- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Coherent exchange-coupled nonlocal Kondo impurities

Lidia Stocker1,* and Oded Zilberberg2

  • *Corresponding author: stocker@phys.ethz.ch
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L022058 – Published 10 June, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L022058

Abstract

Quantum dots exhibit a variety of strongly correlated effects, e.g., they can emulate localized magnetic impurities that form a Kondo singlet with their surrounding environment. Interestingly, in double-dot setups, such magnetic impurities couple to each other by direct Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida (RKKY) interaction, which wins over the Kondo physics. In this work, we investigate a double-dot device where the dots are coupled via off-resonant ballistic modes, dubbed electronic cavity modes. Within this cavity-double-dot system, we study, using variational matrix product state techniques, the competition between Kondo formation and the combined coherent orbital hybridization and RKKY-like interaction that the cavity facilitates. Specifically, we find that Kondo can form on each dot individually whereby the cavity can either (i) destroy the Kondo via the RKKY that mediates a singlet state on the two dots, or (ii) lead to an exotic orbital macrsoscopic superposition of the Kondo forming on each of the dots. We dub the latter “Kondo cat”. En route to this key finding, we rigorously study the many-body phase diagram of the system, as well as compare it with the case of coupling the dots via an incoherent RKKY channel. The realization of a Kondo cat can facilitate applications in metrology, and reveal the spin coherence length in mesoscopic devices.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (63)

  1. D. Loss and D. P. DiVincenzo, Quantum computation with quantum dots, Phys. Rev. A 57, 120 (1998).
  2. G. Burkard, T. D. Ladd, A. Pan, J. M. Nichol, and J. R. Petta, Semiconductor spin qubits, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 025003 (2023).
  3. L. I. Glazman, F. W. J. Hekking, and A. I. Larkin, Kondo effect in quantum dots, in Statistical and Dynamical Aspects of Mesoscopic Systems, Lecture Notes in Physics, edited by D. Reguera, J. M. Rubí, G. Platero, and L. L. Bonilla (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000), pp. 16–26.
  4. P. Coleman, Introduction to Many-Body Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015).
  5. J. Kondo, Resistance minimum in dilute magnetic alloys, Prog. Theor. Phys. 32, 37 (1964).
  6. A. A. Abrikosov, Magnetic impurities in nonmagnetic metals, Sov. Phys. Usp. 12, 168 (1969).
  7. T. K. Ng and P. A. Lee, On-site coulomb repulsion and resonant tunneling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1768 (1988).
  8. A. Kawabata, On the electron transport through a quantum dot, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 60, 3222 (1991).
  9. M. A. Ruderman and C. Kittel, Indirect exchange coupling of nuclear magnetic moments by conduction electrons, Phys. Rev. 96, 99 (1954).
  10. T. Kasuya, A theory of metallic ferro- and antiferromagnetism on Zener's model, Prog. Theor. Phys. 16, 45 (1956).
  11. K. Yosida, Magnetic properties of Cu-Mn alloys, Phys. Rev. 106, 893 (1957).
  12. C. Jayaprakash, H. R. Krishna-murthy, and J. W. Wilkins, Two-impurity Kondo problem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 737 (1981).
  13. B. A. Jones, C. M. Varma, and J. W. Wilkins, Low-temperature properties of the two-impurity Kondo Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 125 (1988).
  14. Y. Utsumi, J. Martinek, P. Bruno, H. Imamura, and S. Maekawa, rkky interaction between two quantum dots embedded in an Aharonov-Bohm ring, in Realizing Controllable Quantum States (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005), pp. 439–444.
  15. M. G. Vavilov and L. I. Glazman, Transport spectroscopy of Kondo quantum dots coupled by RKKY interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 086805 (2005).
  16. L. G. G. V. Dias da Silva, E. Vernek, K. Ingersent, N. Sandler, and S. E. Ulloa, Spin-polarized conductance in double quantum dots: Interplay of Kondo, Zeeman and interference effects, Phys. Rev. B 87, 205313 (2013).
  17. A. Bayat, S. Bose, P. Sodano, and H. Johannesson, Entanglement probe of two-impurity Kondo physics in a spin chain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 066403 (2012).
  18. L. Pan, Y. Wang, Z. Li, J. Wei, and Y. Yan, Kondo effect in double quantum dots with ferromagnetic RKKY interaction, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 025601 (2017).
  19. I. Weymann, R. Chirla, P. Trocha, and C. P. Moca, SU(4) Kondo effect in double quantum dots with ferromagnetic leads, Phys. Rev. B 97, 085404 (2018).
  20. A. V. Parafilo and M. N. Kiselev, Tunable RKKY interaction in a double quantum dot nanoelectromechanical device, Phys. Rev. B 97, 035418 (2018).
  21. C. Piermarocchi, P. Chen, L. J. Sham, and D. G. Steel, Optical RKKY interaction between charged semiconductor quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 167402 (2002).
  22. D. P. Divincenzo, Topics in quantum computers, in Mesoscopic Electron Transport, NATO ASI Series, edited by L. L. Sohn, L. P. Kouwenhoven, and G. Schön (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1997), pp. 657–677.
  23. T. T. Ong and B. A. Jones, Generalized Schrieffer-Wolff transformation of the two-impurity Kondo model, Europhys. Lett. 93, 57004 (2011).
  24. S.-R. E. Yang, J. Schliemann, and A. H. MacDonald, Quantum-Hall quantum bits, Phys. Rev. B 66, 153302 (2002).
  25. V. W. Scarola, J. K. Jain, and E. H. Rezayi, Possible pairing-induced even-denominator fractional quantum Hall effect in the lowest Landau level, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 216804 (2002).
  26. S. J. Elman, S. D. Bartlett, and A. C. Doherty, Long-range entanglement for spin qubits via quantum Hall edge modes, Phys. Rev. B 96, 115407 (2017).
  27. K. D. Petersson, L. W. McFaul, M. D. Schroer, M. Jung, J. M. Taylor, A. A. Houck, and J. R. Petta, Circuit quantum electrodynamics with a spin qubit, Nature (London) 490, 380 (2012).
  28. H. Toida, T. Nakajima, and S. Komiyama, Vacuum rabi splitting in a semiconductor circuit QED system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 066802 (2013).
  29. Y.-Y. Liu, K. D. Petersson, J. Stehlik, J. M. Taylor, and J. R. Petta, Photon emission from a cavity-coupled double quantum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 036801 (2014).
  30. G.-W. Deng, D. Wei, J. R. Johansson, M.-L. Zhang, S.-X. Li, H.-O. Li, G. Cao, M. Xiao, T. Tu, G.-C. Guo, H.-W. Jiang, F. Nori, and G.-P. Guo, Charge number dependence of the dephasing rates of a graphene double quantum dot in a circuit QED architecture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 126804 (2015).
  31. A. Stockklauser, P. Scarlino, J. V. Koski, S. Gasparinetti, C. K. Andersen, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, and A. Wallraff, Strong coupling cavity QED with gate-defined double quantum dots enabled by a high impedance resonator, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011030 (2017).
  32. S.-S. Gu, S. Kohler, Y.-Q. Xu, R. Wu, S.-L. Jiang, S.-K. Ye, T. Lin, B.-C. Wang, H.-O. Li, G. Cao, and G.-P. Guo, Probing two driven double quantum dots strongly coupled to a cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 233602 (2023).
  33. N. J. Craig, J. M. Taylor, E. A. Lester, C. M. Marcus, M. P. Hanson, and A. C. Gossard, Tunable nonlocal spin control in a coupled-quantum dot system, Science 304, 565 (2004).
  34. G. Nicolí, M. S. Ferguson, C. Rössler, A. Wolfertz, G. Blatter, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, and O. Zilberberg, Cavity-mediated coherent coupling between distant quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 236801 (2018).
  35. C. Rössler, D. Oehri, O. Zilberberg, G. Blatter, M. Karalic, J. Pijnenburg, A. Hofmann, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, C. Reichl, and W. Wegscheider, Transport spectroscopy of a spin-coherent dot-cavity system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 166603 (2015).
  36. M. S. Ferguson, D. Oehri, C. Rössler, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, G. Blatter, and O. Zilberberg, Long-range spin coherence in a strongly coupled all-electronic dot-cavity system, Phys. Rev. B 96, 235431 (2017).
  37. L. G. G. V. Dias da Silva, C. H. Lewenkopf, E. Vernek, G. J. Ferreira, and S. E. Ulloa, Conductance and Kondo interference beyond proportional coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 116801 (2017).
  38. C. Gold, B. A. Bräm, M. S. Ferguson, T. Krähenmann, A. Hofmann, R. Steinacher, K. R. Fratus, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, D. Weinmann, K. Ensslin, and T. Ihn, Imaging signatures of the local density of states in an electronic cavity, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, L032005 (2021).
  39. J. A. Katine, M. A. Eriksson, A. S. Adourian, R. M. Westervelt, J. D. Edwards, A. Lupu-Sax, E. J. Heller, K. L. Campman, and A. C. Gossard, Point contact conductance of an open resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4806 (1997).
  40. J. S. Hersch, M. R. Haggerty, and E. J. Heller, Diffractive orbits in an open microwave billiard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5342 (1999).
  41. L. Stocker, S. H. Sack, M. S. Ferguson, and O. Zilberberg, Entanglement-based observables for quantum impurities, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043177 (2022).
  42. P. W. Anderson, Localized magnetic states in metals, Phys. Rev. 124, 41 (1961).
  43. W. B. Thimm, J. Kroha, and J. von Delft, Kondo box: A magnetic impurity in an ultrasmall metallic grain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2143 (1999).
  44. K. G. Wilson, The renormalization group: Critical phenomena and the Kondo problem, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 773 (1975).
  45. H. R. Krishna-murthy, J. W. Wilkins, and K. G. Wilson, Renormalization-group approach to the Anderson model of dilute magnetic alloys. II. Static properties for the asymmetric case, Phys. Rev. B 21, 1044 (1980).
  46. H. R. Krishna-murthy, J. W. Wilkins, and K. G. Wilson, Renormalization-group approach to the Anderson model of dilute magnetic alloys. I. Static properties for the symmetric case, Phys. Rev. B 21, 1003 (1980).
  47. R. Bulla, T. A. Costi, and T. Pruschke, Numerical renormalization group method for quantum impurity systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 395 (2008).
  48. H. Saberi, A. Weichselbaum, and J. von Delft, Matrix-product-state comparison of the numerical renormalization group and the variational formulation of the density-matrix renormalization group, Phys. Rev. B 78, 035124 (2008).
  49. A. Weichselbaum, F. Verstraete, U. Schollwöck, J. I. Cirac, and J. von Delft, Variational matrix product state approach to quantum impurity models, Phys. Rev. B 80, 165117 (2009).
  50. J. R. Schrieffer and P. A. Wolff, Relation between the Anderson and Kondo Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. 149, 491 (1966).
  51. H. Bruus and K. Flensberg, Many-Body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics: An Introduction (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004).
  52. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L022058 for details on: (1) NRG Hamiltonian decomposition, (2) Schrieffer-Wolff transformation, (3) Schrieffer-Wolff transformation of the single impurity Anderson model, (4) Exact diagonalization and Schrieffer-Wolff transformation of the closed cavity-double-dot system, (5) Variational Matrix Product State algorithm for degenerate states.
  53. In Ref. [23], fourth-order correction terms were derived using the Schrieffer-Wolff transformation. They obtain a RKKY interaction and a superexchange interaction term. In the parameter regime of Fig. 2, the superexchange coupling coefficient is negative, favoring a ferromagnetic effect.
  54. In the case of a large central dot [33], a phase transition is analytically predicted [62, 63].
  55. This choice is motivated the fact that we have εC=0.75U and aim to keep the cavity levels within the energy bandwidth of the NRG lead D=[−U,U].
  56. B. Weber, Y. H. M. Tan, S. Mahapatra, T. F. Watson, H. Ryu, R. Rahman, L. C. L. Hollenberg, G. Klimeck, and M. Y. Simmons, Spin blockade and exchange in Coulomb-confined silicon double quantum dots, Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 430 (2014).
  57. A. Kurzmann, Y. Kleeorin, C. Tong, R. Garreis, A. Knothe, M. Eich, C. Mittag, C. Gold, F. K. de Vries, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, V. Fal'ko, Y. Meir, T. Ihn, and K. Ensslin, Kondo effect and spin-orbit coupling in graphene quantum dots, Nat. Commun. 12, 6004 (2021).
  58. L. Banszerus, A. Rothstein, E. Icking, S. Möller, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, C. Stampfer, and C. Volk, Tunable interdot coupling in few-electron bilayer graphene double quantum dots, Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 103101 (2021).
  59. P. Mohanty, E. M. Q. Jariwala, and R. A. Webb, Intrinsic decoherence in mesoscopic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3366 (1997).
  60. G. Xu, C. Broholm, Y.-A. Soh, G. Aeppli, J. F. DiTusa, Y. Chen, M. Kenzelmann, C. D. Frost, T. Ito, K. Oka, and H. Takagi, Mesoscopic phase coherence in a quantum spin fluid, Science 317, 1049 (2007).
  61. M. Fishman, S. White, and E. Stoudenmire, The ITensor software library for tensor network calculations, SciPost Phys. Codebases, 4 (2022).
  62. I. Affleck and A. W. W. Ludwig, Exact critical theory of the two-impurity Kondo model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1046 (1992).
  63. D. F. Mross and H. Johannesson, Two-impurity Anderson model at quantum criticality, Phys. Rev. B 78, 035449 (2008).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L022058– Published 10 June, 2024
  • Received 3 September 2023
  • Accepted 10 May 2024
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation