- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Dynamical phase transitions of information flow in random quantum circuits

J.-Z. Zhuang1,*, Y.-K. Wu1,2, and L.-M. Duan1,2,†

  • 1Center for Quantum Information, Institute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, People's Republic of China
  • 2Hefei National Laboratory, Hefei 230088, People's Republic of China

  • *zhuangjz21@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn
  • †lmduan@tsinghua.edu.cn
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 5, L042043 – Published 26 December, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L042043

Abstract

We study how the information flows in many-body dynamics governed by random quantum circuits and discover a rich set of dynamical phase transitions in this information flow. The phase-transition points and their critical exponents are established across Clifford and Haar random circuits through finite-size scaling. The flow of both classical and quantum information, measured respectively by Holevo and coherent information, shows similar dynamical phase transition behaviors. We investigate how the phase transitions depend on the initial location of the information and the final probe region, and find ubiquitous behaviors in these transitions, revealing interesting properties about the information propagation and scrambling in this quantum many-body model. Our paper underscores rich behaviors of the information flow in large systems with numerous phase transitions, thereby sheds light on the understanding of quantum many-body dynamics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (42)

  1. R. J. Lewis-Swan, A. Safavi-Naini, A. M. Kaufman, and A. M. Rey, Dynamics of quantum information, Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 627 (2019).
  2. D. Harlow, Jerusalem lectures on black holes and quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 015002 (2016).
  3. X.-L. Qi, Does gravity come from quantum information? Nat. Phys. 14, 984 (2018).
  4. E. H. Lieb and D. W. Robinson, The finite group velocity of quantum spin systems, Commun. Math. Phys. 28, 251 (1972).
  5. T. Rakovszky, S. Gopalakrishnan, S. A. Parameswaran, and F. Pollmann, Signatures of information scrambling in the dynamics of the entanglement spectrum, Phys. Rev. B 100, 125115 (2019).
  6. P. Hayden and J. Preskill, Black holes as mirrors: Quantum information in random subsystems, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2007) 120.
  7. Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, Fast scramblers, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2008) 065.
  8. B. Swingle, Unscrambling the physics of out-of-time-order correlators, Nat. Phys. 14, 988 (2018).
  9. S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, Black holes and the butterfly effect, J. High Energ. Phys. 03 (2014) 067.
  10. T. Mori, T. N. Ikeda, E. Kaminishi, and M. Ueda, Thermalization and prethermalization in isolated quantum systems: A theoretical overview, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 51, 112001 (2018).
  11. D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Colloquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 021001 (2019).
  12. A. Nico-Katz, A. Bayat, and S. Bose, Information-theoretic memory scaling in the many-body localization transition, Phys. Rev. B 105, 205133 (2022).
  13. C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papić, Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum many-body scars, Nat. Phys. 14, 745 (2018).
  14. D. Yuan, S.-Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, L.-M. Duan, and D.-L. Deng, Quantum information scrambling in quantum many-body scarred systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023095 (2022).
  15. A. Chandran and C. R. Laumann, Semiclassical limit for the many-body localization transition, Phys. Rev. B 92, 024301 (2015).
  16. C. W. von Keyserlingk, T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and S. L. Sondhi, Operator Hydrodynamics, OTOCs, and entanglement growth in systems without conservation laws, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021013 (2018).
  17. T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and C. W. Von Keyserlingk, Diffusive hydrodynamics of out-of-time-ordered correlators with charge conservation, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031058 (2018).
  18. V. Khemani, A. Vishwanath, and D. A. Huse, Operator spreading and the emergence of dissipative hydrodynamics under unitary evolution with conservation laws, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031057 (2018).
  19. P.-Y. Chang, X. Chen, S. Gopalakrishnan, and J. H. Pixley, Evolution of entanglement spectra under generic quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 190602 (2019).
  20. M. Heyl, Dynamical quantum phase transitions: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 054001 (2018).
  21. M. Heyl, A. Polkovnikov, and S. Kehrein, Dynamical quantum phase transitions in the transverse-field Ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 135704 (2013).
  22. B. Žunkovič, M. Heyl, M. Knap, and A. Silva, Dynamical quantum phase transitions in spin chains with long-range interactions: Merging different concepts of nonequilibrium criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 130601 (2018).
  23. C. Ates, B. Olmos, J. P. Garrahan, and I. Lesanovsky, Dynamical phases and intermittency of the dissipative quantum Ising model, Phys. Rev. A 85, 043620 (2012).
  24. J. P. Garrahan and I. Lesanovsky, Thermodynamics of quantum jump trajectories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 160601 (2010).
  25. A. Deshpande, B. Fefferman, M. C. Tran, M. Foss-Feig, and A. V. Gorshkov, Dynamical phase transitions in sampling complexity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 030501 (2018).
  26. D. Gottesman, The Heisenberg representation of quantum computers (1998), in Proceedings of the XXII International Colloquium on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics, edited by S. P. Corney, R. Delbourgo, and P. D. Jarvis (International Press, Cambridge, 1999), pp. 32–43
  27. S. Aaronson and D. Gottesman, Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits, Phys. Rev. A 70, 052328 (2004).
  28. D. Fattal, T. S. Cubitt, Y. Yamamoto, S. Bravyi, and I. L. Chuang, Entanglement in the stabilizer formalism, arXiv:quant-ph/0406168.
  29. A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Quantum entanglement growth under random unitary dynamics, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031016 (2017).
  30. A. Nahum, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Operator spreading in random unitary circuits, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021014 (2018).
  31. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L042043 for more details of classical information dynamics and the universality of DPTs in random quantum circuit ansatz..
  32. J.-Z. Zhuang, Y.-K. Wu, and L.-M. Duan, Phase-transition-like behavior in information retrieval of a quantum scrambled random circuit system, Phys. Rev. B 106, 144308 (2022).
  33. H. Barnum, M. A. Nielsen, and B. Schumacher, Information transmission through a noisy quantum channel, Phys. Rev. A 57, 4153 (1998).
  34. A. S. Holevo and V. Giovannetti, Quantum channels and their entropic characteristics, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 046001 (2012).
  35. B. Schumacher and M. A. Nielsen, Quantum data processing and error correction, Phys. Rev. A 54, 2629 (1996).
  36. F. Leditzky, D. Leung, and G. Smith, Dephrasure channel and superadditivity of coherent information, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 160501 (2018).
  37. I. Devetak, The private classical capacity and quantum capacity of a quantum channel, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 51, 44 (2005).
  38. K. Li, A. Winter, X. B. Zou, and G. C. Guo, Private capacity of quantum channels is not additive, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 120501 (2009).
  39. W. Brown and O. Fawzi, Short random circuits define good quantum error correcting codes, in 2013 IEEE Int. Symp. Inf. Theory (IEEE, Istanbul, Turkey, 2013), pp. 346–350.
  40. S. Choi, Y. Bao, X.-L. Qi, and E. Altman, Quantum error correction in scrambling dynamics and measurement-induced phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 030505 (2020).
  41. M. J. Gullans, S. Krastanov, D. A. Huse, L. Jiang, and S. T. Flammia, Quantum coding with low-depth random circuits, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031066 (2021).
  42. H. Zhu, Multiqubit clifford groups are unitary 3-designs, Phys. Rev. A 96, 062336 (2017).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 5, L042043– Published 26 December, 2023
  • Received 15 April 2023
  • Revised 7 August 2023
  • Accepted 4 December 2023
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation