Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Non-Hermitian chiral anomalies in interacting systems

Sharareh Sayyad*

  • Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Staudtstraße 2, 91058 Erlangen, Germany

  • *sharareh.sayyad@mpl.mpg.de

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L012028 – Published 16 February, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L012028

Abstract

The emergence of chiral anomaly entails various fascinating phenomena such as anomalous quantum Hall effect and chiral magnetic effect in different branches of (non-)Hermitian physics. While in the single-particle picture, anomalous currents merely appear due to the coupling of massless particles with background fields, many-body interactions can also be responsible for anomalous transport in interacting systems. In this Letter, we study anomalous chiral currents in systems where interacting massless fermions with complex Fermi velocities are coupled to complex gauge fields. Our results reveal that incorporating non-Hermiticity and many-body interactions gives rise to additional terms in anomalous relations beyond their Hermitian counterparts. We further present that many-body corrections in the subsequent non-Hermitian chiral magnetic field or anomalous Hall effect are nonvanishing in nonequilibrium or inhomogeneous systems. Our findings advance efforts in understanding anomalous transport in interacting non-Hermitian systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (90)

  1. J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw, A PCAC puzzle: π0→γγ in the σ-model, Nuovo Cimento A 60, 47 (1969).
  2. S. L. Adler, Axial-vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. 177, 2426 (1969).
  3. S. L. Adler and W. A. Bardeen, Absence of higher-order corrections in the anomalous axial-vector divergence equation, Phys. Rev. 182, 1517 (1969).
  4. A. Bilal, Lectures on Anomalies, arXiv:0802.0634.
  5. J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum anomalies: A few physics applications, in From Random Walks to Random Matrices (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2019).
  6. M. Eto, K. Hashimoto, H. Iida, T. Ishii, and Y. Maezawa, Anomaly-induced charges in baryons, Phys. Rev. D 85, 114038 (2012).
  7. A. A. Zyuzin, S. Wu, and A. A. Burkov, Weyl semimetal with broken time reversal and inversion symmetries, Phys. Rev. B 85, 165110 (2012).
  8. P. Hosur and X. Qi, Recent developments in transport phenomena in Weyl semimetals, C. R. Phys. 14, 857 (2013).
  9. K. Landsteiner, Notes on anomaly induced transport, Acta Phys. Pol. B 47, 2617 (2016).
  10. J. Fröhlich, Chiral anomaly, topological field theory, and novel states of matter, Rev. Math. Phys. 30, 1840007 (2018).
  11. Y. Araki, Magnetic textures and dynamics in magnetic Weyl semimetals, Annalen der Physik 532, 1900287 (2020).
  12. R. Arouca, A. Cappelli, and T. H. Hansson, Quantum field theory anomalies in condensed matter physics, SciPost Phys. Lecture Notes 62 (2022).
  13. J. Froehlich, Gauge invariance and anomalies in condensed matter physics, J. Math. Phys. 64, 031903 (2023).
  14. A. Boyarsky, J. Frohlich, and O. Ruchayskiy, Self-consistent evolution of magnetic fields and chiral asymmetry in the early universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 031301 (2012).
  15. A. Brandenburg, J. Schober, I. Rogachevskii, T. Kahniashvili, A. Boyarsky, J. Froehlich, O. Ruchayskiy, and N. Kleeorin, The turbulent chiral magnetic cascade in the early universe, Astrophys. J. 845, L21 (2017).
  16. X. Huang, L. Zhao, Y. Long, P. Wang, D. Chen, Z. Yang, H. Liang, M. Xue, H. Weng, Z. Fang, X. Dai, and G. Chen, Observation of the chiral-anomaly-induced negative magnetoresistance in 3D Weyl semimetal TaAs, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031023 (2015).
  17. M. Hirschberger, S. Kushwaha, Z. Wang, Q. Gibson, S. Liang, C. A. Belvin, B. A. Bernevig, R. J. Cava, and N. P. Ong, The chiral anomaly and thermopower of Weyl fermions in the half-Heusler GdPtBi, Nat. Mater. 15, 1161 (2016).
  18. C.-L. Zhang, S.-Y. Xu, I. Belopolski, Z. Yuan, Z. Lin, B. Tong, G. Bian, N. Alidoust, C.-C. Lee, S.-M. Huang et al., Signatures of the Adler–Bell–Jackiw chiral anomaly in a Weyl fermion semimetal, Nat. Commun. 7, 10735 (2016).
  19. Q. Li, D. E. Kharzeev, C. Zhang, Y. Huang, I. Pletikosić, A. V. Fedorov, R. D. Zhong, J. A. Schneeloch, G. D. Gu, and T. Valla, Chiral magnetic effect in ZrTe5, Nat. Phys. 12, 550 (2016).
  20. N. P. Ong and S. Liang, Experimental signatures of the chiral anomaly in Dirac–Weyl semimetals, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 394 (2021).
  21. D. E. Kharzeev and Q. Li, The Chiral Qubit: quantum computing with chiral anomaly, arXiv:1903.07133.
  22. E. Babaev, D. Kharzeev, M. Larsson, A. Molochkov, and V. Zhaunerchyk, in Chiral Matter (World Scientific, Singapore, 2023), p. 276.
  23. Z. M. Raines and V. M. Galitski, Enriched axial anomaly in Weyl materials, Phys. Rev. B 96, 161115(R) (2017).
  24. H. Kikuchi, Chiral phase dependence of the massive fermionic path integral, Phys. Rev. D 46, 4704 (1992).
  25. C. Rylands, A. Parhizkar, A. A. Burkov, and V. Galitski, Chiral anomaly in interacting condensed matter systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 185303 (2021).
  26. A. Parhizkar, C. Rylands, and V. Galitski, On the path integral approach to quantum anomalies in interacting models, arXiv:2302.14191.
  27. We note that, in 1+1 dimensions, the massless interacting fermions can be described by the theory of Luttinger liquids. The chiral charge conservation equation for these particles based on the Luttinger liquids, in the absence of any electromagnetic field, has a part that depends on the density-density interaction strength. This term agrees with the correction to the chiral anomaly equation in interacting systems.
  28. A. Giuliani, V. Mastropietro, and M. Porta, Anomaly non-renormalization in interacting Weyl semimetals, Commun. Math. Phys. 384, 997 (2021).
  29. We note that all reported additional terms in Refs. [24, 25, 26] originated from many-body corrections in the anomaly equation can be written as total derivatives of physical quantities.
  30. A. Kamenev, Many-body theory of non-equilibrium systems, arXiv:cond-mat/0412296.
  31. R. van Leeuwen, N. E. Dahlen, G. Stefanucci, C.-O. Almbladh, and U. von Barth, Introduction to the keldysh formalism and applications to time-dependent density-functional theory, arXiv:cond-mat/0506130.
  32. L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 096001 (2016).
  33. Y. Michishita and R. Peters, Equivalence of effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonians in the context of open quantum systems and strongly correlated electron systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 196401 (2020).
  34. H.-G. Zirnstein, G. Refael, and B. Rosenow, Bulk-boundary correspondence for non-Hermitian Hamiltonians via green functions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 216407 (2021).
  35. A. Gomez-Leon, T. Ramos, A. Gonzalez-Tudela, and D. Porras, Bridging the gap between topological non-Hermitian physics and open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 106, L011501 (2022).
  36. Y. L. Gal, X. Turkeshi, and M. Schirò, Volume-to-area law entanglement transition in a non-Hermitian free fermionic chain, SciPost Phys. 14, 138 (2023).
  37. A. A. Zyuzin and P. Simon, Disorder-induced exceptional points and nodal lines in Dirac superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 99, 165145 (2019).
  38. Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian physics, Adv. Phys. 69, 249 (2020).
  39. H. Wang, X. Zhang, J. Hua, D. Lei, M. Lu, and Y. Chen, Topological physics of non-Hermitian optics and photonics: A review, J. Opt. 23, 123001 (2021).
  40. E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021).
  41. N. Okuma and M. Sato, Non-Hermitian topological phenomena: A review, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 83 (2023).
  42. T. Yoshida, R. Peters, and N. Kawakami, Non-Hermitian perspective of the band structure in heavy-fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B 98, 035141 (2018).
  43. T. Yoshida, R. Peters, N. Kawakami, and Y. Hatsugai, Symmetry-protected exceptional rings in two-dimensional correlated systems with chiral symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 99, 121101(R) (2019).
  44. S. Sayyad, J. Yu, A. G. Grushin, and L. M. Sieberer, Entanglement spectrum crossings reveal non-Hermitian dynamical topology, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033022 (2021).
  45. P. Delplace, T. Yoshida, and Y. Hatsugai, Symmetry-protected multifold exceptional points and their topological characterization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 186602 (2021).
  46. K. Ding, C. Fang, and G. Ma, Non-Hermitian topology and exceptional-point geometries, Nat. Rev. Phys., 1 (2022).
  47. S. Sayyad and F. K. Kunst, Realizing exceptional points of any order in the presence of symmetry, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023130 (2022).
  48. X. Zhang, K. Xu, C. Liu, X. Song, B. Hou, R. Yu, H. Zhang, D. Li, and J. Li, Gauge-dependent topology in non-reciprocal hopping systems with pseudo-hermitian symmetry, Commun. Phys. 4, 166 (2021).
  49. S. Sayyad, Protection of all nondefective twofold degeneracies by antiunitary symmetries in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043213 (2022).
  50. S. Sayyad, M. Stalhammar, L. Rodland, and F. K. Kunst, Symmetry-protected exceptional and nodal points in non-Hermitian systems, SciPost Phys. 15, 200 (2023).
  51. X. Zhang, T. Zhang, M.-H. Lu, and Y.-F. Chen, A review on non-Hermitian skin effect, Adv. Phys.: X 7, 2109431 (2022).
  52. T. Fukui and N. Kawakami, Breakdown of the Mott insulator: Exact solution of an asymmetric Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 58, 16051 (1998).
  53. T. Yoshida, K. Kudo, and Y. Hatsugai, Non-Hermitian fractional quantum Hall states, Sci. Rep. 9 (2019).
  54. B. Buča, C. Booker, M. Medenjak, and D. Jaksch, Bethe ansatz approach for dissipation: Exact solutions of quantum many-body dynamics under loss, New J. Phys. 22, 123040 (2020).
  55. T. Yoshida, K. Kudo, H. Katsura, and Y. Hatsugai, Fate of fractional quantum Hall states in open quantum systems: Characterization of correlated topological states for the full Liouvillian, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033428 (2020).
  56. X. Z. Zhang and Z. Song, η-pairing ground states in the non-Hermitian hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 103, 235153 (2021).
  57. M. Nakagawa, N. Kawakami, and M. Ueda, Exact Liouvillian spectrum of a one-dimensional dissipative Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 110404 (2021).
  58. T. Hyart and J. L. Lado, Non-Hermitian many-body topological excitations in interacting quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L012006 (2022).
  59. R. Shen and C. H. Lee, Non-Hermitian skin clusters from strong interactions, Commun. Phys. 5, 238 (2022).
  60. H. Yoshida and H. Katsura, Liouvillian gap and single spin-flip dynamics in the dissipative Fermi-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. A 107, 033332 (2023).
  61. S. Sayyad and J. L. Lado, Topological phase diagrams of exactly solvable non-Hermitian interacting Kitaev chains, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L022046 (2023).
  62. J. Mak, M. J. Bhaseen, and A. Pal, Statics and dynamics of non-Hermitian many-body localization, arXiv:2301.01763.
  63. R. Shen, T. Chen, F. Qin, Y. Zhong, and C. H. Lee, Proposal for observing Yang-Lee criticality in Rydberg atomic arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 080403 (2023).
  64. S. Han, D. J. Schultz, and Y. B. Kim, Complex fixed points of the non-Hermitian Kondo model in a Luttinger liquid, Phys. Rev. B 107, 235153 (2023).
  65. T. Yoshida and Y. Hatsugai, Fate of exceptional points under interactions: Reduction of topological classifications, Phys. Rev. B 107, 075118 (2023).
  66. S. Sayyad and J. L. Lado, Transfer learning from Hermitian to non-Hermitian quantum many-body physics, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 36, 185603 (2024).
  67. S. Sayyad, J. D. Hannukainen, and A. G. Grushin, Non-Hermitian chiral anomalies, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L042004 (2022).
  68. We note that the presence of symmetries imposes constraints on the structure of the M matrix. To keep our findings as generic as possible, we did not enforce any restriction on M.
  69. We emphasize that merely real-valued interaction strengths can be handled in this work as the key Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation breaks down for complex coefficients.
  70. K. Fujikawa, Path-integral measure for gauge-invariant fermion theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1195 (1979).
  71. K. Fujikawa, Path integral for gauge theories with fermions, Phys. Rev. D 21, 2848 (1980).
  72. K. Fujikawa, Energy-momentum tensor in quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D 23, 2262 (1981).
  73. R. A. Bertlmann, Anomalies in Quantum Field Theory (Oxford University Press, New York, 1996).
  74. K. Fujikawa and H. Suzuki, Path Integrals and Quantum Anomalies (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2004).
  75. M. Nakahara, Geometry, Topology and Physics, Graduate student series in physics (Hilger, Bristol, 1990).
  76. S.-S. Shei, Anomaly of the axial-vector current in one space and one time dimension, Phys. Rev. D 6, 3469 (1972).
  77. A similar analysis for noninteracting systems is presented in Ref. [7, 90] for Hermitian and in Ref. [67] for non-Hermitian models.
  78. M. Nuske, L. Broers, B. Schulte, G. Jotzu, S. A. Sato, A. Cavalleri, A. Rubio, J. W. McIver, and L. Mathey, Floquet dynamics in light-driven solids, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043408 (2020).
  79. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L012028 includes details on calculating an effective non-Hermitian Weyl Hamiltonian.
  80. Similar conclusion can be drawn when the non-Hermitian part of the effective Hamiltonian is obtained from the imaginary part of the zero energy self-energy, known as the quasiparticle lifetime. Here, again, the causality imposes that the imaginary part of the spectrum is nonpositive [33, 42].
  81. J. W. McIver, B. Schulte, F-U Stein, T. Matsuyama, G. Jotzu, G. Meier, and A. Cavalleri, Light-induced anomalous Hall effect in graphene, Nat. Phys. 16, 38 (2020).
  82. S. A. Sato, J. W. McIver, M. Nuske, P. Tang, G. Jotzu, B. Schulte, H. Hübener, U. De Giovannini, L. Mathey, M. A. Sentef, A. Cavalleri, and A. Rubio, Microscopic theory for the light-induced anomalous Hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 99, 214302 (2019).
  83. D. E. Kharzeev and Y. Kikuchi, Real-time chiral dynamics from a digital quantum simulation, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023342 (2020).
  84. H. Kamakari, S.-N. Sun, M. Motta, and A. J. Minnich, Digital quantum simulation of open quantum systems using quantum imaginary–time evolution, PRX Quantum 3, 010320 (2022).
  85. A. A. Burkov, Mirror anomaly in Dirac semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 016603 (2018).
  86. T. Matsushita, S. Fujimoto, and A. P. Schnyder, Topological piezoelectric effect and parity anomaly in nodal line semimetals, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043311 (2020).
  87. Y. Ferreiros, Y. Kedem, E. J. Bergholtz, and J. H. Bardarson, Mixed axial-torsional anomaly in Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 056601 (2019).
  88. J. Gooth, A. Niemann, T. Meng, A. Grushin, K. Landsteiner, B. Gotsmann, F. Menges, M. Schmidt, C. Shekhar, V. Sueß, R. Hühne, B. Rellinghaus, C. Felser, B. Yan, and K. Nielsch, Experimental signatures of the mixed axial-gravitational anomaly in the Weyl semimetal NbP, Nature (London) 547, 324 (2017).
  89. M. N. Chernodub, Y. Ferreiros, A. G. Grushin, K. Landsteiner, and M. A. H. Vozmediano, Thermal transport, geometry, and anomalies, Phys. Rep. 977, 1 (2022).
  90. A. A. Zyuzin and A. A. Burkov, Topological response in Weyl semimetals and the chiral anomaly, Phys. Rev. B 86, 115133 (2012).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation