Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Exact analog of the Hatano-Nelson model in one-dimensional continuous nonreciprocal systems

A. Maddi, Y. Auregan, G. Penelet, V. Pagneux, and V. Achilleos

  • Laboratoire d'Acoustique de l'Université du Mans (LAUM), UMR 6613, Institut d'Acoustique - Graduate School (IA-GS), CNRS, Le Mans Université, Le Mans, France

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L012061 – Published 15 March, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L012061

Abstract

Non-Hermitian topology offers a promising avenue toward an enhanced control of waves, and many of the underlying interesting phenomena are studied through the paradigmatic Hatano-Nelson (HN) model, which remains unexplored in continuous wave systems. Herein, we propose a framework to map one-dimensional continuous nonreciprocal systems onto the HN model. Our approach, based on the properties of transfer matrices, is applicable across various physical domains. We experimentally apply our method in audible acoustics using active elements, where we not only observe the predicted skin effect but also access the spectrum topology using stable configurations and observe its subsequent boundary sensitivity. By establishing a connection between continuous wave systems and the discrete HN model, our results significantly broaden the potential application of nonreciprocal topological phenomena.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (59)

  1. Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian physics, Adv. Phys. 69, 249 (2020).
  2. R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non-Hermitian physics and PT symmetry, Nat. Phys. 14, 11 (2018).
  3. C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non-Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998).
  4. C. M. Bender, M. Berry, and A. Mandilara, Generalized PT symmetry and real spectra, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35, L467 (2002).
  5. Z.-P. Liu, J. Zhang, Ş. K. Özdemir, B. Peng, H. Jing, X.-Y. Lü, C.-W. Li, L. Yang, F. Nori, and Y.-X. Liu, Metrology with PT-symmetric cavities: Enhanced sensitivity near the PT-phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 110802 (2016).
  6. M.-A. Miri and A. Alù, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science 363, eaar7709 (2019).
  7. J. Wiersig, Review of exceptional point-based sensors, Photonics Res. 8, 1457 (2020).
  8. W. Chen, Ş. K. Özdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity, Nature (London) 548, 192 (2017).
  9. Y. Aurégan and V. Pagneux, PT-symmetric scattering in flow duct acoustics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 174301 (2017).
  10. S. Longhi, PT-symmetric laser absorber, Phys. Rev. A 82, 031801(R) (2010).
  11. Y. Chong, L. Ge, and A. D. Stone, PT-symmetry breaking and laser-absorber modes in optical scattering systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 093902 (2011); 108, 269902(E) (2012).
  12. G. Poignand, C. Olivier, and G. Penelet, Parity-time symmetric system based on the thermoacoustic effect, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 149, 1913 (2021).
  13. Z. J. Wong, Y.-L. Xu, J. Kim, K. O'Brien, Y. Wang, L. Feng, and X. Zhang, Lasing and anti-lasing in a single cavity, Nat. Photonics 10, 796 (2016).
  14. Z. Lin, H. Ramezani, T. Eichelkraut, T. Kottos, H. Cao, and D. N. Christodoulides, Unidirectional invisibility induced by PT-symmetric periodic structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 213901 (2011).
  15. A. Mostafazadeh, Invisibility and PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. A 87, 012103 (2013).
  16. C. C. Wanjura, M. Brunelli, and A. Nunnenkamp, Correspondence between non-Hermitian topology and directional amplification in the presence of disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 213601 (2021).
  17. S. Longhi, Self-healing of non-Hermitian topological skin modes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 157601 (2022).
  18. S. Weidemann, M. Kremer, T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, A. Stegmaier, M. Greiter, R. Thomale, and A. Szameit, Topological funneling of light, Science 368, 311 (2020).
  19. E. Edvardsson and E. Ardonne, Sensitivity of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B 106, 115107 (2022).
  20. J. C. Budich and E. J. Bergholtz, Non-Hermitian topological sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 180403 (2020).
  21. A. McDonald and A. A. Clerk, Exponentially-enhanced quantum sensing with non-Hermitian lattice dynamics, Nat. Commun. 11, 5382 (2020).
  22. F. Koch and J. C. Budich, Quantum non-Hermitian topological sensors, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013113 (2022).
  23. M. Parto, C. Leefmans, J. Williams, and A. Marandi, Enhanced sensitivity via non-Hermitian topology, arXiv:2305.03282.
  24. H. Yuan, W. Zhang, Z. Zhou, W. Wang, N. Pan, Y. Feng, H. Sun, and X. Zhang, Non-Hermitian topolectrical circuit sensor with high sensitivity, Adv. Sci. 10, 2301128 (2023).
  25. E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021).
  26. N. Okuma and M. Sato, Non-Hermitian topological phenomena: A review, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 83 (2023).
  27. N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Topological origin of non-Hermitian skin effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 086801 (2020).
  28. X. Zhang, T. Zhang, M.-H. Lu, and Y.-F. Chen, A review on non-Hermitian skin effect, Adv. Phys.: X 7, 2109431 (2022).
  29. R. Lin, T. Tai, L. Li, and C. H. Lee, Topological non-Hermitian skin effect, Front. Phys. 18, 53605 (2023).
  30. K. Xu, X. Zhang, K. Luo, R. Yu, D. Li, and H. Zhang, Coexistence of topological edge states and skin effects in the non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model with long-range nonreciprocal hopping in topoelectric realizations, Phys. Rev. B 103, 125411 (2021).
  31. T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, S. Imhof, M. Abdelghany, T. Kiessling, L. Molenkamp, C. Lee, A. Szameit, M. Greiter, and R. Thomale, Generalized bulk–boundary correspondence in non-Hermitian topolectrical circuits, Nat. Phys. 16, 747 (2020).
  32. S. Liu, R. Shao, S. Ma, L. Zhang, O. You, H. Wu, Y. J. Xiang, T. J. Cui, and S. Zhang, Non-Hermitian skin effect in a non-Hermitian electrical circuit, Research 2021, 5608038 (2021).
  33. L. Zhang, Y. Yang, Y. Ge, Y.-J. Guan, Q. Chen, Q. Yan, F. Chen, R. Xi, Y. Li, D. Jia, S.-Q. Yuan, H.-X. Sun, H. Chen, and B. Zhang, Acoustic non-Hermitian skin effect from twisted winding topology, Nat. Commun. 12, 6297 (2021).
  34. Z. Gu, H. Gao, H. Xue, J. Li, Z. Su, and J. Zhu, Transient non-Hermitian skin effect, Nat. Commun. 13, 7668 (2022).
  35. N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization transitions in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 570 (1996).
  36. S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invariants of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018).
  37. Q. Zhou, J. Wu, Z. Pu, J. Lu, X. Huang, W. Deng, M. Ke, and Z. Liu, Observation of geometry-dependent skin effect in non-Hermitian phononic crystals with exceptional points, Nat. Commun. 14, 4569 (2023).
  38. G. Penelet, V. Pagneux, G. Poignand, C. Olivier, and Y. Aurégan, Broadband nonreciprocal acoustic scattering using a loudspeaker with asymmetric feedback, Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 064012 (2021).
  39. F. K. Kunst and V. Dwivedi, Non-Hermitian systems and topology: A transfer-matrix perspective, Phys. Rev. B 99, 245116 (2019).
  40. K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Correspondence between winding numbers and skin modes in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 126402 (2020).
  41. B. Peng, Ş. K. Özdemir, M. Liertzer, W. Chen, J. Kramer, H. Yılmaz, J. Wiersig, S. Rotter, and L. Yang, Chiral modes and directional lasing at exceptional points, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6845 (2016).
  42. H.-Z. Chen, T. Liu, H.-Y. Luan, R.-J. Liu, X.-Y. Wang, X.-F. Zhu, Y.-B. Li, Z.-M. Gu, S.-J. Liang, H. Gao, L. Lu, L. Ge, S. Zhang, J. Zhu, and R.-M. Ma, Revealing the missing dimension at an exceptional point, Nat. Phys. 16, 571 (2020).
  43. A. Hashemi, S. Rezaei, S. Özdemir, and R. El-Ganainy, New perspective on chiral exceptional points with application to discrete photonics, APL Photonics 6, 040803 (2021).
  44. C. Olivier, A. Maddi, G. Poignand, and G. Penelet, Asymmetric transmission and coherent perfect absorption in a periodic array of thermoacoustic cells, J. Appl. Phys. 131, 244701 (2022).
  45. H. Nassar, B. Yousefzadeh, R. Fleury, M. Ruzzene, A. Alù, C. Daraio, A. N. Norris, G. Huang, and M. R. Haberman, Nonreciprocity in acoustic and elastic materials, Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 667 (2020).
  46. R. Fleury, D. L. Sounas, C. F. Sieck, M. R. Haberman, and A. Alù, Sound isolation and giant linear nonreciprocity in a compact acoustic circulator, Science 343, 516 (2014).
  47. B.-I. Popa and S. A. Cummer, Non-reciprocal and highly nonlinear active acoustic metamaterials, Nat. Commun. 5, 3398 (2014).
  48. Y. Zhai, H.-S. Kwon, and B.-I. Popa, Active Willis metamaterials for ultracompact nonreciprocal linear acoustic devices, Phys. Rev. B 99, 220301(R) (2019).
  49. N. Geib, A. Sasmal, Z. Wang, Y. Zhai, B.-I. Popa, and K. Grosh, Tunable nonlocal purely active nonreciprocal acoustic media, Phys. Rev. B 103, 165427 (2021).
  50. Z. Chen, Y. Peng, H. Li, J. Liu, Y. Ding, B. Liang, X.-F. Zhu, Y. Lu, J. Cheng, and A. Alù, Efficient nonreciprocal mode transitions in spatiotemporally modulated acoustic metamaterials, Sci. Adv. 7, eabj1198 (2021).
  51. C. Shen, X. Zhu, J. Li, and S. A. Cummer, Nonreciprocal acoustic transmission in space-time modulated coupled resonators, Phys. Rev. B 100, 054302 (2019).
  52. C. Rasmussen, L. Quan, and A. Alù, Acoustic nonreciprocity, J. Appl. Phys. 129, 210903 (2021).
  53. A. Maddi, C. Olivier, G. Poignand, G. Penelet, V. Pagneux, and Y. Aurégan, Frozen sound: An ultra-low frequency and ultra-broadband non-reciprocal acoustic absorber, Nat. Commun. 14, 4028 (2023).
  54. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L012061 for a detailed derivation of the transfer matrix, the solutions of det(MdMexptN−I)=0, and details of the analytical 1D model.
  55. M. S. Allen and J. H. Ginsberg, A global, single-input–multi-output (SIMO) implementation of the algorithm of mode isolation and application to analytical and experimental data, Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 20, 1090 (2006).
  56. B. Peeters, H. Van der Auweraer, P. Guillaume, and J. Leuridan, The PolyMAX frequency-domain method: a new standard for modal parameter estimation? Shock Vib. 11, 395 (2004).
  57. Y. Liu, Y. Zeng, L. Li, and S. Chen, Exact solution of the single impurity problem in nonreciprocal lattices: Impurity-induced size-dependent non-Hermitian skin effect, Phys. Rev. B 104, 085401 (2021).
  58. J. Kergomard and A. Garcia, Simple discontinuities in acoustic waveguides at low frequencies: Critical analysis and formulae, J. Sound Vib. 114, 465 (1987).
  59. T. Herdtle, J. S. Bolton, N. N. Kim, J. H. Alexander, and R. W. Gerdes, Transfer impedance of microperforated materials with tapered holes, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134, 4752 (2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation