Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Direct observation of entangled electronic-nuclear wave packets

Gönenç Moğol, Brian Kaufman, and Thomas Weinacht*

Chuan Cheng

Itzik Ben-Itzhak

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook New York 11794-3800, USA

  • Stanford PULSE Institute, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook New York 11794-3800, USA

  • James R. Mcdonald Laboratory, Kansas State University, Manhattan Kansas 66506-2604, USA

  • *Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: thomas.weinacht@stonybrook.edu

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L022047 – Published 28 May, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L022047

Abstract

We present momentum resolved covariance measurements of entangled electronic-nuclear wave packets created and probed with octave spanning phaselocked ultrafast pulses. We launch vibrational wave packets on multiple electronic states via multiphoton absorption, and probe these wave packets via strong field double ionization using a second phaselocked pulse. Momentum resolved covariance mapping of the fragment ions highlights the nuclear motion, while measurements of the yield as a function of the relative phase between pump and probe pulses highlight the electronic coherence. The combined measurements allow us to directly visualize the entanglement between the electronic and nuclear degrees of freedom and follow the evolution of the complete wavefunction.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (42)

  1. P. B. Corkum and F. Krausz, Attosecond science, Nat. Phys. 3, 381 (2007).
  2. A. Palacios and F. Martín, The quantum chemistry of attosecond molecular science, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. 10, e1430 (2020).
  3. L.-M. Koll, L. Maikowski, L. Drescher, T. Witting, and M. J. J. Vrakking, Experimental control of quantum-mechanical entanglement in an attosecond pump-probe experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 043201 (2022).
  4. M. J. J. Vrakking, Ion-photoelectron entanglement in photoionization with chirped laser pulses, J. Phys. B 55, 134001 (2022).
  5. M. J. J. Vrakking, Control of attosecond entanglement and coherence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 113203 (2021).
  6. H.-G. Duan, V. I. Prokhorenko, R. J. Cogdell, K. Ashraf, A. L. Stevens, M. Thorwart, and R. J. D. Miller, Nature does not rely on long-lived electronic quantum coherence for photosynthetic energy transfer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 8493 (2017).
  7. M. Maiuri, E. E. Ostroumov, R. G. Saer, R. E. Blankenship, and G. D. Scholes, Coherent wavepackets in the Fenna–Matthews–Olson complex are robust to excitonic-structure perturbations caused by mutagenesis, Nat. Chem. 10, 177 (2018).
  8. H. Maeda and T. F. Gallagher, Nondispersing wave packets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 133004 (2004).
  9. T. C. Weinacht, J. Ahn, and P. H. Bucksbaum, Measurement of the amplitude and phase of a sculpted Rydberg wave packet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5508 (1998).
  10. J. A. Yeazell, M. Mallalieu, and C. R. Stroud, Observation of the collapse and revival of a Rydberg electronic wave packet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2007 (1990).
  11. C. Arnold, O. Vendrell, and R. Santra, Electronic decoherence following photoionization: Full quantum-dynamical treatment of the influence of nuclear motion, Phys. Rev. A 95, 033425 (2017).
  12. G. J. Halász, A. Perveaux, B. Lasorne, M. A. Robb, F. Gatti, and Á. Vibók, Coherence revival during the attosecond electronic and nuclear quantum photodynamics of the ozone molecule, Phys. Rev. A 88, 023425 (2013).
  13. I. Franco, M. Shapiro, and P. Brumer, Femtosecond dynamics and laser control of charge transport in trans-polyacetylene, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 244905 (2008).
  14. A. Scheidegger, J. Vaníček, and N. V. Golubev, Search for long-lasting electronic coherence using on-the-fly ab initio semiclassical dynamics, J. Chem. Phys. 156, 034104 (2022).
  15. H. Hwang and P. J. Rossky, Electronic decoherence induced by intramolecular vibrational motions in a betaine dye molecule, J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 6723 (2004).
  16. H. Kamisaka, S. V. Kilina, K. Yamashita, and O. V. Prezhdo, Ultrafast vibrationally-induced dephasing of electronic excitations in pbse quantum dots, Nano Lett. 6, 2295 (2006).
  17. M. Vacher, M. J. Bearpark, M. A. Robb, and J. P. Malhado, Electron dynamics upon ionization of polyatomic molecules: Coupling to quantum nuclear motion and decoherence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 083001 (2017).
  18. M. Vacher, L. Steinberg, A. J. Jenkins, M. J. Bearpark, and M. A. Robb, Electron dynamics following photoionization: Decoherence due to the nuclear-wave-packet width, Phys. Rev. A 92, 040502(R) (2015).
  19. V. Despré, N. V. Golubev, and A. I. Kuleff, Charge migration in propiolic acid: A full quantum dynamical study, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 203002 (2018).
  20. B. Kaufman, P. Marquetand, T. Weinacht, and T. Rozgonyi, Numerical calculations of multiphoton molecular absorption, Phys. Rev. A 106, 013111 (2022).
  21. W. D. M. Lunden, P. Sándor, T. C. Weinacht, and T. Rozgonyi, Model for describing resonance-enhanced strong-field ionization with shaped ultrafast laser pulses, Phys. Rev. A 89, 053403 (2014).
  22. B. Kaufman, P. Marquetand, T. Rozgonyi, and T. Weinacht, Long-lived electronic coherences in molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 263202 (2023).
  23. C. Cheng, L. J. Frasinski, G. Moğol, F. Allum, A. J. Howard, D. Rolles, P. H. Bucksbaum, M. Brouard, R. Forbes, and T. Weinacht, Multiparticle cumulant mapping for coulomb explosion imaging, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 093001 (2023).
  24. F. Allum, C. Cheng, A. J. Howard, P. H. Bucksbaum, M. Brouard, T. Weinacht, and R. Forbes, Multi-particle three-dimensional covariance imaging: “coincidence” insights into the many-body fragmentation of strong-field ionized D2O, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 8302 (2021).
  25. B. Kaufman, P. Marquetand, T. Rozgonyi, and T. Weinacht, Long lived electronic coherences in molecular wave packets probed with pulse shape spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. A (2023).
  26. D. T. Matselyukh, V. Despré, N. V. Golubev, A. I. Kuleff, and H. J. Wörner, Decoherence and revival in attosecond charge migration driven by non-adiabatic dynamics, Nat. Phys. 18, 1206 (2022).
  27. J. Vester, V. Despré, and A. I. Kuleff, The role of symmetric vibrational modes in the decoherence of correlation-driven charge migration, J. Chem. Phys. 158, 104305 (2023).
  28. D. Dey, A. I. Kuleff, and G. A. Worth, Quantum interference paves the way for long-lived electronic coherences, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 173203 (2022).
  29. M. Vacher, F. E. A. Albertani, A. J. Jenkins, I. Polyak, M. J. Bearpark, and M. A. Robb, Electron and nuclear dynamics following ionisation of modified bismethylene-adamantane, Faraday Discuss. 194, 95 (2016).
  30. A. Csehi, P. Badankó, G. J. Halasz, Á. Vibók, and B. Lasorne, On the preservation of coherence in the electronic wavepacket of a neutral and rigid polyatomic molecule, J. Phys. B 53, 184005 (2020).
  31. G. N. Gibson, R. R. Freeman, and T. J. McIlrath, Dynamics of the high-intensity multiphoton ionization of N2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1230 (1991).
  32. A. Catanese, B. Kaufman, C. Cheng, E. Jones, M. G. Cohen, and T. Weinacht, Acousto-optic modulator pulse-shaper compression of octave-spanning pulses from a stretched hollow-core fiber, OSA Continuum. 4, 3176 (2021).
  33. A. Nomerotski, Imaging and time stamping of photons with nanosecond resolution in timepix based optical cameras, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 937, 26 (2019).
  34. C. Cheng, R. Forbes, A. J. Howard, M. Spanner, P. H. Bucksbaum, and T. Weinacht, Momentum-resolved above-threshold ionization of deuterated water, Phys. Rev. A 102, 052813 (2020).
  35. A. Zhao, M. van Beuzekom, B. Bouwens, D. Byelov, I. Chakaberia, C. Cheng, E. Maddox, A. Nomerotski, P. Svihra, J. Visser, V. Vrba, and T. Weinacht, Coincidence velocity map imaging using Tpx3Cam, a time stamping optical camera with 1.5 ns timing resolution, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88, 113104 (2017).
  36. C. Cheng, V. Singh, S. Matsika, and T. Weinacht, Strong field double ionization of formaldehyde investigated using momentum resolved covariance imaging and trajectory surface hopping, J. Phys. Chem. A 126, 7399 (2022).
  37. A. E. Boguslavskiy, J. Mikosch, A. Gijsbertsen, M. Spanner, S. Patchkovskii, N. Gador, M. J. J. Vrakking, and A. Stolow, The multielectron ionization dynamics underlying attosecond strong-field spectroscopies, Science 335, 1336 (2012).
  38. D. Cardoza, M. Baertschy, and T. Weinacht, Understanding learning control of molecular fragmentation, Chem. Phys. Lett. 411, 311 (2005).
  39. D. Cardoza, M. Baertschy, and T. Weinacht, Interpreting closed-loop learning control of molecular fragmentation in terms of wave-packet dynamics and enhanced molecular ionization, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 074315 (2005).
  40. The naming convention comes from the prominent movement of the CF3 group.
  41. In general, if the states were separated by K photons we would see K modulations within 2π as the phase term in Eq. (5) would become eiKϕ.
  42. J. R. Durig and J. S. Church, Vibrational spectra and the assignment of the normal modes of 1,1,1-trifluoro-2-propanone, Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular Spectroscopy 36, 957 (1980).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation