Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Extracting the quantum geometric tensor of an optical Raman lattice by Bloch-state tomography

Chang-Rui Yi1,2,3,*, Jinlong Yu4,5,*, Huan Yuan1,2,3, Rui-Heng Jiao1,2,3, Yu-Meng Yang1,2,3, Xiao Jiang1,2,3, Jin-Yi Zhang1,2,3, Shuai Chen1,2,3, and Jian-Wei Pan1,2,3

  • 1Hefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale and School of Physical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
  • 2Shanghai Research Center for Quantum Science and CAS Center for Excellence in Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Shanghai 201315, China
  • 3Hefei National Laboratory, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230088, China
  • 4Center for Theoretical Physics, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
  • 5School of Science, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.

Phys. Rev. Research 5, L032016 – Published 2 August, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L032016

Abstract

In Hilbert space, the geometry of the quantum state is identified by the quantum geometric tensor (QGT), whose imaginary part is the Berry curvature and whose real part is the quantum metric tensor. Here, we experimentally realize a complete Bloch-state tomography to directly measure the eigenfunction of an optical Raman lattice for ultracold atoms. Through the measured eigenfunction, the distribution of the complete QGT in the Brillouin zone is reconstructed, with which the topological invariants are extracted by the Berry curvature and the distances of quantum states in momentum space are measured by the quantum metric tensor. Furthermore, we experimentally test a predicted inequality between the Berry curvature and the quantum metric tensor, which reveals a deep connection between the topology and geometry.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (52)

  1. M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes, Proc. R. Soc. A 392, 45 (1984).
  2. M. V. Berry, The quantum phase, five years after, in Geometric Phases in Physics, edited by F. Wilczek and A. Shapere, Advanced Series in Mathematical Physics Vol. 5 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989), pp. 7–28.
  3. Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory, Phys. Rev. 115, 485 (1959).
  4. K. von Klitzing, The quantized Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 519 (1986).
  5. M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010).
  6. X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011).
  7. J. P. Provost and G. Vallee, Riemannian structure on manifolds of quantum states, Commun. Math. Phys. 76, 289 (1980).
  8. J. Anandan and Y. Aharonov, Geometry of quantum evolution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1697 (1990).
  9. Y.-Q. Ma, S.-J. Gu, S. Chen, H. Fan, and W.-M. Liu, The Euler number of Bloch states manifold and the quantum phases in gapped fermionic systems, Europhys. Lett. 103, 10008 (2013).
  10. S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3439 (1994).
  11. P. Hauke, M. Heyl, L. Tagliacozzo, and P. Zoller, Measuring multipartite entanglement through dynamic susceptibilities, Nat. Phys. 12, 778 (2016).
  12. P. Zanardi, P. Giorda, and M. Cozzini, Information-Theoretic Differential Geometry of Quantum Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 100603 (2007).
  13. X. Tan, D.-W. Zhang, Z. Yang, J. Chu, Y.-Q. Zhu, D. Li, X. Yang, S. Song, Z. Han, Z. Li, Y. Dong, H.-F. Yu, H. Yan, S.-L. Zhu, and Y. Yu, Experimental Measurement of the Quantum Metric Tensor and Related Topological Phase Transition with a Superconducting Qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 210401 (2019).
  14. M. Yu, P. Yang, M. Gong, Q. Cao, Q. Lu, H. Liu, S. Zhang, M. B. Plenio, F. Jelezko, T. Ozawa, N. Goldman, and J. Cai, Experimental measurement of the quantum geometric tensor using coupled qubits in diamond, Natl. Sci. Rev. 7, 254 (2020).
  15. M. Yu, X. Li, Y. Chu, B. Mera, F. N. Ünal, P. Yang, Y. Liu, N. Goldman, and J. Cai, Experimental demonstration of topological bounds in quantum metrology, arXiv:2206.00546.
  16. A. Gianfrate, O. Bleu, L. Dominici, V. Ardizzone, M. De Giorgi, D. Ballarini, G. Lerario, K. W. West, L. N. Pfeiffer, D. D. Solnyshkov, D. Sanvitto, and G. Malpuech, Measurement of the quantum geometric tensor and of the anomalous Hall drift, Nature (London) 578, 381 (2020).
  17. N. R. Cooper, J. Dalibard, and I. B. Spielman, Topological bands for ultracold atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015005 (2019).
  18. L. Asteria, D. T. Tran, T. Ozawa, M. Tarnowski, B. S. Rem, N. Fläschner, K. Sengstock, N. Goldman, and C. Weitenberg, Measuring quantized circular dichroism in ultracold topological matter, Nat. Phys. 15, 449 (2019).
  19. P. Hauke, M. Lewenstein, and A. Eckardt, Tomography of Band Insulators from Quench Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 045303 (2014).
  20. N. Fläschner, B. S. Rem, M. Tarnowski, D. Vogel, D.-S. Lühmann, K. Sengstock, and C. Weitenberg, Experimental reconstruction of the Berry curvature in a Floquet Bloch band, Science 352, 1091 (2016).
  21. M. Tarnowski, F. N. Ünal, N. Fläschner, B. S. Rem, A. Eckardt, K. Sengstock, and C. Weitenberg, Measuring topology from dynamics by obtaining the Chern number from a linking number, Nat. Commun. 10, 1728 (2019).
  22. T. Li, L. Duca, M. Reitter, F. Grusdt, E. Demler, M. Endres, M. Schleier-Smith, I. Bloch, and U. Schneider, Bloch state tomography using Wilson lines, Science 352, 1094 (2016).
  23. L. Duca, T. Li, M. Reitter, I. Bloch, M. Schleier-Smith, and U. Schneider, An Aharonov-Bohm interferometer for determining Bloch band topology, Science 347, 288 (2015).
  24. C. D. Brown, S.-W. Chang, M. N. Schwarz, T.-H. Leung, V. Kozii, A. Avdoshkin, J. E. Moore, and D. Stamper-Kurn, Direct geometric probe of singularities in band structure, Science 377, 1319 (2022).
  25. M. Tarnowski, M. Nuske, N. Fläschner, B. Rem, D. Vogel, L. Freystatzky, K. Sengstock, L. Mathey, and C. Weitenberg, Observation of Topological Bloch-State Defects and Their Merging Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 240403 (2017).
  26. Z. Wu, L. Zhang, W. Sun, X.-T. Xu, B.-Z. Wang, S.-C. Ji, Y. Deng, S. Chen, X.-J. Liu, and J.-W. Pan, Realization of two-dimensional spin-orbit coupling for Bose-Einstein condensates, Science 354, 83 (2016).
  27. W. Sun, B.-Z. Wang, X.-T. Xu, C.-R. Yi, L. Zhang, Z. Wu, Y. Deng, X.-J. Liu, S. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Highly Controllable and Robust 2D Spin-Orbit Coupling for Quantum Gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 150401 (2018).
  28. T. Ozawa and B. Mera, Relations between topology and the quantum metric for Chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B 104, 045103 (2021).
  29. B. Mera, A. Zhang, and N. Goldman, Relating the topology of Dirac Hamiltonians to quantum geometry: When the quantum metric dictates Chern numbers and winding numbers, SciPost Phys. 12, 018 (2022).
  30. X.-J. Liu, K. T. Law, and T. K. Ng, Realization of 2D Spin-Orbit Interaction and Exotic Topological Orders in Cold Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 086401 (2014).
  31. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L032016 for more details including the experimental scheme, the theoretical calculations of the Bloch-state tomography, the experimental protocol, and the data analysis.
  32. E. Alba, X. Fernandez-Gonzalvo, J. Mur-Petit, J. K. Pachos, and J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, Seeing Topological Order in Time-of-Flight Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 235301 (2011).
  33. Z.-Y. Wang, X.-C. Cheng, B.-Z. Wang, J.-Y. Zhang, Y.-H. Lu, C.-R. Yi, S. Niu, Y. Deng, X.-J. Liu, S. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Realization of an ideal Weyl semimetal band in a quantum gas with 3D spin-orbit coupling, Science 372, 271 (2021).
  34. T. Skyrme, A unified field theory of mesons and baryons, Nucl. Phys. 31, 556 (1962).
  35. W. Sun, C.-R. Yi, B.-Z. Wang, W.-W. Zhang, B. C. Sanders, X.-T. Xu, Z.-Y. Wang, J. Schmiedmayer, Y. Deng, X.-J. Liu, S. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Uncover Topology by Quantum Quench Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 250403 (2018).
  36. J. Yu, Phase vortices of the quenched Haldane model, Phys. Rev. A 96, 023601 (2017).
  37. M. Kolodrubetz, D. Sels, P. Mehta, and A. Polkovnikov, Geometry and non-adiabatic response in quantum and classical systems, Phys. Rep. 697, 1 (2017).
  38. C.-R. Yi, L. Zhang, L. Zhang, R.-H. Jiao, X.-C. Cheng, Z.-Y. Wang, X.-T. Xu, W. Sun, X.-J. Liu, S. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Observing Topological Charges and Dynamical Bulk-Surface Correspondence with Ultracold Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 190603 (2019).
  39. L. Zhang, L. Zhang, S. Niu, and X.-J. Liu, Dynamical classification of topological quantum phases, Sci. Bull. 63, 1385 (2018).
  40. Compared with the definition of the quantum volume in Refs. [28, 29], we have rescaled its coefficient (by a factor of π) here to facilitate a direct comparison of this quantity and the Chern number: This convention helps to make the inequality look slightly more concise.
  41. S. Peotta and P. Törmä, Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands, Nat. Commun. 6, 8944 (2015).
  42. Y.-Q. Ma, Euler characteristic number of the energy band and the reason for its non-integer values, arXiv:2001.05946.
  43. J.-H. Zheng, B. Irsigler, L. Jiang, C. Weitenberg, and W. Hofstetter, Measuring an interaction-induced topological phase transition via the single-particle density matrix, Phys. Rev. A 101, 013631 (2020).
  44. F. N. Ünal, A. Bouhon, and R.-J. Slager, Topological Euler Class as a Dynamical Observable in Optical Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 053601 (2020).
  45. C. Wang, P. Zhang, X. Chen, J. Yu, and H. Zhai, Scheme to Measure the Topological Number of a Chern Insulator from Quench Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 185701 (2017).
  46. J. Yu, Measuring Hopf links and Hopf invariants in a quenched topological Raman lattice, Phys. Rev. A 99, 043619 (2019).
  47. C.-R. Yi, J.-L. Yu, W. Sun, X.-T. Xu, S. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Observation of the Hopf links and Hopf fibration in a 2D topological Raman lattice, arXiv:1904.11656.
  48. Y. Hwang, J. Jung, J.-W. Rhim, and B.-J. Yang, Wave-function geometry of band crossing points in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 103, L241102 (2021).
  49. D. D. Solnyshkov, C. Leblanc, L. Bessonart, A. Nalitov, J. Ren, Q. Liao, F. Li, and G. Malpuech, Quantum metric and wave packets at exceptional points in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B 103, 125302 (2021).
  50. W. Chen, Ş. Kaya Özdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity, Nature (London) 548, 192 (2017).
  51. F. Piéchon, A. Raoux, J.-N. Fuchs, and G. Montambaux, Geometric orbital susceptibility: Quantum metric without Berry curvature, Phys. Rev. B 94, 134423 (2016).
  52. M. Iskin, Exposing the quantum geometry of spin-orbit-coupled Fermi superfluids, Phys. Rev. A 97, 063625 (2018).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation