Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Extensibility governs the flow-induced alignment of polymers and rod-like colloids

Vincenzo Calabrese1,*, Tatiana Porto Santos1, Carlos G. Lopez2, Minne Paul Lettinga3,4, Simon J. Haward1, and Amy Q. Shen1

  • 1Micro/Bio/Nanofluidics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, 1919-1 Tancha, Onna-son, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan
  • 2RWTH Aachen University, Institute of Physical Chemistry, Landoltweg 2, 52074 Aachen, Germany
  • 3Laboratory for Soft Matter and Biophysics, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200D, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
  • 4ICS-3, Institut für Weiche Materie, Forschungszentrum Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany

  • *Corresponding author: vincenzo.calabrese@oist.jp

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L012042 – Published 26 February, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L012042

Abstract

Polymers and rod-like colloids (PaRC) adopt a favorable orientation under sufficiently strong flows. However, how the flow kinematics affect the alignment of such nanostructures according to their extensibility remains unclear. By analyzing the shear- and extension-induced alignment of chemically and structurally different PaRC, we show that extensibility is a key determinant of the structural response to the imposed kinematics. We propose a unified description of the effectiveness of extensional flow, compared to shearing flow, at aligning PaRC of different extensibility.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (53)

  1. M. Rubinstein and R. H. Colby, Polymer Physics (Oxford University Press, New York, 2003).
  2. M. Doi and S. F. Edwards, The Theory of Polymer Dynamics (Oxford University Press, New York, 1988).
  3. T. Rosén, B. S. Hsiao, and L. D. Söderberg, Elucidating the opportunities and challenges for nanocellulose spinning, Adv. Mater. 33, 2001238 (2021).
  4. Y.-J. Chen, D. Wu, W. Gelbart, C. M. Knobler, R. Phillips, and W. K. Kegel, Two-stage dynamics of in vivo bacteriophage genome ejection, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021029 (2018).
  5. P. Grayson, L. Han, T. Winther, and R. Phillips, Real-time observations of single bacteriophage λ DNA ejections in vitro, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 14652 (2007).
  6. E. K. Hill, B. Krebs, D. G. Goodall, G. J. Howlett, and D. E. Dunstan, Shear flow induces amyloid fibril formation, Biomacromolecules 7, 10 (2006).
  7. C. Akkermans, A. J. van der Goot, P. Venema, E. van der Linden, and R. M. Boom, Formation of fibrillar whey protein aggregates: Influence of heat and shear treatment, and resulting rheology, Food Hydrocolloids 22, 1315 (2008).
  8. R. H. Colby, Structure and linear viscoelasticity of flexible polymer solutions: Comparison of polyelectrolyte and neutral polymer solutions, Rheol. Acta 49, 425 (2010).
  9. Note that |E|≡γ̇ for the shear rate and |E|≡ɛ̇ for the extension rate; the extension rate ɛ̇ refers to the streamwise velocity gradient and the shear rate γ̇ refers to the velocity gradient normal to the flow direction.
  10. V. Calabrese, A. Q. Shen, and S. J. Haward, Naturally derived colloidal rods in microfluidic flows, Biomicrofluidics 17, 021301 (2023).
  11. C. Lang, J. Kohlbrecher, L. Porcar, A. Radulescu, K. Sellinghoff, J. K. G. Dhont, and M. P. Lettinga, Microstructural understanding of the length- and stiffness-dependent shear thinning in semidilute colloidal rods, Macromolecules 52, 9604 (2019).
  12. M. Doi and S. F. Edwards, Dynamics of rod-like macromolecules in concentrated solution. Part 1, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 74, 560 (1978).
  13. J. K. G. Dhont and W. J. Briels, Soft Matter (Wiley‐VCH, Weinheim, 2005), Vol. 2.
  14. A. Zöttl, K. E. Klop, A. K. Balin, Y. Gao, J. M. Yeomans, and D. G. Aarts, Dynamics of individual Brownian rods in a microchannel flow, Soft Matter 15, 5810 (2019).
  15. V. Calabrese, S. J. Haward, and A. Q. Shen, Effects of shearing and extensional flows on the alignment of colloidal rods, Macromolecules 54, 4176 (2021).
  16. V. Calabrese, C. György, S. J. Haward, T. J. Neal, S. P. Armes, and A. Q. Shen, Microstructural dynamics and rheology of worm-like diblock copolymer nanoparticle dispersions under a simple shear and a planar extensional flow, Macromolecules 55, 10031 (2022).
  17. P. T. Corona, B. Berke, M. Guizar-Sicairos, L. G. Leal, M. Liebi, and M. E. Helgeson, Fingerprinting soft material nanostructure response to complex flow histories, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 045603 (2022).
  18. B. Chun and H. W. Jung, Universal flow-induced orientational ordering of colloidal rods in planar shear and extensional flows: Dilute and semidilute concentrations, J. Rheol. 67, 315 (2023).
  19. P. G. De Gennes, Coil-stretch transition of dilute flexible polymers under ultrahigh velocity gradients, J. Chem. Phys. 60, 5030 (1974).
  20. A. Keller and J. A. Odell, The extensibility of macromolecules in solution; A new focus for macromolecular science, Colloid Polym. Sci. 263, 181 (1985).
  21. C. M. Schroeder, Single polymer dynamics for molecular rheology, J. Rheol. 62, 371 (2018).
  22. R. Larson and J. Magda, Coil-stretch transitions in mixed shear and extensional flows of dilute polymer solutions, Macromolecules 22, 3004 (1989).
  23. D. E. Smith, H. P. Babcock, and S. Chu, Single-polymer dynamics in steady shear flow, Science 283, 1724 (1999).
  24. J. S. Hur, E. S. G. Shaqfeh, H. P. Babcock, and S. Chu, Dynamics and configurational fluctuations of single DNA molecules in linear mixed flows, Phys. Rev. E 66, 011915 (2002).
  25. S. J. Haward, M. S. N. Oliveira, M. A. Alves, and G. H. McKinley, Optimized cross-slot flow geometry for microfluidic extensional rheometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 128301 (2012).
  26. S. J. Haward, G. H. McKinley, and A. Q. Shen, Elastic instabilities in planar elongational flow of monodisperse polymer solutions, Sci. Rep. 6, 33029 (2016).
  27. G. G. Fuller, Optical Rheometry of Complex Fluids (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995).
  28. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L012042 for the detailed information of the PaRC and their rheological characterization, including Refs. [15, 21, 26, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 44, 45, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53].
  29. N. Burshtein, S. T. Chan, K. Toda-Peters, A. Q. Shen, and S. J. Haward, 3D-printed glass microfluidics for fluid dynamics and rheology, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 43, 1 (2019).
  30. S. J. Haward, Characterization of hyaluronic acid and synovial fluid in stagnation point elongational flow, Biopolymers 101, 287 (2014).
  31. I. Usov and R. Mezzenga, FiberApp: An open-source software for tracking and analyzing polymers, filaments, biomacromolecules, and fibrous objects, Macromolecules 48, 1269 (2015).
  32. C. G. Lopez, R. H. Colby, and J. T. Cabral, Electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions in NaCMC aqueous solutions: Effect of degree of substitution, Macromolecules 51, 3165 (2018).
  33. T. Norisuye, Conformation and solution properties of water-soluble polysaccharides: Case study of hyaluronic acid, in Hydrocolloids (Elsevier, New York, 2000), pp. 311–320.
  34. K. Salamon, D. Aumiler, G. Pabst, and T. Vuletic, Probing the mesh formed by the semirigid polyelectrolytes, Macromolecules 46, 1107 (2013).
  35. W. Reisner, J. N. Pedersen, and R. H. Austin, DNA confinement in nanochannels: Physics and biological applications, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 106601 (2012).
  36. K. R. Purdy, Z. Dogic, S. Fraden, A. Rühm, L. Lurio, and S. G. J. Mochrie, Measuring the nematic order of suspensions of colloidal fd virus by x-ray diffraction and optical birefringence, Phys. Rev. E 67, 031708 (2003).
  37. K. Uetani, H. Koga, and M. Nogi, Estimation of the intrinsic birefringence of cellulose using bacterial cellulose nanofiber films, ACS Macro Lett. 8, 250 (2019).
  38. T. Rosén, R. Wang, C. Zhan, H. He, S. Chodankar, and B. S. Hsiao, Cellulose nanofibrils and nanocrystals in confined flow: Single-particle dynamics to collective alignment revealed through scanning small-angle x-ray scattering and numerical simulations, Phys. Rev. E 101, 032610 (2020).
  39. I. Kirchenbuechler, D. Guu, N. A. Kurniawan, G. H. Koenderink, and M. P. Lettinga, Direct visualization of flow-induced conformational transitions of single actin filaments in entangled solutions, Nat. Commun. 5, 5060 (2014).
  40. C. M. Schroeder, R. E. Teixeira, E. S. G. Shaqfeh, and S. Chu, Characteristic periodic motion of polymers in shear flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 018301 (2005).
  41. Y. Liu, K. Zografos, J. Fidalgo, C. Duchêne, C. Quintard, T. Darnige, V. Filipe, S. Huille, O. Du Roure, M. S. Oliveira, and A. Lindner, Optimised hyperbolic microchannels for the mechanical characterisation of bio-particles, Soft Matter 16, 9844 (2020).
  42. J. Dinic, C. D. V. Martínez Narváez, and V. Sharma, Rheology of unentangled polymer solutions depends on three macromolecular properties: Flexibility, extensibility, and segmental dissymmetry, in Macromolecular Engineering, edited by N. Hadjichristidis, Y. Gnanou, K. Matyjaszewski, and M. Muthukumar (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2022).
  43. A. Lindner, Morphological transitions of flexible fibers in viscous flows, Science Talks 3, 100057 (2022).
  44. C. G. Lopez and W. Richtering, Conformation and dynamics of flexible polyelectrolytes in semidilute salt-free solutions, J. Chem. Phys. 148, 244902 (2018).
  45. J. Sambrook, E. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, New York, 1989).
  46. V. Calabrese, S. Varchanis, S. J. Haward, and A. Q. Shen, Alignment of colloidal rods in crowded environments, Macromolecules 55, 5610 (2022).
  47. P. Bertsch, A. Sánchez-Ferrer, M. Bagnani, S. Isabettini, J. Kohlbrecher, R. Mezzenga, and P. Fischer, Ion-induced formation of nanocrystalline cellulose colloidal glasses containing nematic domains, Langmuir 35, 4117 (2019).
  48. R. Tanaka, T. Saito, D. Ishii, and A. Isogai, Determination of nanocellulose fibril length by shear viscosity measurement, Cellulose 21, 1581 (2014).
  49. T. P. Santos, V. Calabrese, M. W. Boehm, S. K. Baier, and A. Q. Shen, Flow-induced alignment of protein nanofibril dispersions, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 638, 487 (2023).
  50. B. Barabé, S. Abakumov, D. Z. Gunes, and M. P. Lettinga, Sedimentation of large particles in a suspension of colloidal rods, Phys. Fluids 32, 053105 (2020).
  51. L. M. Bravo-Anaya, M. Rinaudo, and F. A. Soltero Martínez, Conformation and rheological properties of calf-thymus DNA in solution, Polymers 8, 51 (2016).
  52. C. G. Lopez, R. H. Colby, P. Graham, and J. T. Cabral, Viscosity and scaling of semiflexible polyelectrolyte NaCMC in aqueous salt solutions, Macromolecules 50, 332 (2017).
  53. C. G. Lopez and W. Richtering, Influence of divalent counterions on the solution rheology and supramolecular aggregation of carboxymethyl cellulose, Cellulose 26, 1517 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation