Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Probing Purcell enhancement and photon collection efficiency of InAs quantum dots at nodes of the cavity electric field

Matthew Jordan1,2, Petros Androvitsaneas1,2, Rachel N. Clark1,2, Aristotelis Trapalis3, Ian Farrer3,4, Wolfgang Langbein5, and Anthony J. Bennett1,2,5,*

  • 1School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Queen's Buildings, The Parade, Cardiff CF24 3AA, United Kingdom
  • 2Translational Research Hub, Maindy Road, Cardiff CF24 4HQ, United Kingdom
  • 3Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Mappin Steet, Sheffield S1 3JD, United Kingdom
  • 4EPSRC National Epitaxy Facility, University of Sheffield, Broad Lane, Sheffield S3 7HQ, United Kingdom
  • 5School of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University, Queen's Buildings, The Parade, Cardiff CF24 3AA, United Kingdom

  • *Corresponding author: BennettA19@cardiff.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L022004 – Published 4 April, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L022004

Abstract

The interaction of excitonic transitions with confined photonic modes enables tests of quantum physics and design of efficient optoelectronic devices. Here we study how key metrics such as Purcell factor, β factor, and collection efficiency are determined by the non-cavity modes that exist in real devices, taking the well-studied micropillar cavity as an example. Samples with dots at different positions in the cavity field allow us to quantify the effect of the non-cavity modes and show that the zero-phonon line and the phonon-assisted emission into the cavity mode HE11 is suppressed by positioning dots at the field node.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (39)

  1. S. Magnitskii, D. Frolovtsev, D. Agapov, A. Demin, V. Krutikov, and G. Levin, Metrology of single photons for quantum information technologies, Meas. Tech. 60, 235 (2017).
  2. J. Kołodyński, A. Máttar, P. Skrzypczyk, E. Woodhead, D. Cavalcanti, K. Banaszek, and A. Acín, Device-independent quantum key distribution with single-photon sources, Quantum 4, 260 (2020).
  3. T. Rudolph, Why I am optimistic about the silicon-photonic route to quantum computing, APL Photon. 2, 030901 (2017).
  4. R. Raussendorf and J. Harrington, Fault-tolerant quantum computation with high threshold in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 190504 (2007).
  5. D. Englund, D. Fattal, E. Waks, G. Solomon, B. Zhang, T. Nakaoka, Y. Arakawa, Y. Yamamoto, and J. Vučković, Controlling the spontaneous emission rate of single quantum dots in a two-dimensional photonic crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 013904 (2005).
  6. L. Sapienza, H. Thyrrestrup, S. Stobbe, P. D. Garcia, S. Smolka, and P. Lodahl, Cavity quantum electrodynamics with Anderson-localized modes, Science 327, 1352 (2010).
  7. J. Claudon, J. Bleuse, N. S. Malik, M. Bazin, P. Jaffrennou, N. Gregersen, C. Sauvan, P. Lalanne, and J.-M. Gérard, A highly efficient single-photon source based on a quantum dot in a photonic nanowire, Nat. Photon. 4, 174 (2010).
  8. A. G. Curto, G. Volpe, T. H. Taminiau, M. P. Kreuzer, R. Quidant, and N. F. Van Hulst, Unidirectional emission of a quantum dot coupled to a nanoantenna, Science 329, 930 (2010).
  9. K. J. Vahala, Optical microcavities, Nature (London) 424, 839 (2003).
  10. J. Gerard, D. Barrier, J. Marzin, R. Kuszelewicz, L. Manin, E. Costard, V. Thierry-Mieg, and T. Rivera, Quantum boxes as active probes for photonic microstructures: The pillar microcavity case, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 449 (1996).
  11. P. Androvitsaneas, R. N. Clark, M. Jordan, M. Alvarez Perez, T. Peach, S. Thomas, S. Shabbir, A. D. Sobiesierski, A. Trapalis, and I. A. Farrer, Direct-write projection lithography of quantum dot micropillar single photon sources, Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 094001 (2023).
  12. S. Reitzenstein and A. Forchel, Quantum dot micropillars, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43, 033001 (2010).
  13. F. R. Connor, Wave Transmission (Edward Arnold, London, 1972).
  14. X. Ding, Y. He, Z.-C. Duan, N. Gregersen, M.-C. Chen, S. Unsleber, S. Maier, C. Schneider, M. Kamp, and S. Höfling, On-demand single photons with high extraction efficiency and near-unity indistinguishability from a resonantly driven quantum dot in a micropillar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 020401 (2016).
  15. H. Wang, Y.-M. He, T.-H. Chung, H. Hu, Y. Yu, S. Chen, X. Ding, M.-C. Chen, J. Qin, and X. Yang, Towards optimal single-photon sources from polarized microcavities, Nat. Photon. 13, 770 (2019).
  16. B.-Y. Wang, E. V. Denning, U. M. Gür, C.-Y. Lu, and N. Gregersen, Micropillar single-photon source design for simultaneous near-unity efficiency and indistinguishability, Phys. Rev. B 102, 125301 (2020).
  17. A. J. Bennett, J. P. Lee, D. J. Ellis, T. Meany, E. Murray, F. F. Floether, J. P. Griffths, I. Farrer, D. A. Ritchie, and A. J. Shields, Cavity-enhanced coherent light scattering from a quantum dot, Sci. Adv. 2, e1501256 (2016).
  18. N. Tomm, A. Javadi, N. O. Antoniadis, D. Najer, M. C. Löbl, A. R. Korsch, R. Schott, S. R. Valentin, A. D. Wieck, and A. Ludwig, A bright and fast source of coherent single photons, Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 399 (2021).
  19. A. Dousse, J. Suffczyński, A. Beveratos, O. Krebs, A. Lemaître, I. Sagnes, J. Bloch, P. Voisin, and P. Senellart, Ultrabright source of entangled photon pairs, Nature (London) 466, 217 (2010).
  20. A. Muller, E. B. Flagg, P. Bianucci, X. Wang, D. G. Deppe, W. Ma, J. Zhang, G. Salamo, M. Xiao, and C.-K. Shih, Resonance fluorescence from a coherently driven semiconductor quantum dot in a cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 187402 (2007).
  21. A. Nick Vamivakas, Y. Zhao, C.-Y. Lu, and M. Atatüre, Spin-resolved quantum-dot resonance fluorescence, Nat. Phys. 5, 198 (2009).
  22. E. Moreau, I. Robert, J. Gérard, I. Abram, L. Manin, and V. Thierry-Mieg, Single-mode solid-state single photon source based on isolated quantum dots in pillar microcavities, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 2865 (2001).
  23. P. Androvitsaneas, A. B. Young, C. Schneider, S. Maier, M. Kamp, S. Höfling, S. Knauer, E. Harbord, C.-Y. Hu, and J. G. Rarity, Charged quantum dot micropillar system for deterministic light-matter interactions, Phys. Rev. B 93, 241409(R) (2016).
  24. A. M. Fox, Quantum Optics: An Introduction (Oxford University Press, New York, 2006), Vol. 15.
  25. E. Purcell, Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies, Phys. Rev. 69, 681 (1946).
  26. M. Munsch, A. Mosset, A. Auffèves, S. Seidelin, J.-P. Poizat, J.-M. Gérard, A. Lemaître, I. Sagnes, and P. Senellart, Continuous-wave versus time-resolved measurements of Purcell factors for quantum dots in semiconductor microcavities, Phys. Rev. B 80, 115312 (2009).
  27. J.-M. Gérard, B. Sermage, B. Gayral, B. Legrand, E. Costard, and V. Thierry-Mieg, Enhanced spontaneous emission by quantum boxes in a monolithic optical microcavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1110 (1998).
  28. L. Engel, S. Kolatschek, T. Herzog, S. Vollmer, M. Jetter, S. L. Portalupi, and P. Michler, Purcell enhanced single-photon emission from a quantum dot coupled to a truncated Gaussian microcavity, Appl. Phys. Lett. 122, 043503 (2023).
  29. K. Hennessy, C. Högerle, E. Hu, A. Badolato, and A. Imamoğlu, Tuning photonic nanocavities by atomic force microscope nano-oxidation, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 041118 (2006).
  30. A. Nowak, S. Portalupi, V. Giesz, O. Gazzano, C. Dal Savio, P.-F. Braun, K. Karrai, C. Arnold, L. Lanco, and I. Sagnes, Deterministic and electrically tunable bright single-photon source, Nat. Commun. 5, 3240 (2014).
  31. F. Jenkins and E. Segre, The quadratic Zeeman effect, Phys. Rev. 55, 52 (1939).
  32. E. A. Muljarov and W. Langbein, Exact mode volume and Purcell factor of open optical systems, Phys. Rev. B 94, 235438 (2016).
  33. E. F. Schubert, Light-Emitting Diodes (E. Fred Schubert, New York, 2018).
  34. P. Androvitsaneas, A. Young, J. Lennon, C. Schneider, S. Maier, J. Hinchliff, G. Atkinson, E. Harbord, M. Kamp, and S. Höfling, Efficient quantum photonic phase shift in a low Q-factor regime, ACS Photon. 6, 429 (2019).
  35. U. Hohenester, A. Laucht, M. Kaniber, N. Hauke, A. Neumann, A. Mohtashami, M. Seliger, M. Bichler, and J. J. Finley, Phonon-assisted transitions from quantum dot excitons to cavity photons, Phys. Rev. B 80, 201311(R) (2009).
  36. U. Hohenester, Cavity quantum electrodynamics with semiconductor quantum dots: Role of phonon-assisted cavity feeding, Phys. Rev. B 81, 155303 (2010).
  37. T. Nakaoka, T. Saito, J. Tatebayashi, S. Hirose, T. Usuki, N. Yokoyama, and Y. Arakawa, Tuning of g-factor in self-assembled In(Ga) As quantum dots through strain engineering, Phys. Rev. B 71, 205301 (2005).
  38. T. Nakaoka, T. Saito, J. Tatebayashi, and Y. Arakawa, Size, shape, and strain dependence of the g factor in self-assembled In(Ga)As quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 70, 235337 (2004).
  39. Doi: 10.17035/d.2024.0305910438

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation