entanglement and measurement in high-order harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. A 106, L050402 (2022).
  8. P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, A. S. Maxwell, T. Lamprou, J. Argüello-Luengo, P. Tzallas, M. F. Ciappina, and M. Lewenstein, Entanglement and squeezing of the optical field modes in high harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 143603 (2024).
  9. P. Stammer and M. Lewenstein, Quantum optics as applied quantum electrodynamics is back in town, Acta Phys. Pol. A 143, S42 (2023).
  10. P. Stammer, On the limitations of the semi-classical picture in high harmonic generation, Nat. Phys. 20, 1040 (2024).
  11. L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Coherence properties of optical fields, Rev. Mod. Phys. 37, 231 (1965).
  12. L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
  13. K. Mølmer, Optical coherence: A convenient fiction, Phys. Rev. A 55, 3195 (1997).
  14. K. Mølmer, Quantum entanglement and classical behaviour, J. Mod. Opt. 44, 1937 (1997).
  15. T. Rudolph and B. C. Sanders, Requirement of optical coherence for continuous-variable quantum teleportation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 077903 (2001).
  16. S. D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, and R. W. Spekkens, Dialogue concerning two views on quantum coherence: Factist and fictionist, Int. J. Quantum Inform. 04, 17 (2006).
  17. S. J. van Enk and C. A. Fuchs, Quantum state of an ideal propagating laser field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 027902 (2001).
  18. S. J. van Enk and C. A. Fuchs, The quantum state of a propagating laser field, Quantum Inf. Comput. 2, 151 (2002).
  19. A. Pizzi, A. Gorlach, N. Rivera, A. Nunnenkamp, and I. Kaminer, Light emission from strongly driven many-body systems, Nat. Phys. 19, 551 (2023).
  20. A. Gorlach, M. E. Tzur, M. Birk, M. Krüger, N. Rivera, O. Cohen, and I. Kaminer, High-harmonic generation driven by quantum light, Nat. Phys. 19, 1689 (2023).
  21. P. Stammer, T. F. Martos, M. Lewenstein, and G. Rajchel-Mieldzioć, Metrological robustness of high photon number optical cat states, arXiv:2311.01371.
  22. Á. Gombkötő, A. Czirják, S. Varró, and P. Földi, Quantum-optical model for the dynamics of high-order-harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. A 94, 013853 (2016).
  23. Á. Gombkötő, S. Varró, P. Mati, and P. Földi, High-order harmonic generation as induced by a quantized field: Phase-space picture, Phys. Rev. A 101, 013418 (2020).
  24. M. E. Tzur, M. Birk, A. Gorlach, M. Krüger, I. Kaminer, and O. Cohen, Photon-statistics force in ultrafast electron dynamics, Nat. Photon. 17, 501 (2023).
  25. T. Lamprou, J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, M. Lewenstein, and P. Tzallas, Nonlinear optics using intense optical Schrödinger cat states, arXiv:2306.14480.
  26. J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, A. S. Maxwell, T. Lamprou, A. F. Ordóñez, E. Pisanty, P. Tzallas, M. Lewenstein, and M. F. Ciappina, Entanglement and non-classical states of light in a strong-laser driven solid-state system, arXiv:2211.00033.
  27. I. Gonoskov, R. Sondenheimer, C. Hünecke, D. Kartashov, U. Peschel, and S. Gräfe, Nonclassical light generation and control from laser-driven semiconductor intraband excitations, Phys. Rev. B 109, 125110 (2024).
  28. M. Lewenstein, N. Baldelli, U. Bhattacharya, J. Biegert, M. F. Ciappina, T. Grass, P. T. Grochowski, A. S. Johnson, Th. Lamprou, A. S. Maxwell et al., Attosecond physics and quantum information science, in International Conference on Attosecond Science and Technology (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2012), pp. 27–44.
  29. U. Bhattacharya, T. Lamprou, A. S. Maxwell, A. Ordonez, E. Pisanty, J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, M. F. Ciappina, M. Lewenstein, and P. Tzallas, Strong–laser–field physics, non–classical light states and quantum information science, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 094401 (2023).
  30. L. Cruz-Rodriguez, D. Dey, A. Freibert, and P. Stammer, Quantum phenomena in attosecond science, arXiv:2403.05482.
  31. B. Sundaram and P. W. Milonni, High-order harmonic generation: Simplified model and relevance of single-atom theories to experiment, Phys. Rev. A 41, 6571 (1990).
  32. P. D. Drummond and C. W. Gardiner, Generalised P-representations in quantum optics, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 13, 2353 (1980).
  33. M. S. Kim, F. A. M. De Oliveira, and P. L. Knight, Properties of squeezed number states and squeezed thermal states, Phys. Rev. A 40, 2494 (1989).
  34. A. Gilchrist, C. W. Gardiner, and P. D. Drummond, Positive P representation: Application and validity, Phys. Rev. A 55, 3014 (1997).
  35. This relation holds if the Fourier coefficients of P(α,β*) vanish faster than any power of |α| and |β|, which is the case for the states under consideration in this paper [44].
  36. We consider the limit of high intense laser fields in which the physical quantity of the electric field amplitude Eα remains fiinte and constant in the limit of large quantization volumes κ→0 and large coherent state amplitudes α→∞.
  37. For the Fock state drive in the considered limit we have ρq=|χq(0)〉〈χq(0)|=|0〉〈0|, which is evidently diagonal in the photon number basis.
  38. The first mentioning (to the best of our knowledge) of the quantum optical coherence properties in HHG due to the associated classical charge current is given in Ref. [13].
  39. P. Agostini and L. F. DiMauro, The physics of attosecond light pulses, Rep. Prog. Phys. 67, 813 (2004).
  40. D. A. Kopylov, K. Yu. Spasibko, T. V. Murzina, and M. V. Chekhova, Study of broadband multimode light via non-phase-matched sum frequency generation, New J. Phys. 21, 033024 (2019).
  41. C. Li, B. Braverman, G. Kulkarni, and R. W. Boyd, Experimental generation of polarization entanglement from spontaneous parametric down-conversion pumped by spatiotemporally highly incoherent light, Phys. Rev. A 107, L041701 (2023).
  42. K. Y. Spasibko, D. A. Kopylov, V. L. Krutyanskiy, T. V. Murzina, G. Leuchs, and M. V. Chekhova, Multiphoton effects enhanced due to ultrafast photon-number fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 223603 (2017).
  43. D. A. Kopylov, A. V. Rasputnyi, T. V. Murzina, and M. V. Chekhova, Spectral properties of second, third and fourth harmonics generation from broadband multimode bright squeezed vacuum, Laser Phys. Lett. 17, 075401 (2020).
  44. M. K. Olsen and A. S. Bradley, Numerical representation of quantum states in the positive-P and Wigner representations, Opt. Commun. 282, 3924 (2009).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation