Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Nonlinear response of a two-dimensional electron gas in the quantum Hall regime

Shuichi Iwakiri1,*, Lev V. Ginzburg1, Marc P. Röösli1, Yigal Meir2, Ady Stern3, Christian Reichl1, Matthias Berl1, Werner Wegscheider1, Thomas Ihn1 et al.

Klaus Ensslin1

  • 1Department of Physics, ETH Zürich, Otto-Stern-Weg 1, Zürich 8093, Switzerland
  • 2Department of Physics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel
  • 3Department of Condensed Matter Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel

  • *siwakiri@phys.ethz.ch

Phys. Rev. Research 5, L032046 – Published 28 September, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L032046

Abstract

Breaking of inversion symmetry leads to nonlinear and nonreciprocal electron transport, in which the voltage response does not invert with the reversal of the current direction. Many systems have incorporated inversion symmetry breaking into their band or crystal structures. In this Letter, we demonstrate that a conventional two-dimensional electron gas system with a back gate shows nonreciprocal behavior (with voltage proportional to current squared) in the quantum Hall regime, which depends on the out-of-plane magnetic field and contact configuration. The inversion symmetry is broken due to the presence of the back gate and magnetic field, and our phenomenological model provides a qualitative explanation of the experimental data. Our results suggest a universal mechanism that gives rise to nonreciprocal behavior in gated samples.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (18)

  1. R. Kubo, Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes. I. General theory and simple applications to magnetic and conduction problems, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 12, 570 (1957).
  2. R. Landauer, Spatial variation of currents and fields due to localized scatterers in metallic conduction, IBM J. Res. Dev. 1, 223 (1957).
  3. R. Landauer, Electrical resistance of disordered one-dimensional lattices, Philos. Mag. 21, 863 (1970).
  4. M. Büttiker, Four-Terminal Phase-Coherent Conductance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1761 (1986).
  5. H. B. G. Casimir, On Onsager's principle of microscopic reversibility, Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 343 (1945).
  6. L. Onsager, Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. I, Phys. Rev. 37, 405 (1931).
  7. L. Onsager, Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. II. Phys. Rev. 38, 2265 (1931).
  8. G. L. J. A. Rikken, J. Fölling, and P. Wyder, Electrical Magnetochiral Anisotropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 236602 (2001).
  9. Y. Tokura and N. Nagaosa, Nonreciprocal responses from non-centrosymmetric quantum materials, Nat. Commun. 9, 3740 (2018).
  10. F. Ando, Y. Miyasaka, T. Li, J. Ishizuka, T. Arakawa, Y. Shiota, T. Moriyama, Y. Yanase, and T. Ono, Observation of superconducting diode effect, Nature (London) 584, 373 (2020).
  11. A. Daido, Y. Ikeda, and Y. Yanase, Intrinsic Superconducting Diode Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 037001 (2022).
  12. I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum Nonlinear Hall Effect Induced by Berry Curvature Dipole in Time-Reversal Invariant Materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 216806 (2015).
  13. Q. Ma, S. Y. Xu, H. Shen, D. MacNeill, V. Fatemi, T. R. Chang, A. M. Mier Valdivia, S. Wu, Z. Du, C. H. Hsu, S. Fang, Q. D. Gibson, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. J. Cava, E. Kaxiras, H. Z. Lu, H. Lin, L. Fu, N. Gedik et al., Observation of the nonlinear Hall effect under time-reversal-symmetric conditions, Nature (London) 565, 337 (2019).
  14. M. Berl, L. Tiemann, W. Dietsche, H. Karl, and W. Wegscheider, Structured back gates for high-mobility two-dimensional electron systems using oxygen ion implantation, Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 132102 (2016).
  15. R. Ilan, N. R. Cooper, and A. Stern, Longitudinal resistance of a quantum Hall system with a density gradient, Phys. Rev. B 73, 235333 (2006).
  16. S. H. Simon and B. I. Halperin, Explanation for the Resistivity Law in Quantum Hall Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3278 (1994).
  17. K. E. Nagaev, O. S. Ayvazyan, N. Yu. Sergeeva, and M. Büttiker, Magnetic-Field-Induced Non-Gaussian Fluctuations in Macroscopic Equilibrium Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 146802 (2010).
  18. W. Pan, J. S. Xia, H. L. Stormer, D. C. Tsui, C. L. Vicente, E. D. Adams, N. S. Sullivan, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. Baldwin, and K. W. West, Quantization of the Diagonal Resistance: Density Gradients and the Empirical Resistance Rule in a 2D System, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 066808 (2005).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation