- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Giant emitters in a structured bath with non-Hermitian skin effect

Lei Du1,2,*, Lingzhen Guo3, Yan Zhang1,†, and Anton Frisk Kockum2

  • 1School of Physics and Center for Quantum Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
  • 2Department of Microtechnology and Nanoscience, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden
  • 3Center for Joint Quantum Studies and Department of Physics, School of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

  • *lei.du@chalmers.se
  • †zhangy345@nenu.edu.cn
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 5, L042040 – Published 15 December, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L042040

Abstract

Giant emitters derive their name from nonlocal field-emitter interactions and feature diverse self-interference effects. Authors of most of the existing works on giant emitters have considered Hermitian waveguides or photonic lattices. In this letter, we unveil how giant emitters behave if they are coupled to a non-Hermitian bath, i.e., a Hatano-Nelson (HN) model which features the non-Hermitian skin effect due to the asymmetric intersite tunneling rates. We show that the behaviors of the giant emitters are closely related to the stability of the bath. In the convectively unstable regime, where the HN model can be mapped to a pseudo-Hermitian lattice, a giant emitter can either behave as in a Hermitian bath or undergo excitation amplification, depending on the relative strength of different emitter-bath coupling paths. Based on this mechanism, we can realize protected nonreciprocal interactions between giant emitters, with nonreciprocity opposite to that of the bath. Such giant-emitter effects are not allowed, however, if the HN model enters the absolutely unstable regime, where the coupled emitters always show secular energy growth. Our proposal provides a paradigm of non-Hermitian quantum optics, which may be useful for, e.g., engineering interactions between quantum emitters and performing many-body simulations in the non-Hermitian framework.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (81)

  1. A. F. Kockum, Quantum Optics with Giant Atoms—The First Five Years, in International Symposium on Mathematics, Quantum Theory, and Cryptography, edited by T. Takagi, M. Wakayama, K. Tanaka, N. Kunihiro, K. Kimoto, and Y. Ikematsu (Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2021), pp. 125–146.
  2. A. Frisk Kockum, P. Delsing, and G. Johansson, Designing frequency-dependent relaxation rates and Lamb shifts for a giant artificial atom, Phys. Rev. A 90, 013837 (2014).
  3. M. V. Gustafsson, T. Aref, A. F. Kockum, M. K. Ekström, G. Johansson, and P. Delsing, Propagating phonons coupled to an artificial atom, Science 346, 207 (2014).
  4. L. Guo, A. Grimsmo, A. F. Kockum, M. Pletyukhov, and G. Johansson, Giant acoustic atom: A single quantum system with a deterministic time delay, Phys. Rev. A 95, 053821 (2017).
  5. G. Andersson, B. Suri, L. Guo, T. Aref, and P. Delsing, Non-exponential decay of a giant artificial atom, Nat. Phys. 15, 1123 (2019).
  6. A. M. Vadiraj, A. Ask, T. G. McConkey, I. Nsanzineza, C. W. Sandbo Chang, A. F. Kockum, and C. M. Wilson, Engineering the level structure of a giant artificial atom in waveguide quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. A 103, 023710 (2021).
  7. B. Kannan, M. Ruckriegel, D. Campbell, A. F. Kockum, J. Braumüller, D. Kim, M. Kjaergaard, P. Krantz, A. Melville, B. M. Niedzielski et al., Waveguide quantum electrodynamics with superconducting artificial giant atoms, Nature (London) 583, 775 (2020).
  8. A. F. Kockum, G. Johansson, and F. Nori, Decoherence-free interaction between giant atoms in waveguide quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 140404 (2018).
  9. A. Carollo, D. Cilluffo, and F. Ciccarello, Mechanism of decoherence-free coupling between giant atoms, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043184 (2020).
  10. A. Soro and A. F. Kockum, Chiral quantum optics with giant atoms, Phys. Rev. A 105, 023712 (2022).
  11. L. Du, L. Guo, and Y. Li, Complex decoherence-free interactions between giant atoms, Phys. Rev. A 107, 023705 (2023).
  12. S. Bay, P. Lambropoulos, and K. Mölmer, Atom-atom interaction in strongly modified reservoirs, Phys. Rev. A 55, 1485 (1997).
  13. P. Lambropoulos, G. M. Nikolopoulos, T. R. Nielsen, and S. Bay, Fundamental quantum optics in structured reservoirs, Rep. Prog. Phys. 63, 455 (2000).
  14. E. Shahmoon and G. Kurizki, Nonradiative interaction and entanglement between distant atoms, Phys. Rev. A 87, 033831 (2013).
  15. X. Wang, T. Liu, A. F. Kockum, H.-R. Li, and F. Nori, Tunable chiral bound states with giant atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 043602 (2021).
  16. X. Wang and H. r. Li, Chiral quantum network with giant atoms, Quantum Sci. Technol. 7, 035007 (2022).
  17. L. Du, Y. Zhang, J.-H. Wu, A. F. Kockum, and Y. Li, Giant atoms in a synthetic frequency dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 223602 (2022).
  18. Y.-T. Chen, L. Du, L. Guo, Z. Wang, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, and J.-H. Wu, Nonreciprocal and chiral single-photon scattering for giant atoms, Commun. Phys. 5, 215 (2022).
  19. L. Du, Y.-T. Chen, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, and J.-H. Wu, Decay dynamics of a giant atom in a structured bath with broken time-reversal symmetry, Quantum Sci. Technol. 8, 045010 (2023).
  20. C. Joshi, F. Yang, and M. Mirhosseini, Resonance fluorescence of a chiral artificial atom, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021039 (2023).
  21. C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics (Wiley, New York, 2005).
  22. C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non-hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998).
  23. C. M. Bender, Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, Rep. Prog. Phys. 70, 947 (2007).
  24. S. Longhi, Bloch oscillations in complex crystals with PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 123601 (2009).
  25. J.-H. Wu, M. Artoni, and G. C. La Rocca, Non-Hermitian degeneracies and unidirectional reflectionless atomic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 123004 (2014).
  26. V. V. Konotop, J. Yang, and D. A. Zezyulin, Nonlinear waves in PT-symmetric systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035002 (2016).
  27. L. Feng, R. El-Ganainy, and L. Ge, Non-hermitian photonics based on parity-time symmetry, Nat. Photon. 11, 752 (2017).
  28. R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non-hermitian physics and PT symmetry, Nat. Phys. 14, 11 (2018).
  29. Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Higashikawa, and M. Ueda, Topological phases of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031079 (2018).
  30. K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Symmetry and topology in non-Hermitian physics, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041015 (2019).
  31. W. D. Heiss, The physics of exceptional points, J. Phys. A 45, 444016 (2012).
  32. F. Minganti, A. Miranowicz, R. W. Chhajlany, and F. Nori, Quantum exceptional points of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and Liouvillians: The effects of quantum jumps, Phys. Rev. A 100, 062131 (2019).
  33. M.-A. Miri and A. Alù, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science 363, eaar7709 (2019).
  34. E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021).
  35. D. C. Brody, Biorthogonal quantum mechanics, J. Phys. A 47, 035305 (2014).
  36. F. K. Kunst, E. Edvardsson, J. C. Budich, and E. J. Bergholtz, Biorthogonal bulk-boundary correspondence in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 026808 (2018).
  37. K. Yokomizo and S. Murakami, Non-Bloch band theory of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 066404 (2019).
  38. K. Yokomizo and S. Murakami, Non-Bloch band theory and bulk-edge correspondence in non-Hermitian systems, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 12A102 (2020).
  39. K. Kawabata, N. Okuma, and M. Sato, Non-Bloch band theory of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians in the symplectic class, Phys. Rev. B 101, 195147 (2020).
  40. W.-T. Xue, M.-R. Li, Y.-M. Hu, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Simple formulas of directional amplification from non-Bloch band theory, Phys. Rev. B 103, L241408 (2021).
  41. K. Yokomizo and S. Murakami, Non-Bloch bands in two-dimensional non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B 107, 195112 (2023).
  42. N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization transitions in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 570 (1996).
  43. S. Longhi, D. Gatti, and G. D. Valle, Robust light transport in non-Hermitian photonic lattices, Sci. Rep. 5, 13376 (2015).
  44. S. Longhi, D. Gatti, and G. Della Valle, Non-Hermitian transparency and one-way transport in low-dimensional lattices by an imaginary gauge field, Phys. Rev. B 92, 094204 (2015).
  45. A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. X 5, 021025 (2015).
  46. C. C. Wanjura, M. Brunelli, and A. Nunnenkamp, Topological framework for directional amplification in driven-dissipative cavity arrays, Nat. Commun. 11, 3149 (2020).
  47. S. Weidemann, M. Kremer, T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, A. Stegmaier, M. Greiter, R. Thomale, and A. Szameit, Topological funneling of light, Science 368, 311 (2020).
  48. S. Weidemann, M. Kremer, S. Longhi, and A. Szameit, Topological triple phase transition in non-Hermitian Floquet quasicrystals, Nature (London) 601, 354 (2022).
  49. Q. Liang, D. Xie, Z. Dong, H. Li, H. Li, B. Gadway, W. Yi, and B. Yan, Dynamic signatures of non-Hermitian skin effect and topology in ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 070401 (2022).
  50. Y. Song, W. Liu, L. Zheng, Y. Zhang, B. Wang, and P. Lu, Two-dimensional non-Hermitian skin effect in a synthetic photonic lattice, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 064076 (2020).
  51. K. Wang, A. Dutt, K. Y. Yang, C. C. Wojcik, J. Vučković, and S. Fan, Generating arbitrary topological windings of a non-Hermitian band, Science 371, 1240 (2021).
  52. V. M. Martinez Alvarez, J. E. Barrios Vargas, and L. E. F. Foa Torres, Non-Hermitian robust edge states in one dimension: Anomalous localization and eigenspace condensation at exceptional points, Phys. Rev. B 97, 121401(R) (2018).
  53. S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invariants of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018).
  54. S. Yao, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Non-Hermitian chern bands, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 136802 (2018).
  55. D. S. Borgnia, A. J. Kruchkov, and R.-J. Slager, Non-Hermitian boundary modes and topology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 056802 (2020).
  56. N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Topological origin of non-Hermitian skin effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 086801 (2020).
  57. X. Zhu, H. Wang, S. K. Gupta, H. Zhang, B. Xie, M. Lu, and Y. Chen, Photonic non-Hermitian skin effect and non-Bloch bulk-boundary correspondence, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013280 (2020).
  58. J. C. Budich and E. J. Bergholtz, Non-Hermitian topological sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 180403 (2020).
  59. K. Kawabata, M. Sato, and K. Shiozaki, Higher-order non-Hermitian skin effect, Phys. Rev. B 102, 205118 (2020).
  60. S. Longhi, Quantum decay and amplification in a non-Hermitian unstable continuum, Phys. Rev. A 93, 062129 (2016).
  61. F. Roccati, S. Lorenzo, G. Calajò, G. M. Palma, A. Carollo, and F. Ciccarello, Exotic interactions mediated by a non-Hermitian photonic bath, Optica 9, 565 (2022).
  62. Z. Gong, M. Bello, D. Malz, and F. K. Kunst, Anomalous behaviors of quantum emitters in non-Hermitian baths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 223601 (2022).
  63. Z. Gong, M. Bello, D. Malz, and F. K. Kunst, Bound states and photon emission in non-Hermitian nanophotonics, Phys. Rev. A 106, 053517 (2022).
  64. C. Lv, R. Zhang, Z. Zhai, and Q. Zhou, Curving the space by non-hermiticity, Nat. Commun. 13, 2184 (2022).
  65. Z.-Q. Wang, Y.-P. Wang, J. Yao, R.-C. Shen, W.-J. Wu, J. Qian, J. Li, S.-Y. Zhu, and J. Q. You, Giant spin ensembles in waveguide magnonics, Nat. Commun. 13, 7580 (2022).
  66. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L042040 for further details on the numerical method of this work, the complete analysis of the dynamics of a single and two braided giant emitters, a brief review of the convectively and absolutely unstable regimes, and a proof-of-principle mapping between the present model and its curved-space correspondence.
  67. S. Longhi, Photonic simulation of giant atom decay, Opt. Lett. 45, 3017 (2020).
  68. L. Du, Y.-T. Chen, Y. Zhang, and Y. Li, Giant atoms with time-dependent couplings, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023198 (2022).
  69. A. Soro, C. S. Muñoz, and A. F. Kockum, Interaction between giant atoms in a one-dimensional structured environment, Phys. Rev. A 107, 013710 (2023).
  70. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Nonperturbative calculation of transition Aamplitudes, in Atom-Photon Interactions (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Hoboken, 1998), Chap. 3, pp. 165–255.
  71. J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2011).
  72. A. González-Tudela and J. I. Cirac, Quantum emitters in two-dimensional structured reservoirs in the nonperturbative regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 143602 (2017).
  73. A. González-Tudela and J. I. Cirac, Markovian and non-Markovian dynamics of quantum emitters coupled to two-dimensional structured reservoirs, Phys. Rev. A 96, 043811 (2017).
  74. W. Zhao and Z. Wang, Single-photon scattering and bound states in an atom-waveguide system with two or multiple coupling points, Phys. Rev. A 101, 053855 (2020).
  75. A. McDonald, R. Hanai, and A. A. Clerk, Nonequilibrium stationary states of quantum non-Hermitian lattice models, Phys. Rev. B 105, 064302 (2022).
  76. S.-X. Wang and S. Wan, Duality between the generalized non-Hermitian Hatano-Nelson model in flat space and a Hermitian system in curved space, Phys. Rev. B 106, 075112 (2022).
  77. A. J. Kollár, M. Fitzpatrick, and A. A. Houck, Hyperbolic lattices in circuit quantum electrodynamics, Nature (London) 571, 45 (2019).
  78. P. Bienias, I. Boettcher, R. Belyansky, A. J. Kollár, and A. V. Gorshkov, Circuit quantum electrodynamics in hyperbolic space: From photon bound states to frustrated spin models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 013601 (2022).
  79. A. González-Tudela, C. S. Muñoz, and J. I. Cirac, Engineering and Harnessing giant atoms in high-dimensional baths: A proposal for implementation with cold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 203603 (2019).
  80. C. Vega, D. Porras, and A. González-Tudela, Topological multimode waveguide QED, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023031 (2023).
  81. E. Ingelsten, A. F. Kockum, and A. Soro, Giant atoms in a two-dimensional structured environment (unpublished).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 5, L042040– Published 15 December, 2023
  • Received 31 August 2023
  • Revised 22 October 2023
  • Accepted 24 November 2023
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation