Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Kubo formula for dc conductivity: Generalization to systems with spin-orbit coupling

I. A. Ado1,2,*, M. Titov1, Rembert A. Duine2,3, and Arne Brataas4

  • 1Radboud University, Institute for Molecules and Materials, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • 2Institute for Theoretical Physics, Utrecht University, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • 3Department of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
  • 4Center for Quantum Spintronics, Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Høgskoleringen 5, 7491 Trondheim, Norway

  • *iv.a.ado@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L012057 – Published 11 March, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L012057

Abstract

We revise the Kubo formula for the electric dc conductivity in the presence of spin-orbit coupling (SOC). We discover that each velocity operator that enters this formula differs from ∂H/∂p, where H is the Hamiltonian and p is the canonical momentum. Moreover, we find an additional contribution to the Hall dc conductivity from noncommuting coordinates that is missing in the conventional Kubo-Středa formula. This contribution originates from the “electron-positron” matrix elements of the velocity and position operators. We argue that the widely used Rashba model does in fact provide a finite anomalous Hall dc conductivity in the metallic regime (in the noncrossing approximation) if SOC-corrections to the velocity and position operators are properly taken into account. While we focus on the response of the charge current to the electric field, linear response theories of other SOC-related effects should be modified similarly.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (60)

  1. N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539 (2010).
  2. J. Sinova, S. O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C. H. Back, and T. Jungwirth, Spin Hall effects, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213 (2015).
  3. A. Manchon, J. Železný, I. M. Miron, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 035004 (2019).
  4. G. E. Bauer, E. Saitoh, and B. J. Van Wees, Spin caloritronics, Nat. Mater. 11, 391 (2012).
  5. K. Garello, F. Yasin, S. Couet, L. Souriau, J. Swerts, S. Rao, S. Van Beek, W. Kim, E. Liu, S. Kundu, D. Tsvetanova, K. Croes, N. Jossart, E. Grimaldi, M. Baumgartner, D. Crotti, A. Fumémont, P. Gambardella, and G. Kar, SOT-MRAM 300MM Integration for Low Power and Ultrafast Embedded Memories, in Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2018), pp. 81–82.
  6. R. Saha, Y. P. Pundir, and P. Kumar Pal, Comparative analysis of STT and SOT based MRAMs for last level caches, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 551, 169161 (2022).
  7. S. Parkin and S.-H. Yang, Memory on the racetrack, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 195 (2015).
  8. J. Grollier, D. Querlioz, K. Camsari, K. Everschor-Sitte, S. Fukami, and M. D. Stiles, Neuromorphic spintronics, Nat. Electron. 3, 360 (2020).
  9. D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010).
  10. M. Bonilla, S. Kolekar, Y. Ma, H. C. Diaz, V. Kalappattil, R. Das, T. Eggers, H. R. Gutierrez, M.-H. Phan, and M. Batzill, Strong room-temperature ferromagnetism in VSe2 monolayers on van der Waals substrates, Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 289 (2018).
  11. C. Tan, J. Lee, S.-G. Jung, T. Park, S. Albarakati, J. Partridge, M. R. Field, D. G. McCulloch, L. Wang, and C. Lee, Hard magnetic properties in nanoflake van der Waals Fe3GeTe2, Nat. Commun. 9, 1554 (2018).
  12. Y. Deng, Y. Yu, Y. Song, J. Zhang, N. Z. Wang, Z. Sun, Y. Yi, Y. Z. Wu, S. Wu, J. Zhu et al., Gate-tunable room-temperature ferromagnetism in two-dimensional Fe3GeTe2, Nature (London) 563, 94 (2018).
  13. M. Alghamdi, M. Lohmann, J. Li, P. R. Jothi, Q. Shao, M. Aldosary, T. Su, B. P. T. Fokwa, and J. Shi, Highly efficient spin–orbit torque and switching of layered ferromagnet Fe3GeTe2, Nano Lett. 19, 4400 (2019).
  14. R. Kubo, Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes. I. General theory and simple applications to magnetic and conduction problems, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 12, 570 (1957).
  15. A. Bastin, C. Lewiner, O. Betbeder-matibet, and P. Nozieres, Quantum oscillations of the Hall effect of a fermion gas with random impurity scattering, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 32, 1811 (1971).
  16. P. Streda, Theory of quantised Hall conductivity in two dimensions, J. Phys. C 15, L717 (1982).
  17. For a system described by the Pauli Hamiltonian, A also contributes to the Zeeman term through B=∇×A, but its derivative with respect to A does not contribute to the transport current.
  18. L. L. Foldy and S. A. Wouthuysen, On the Dirac theory of spin 1/2 particles and its non-relativistic limit, Phys. Rev. 78, 29 (1950).
  19. P. Noziéres and C. Lewiner, A simple theory of the anomalous Hall effect in semiconductors, J. Phys. (Paris) 34, 901 (1973).
  20. G. Vignale, Ten years of spin Hall effect, J. Supercond. Novel Magn. 23, 3 (2010).
  21. H.-A. Engel, E. I. Rashba, and B. I. Halperin, in Handbook of Magnetism and Advanced Magnetic Materials, edited by H. Kronmüller and S. S. Parkin (Wiley, Chichester, 2007), Vol. 5, pp. 2858–2877.
  22. C. Espedal, P. Lange, S. Sadjina, A. G. Mal'shukov, and A. Brataas, Spin Hall effect and spin swapping in diffusive superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 95, 054509 (2017).
  23. To be more precise, Adams and Blount used the term “anomalous velocity” to refer to the expression v−∂H/∂p projected to a band of a solid [24]. In the Berry-phase theory of AHE, the same terminology is used nowadays for a particular situation when v≠∂H/∂p due to the external electric field. In the present paper, the “anomalous velocity” means the difference v−∂H/∂p understood in the operator form, i.e. without any projections implied.
  24. E. Adams and E. Blount, Energy bands in the presence of an external force field–II: Anomalous velocities, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 10, 286 (1959).
  25. E. Blount, Formalisms of Band Theory, in Solid State Phys., edited by F. Seitz and D. Turnbull (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1962), Vol. 13, pp. 305–373.
  26. A. Crépieux and P. Bruno, Relativistic corrections in magnetic systems, Phys. Rev. B 64, 094434 (2001).
  27. A. Crépieux and P. Bruno, Theory of the anomalous Hall effect from the Kubo formula and the Dirac equation, Phys. Rev. B 64, 014416 (2001).
  28. R. Mondal, M. Berritta, K. Carva, and P. M. Oppeneer, Ab initio investigation of light-induced relativistic spin-flip effects in magneto-optics, Phys. Rev. B 91, 174415 (2015).
  29. M.-C. Chang and Q. Niu, Berry curvature, orbital moment, and effective quantum theory of electrons in electromagnetic fields, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 193202 (2008).
  30. R. Winkler, Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Two-Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics Vol. 191 (Springer, Berlin, 2003).
  31. J. Sinova and A. MacDonald, Theory of spin-orbit effects in semiconductors, Semiconduct. Semimet. 82, 45 (2008).
  32. In Eq. (17), we disregard all terms beyond the order 1/c2.
  33. D. Culcer, E. M. Hankiewicz, G. Vignale, and R. Winkler, Side jumps in the spin Hall effect: Construction of the Boltzmann collision integral, Phys. Rev. B 81, 125332 (2010).
  34. C. Xiao, B. Xiong, and F. Xue, Boltzmann approach to spin orbit-induced transport in effective quantum theories, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 30, 415002 (2018).
  35. In fact, we assume that the Fermi level lies above the lower bound of the spectrum of H(el).
  36. V. Bonbien and A. Manchon, Symmetrized decomposition of the Kubo-Bastin formula, Phys. Rev. B 102, 085113 (2020).
  37. X. Bi, P. He, E. M. Hankiewicz, R. Winkler, G. Vignale, and D. Culcer, Anomalous spin precession and spin Hall effect in semiconductor quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B 88, 035316 (2013).
  38. When, in a crystal, r, v, H are projected to a finite set of bands, it can happen that, for projected operators, v≠[r,H]/(iℏ). In this case, Streda's formula that we derived is still valid, but one should choose such an operator for r(D) that forms a canonical pair with momentum [57].
  39. H.-A. Engel, B. I. Halperin, and E. I. Rashba, Theory of spin Hall conductivity in n-doped GaAs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 166605 (2005).
  40. E. O. Kane, Band structure of indium antimonide, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1, 249 (1957).
  41. Y. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, Oscillatory effects and the magnetic susceptibility of carriers in inversion layers, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 17, 6039 (1984).
  42. R. Hanson, L. P. Kouwenhoven, J. R. Petta, S. Tarucha, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Spins in few-electron quantum dots, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 1217 (2007).
  43. J.-I. Inoue, G. E. W. Bauer, and L. W. Molenkamp, Suppression of the persistent spin Hall current by defect scattering, Phys. Rev. B 70, 041303(R) (2004).
  44. I. A. Ado, O. A. Tretiakov, and M. Titov, Microscopic theory of spin-orbit torques in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 95, 094401 (2017).
  45. J.-I. Inoue, T. Kato, Y. Ishikawa, H. Itoh, G. E. W. Bauer, and L. W. Molenkamp, Vertex corrections to the anomalous Hall effect in spin-polarized two-dimensional electron gases with a Rashba spin-orbit interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 046604 (2006).
  46. M. F. Borunda, T. S. Nunner, T. Lück, N. A. Sinitsyn, C. Timm, J. Wunderlich, T. Jungwirth, A. H. MacDonald, and J. Sinova, Absence of skew scattering in two-dimensional systems: Testing the origins of the anomalous Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 066604 (2007).
  47. T. Kato, Y. Ishikawa, H. Itoh, and J.-I. Inoue, Anomalous Hall effect in spin-polarized two-dimensional electron gases with Rashba spin-orbit interaction, New J. Phys. 9, 350 (2007).
  48. T. S. Nunner, N. A. Sinitsyn, M. F. Borunda, V. K. Dugaev, A. A. Kovalev, A. Abanov, C. Timm, T. Jungwirth, J.-I. Inoue, A. H. MacDonald, and J. Sinova, Anomalous Hall effect in a two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B 76, 235312 (2007).
  49. T. S. Nunner, G. Zaránd, and F. von Oppen, Anomalous Hall effect in a two-dimensional electron gas with magnetic impurities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 236602 (2008).
  50. A. A. Kovalev, Y. Tserkovnyak, K. Výborný, and J. Sinova, Transport theory for disordered multiple-band systems: Anomalous Hall effect and anisotropic magnetoresistance, Phys. Rev. B 79, 195129 (2009).
  51. I. A. Ado, I. A. Dmitriev, P. M. Ostrovsky, and M. Titov, Anomalous Hall effect in a 2D Rashba ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 046601 (2016).
  52. D. Culcer, The Anomalous Hall Effect, in Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2022).
  53. We disregard nonparabolic corrections to the velocity operator. They correspond to nonparabolic corrections to the Hamiltonian that we have already neglected.
  54. In fact, this is also a simplification. The correct expression for the velocity operator in the Kane model (projected to the conduction band) includes an additional prefactor γ≠0 in front of the last term on the right-hand side of Eq. (27). As a result, the expression for σxyI in Eq. (28) is multiplied by γ2. The prefactor γ is a function of the parameters of the Kane model. More detailed analysis of this model is presented in Ref. [57].
  55. I. A. Ado, P. M. Ostrovsky, and M. Titov, Anisotropy of spin-transfer torques and Gilbert damping induced by Rashba coupling, Phys. Rev. B 101, 085405 (2020).
  56. In Eq. (28), σxyI is given by a contribution quadratic with respect to αR. In principle, there is no guarantee that it is the only contribution to σxyI in this order.
  57. I. A. Ado, M. Titov, R. A. Duine, and A. Brataas, Position operators and interband matrix elements of scalar and vector potentials in the 8-band Kane model, arXiv:2312.09349.
  58. In both the nonrelativistic and the fully relativistic theories, the system can be described by a Hamiltonian H that acts in a certain Hilbert space. The velocity operator equals ∂H/∂p in each of these two cases and acts in the same Hilbert space. Using this as a basis, one can employ the standard time-dependent perturbation formalism to derive the Středa's formula of Eqs. (2) which, therefore, would be valid in both theories. However, when projections to subbands are involved, this scheme cannot be applied without a proper change, as we have shown in this work.
  59. S. Lowitzer, D. Ködderitzsch, and H. Ebert, Coherent description of the intrinsic and extrinsic anomalous Hall effect in disordered alloys on an ab initio level, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 266604 (2010).
  60. N. A. Sinitsyn, A. H. MacDonald, T. Jungwirth, V. K. Dugaev, and J. Sinova, Anomalous Hall effect in a two-dimensional Dirac band: The link between the Kubo-Streda formula and the semiclassical Boltzmann equation approach, Phys. Rev. B 75, 045315 (2007).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation