Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Second-order perturbation theory in continuum quantum Monte Carlo calculations

Ryan Curry1, Joel E. Lynn2,3, Kevin E. Schmidt4, and Alexandros Gezerlis1

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
  • 2Institut für Kernphysik, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
  • 3ExtreMe Matter Institute EMMI, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
  • 4Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA

Phys. Rev. Research 5, L042021 – Published 8 November, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L042021

Abstract

We report on the first results for the second-order perturbation theory correction to the ground-state energy of a nuclear many-body system in a continuum quantum Monte Carlo calculation. Second-order (and higher) perturbative corrections are notoriously difficult to compute in most ab initio many-body methods, where the focus is usually on obtaining the ground-state energy. By mapping our calculation of the second-order energy correction to an evolution in imaginary time using the diffusion Monte Carlo method, we are able to calculate these nuclear corrections for the first time. After benchmarking our method in the few-body sector, we explore the effect of charge-independence-breaking terms in the nuclear Hamiltonian. We then employ that approach to investigate the many-body, perturbative, order-by-order convergence that is fundamental in modern theories of the nucleon-nucleon interaction derived from chiral effective field theory. We find cutoff-dependent perturbativeness between potentials at higher chiral order and also that the difference between leading order and next-to-leading order potentials is nonperturbative; both of these results have important implications for future nuclear many-body calculations. Our approach is quite general and promises to be of wide applicability.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (57)

  1. H. Hergert, A guided tour of ab-initio nuclear many-body theory, Front. Phys. 8, 379 (2020).
  2. R. Roth and P. Navrátil, Ab initio study of Ca40 with an importance-truncated no-core shell model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 092501 (2007).
  3. R. B. Wiringa and S. C. Pieper, Evolution of nuclear spectra with nuclear forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 182501 (2002).
  4. D. Lee, Lattice simulations for few- and many-body systems, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 63, 117 (2009).
  5. A. Tichai, J. Langhammer, S. Binder, and R. Roth, Hartree–Fock many-body perturbation theory for nuclear ground-states, Phys. Lett. B 756, 283 (2016).
  6. B. Hu, F. R. Xu, Z. H. Sun, J. P. Vary, and T. Li, Ab initio nuclear many-body perturbation calculations in the Hartree-Fock basis, Phys. Rev. C 94, 014303 (2016).
  7. V. Soma, Self-consistent Green's function theory for atomic nuclei, Front. Phys. 8, 340 (2020).
  8. G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, M. Hjorth-Jensen, and D. J. Dean, Coupled-cluster computations of atomic nuclei, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 096302 (2014).
  9. H. Hergert, S. K. Bogner, T. D. Morris, A. Schwenk, and K. Tsukiyama, The in-medium similarity renormalization group: A novel ab initio method for nuclei, Phys. Rep. 621, 165 (2016).
  10. S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Theory of ultracold atomic Fermi gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1215 (2008).
  11. R. J. Bartlett and M. Musial, Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 291 (2007).
  12. J. Kolorenč and L. Mitas, Applications of quantum Monte Carlo methods in condensed systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 026502 (2011).
  13. J. E. Drut and A. N. Nicholson, Lattice methods for strongly interacting many-body systems, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 40, 043101 (2013).
  14. H. Shi and S. Zhang, Some recent developments in auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo for real materials, J. Chem. Phys. 154, 024107 (2021).
  15. K. Hebeler and A. Schwenk, Chiral three-nucleon forces and neutron matter, Phys. Rev. C 82, 014314 (2010).
  16. A. Gezerlis, I. Tews, E. Epelbaum, S. Gandolfi, K. Hebeler, A. Nogga, and A. Schwenk, Quantum Monte Carlo calculations with chiral effective field theory interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 032501 (2013).
  17. L. Coraggio, J. W. Holt, N. Itaco, R. Machleidt, and F. Sammarruca, Reduced regulator dependence of neutron-matter predictions with perturbative chiral interactions, Phys. Rev. C 87, 014322 (2013).
  18. G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, A. Ekström, K. A. Wendt, G. Baardsen, S. Gandolfi, M. Hjorth-Jensen, and C. J. Horowitz, Coupled-cluster calculations of nucleonic matter, Phys. Rev. C 89, 014319 (2014).
  19. A. Gezerlis, I. Tews, E. Epelbaum, M. Freunek, S. Gandolfi, K. Hebeler, A. Nogga, and A. Schwenk, Local chiral effective field theory interactions and quantum Monte Carlo applications, Phys. Rev. C 90, 054323 (2014).
  20. A. Carbone, A. Rios, and A. Polls, Correlated density-dependent chiral forces for infinite-matter calculations within the Green's function approach, Phys. Rev. C 90, 054322 (2014).
  21. A. Roggero, A. Mukherjee, and F. Pederiva, Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of neutron matter with nonlocal chiral interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 221103 (2014).
  22. G. Wlazłowski, J. W. Holt, S. Moroz, A. Bulgac, and K. J. Roche, Auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo simulations of neutron matter in chiral effective field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 182503 (2014).
  23. V. Somà, A. Cipollone, C. Barbieri, P. Navrátil, and T. Duguet, Chiral two- and three-nucleon forces along medium-mass isotope chains, Phys. Rev. C 89, 061301(R) (2014).
  24. S. Elhatisari, D. Lee, G. Rupak, E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, T. A. Lähde, T. Luu, and U.-G. Meißner, Ab initio alpha–alpha scattering, Nature (London) 528, 111 (2015).
  25. I. Tews, S. Gandolfi, A. Gezerlis, and A. Schwenk, Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of neutron matter with chiral three-body forces, Phys. Rev. C 93, 024305 (2016).
  26. M. Piarulli, A. Baroni, L. Girlanda, A. Kievsky, A. Lovato, Ewing Lusk, L. E. Marcucci, Steven C. Pieper, R. Schiavilla, M. Viviani, and R. B. Wiringa, Light-nuclei spectra from chiral dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 052503 (2018).
  27. D. Lonardoni, J. Carlson, S. Gandolfi, J. E. Lynn, K. E. Schmidt, A. Schwenk, and X. B. Wang, Properties of nuclei up to A=16 using local chiral interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 122502 (2018).
  28. L. E. Marcucci, F. Sammarruca, M. Viviani, and R. Machleidt, Momentum distributions and short-range correlations in the deuteron and He3 with modern chiral potentials, Phys. Rev. C 99, 034003 (2019).
  29. R. Schiavilla, A. Baroni, S. Pastore, M. Piarulli, L. Girlanda, A. Kievsky, A. Lovato, L. E. Marcucci, S. C. Pieper, M. Viviani, and R. B. Wiringa, Local chiral interactions and magnetic structure of few-nucleon systems, Phys. Rev. C 99, 034005 (2019).
  30. A. Carbone and A. Schwenk, Ab initio constraints on thermal effects of the nuclear equation of state, Phys. Rev. C 100, 025805 (2019).
  31. A. Tichai, R. Roth, and T. Duguet, Many-body perturbation theories for finite nuclei, Front. Phys. 8, 164 (2020).
  32. X. Zhang, S. R. Stroberg, P. Navratil, C. Gwak, J. A. Melendez, R. J. Furnstahl, and J. D. Holt, Ab Initio calculations of low-energy nuclear scattering using confining potential traps, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 112503 (2020).
  33. C.-J. Yang, A. Ekström, C. Forssén, and G. Hagen, Power counting in chiral effective field theory and nuclear binding, Phys. Rev. C 103, 054304 (2021).
  34. J. E. Sobczyk, B. Acharya, S. Bacca, and G. Hagen, Ab initio computation of the longitudinal response function in Ca40, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 072501 (2021).
  35. R. Chen and K. E. Schmidt, Path-integral quantum Monte Carlo calculations of light nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 106, 044327 (2022).
  36. H.-W. Hammer, S. König, and U. van Kolck, Nuclear effective field theory: Status and perspectives, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 025004 (2020).
  37. I. Tews et al., Nuclear forces for precision nuclear physics: A collection of perspectives, Few-Body Syst. 63, 67 (2022).
  38. S. C. Pieper, R. B. Wiringa, and J. Carlson, Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of excited states in A=6–8 nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 70, 054325 (2004).
  39. M. Caffarel and O. Hess, Quantum Monte Carlo perturbation calculations of interaction energies, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2139 (1991).
  40. B.-N. Lu, N. Li, S. Elhatisari, Y.-Z. Ma, D. Lee, and Ulf-G. Meißner, Perturbative quantum Monte Carlo method for nuclear physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 242501 (2022).
  41. R. Gaudoin and J. M. Pitarke, Efficient method for the quantum Monte Carlo evaluation of the static density response function of a many-electron system, Phys. Rev. B 81, 245116 (2010).
  42. D. Ceperley, G. V. Chester, and M. H. Kalos, Monte Carlo simulation of a many-fermion study, Phys. Rev. B 16, 3081 (1977).
  43. B. S. Pudliner, V. R. Pandharipande, J. Carlson, S. C. Pieper, and R. B. Wiringa, Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of nuclei with A<∼7, Phys. Rev. C 56, 1720 (1997).
  44. W. M. C. Foulkes, L. Mitas, R. J. Needs, and G. Rajagopal, Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of solids, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 33 (2001).
  45. A. Gezerlis and J. Carlson, Low-density neutron matter, Phys. Rev. C 81, 025803 (2010).
  46. S. Y. Chang and G. F. Bertsch, Unitary Fermi gas in a harmonic trap, Phys. Rev. A 76, 021603(R) (2007).
  47. R. B. Wiringa, V. G. J. Stoks, and R. Schiavilla, Accurate nucleon-nucleon potential with charge-independence breaking, Phys. Rev. C 51, 38 (1995).
  48. H. A. Bethe, Theory of the effective range in nuclear scattering, Phys. Rev. 76, 38 (1949).
  49. G. Palkanoglou, F. K. Diakonos, and A. Gezerlis, From odd-even staggering to the pairing gap in neutron matter, Phys. Rev. C 102, 064324 (2020).
  50. D. J. Dean and M. Hjorth-Jensen, Pairing in nuclear systems: From neutron stars to finite nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 607 (2003).
  51. J. Carlson, S.-Y. Chang, V. R. Pandharipande, and K. E. Schmidt, Superfluid Fermi gases with large scattering length, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 050401 (2003).
  52. R. Machleidt and D. R. Entem, Chiral effective field theory and nuclear forces, Phys. Rep. 503, 1 (2011).
  53. E. Epelbaum, H.-W. Hammer, and U.-G. Meißner, Modern theory of nuclear forces, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1773 (2009).
  54. M. Buraczynski, S. Martinello, and A. Gezerlis, Satisfying the compressibility sum rule in neutron matter, Phys. Lett. B 818, 136347 (2021).
  55. J. E. Lynn, J. Carlson, E. Epelbaum, S. Gandolfi, A. Gezerlis, and A. Schwenk, Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of light nuclei using chiral potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 192501 (2014).
  56. A. Nogga, R. G. E. Timmermans, and U. van Kolck, Renormalization of one-pion exchange and power counting, Phys. Rev. C 72, 054006 (2005).
  57. B. Long and C.-J. Yang, Renormalizing chiral nuclear forces: Triplet channels, Phys. Rev. C 85, 034002 (2012).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation