- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Control of the Purcell effect via unexcited atoms and exceptional points

G. S. Agarwal*

  • Institute for Quantum Science and Engineering, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA

  • *Girish.Agarwal@ag.tamu.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L012050 – Published 6 March, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L012050

Abstract

We examine the possible control of the celebrated Purcell effect in cavity quantum electrodynamics. We demonstrate that the presence of an unexcited atom can significantly alter the Purcell decay depending on the strength of coupling of the unexcited atom with the cavity mode though the excited atom has to be weakly coupled for it to be in the Purcell regime. This cooperative behavior is distinct from the nonradiative nature of the singlet state which is an entangled state of the two-atom system. We present a physical interpretation for inhibition as due to interference between two polariton channels of decay. For specific values of the parameters, we bring out a connection to exceptional points in the cavity QED system as the unexcited atom and cavity mode can produce a second-order exceptional point. We further show how two unexcited atoms can create a third-order exceptional point leading to inhibition of the Purcell effect. We also discuss the case when the Purcell effect can be enhanced.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. E. M. Purcell, Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies, Phys. Rev. 69, 37 (1946).
  2. P. Goy, J. M. Raimond, M. Gross, and S. Haroche, Observation of cavity-enhanced single-atom spontaneous emission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1903 (1983).
  3. D. G. Angelakis, P. L. Knight, and E. Paspalakis, Photonic crystals and inhibition of spontaneous emission: An introduction, Contemp. Phys. 45, 303 (2004).
  4. A. F. Kockum, G. Johansson, and F. Nori, Decoherence-free interaction between giant atoms in waveguide quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 140404 (2018).
  5. R. Collison, J. B. Pérez-Sánchez, M. Du, J. Trevino, J. Yuen-Zhou, S. O'Brien, and V. M. Menon, Purcell effect of plasmonic surface lattice resonances and its influence on energy transfer, ACS Photonics 8, 2211 (2021).
  6. H. N. Krishnamoorthy, Z. Jacob, E. Narimanov, I. Kretzschmar, and V. M. Menon, Topological transitions in metamaterials, Science 336, 205 (2012).
  7. A. E. Krasnok, A. P. Slobozhanyuk, C. R. Simovski, S. A. Tretyakov, A. N. Poddubny, A. E. Miroshnichenko, Y. S. Kivshar, and P. A. Belov, An antenna model for the Purcell effect, Sci. Rep. 5, 12956 (2015).
  8. G. S. Agarwal, Quantum electrodynamics in the presence of dielectrics and conductors. IV. General theory for spontaneous emission in finite geometries, Phys. Rev. A 12, 1475 (1975).
  9. J. Gallego, W. Alt, T. Macha, M. Martinez-Dorantes, D. Pandey, and D. Meschede, Strong Purcell effect on a neutral atom trapped in an open fiber cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 173603 (2018).
  10. H. M. Doeleman, C. D. Dieleman, C. Mennes, B. Ehrler, and A. F. Koenderink, Observation of cooperative Purcell enhancements in antenna–cavity hybrids, ACS Nano 14, 12027 (2020).
  11. H. Siampour, C. O'Rourke, A. J. Brash, M. N. Makhonin, R. Dost, D. J. Hallett, E. Clarke, P. K. Patil, M. S. Skolnick, and A. M. Fox, Observation of large spontaneous emission rate enhancement of quantum dots in a broken-symmetry slow-light waveguide, npj Quantum Inf. 9, 15 (2023).
  12. V. S. C. Manga Rao and S. Hughes, Single quantum-dot Purcell factor and β factor in a photonic crystal waveguide, Phys. Rev. B 75, 205437 (2007).
  13. D. Kleppner, Inhibited spontaneous emission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 233 (1981).
  14. E. Yablonovitch, Inhibited spontaneous emission in solid-state physics and electronics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2059 (1987).
  15. S. John and J. Wang, Quantum electrodynamics near a photonic band gap: Photon bound states and dressed atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2418 (1990).
  16. M. D. Leistikow, A. P. Mosk, E. Yeganegi, S. R. Huisman, A. Lagendijk, and W. L. Vos, Inhibited spontaneous emission of quantum dots observed in a 3D photonic band gap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 193903 (2011).
  17. L. He, Ş. K. Özdemir, J. Zhu, W. Kim, and L. Yang, Detecting single viruses and nanoparticles using whispering gallery microlasers, Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 428 (2011).
  18. J. Wiersig, Enhancing the sensitivity of frequency and energy splitting detection by using exceptional points: Application to microcavity sensors for single-particle detection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 203901 (2014).
  19. W. Chen, Ş. K. Özdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity, Nature (London) 548, 192 (2017).
  20. H. Hodaei, A. U. Hassan, S. Wittek, H. Garcia-Gracia, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points, Nature (London) 548, 187 (2017).
  21. J. Wiersig, Review of exceptional point-based sensors, Photonics Res. 8, 1457 (2020).
  22. H.-K. Lau and A. A. Clerk, Fundamental limits and non-reciprocal approaches in non-Hermitian quantum sensing, Nat. Commun. 9, 4320 (2018).
  23. C. Chen, L. Jin, and R.-B. Liu, Sensitivity of parameter estimation near the exceptional point of a non-Hermitian system, New J. Phys. 21, 083002 (2019).
  24. D. Anderson, M. Shah, and L. Fan, Clarification of the exceptional-point contribution to photonic sensing, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 034059 (2023).
  25. R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non-Hermitian physics and PT symmetry, Nat. Phys. 14, 11 (2018).
  26. Ş. K. Özdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Parity–time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics, Nat. Mater. 18, 783 (2019).
  27. M. Khanbekyan and J. Wiersig, Decay suppression of spontaneous emission of a single emitter in a high-Q cavity at exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023375 (2020).
  28. G. S. Agarwal and K. Qu, Spontaneous generation of photons in transmission of quantum fields in PT-symmetric optical systems, Phys. Rev. A 85, 031802(R) (2012).
  29. Z.-Z. Li, W. Chen, M. Abbasi, K. W. Murch, and K. B. Whaley, Speeding up entanglement generation by proximity to higher-order exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 100202 (2023).
  30. S. Mukamel, A. Li, and M. Galperin, Exceptional points treatment of cavity spectroscopies, J. Chem. Phys. 158, 154106 (2023).
  31. J. Hopfield, Theory of the contribution of excitons to the complex dielectric constant of crystals, Phys. Rev. 112, 1555 (1958).
  32. C. Song, K. Xu, H. Li, Y.-R. Zhang, X. Zhang, W. Liu, Q. Guo, Z. Wang, W. Ren, J. Hao et al., Generation of multicomponent atomic Schrödinger cat states of up to 20 qubits, Science 365, 574 (2019).
  33. J. A. Mlynek, A. A. Abdumalikov, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Observation of Dicke superradiance for two artificial atoms in a cavity with high decay rate, Nat. Commun. 5, 5186 (2014).
  34. Y. Liu, Z. Wang, P. Yang, Q. Wang, Q. Fan, S. Guan, G. Li, P. Zhang, and T. Zhang, Realization of strong coupling between deterministic single-atom arrays and a high-finesse miniature optical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 173601 (2023).
  35. G. S. Agarwal, Laser field initiation of higher order poles of S-matrix-optical realization of field theoretic models, arXiv:2301.05179.
  36. S. E. Harris, J. E. Field, and A. Imamoğlu, Nonlinear optical processes using electromagnetically induced transparency, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1107 (1990).
  37. C. Liang, Y. Tang, A.-N. Xu, and Y.-C. Liu, Observation of exceptional points in thermal atomic ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 263601 (2023).
  38. M. O. Scully, Single photon subradiance: Quantum control of spontaneous emission and ultrafast readout, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 243602 (2015).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L012050– Published 6 March, 2024
  • Received 16 October 2023
  • Accepted 19 February 2024
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation