Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Topological and conventional nanophotonic waveguides for directional integrated quantum optics

N. J. Martin1,*, M. Jalali Mehrabad2, X. Chen1, R. Dost1, E. Nussbaum3, D. Hallett1, L. Hallacy1, A. Foster1, E. Clarke4 et al.

P. K. Patil4, S. Hughes3, M. Hafezi2, A. M. Fox1, M. S. Skolnick1, and L. R. Wilson1

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom
  • 2Joint Quantum Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
  • 3Centre for Nanophotonics, Department of Physics, Engineering Physics and Astronomy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada
  • 4EPSRC National Epitaxy Facility, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DE, United Kingdom

  • *n.j.martin@sheffield.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L022065 – Published 20 June, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L022065

Abstract

Directionality in integrated quantum photonics has emerged as a promising route towards achieving scalable quantum technologies with nonlinearities at the single-photon level. Topological photonic waveguides have been proposed as a novel approach to harnessing such directional light-matter interactions on-chip. However, uncertainties remain regarding the strength of the directional coupling of embedded quantum emitters to topological waveguides in comparison to conventional line defect waveguides. In this work we present an investigation of directional coupling in a range of waveguides using a combination of experimental, theoretical, and numerical analyses. We quantitatively characterize the position dependence of the light-matter coupling on several topological photonic waveguides and benchmark their directional coupling performance against conventional line defect waveguides. We conclude that topological waveguides underperform in comparison to conventional line defect waveguides, casting their directional optics credentials into doubt. To demonstrate this is not a question of the maturity of the field; we show that state-of-the-art inverse design methods, while capable of improving the directional emission of these topological waveguides, still place them significantly behind the operation of a conventional (glide-plane) photonic crystal waveguide. Our results and conclusions pave the way towards improving the implementation of quantitatively predicted quantum nonlinear effects on-chip.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (39)

  1. P. Lodahl et al., Chiral quantum optics, Nature (London) 541, 473 (2017).
  2. I. Söllner et al., Deterministic photon-emitter coupling in chiral photonic circuits, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 775 (2015).
  3. R. J. Coles et al., Chirality of nanophotonic waveguide with embedded quantum emitter for unidirectional spin transfer, Nat. Commun. 7, 11183 (2016).
  4. A. B. Young et al., Polarization engineering in photonic crystal waveguides for spin-photon entanglers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 153901 (2015).
  5. S. Mahmoodian, K. Prindal-Nielsen, I. Söllner, S. Stobbe, and P. Lodahl, Engineering chiral light matter interaction in photonic crystal waveguides with slow light, Opt. Mater. Express 7, 43 (2017).
  6. H. Siampour et al., Observation of large spontaneous emission rate enhancement of quantum dots in a broken-symmetry slow-light waveguide, npj Quantum Inf. 9, 15 (2023).
  7. S. Barik et al., A topological quantum optics interface, Science 359, 666 (2018).
  8. J. Ma, X. Xi, and X. Sun, Topological photonic integrated circuits based on valley kink states, Laser Photonics Rev. 13, 1900087 (2019).
  9. T. Yamaguchi et al., GaAs valley photonic crystal waveguide with light-emitting InAs quantum dots, Appl. Phys. Express 12, 062005 (2019).
  10. X.-T. He et al., A silicon-on-insulator slab for topological valley transport, Nat. Commun. 10, 872 (2019).
  11. M. I. Shalaev, W. Walasik, A. Tsukernik, Y. Xu, and N. M. Litchinitser, Robust topologically protected transport in photonic crystals at telecommunication wavelengths, Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 31 (2019).
  12. N. Parappurath, F. Alpeggiani, L. Kuipers, and E. Verhagen, Direct observation of topological edge states in silicon photonic crystals: Spin, dispersion, and chiral routing, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaw4137 (2020).
  13. H. Yoshimi et al., Experimental demonstration of topological slow light waveguides in valley photonic crystals, Opt. Express 29, 13441 (2021).
  14. M. Jalali Mehrabad, Integrated topological quantum optics, https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/29610/ (2021).
  15. M. J. Mehrabad, S. Mittal, and M. Hafezi, Topological photonics: fundamental concepts, recent developments, and future directions, Phys. Rev. A 108, 040101 (2023).
  16. S. Barik, A. Karasahin, S. Mittal, E. Waks, and M. Hafezi, Chiral quantum optics using a topological resonator, Phys. Rev. B 101, 205303 (2020).
  17. M. J. Mehrabad et al., A semiconductor topological photonic ring resonator, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 061102 (2020).
  18. M. J. Mehrabad et al., Chiral topological photonics with an embedded quantum emitter, Optica 7, 1690 (2020).
  19. L. Gu et al., A topological photonic ring-resonator for on-chip channel filters, J. Lightwave Technol. 39, 5069 (2021).
  20. M. J. Mehrabad et al., Chiral topological add–drop filter for integrated quantum photonic circuits, Optica 10, 415 (2023).
  21. C. A. Rosiek et al., Observation of strong backscattering in valley-Hall photonic topological interface modes, Nat. Photon. 17, 386 (2023).
  22. N. V. Hauff, H. Le Jeannic, P. Lodahl, S. Hughes, and N. Rotenberg, Chiral quantum optics in broken-symmetry and topological photonic crystal waveguides, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023082 (2022).
  23. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L022065 for more information on the waveguide designs, asymmetric directional contrast and the calculation of the β-factor.
  24. E. Sauer, J. P. Vasco, and S. Hughes, Theory of intrinsic propagation losses in topological edge states of planar photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043109 (2020).
  25. M. Minkov et al., Inverse design of photonic crystals through automatic differentiation, ACS Photonics 7, 1729 (2020).
  26. S. Manna et al., Surface passivation and oxide encapsulation to improve optical properties of a single GaAs quantum dot close to the surface, Appl. Surf. Sci. 532, 147360 (2020).
  27. T. Pregnolato et al., Deterministic positioning of nanophotonic waveguides around single self-assembled quantum dots, APL Photonics 5, 086101 (2020).
  28. B. Lang, D. M. Beggs, and R. Oulton, Time-reversal constraint limits unidirectional photon emission in slow-light photonic crystals, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 374, 20150263 (2016).
  29. L. Sapienza, M. Davanço, A. Badolato, and K. Srinivasan, Nanoscale optical positioning of single quantum dots for bright and pure single-photon emission, Nat. Commun. 6, 7833 (2015).
  30. P. Schnauber et al., Deterministic integration of quantum dots into on-chip multimode interference beamsplitters using in situ electron beam lithography, Nano Lett. 18, 2336 (2018).
  31. J. Große, M. von Helversen, A. Koulas-Simos, M. Hermann, and S. Reitzenstein, Development of site-controlled quantum dot arrays acting as scalable sources of indistinguishable photons, APL Photonics 5, 096107 (2020).
  32. K. D. Jöns et al., Triggered indistinguishable single photons with narrow line widths from site-controlled quantum dots, Nano Lett. 13, 126 (2013).
  33. C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, A. Gonzalez-Tudela, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, and E. Moreno, Chiral route to spontaneous entanglement generation, Phys. Rev. B 92, 155304 (2015).
  34. A. Tiranov et al., Collective super- and subradiant dynamics between distant optical quantum emitters, Science 379, 389 (2023).
  35. J.-H. Kim, S. Aghaeimeibodi, C. J. K. Richardson, R. P. Leavitt, and E. Waks, Super-radiant emission from quantum dots in a nanophotonic waveguide, Nano Lett. 18, 4734 (2018).
  36. J. Q. Grim et al., Scalable in operando strain tuning in nanophotonic waveguides enabling three-quantum-dot superradiance, Nat. Mater. 18, 963 (2019).
  37. H. Pichler, T. Ramos, A. J. Daley, and P. Zoller, Quantum optics of chiral spin networks, Phys. Rev. A 91, 042116 (2015).
  38. D. G. Suarez-Forero et al., Spin-selective strong light-matter coupling in a 2D hole gas-microcavity system, Nat. Photon. 17, 912 (2023).
  39. D. Session et al., Optical pumping of electronic quantum Hall states with vortex light, arXiv:2306.03417.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation