Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Charge-order melting in the one-dimensional Edwards model

Florian Lange1, Gerhard Wellein1, and Holger Fehske1,2

  • 1Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen National High Performance Computing Center (NHR@FAU), 91058 Erlangen, Germany
  • 2Institute of Physics, University of Greifswald, 17489 Greifswald, Germany

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L022007 – Published 8 April, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L022007

Abstract

We use infinite matrix-product-state techniques to study the time evolution of the charge-density-wave (CDW) order after a quench or a light pulse in a fundamental fermion-boson model. The motion of fermions in the model is linked to the creation of bosonic excitations, which counteracts the melting of the CDW order. For low-energy quenches corresponding to a change of the boson relaxation rate, we find behavior similar to that in an effective t−V model. When the boson energy is quenched instead or a light pulse is applied to the system, the transient dynamics are more complex, with the CDW order first quickly decreasing to an intermediate value while the density-wave-like order of the bosons rises. In the case of pulse irradiation, the subsequent time evolution of the CDW order depends strongly on the photon frequency. For frequencies slightly below the boson energy, we observe a temporary increase of the CDW order parameter. Our results reveal the complex physics of driven Mott insulators in low-dimensional systems with strong correlations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (41)

  1. M. Maiuri, M. Garavelli, and G. Cerullo, Ultrafast spectroscopy: State of the art and open challenges, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 3 (2020).
  2. C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Science 357, 995 (2017).
  3. A. Rosch, D. Rasch, B. Binz, and M. Vojta, Metastable superfluidity of repulsive fermionic atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 265301 (2008).
  4. T. Kaneko, T. Shirakawa, S. Sorella, and S. Yunoki, Photoinduced η pairing in the Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 077002 (2019).
  5. C. Gadermaier, A. S. Alexandrov, V. V. Kabanov, P. Kusar, T. Mertelj, X. Yao, C. Manzoni, D. Brida, G. Cerullo, and D. Mihailovic, Electron-phonon coupling in high-temperature cuprate superconductors determined from electron relaxation rates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 257001 (2010).
  6. M. Ueda, Quantum equilibration, thermalization and prethermalization in ultracold atoms, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 669 (2020).
  7. S. Hellmann, M. Beye, C. Sohrt, T. Rohwer, F. Sorgenfrei, H. Redlin, M. Kalläne, M. Marczynski-Bühlow, F. Hennies, M. Bauer, A. Föhlisch, L. Kipp, W. Wurth, and K. Rossnagel, Ultrafast melting of a charge-density wave in the Mott insulator 1T−TaS2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 187401 (2010).
  8. J. Maklar, Y. W. Windsor, C. W. Nicholson, M. Puppin, P. Walmsley, V. Esposito, M. Porer, J. Rittmann, D. Leuenberger, M. Kubli, M. Savoini, E. Abreu, S. L. Johnson, P. Beaud, G. Ingold, U. Staub, I. R. Fisher, R. Ernstorfer, M. Wolf, and L. Rettig, Nonequilibrium charge-density-wave order beyond the thermal limit, Nat. Commun. 12, 2499 (2021).
  9. P. Barmettler, M. Punk, V. Gritsev, E. Demler, and E. Altman, Relaxation of antiferromagnetic order in spin-1/2 chains following a quantum quench, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 130603 (2009).
  10. M. Collura and F. H. L. Essler, How order melts after quantum quenches, Phys. Rev. B 101, 041110(R) (2020).
  11. H. Hashimoto and S. Ishihara, Photoinduced charge-order melting dynamics in a one-dimensional interacting Holstein model, Phys. Rev. B 96, 035154 (2017).
  12. J. Stolpp, J. Herbrych, F. Dorfner, E. Dagotto, and F. Heidrich-Meisner, Charge-density-wave melting in the one-dimensional Holstein model, Phys. Rev. B 101, 035134 (2020).
  13. D. M. Edwards, A quantum phase transition in a model with boson-controlled hopping, Physica B: Condens. Matter 378-380, 133 (2006).
  14. M. Berciu, Challenging a hole to move through an ordered insulator, Physics 2, 55 (2009).
  15. A. S. Alexandrov, Polarons in Advanced Materials, Springer Series in Material Sciences (Springer, Dordrecht, 2007), Vol. 103.
  16. C. L. Kane, P. A. Lee, and N. Read, Motion of a single hole in a quantum antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 39, 6880 (1989).
  17. K. Wohlfeld, A. M. Oleś, and P. Horsch, Orbitally induced string formation in the spin-orbital polarons, Phys. Rev. B 79, 224433 (2009).
  18. A. Alvermann, D. M. Edwards, and H. Fehske, Boson-controlled quantum transport, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 056602 (2007).
  19. A. Alvermann, D. M. Edwards, and H. Fehske, Analytical calculation of the Green's function and Drude weight for a correlated fermion-boson system, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 220, 012023 (2010).
  20. G. Wellein, H. Fehske, A. Alvermann, and D. M. Edwards, Correlation-induced metal insulator transition in a Two-channel Fermion-Boson model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 136402 (2008).
  21. S. Ejima, G. Hager, and H. Fehske, Quantum phase transition in a 1D transport model with Boson-affected hopping: Luttinger liquid versus charge-density-wave behavior, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 106404 (2009).
  22. V. Zauner-Stauber, L. Vanderstraeten, M. T. Fishman, F. Verstraete, and J. Haegeman, Variational optimization algorithms for uniform matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 97, 045145 (2018).
  23. G. Vidal, Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in one spatial dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 070201 (2007).
  24. T. Hashizume, J. C. Halimeh, and I. P. McCulloch, Hybrid infinite time-evolving block decimation algorithm for long-range multidimensional quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B 102, 035115 (2020).
  25. J. Haegeman, C. Lubich, I. Oseledets, B. Vandereycken, and F. Verstraete, Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 94, 165116 (2016).
  26. E. Jeckelmann and S. R. White, Density-matrix renormalization-group study of the polaron problem in the Holstein model, Phys. Rev. B 57, 6376 (1998).
  27. C. Brockt, F. Dorfner, L. Vidmar, F. Heidrich-Meisner, and E. Jeckelmann, Matrix-product-state method with a dynamical local basis optimization for bosonic systems out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. B 92, 241106(R) (2015).
  28. T. Köhler, J. Stolpp, and S. Paeckel, Efficient and flexible approach to simulate low-dimensional quantum lattice models with large local Hilbert spaces, SciPost Phys. 10, 058 (2021).
  29. J. Stolpp, T. Köhler, S. R. Manmana, E. Jeckelmann, F. Heidrich-Meisner, and S. Paeckel, Comparative study of state-of-the-art matrix-product-state methods for lattice models with large local Hilbert spaces without U(1) symmetry, Comput. Phys. Commun. 269, 108106 (2021).
  30. M. J. Hartmann, J. Prior, S. R. Clark, and M. B. Plenio, Density matrix renormalization group in the Heisenberg picture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 057202 (2009).
  31. D. Kennes and C. Karrasch, Extending the range of real time density matrix renormalization group simulations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 200, 37 (2016).
  32. M. V. Damme and L. Vanderstraeten, Momentum-resolved time evolution with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 105, 205130 (2022).
  33. S. Ejima and H. Fehske, One-dimensional quantum transport affected by a background medium: Fluctuations versus correlations, Phys. Rev. B 80, 155101 (2009).
  34. S. Ejima and H. Fehske, Charge-density-wave formation in the Edwards Fermion-Boson model at one-third band filling, JPS Conf. Proc. 3, 013006 (2014).
  35. Y. Murakami, S. Takayoshi, T. Kaneko, Z. Sun, D. Golež, A. J. Millis, and P. Werner, Exploring nonequilibrium phases of photo-doped Mott insulators with generalized Gibbs ensembles, Commun. Phys. 5, 23 (2022).
  36. D. R. Baykusheva, M. H. Kalthoff, D. Hofmann, M. Claassen, D. M. Kennes, M. A. Sentef, and M. Mitrano, Witnessing nonequilibrium entanglement dynamics in a strongly correlated fermionic chain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 106902 (2023).
  37. M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor software library for tensor network calculations, SciPost Phys. Codebases, 4 (2022).
  38. M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, Codebase release 0.3 for ITensor, SciPost Phys. Codebases, 4–r0.3 (2022).
  39. A. H. MacDonald, S. M. Girvin, and D. Yoshioka, tU expansion for the Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 37, 9753 (1988).
  40. S. Nishimoto, S. Ejima, and H. Fehske, Anderson localization versus charge-density-wave formation in disordered electron systems, Phys. Rev. B 87, 045116 (2013).
  41. M. Claassen, H.-C. Jiang, B. Moritz, and T. P. Devereaux, Dynamical time-reversal symmetry breaking and photo-induced chiral spin liquids in frustrated Mott insulators, Nat. Commun. 8, 1192 (2017).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation