Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Broken seniority symmetry in the semimagic proton mid-shell nucleus Rh95

B. Das1,2,*, B. Cederwall1,†, C. Qi1, M. Górska2, P. H. Regan3,4, Ö. Aktas1, H. M. Albers2, A. Banerjee2,‡, M. M. R. Chishti3 et al.

J. Gerl2, N. Hubbard2,5,6, S. Jazrawi3,4, J. Jolie7, A. K. Mistry2,5, F. Nowacki8, M. Polettini9,10, A. Yaneva2,7, U. Ahmed5,6, S. Alhomaidhi2,5,6,11, A. Algora12,13, C. Appleton14, T. Arici2, S. Bagchi15, G. Benzoni10, J. Benito16, A. Blazhev7, P. Boutachkov2, A. Bracco9,10, A. M. Bruce17, M. Brunet3, R. Canavan3,4, T. Davinson14, T. Dickel2,18, A. Esmaylzadeh7, L. M. Fraile16, E. Haettner2, O. Hall14, G. Häfner19,7, H. Heggen2, Ch. Hornung2, J. P. Hucka5, P. R. John5, D. Kahl14, V. Karayonchev7, R. Kern5, R. Knöbel2, A. Korgul20, G. Kosir21,22, I. Kojouharov2, D. Kostyleva2, N. Kuzminchuk2, N. Kurz2, R. Liotta1, R. Lozeva19, M. Mikolajczuk20,2, I. Mukha2, P. Napiralla5, R. Page23, C. M. Petrache19, N. Pietralla5, S. Pietri2, W. R. Plaß2,18, Zs. Podolyák3, J.-M. Régis7, M. Rudigier5, H. Rösch5, P. Ruotsalainen24, E. Sahin2,5,6, V. Sánchez-Tembleque16, H. Schaffner2, C. Scheidenberger2, F. Schirru2, L. Sexton14, B. S. Nara Singh25, A. Sharma26, R. Shearman4, M. Si19, Y. K. Tanaka27, J. Vasiljević1, J. Vesić21, J. Vilhena28, H. Weick2, H. J. Wollersheim2, V. Werner5,6, J. Wiederhold5, W. Witt5, P. J. Woods14, G. Zimba24, and J. Zhao2

  • 1KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden
  • 2GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH - Darmstadt, 64291 Germany
  • 3Department of Physics, University of Surrey - Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK
  • 4National Physical Laboratory - Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LW, UK
  • 5Institut für Kernphysik, Technische Universität Darmstadt - Darmstadt, 64289 Germany
  • 6Helmholtz Forschungsakademie Hessen für FAIR (HFHF), GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Campus Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
  • 7Institut für Kernphysik der Universität zu Köln - Zülpicher Strasse 77, D-50937 Köln, Germany
  • 8Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
  • 9Dipartimento di Fisica, Universitã degli Studi di Milano - Milano, 20133 Italy
  • 10INFN, Sezione di Milano - Milano, 20133 Italy
  • 11King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), Riyadh 11442, Saudi Arabia
  • 12Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular, CSIC-Universidad de Valencia - E-46071 Valencia, Spain
  • 13Institute for Nuclear Research (ATOMKI), Bem ter 18/c, H-4026 Debrecen, Hungary
  • 14University of Edinburgh, School of Physics and Astronomy - Edinburgh EH9 3FD, UK
  • 15Indian Institute of Technology, Dhanbad-826004, Jharkhand, India
  • 16Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, CEI Moncloa - E-28040 Madrid, Spain
  • 17School of Computing Engineering and Mathematics, University of Brighton - Brighton, BN2 4AT UK
  • 18Justus Liebig University, 35390 Giessen, Germany
  • 19Université Paris-Saclay, IJCLab, CNRS/IN2P3, F-91405 Orsay, France
  • 20Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, PL 02-093, Warsaw, Poland
  • 21Jozef Stefan Institute - Jamova cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • 22Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • 23Department of Physics, Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool Liverpool L69 7ZE, UK
  • 24University of Jyväskylä - Seminaarinkatu 15, 40014 Jyväskylän yliopisto, Finland
  • 25SUPA, School of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of the West of Scotland - Paisley, PA1 2BE UK
  • 26Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Ropar, Rupnagar-140 001, Punjab, India
  • 27High-Energy Nuclear Physics Laboratory, RIKEN, 351-0198 Saitama, Japan
  • 28Laboratoire de Physique de la Matiére Condensé et Nanostructures, Université Lyon I, CNRS, UMR 5586, Domaine scientifique de la Doua - F-69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France

  • *Corresponding author: b.das@gsi.de
  • †Corresponding author: bc@kth.se
  • ‡Present address: Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kolkata-700064, India

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L022038 – Published 10 May, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L022038

Abstract

Lifetime measurements of low-lying excited states in the semimagic (N=50) nucleus Rh95 have been performed by means of the fast-timing technique. The experiment was carried out using γ-ray detector arrays consisting of LaBr3(Ce) scintillators and germanium detectors integrated into the DESPEC experimental setup commissioned for the Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research (fair) Phase-0, Darmstadt, Germany. The excited states in Rh95 were populated primarily via the β decays of Pd95 nuclei, produced in the projectile fragmentation of a 850 MeV/nucleon Xe124 beam impinging on a 4g/cm2Be9 target. The deduced electromagnetic E2 transition strengths for the γ-ray cascade within the multiplet structure depopulating from the isomeric Iπ=21/2+ state are found to exhibit strong deviations from predictions of standard shell model calculations which feature approximately conserved seniority symmetry. In particular, the observation of a strongly suppressed E2 strength for the 13/2+→9/2+ ground state transition cannot be explained by calculations employing standard interactions. This remarkable result may require revision of the nucleon-nucleon interactions employed in state-of-the-art theoretical model calculations, and might also point to the need for including three-body forces in the Hamiltonian.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (43)

  1. John. P. Schiffer and William. W. True, The effective interaction between nucleons deduced from nuclear spectra, Rev. Mod. Phys. 48, 191 (1976).
  2. G. Racah, Theory of complex spectra. III, Phys. Rev. 63, 367 (1943).
  3. A. Escuderos and L. Zamick, Seniority conservation and seniority violation in the g9/2 shell, Phys. Rev. C 73, 044302 (2006).
  4. P. Van Isacker and S. Heinze, Partial conservation of seniority and nuclear isomerism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 052501 (2008).
  5. P. Van Isacker, Seniority isomers in nuclei, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 322, 012003 (2011).
  6. C. Qi, Partial conservation of seniority in the j=9/2 shell: Analytic and numerical studies, Phys. Rev. C 83, 014307 (2011).
  7. H. Mach, A. Korgul, M. Gorska, H. Grawe, I. Matea, M. Stanoiu, L. M. Fraile, Y. E. Penionzkevich, F. D. Santos, D. Verney, S. Lukyanov, B. Cederwall, A. Covello, Z. Dlouhy, B. Fogelberg, G. DeFrance, A. Gargano, G. Georgiev, R. Grzywacz, A. F. Lisetskiy, J. Mrazek, F. Nowacki, W. A. Plociennik, Z. Podolyak, S. Ray, E. Ruchowska, M. G. Saint-Laurent, M. Sawicka, C. Stodel, and O. Tarasov, Ultrafast-timing lifetime measurements in Ru94 and Pd96: Breakdown of the seniority scheme in N = 50 isotones, Phys. Rev. C 95, 014313 (2017).
  8. C. Qi, Partial conservation of seniority and its unexpected influence on E2 transitions in g9/2 nuclei, Phys. Lett. B 773, 616 (2017).
  9. Y. Qian and C. Qi, Partial seniority conservation and solvability of single-j systems, Phys. Rev. C 98, 061303(R) (2018).
  10. A. I. Morales, G. Benzoni, H. Watanabe, G. de Angelis, S. Nishimura, L. Coraggio, A. Gargano, N. Itaco, T. Otsuka, Y. Tsunoda et al., Is seniority a partial dynamic symmetry in the first νg9/2 shell? Phys. Lett. B 781, 706 (2018).
  11. J. J. Valiente-Dobón, A. Gottardo, G. Benzoni, A. Gadea, S. Lunardi, A. Algora, G. de Angelis, D. Bazzacco, J. Benlliure, P. Boutachkov et al., Manifestation of the Berry phase in the atomic nucleus Pb213, Phys. Lett. B 816, 136183 (2021).
  12. B. Das, B. Cederwall, C. Qi, M. Górska, P. H. Regan et al., Nature of seniority symmetry breaking in the semimagic nucleus Ru94, Phys. Rev. C 105, L031304 (2022).
  13. R. M. Pérez-Vidal et al., Evidence of partial seniority conservation in the πg9/2 shell for the N = 50 isotones, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 112501 (2022).
  14. A. Amusa and R. D. Lawson, High spin states in Ru94 and Rh95, Z. Phys. A 307, 333 (1982).
  15. A. Jungclaus, D. Kast, K. P. Lieb, C. Teich, M. Weiszflog, T. Härtlein, C. Ender, F. Köck, D. Schwalm, J. Reif et al., Picosecond lifetime measurement of neutron core-excited states in the N = 50 nucleus Rh95, Nucl. Phys. A 637, 346 (1998).
  16. E. Nolte, G. Korschinek, and U. Heim, Investigation of very neutron deficient Ru and Rh nuclei with the help of (40Ca;yp+zαγ) reactions, Z. Phys. A 298, 191 (1980).
  17. A. K. Mistry et al., The DESPEC setup for GSI and FAIR, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 1033, 166662 (2022).
  18. P. Spiller and G. Franchetti, The FAIR accelerator project at GSI, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 561, 305 (2006).
  19. M. Polettini et al., DESPEC Phase-0 campaign at GSI, NUOVO CIMENTO 44C, 67 (2021).
  20. H. Geissel, P. Armbruster, K.H. Behr, A. Brünle, K. Burkard, M. Chen, H. Folger, B. Franczak, H. Keller, O. Klepper et al., The GSI projectile fragment separator (FRS): a versatile magnetic system for relativistic heavy ions, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 70, 286 (1992).
  21. A. B. Garnsworthy et al., Isomeric states in neutron-deficient A ∼ 80–90 nuclei populated in the fragmentation of Ag107, Phys. Rev. C 80, 064303 (2009).
  22. C. J. Griffin et al., β-decay studies of r-process nuclei using the Advanced Implantation Detector Array (AIDA), JPS Conf. Proc. 14, 020622 (2017).
  23. O. Hall, T. Davinson, C. J. Griffin, P. J. Woods, C. Appleton, C. G. Bruno, A. Estrade, D. Kahl, L. Sexton, I. Burrows et al., The advanced implantation detector array (AIDA), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 1050, 168166 (2023).
  24. J. Serrano , The white rabbit project, Proceedings of ICALEPCS TUC004 (Kobe, Japan, 2009).
  25. E. Nolte and H. Hick, β delayed proton emission from a long-lived high-spin isomer in Pd95, Phys. Lett. B 97, 55 (1980).
  26. P. H. Regan, Precision measurement of sub-nanosecond lifetimes of excited nuclear states using fast-timing coincidences with LaBr3(Ce) detectors, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 116, 38 (2015).
  27. M. Rudigier, Zs. Podolyák, P. H. Regan, A. M. Bruce, S. Lalkovski, R. L. Canavan, E. R. Gamba, O. Roberts, I. Burrows, D. M. Cullen et al., FATIMA—FAst TIMing Array for DESPEC at FAIR, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 969, 163967 (2020).
  28. S. Jazrawi, A. Yaneva, M. Polettini, B. Das, P. H. Regan, M. Górska, B. Cederwall, J. Jolie, H. M. Albers, M. M. R. Chishti et al., Commissioning the FAst TIMing array (FATIMA) at FAIR Phase-0: half-lives of excited states in the N = 50 isotones Pd96 and Ru94, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 200, 110234 (2022).
  29. H. A. Roth, S. E. Arnell, D. Foltescu, O. Skeppstedt, J. Blomqvist, A. Nilsson, T. Kuroyanagi, S. Mitarai, and J. Nyberg, Gaps in the yrast level structure of the N = 50 isotones Tc93, Ru94, and Rh95 at high angular momentum, Phys. Rev. C 50, 1330 (1994).
  30. J.-M. Régis et al., The generalized centroid difference method for picosecond sensitive determination of lifetimes of nuclear excited states using large fast-timing arrays, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 726, 191 (2013).
  31. J.-M. Régis, H. Mach, G. S. Simpson, J. Jolie, G. Pascovici, N. Saed-Samii, N. Warr, A. Bruce, J. Degenkolb, L. M. Fraile et al., The generalized centroid difference method for lifetime measurements via γ−γ coincidences using large fast-timing array, EPJ Web Conf. 93, 01013 (2015).
  32. J.-M. Régis, G. Pascovici, J. Jolie, and M. Rudigier, The mirror symmetric centroid difference method for picosecond lifetime measurements via γ−γ coincidences using very fast LaBr3 (Ce) scintillator detectors, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 622, 83 (2010).
  33. J.-M. Régis, J. Jolie, N. Saed-Samii, N. Warr, M. Pfeiffer, A. Blanc, M. Jentschel, U. Koster, P. Mutti, T. Soldner, G. S. Simpson, F. Drouet, A. Vancraeyenest, G. deFrance, E. Clement, O. Stezowski, C. A. Ur, W. Urban, P. H. Regan, Z. Podolyak, C. Larijani, C. Townsley, R. Carroll, E. Wilson, L. M. Fraile, H. Mach, V. Paziy, B. Olaizola, V. Vedia, A. M. Bruce, O. J. Roberts, J. F. Smith, M. Scheck, T. Kroll, A. L. Hartig, A. Ignatov, S. Ilieva, S. Lalkovski, W. Korten, N. Marginean, T. Otsuka, N. Shimizu, T. Togashi, and Y. Tsunoda, Abrupt shape transition at neutron number N=60: B(E2) values in Sr94,96,98 from fast γ−γ timing, Phys. Rev. C 95, 054319 (2017).
  34. J. Erler, On the combination procedure of correlated errors, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 453 (2015).
  35. A. Yaneva et al., Fast-timing measurement in Pd96 : Improved accuracy for the lifetime of the 41+ state, Acta Phys. Pol. B Proc. Suppl. 16, 4-A30 (2023).
  36. B. Cederwall et al., Evidence for a spin-aligned neutron–proton paired phase from the level structure of Pd92, Nature (London) 469, 68 (2011).
  37. M. Honma, T. Otsuka, T. Mizusaki, and M. Hjorth-Jensen, New effective interaction for f5pg9-shell nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 80, 064323 (2009).
  38. A. Blazhev, M. Gorska, H. Grawe, J. Nyberg, M. Palacz, E. Caurier, O. Dorvaux, A. Gadea, F. Nowacki, C. Andreoiu, G. deAngelis, D. Balabanski, C. Beck, B. Cederwall, D. Curien, J. Doring, J. Ekman, C. Fahlander, K. Lagergren, J. Ljungvall, M. Moszynski, L. O. Norlin, C. Plettner, D. Rudolph, D. Sohler, K. M. Spohr, O. Thelen, M. Weiszflog, M. Wisell, M. Wolinska, and D. Wolski, Observation of a core-excited E4 isomer in Cd98, Phys. Rev. C 69, 064304 (2004).
  39. H. Grawe, K. Straub, T. Faestermann, M. Górska, C. Hinke, R. Krücken, F. Nowacki, M. Böhmer, P. Boutachkov, H. Geissel et al., The (6+) isomer in Sn102 revisited: Neutron and proton effective charges close to the double shell closure, Phys. Lett. B 820, 136591 (2021).
  40. F. Ghazi Moradi, B. Cederwall, C. Qi, T. Back, A. Atac, R. Liotta, M. Doncel, A. Johnson, G. deFrance, E. Clement, J. Nyberg, A. Gengelbach, B. M. Nyako, J. Gal, G. Kalinka, J. Molnar, J. Timar, D. Sohler, Z. Dombradi, I. Kuti, K. Juhasz, D. R. Napoli, A. Gottardo, V. Modamio, R. Wadsworth, T. W. Henry, A. J. Nichols, H. Al-Azri, M. Palacz, E. Ideguchi, O. Aktas, A. DiNitto, A. Dijon, T. Huyuk, G. Jaworski, P. R. John, and B. Yilmaz, Spectroscopy of the neutron-deficient N = 50 nucleus Rh95, Phys. Rev. C 89, 044310 (2014).
  41. F. Ghazi Moradi, C. Qi, B. Cederwall, A. Atac, T. Back, R. Liotta, M. Doncel, A. Johnson, G. deFrance, E. Clement, A. Dijon, R. Wadsworth, T. W. Henry, A. J. Nichols, H. Al-Azri, J. Nyberg, A. Gengelbach, T. Huyuk, B.M. Nyako, J. Timar, D. Sohler, Z. Dombradi, I. Kuti, K. Juhasz, M. Palacz, G. Jaworski, S. M. Lenzi, P.R. John, D. R. Napoli, A. Gottardo, V. Modamio, A. DiNitto, B. Yilmaz, O. Aktas, and E. Ideguchi, Character of particle-hole excitations in Ru94 deduced from γ-ray angular correlation and linear polarization measurements, Phys. Rev. C 89, 014301 (2014).
  42. T. Fukui, L. De Angelis, Y. Z. Ma, L. Coraggio, A. Gargano, N. Itaco, and F. R. Xu, Realistic shell-model calculations for p-shell nuclei including contributions of a chiral three-body force, Phys. Rev. C 98, 044305 (2018).
  43. Y. Z. Ma, L. Coraggio, L. De Angelis, T. Fukui, A. Gargano, N. Itaco, and F. R. Xu, Contribution of chiral three-body forces to the monopole component of the effective shell-model Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. C 100, 034324 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation