Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Inherent trade-off in noisy neural communication with rank-order coding

Ibrahim Alsolami* and Tomoki Fukai

  • Neural Coding and Brain Computing Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST) Graduate University, Onna, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan

  • *ibrahim.alsolami@oist.jp

Phys. Rev. Research 6, L012009 – Published 16 January, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L012009

Abstract

Rank-order coding, a form of temporal coding, has emerged as a promising scheme to explain the rapid ability of the mammalian brain. Owing to its speed as well as efficiency, rank-order coding is increasingly gaining interest in diverse research areas beyond neuroscience. However, much uncertainty still exists about the performance of rank-order coding under noise. Herein we show what information rates are fundamentally possible and what trade-offs are at stake. An unexpected finding in this Letter is the emergence of a special class of errors that, in a regime, increase with less noise.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (24)

  1. D. Marković, A. Mizrahi, D. Querlioz, and J. Grollier, Physics for neuromorphic computing, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 499 (2020).
  2. G. V. Vinci, R. Benzi, and M. Mattia, Self-consistent stochastic dynamics for finite-size networks of spiking neurons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 097402 (2023).
  3. R. VanRullen, R. Guyonneau, and S. J. Thorpe, Spike times make sense, Trends Neurosci. 28, 1 (2005).
  4. S. Thorpe, A. Delorme, and R. Van Rullen, Spike-based strategies for rapid processing, Neural Networks 14, 715 (2001).
  5. S. J. Thorpe and M. Imbert, Biological constraints on connectionist modelling, in Connectionism in Perspective, edited by R. Pfeifer, Z. Schreter, and F. Fogelman-Soulié (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989), pp. 63–92.
  6. L. Bonilla, J. Gautrais, S. Thorpe, and T. Masquelier, Analyzing time-to-first-spike coding schemes, Front. Neurosci. 16, 971937 (2022).
  7. T. Gollisch and M. Meister, Rapid neural coding in the retina with relative spike latencies, Science 319, 1108 (2008).
  8. G. Portelli, J. M. Barrett, G. Hilgen, T. Masquelier, A. Maccione, S. Di Marco, L. Berdondini, P. Kornprobst, and E. Sernagor, Rank order coding: a retinal information decoding strategy revealed by large-scale multielectrode array retinal recordings, eNeuro 3, ENEURO.0134-15.2016 (2016).
  9. S. Junek, E. Kludt, F. Wolf, and D. Schild, Olfactory coding with patterns of response latencies, Neuron 67, 872 (2010).
  10. A. Riehle, S. Grun, M. Diesmann, and A. Aertsen, Spike synchronization and rate modulation differentially involved in motor cortical function, Science 278, 1950 (1997).
  11. E. Lemaire, L. Cordone, A. Castagnetti, P.-E. Novac, J. Courtois, and B. Miramond, An analytical estimation of spiking neural networks energy efficiency, in International Conference on Neural Information Processing (Springer, Berlin, 2022), pp. 574–587.
  12. S. R. Kheradpisheh, M. Ganjtabesh, S. J. Thorpe, and T. Masquelier, STDP-based spiking deep convolutional neural networks for object recognition, Neural Networks 99, 56 (2018).
  13. Y. Yan, H. Chu, X. Chen, Y. Jin, Y. Huan, L. Zheng, and Z. Zou, Graph-based spatio-temporal backpropagation for training spiking neural networks, in 2021 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Circuits and Systems (AICAS) (IEEE, New York, 2021), pp. 1–4.
  14. C. Frenkel, M. Lefebvre, J.-D. Legat, and D. Bol, A 0.086-mm2 12.7-pJ/SOP 64k-synapse 256-neuron online-learning digital spiking neuromorphic processor in 28-nm CMOS, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 13, 145 (2018).
  15. C. Frenkel, J.-D. Legat, and D. Bol, MorphIC: A 65-nm 738k-synapse/mm2 quad-core binary-weight digital neuromorphic processor with stochastic spike-driven online learning, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 13, 999 (2019).
  16. Y. Wu, R. Zhao, J. Zhu, F. Chen, M. Xu, G. Li, S. Song, L. Deng, G. Wang, H. Zheng et al., Brain-inspired global-local learning incorporated with neuromorphic computing, Nat. Commun. 13, 65 (2022).
  17. S. Thorpe and J. Gautrais, Rank order coding, in Computational Neuroscience: Trends in Research, 1998 (Springer, Berlin, 1998), pp. 113–118.
  18. C. E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379 (1948).
  19. T. Cover and J. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2012).
  20. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L012009 for derivation of equations and simulation results.
  21. T. Branco, B. A. Clark, and M. Häusser, Dendritic discrimination of temporal input sequences in cortical neurons, Science 329, 1671 (2010).
  22. R. Gütig and H. Sompolinsky, The tempotron: a neuron that learns spike timing-based decisions, Nat. Neurosci. 9, 420 (2006).
  23. G. Buzsáki and K. Mizuseki, The log-dynamic brain: how skewed distributions affect network operations, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 15, 264 (2014).
  24. A. Pitti, C. Weidmann, and M. Quoy, Digital computing through randomness and order in neural networks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2115335119 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation