Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Energy-time entanglement from a resonantly driven quantum-dot three-level system

M. Hohn1, K. Barkemeyer2, M. von Helversen1, L. Bremer1, M. Gschrey1, J.-H. Schulze1, A. Strittmatter1,*, A. Carmele2, S. Rodt1 et al.

S. Bounouar1 and S. Reitzenstein1

  • 1Institut für Festkörperphysik, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany
  • 2Institut für Theoretische Physik, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany

  • *Present address: Institute of Physics, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.

Phys. Rev. Research 5, L022060 – Published 22 June, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L022060

Abstract

Entanglement is a major resource in advanced quantum technology where it can enable a secure exchange of information over large distances. Energy-time entanglement is particularly attractive for its beneficial robustness in fiber-based quantum communication and can be demonstrated in the Franson interferometer. We report on Franson-type interference from a resonantly driven biexciton cascade under continuous wave excitation. Our measurements yield a maximum visibility of (73±2)% surpassing the limit of violation of Bell's inequality (70.7%) by more than one standard deviation. Despite being unable to satisfy a loophole free violation, our work demonstrates promising results concerning future studies on such a system. Furthermore, our systematical investigations on the impact of driving strength indicate that dephasing mechanisms and deviations from the cascaded emission have a major impact on the degree of the measured energy-time entanglement.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (56)

  1. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
  2. J. S. Bell, On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox, Phys. Phys. Fiz. 1, 195 (1964).
  3. A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell's Inequalities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982).
  4. B. Hensen, H. Bernien, A. E. Dréau, A. Reiserer, N. Kalb, M. S. Blok, J. Ruitenberg, R. F. L. Vermeulen, R. N. Schouten, C. Abellán et al., Loophole-free bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres, Nature (London) 526, 682 (2015).
  5. M. Giustina, M. A. M. Versteegh, S. Wengerowsky, J. Handsteiner, A. Hochrainer, K. Phelan, F. Steinlechner, J. Kofler, J. A. Larsson, C. Abellan et al., Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell's Theorem with Entangled Photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250401 (2015).
  6. L. K. Shalm, E. Meyer-Scott, B. G. Christensen, P. Bierhorst, M. A. Wayne, M. J. Stevens, T. Gerrits, S. Glancy, D. R. Hamel, M. S. Allman et al., Strong Loophole-Free Test of Local Realism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250402 (2015).
  7. A. Steane, Reports on progress in physics related content quantum computing, Rep. Prog. Phys 61, 117 (1998).
  8. R. Horodecki, Quantum information, Acta Phys. Pol. A 139, 197 (2021).
  9. J. L. O’Brien, Optical quantum computing, Science 318, 1567 (2007).
  10. N. Gisin and R. Thew, Quantum communication review, Nat. Photonics 1, 165 (2007).
  11. D. A. Vajner, L. Rickert, T. Gao, K. Kaymazlar, and T. Heindel, Quantum communication using semiconductor quantum dots, Adv. Quantum Technol. 5, 2100116 (2022).
  12. N. Gisin, G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, Quantum cryptography, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 145 (2002).
  13. M. Brodsky, E. C. George, C. Antonelli, and M. Shtaif, Loss of polarization entanglement in a fiber-optic system with polarization mode dispersion in one optical path, Opt. Lett. 36, 43 (2011).
  14. C. Antonelli, M. Shtaif, and M. Brodsky, Sudden Death of Entanglement Induced by Polarization Mode Dispersion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 080404 (2011).
  15. W. Tittel, J. Brendel, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin, Violation of Bell Inequalities by Photons More Than 10 Km Apart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3563 (1998).
  16. T. Inagaki, N. Matsuda, O. Tadanaga, M. Asobe, and H. Takesue, Entanglement distribution over 300 km of fiber, Opt. Express 21, 23241 (2013).
  17. W. Tittel, J. Brendel, N. Gisin, and H. Zbinden, Long-distance bell-type tests using energy-time entangled photons, Phys. Rev. A 59, 4150 (1999).
  18. A. Cuevas, G. Carvacho, G. Saavedra, J. Cariñe, W. A. T. Nogueira, M. Figueroa, A. Cabello, P. Mataloni, G. Lima, and G. B. Xavier, Long-distance distribution of genuine energy-time entanglement, Nat. Commun. 4, 2871 (2013).
  19. J. Brendel, N. Gisin, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, Pulsed Energy-Time Entangled Twin-Photon Source for Quantum Communication, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2594 (1999).
  20. I. Marcikic, H. de Riedmatten, W. Tittel, H. Zbinden, M. Legré, and N. Gisin, Distribution of Time-Bin Entangled Qubits Over 50 Km of Optical Fiber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 180502 (2004).
  21. Y. Shih, An Introduction to Quantum Optics: Photon and Biphoton Physics (CRC, Boca Raton, 2011).
  22. J. Liang, S. M. Hendrickson, and T. B. Pittman, Role of pump coherence in two-photon interferometry, Phys. Rev. A 83, 033812 (2011).
  23. D. Huber, M. Reindl, J. Aberl, A. Rastelli, and R. Trotta, Semiconductor quantum dots as an ideal source of polarization-entangled photon pairs on-demand: A review, J. Opt. 20, 073002 (2018).
  24. R. Hafenbrak, S. M. Ulrich, P. Michler, L. Wang, A. Rastelli, and O. G. Schmidt, Triggered polarization-entangled photon pairs from a single quantum dot up to 30 k, New J. Phys. 9, 315 (2007).
  25. F. Troiani, J. I. Perea, and C. Tejedor, Cavity-assisted generation of entangled photon pairs by a quantum-dot cascade decay, Phys. Rev. B 74, 235310 (2006).
  26. S. Bounouar, C. de la Haye, M. Strauß, P. Schnauber, A. Thoma, M. Gschrey, J.-H. Schulze, A. Strittmatter, S. Rodt, and S. Reitzenstein, Generation of maximally entangled states and coherent control in quantum dot microlenses, Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 153107 (2018).
  27. T. Lettner et al., Strain-controlled quantum dot fine structure for entangled photon generation at 1550 nm, Nano Lett. 21, 10501 (2021).
  28. H. Jayakumar, A. Predojević, T. Kauten, T. Huber, G. S. Solomon, and G. Weihs, Time-bin entangled photons from a quantum dot, Nat. Commun. 5, 4251 (2014).
  29. T. Huber, L. Ostermann, M. Prilmüller, G. S. Solomon, H. Ritsch, G. Weihs, and A. Predojević, Coherence and degree of time-bin entanglement from quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 93, 201301(R) (2016).
  30. M. A. M. Versteegh, M. E. Reimer, A. A. Van Den Berg, G. Juska, V. Dimastrodonato, A. Gocalinska, E. Pelucchi, and V. Zwiller, Single pairs of time-bin-entangled photons, Phys. Rev. A 92, 033802 (2015).
  31. L. Ginés, C. Pepe, J. Gonzales, N. Gregersen, S. Höfling, C. Schneider, and A. Predojević, Time-bin entangled photon pairs from quantum dots embedded in a self-aligned cavity, Opt. Express 29, 4174 (2021).
  32. J. P. Lee, B. Villa, A. J. Bennett, R. M. Stevenson, D. J. P. Ellis, I. Farrer, D. A. Ritchie, and A. J. Shields, A quantum dot as a source of time-bin entangled multi-photon states, Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 025011 (2019).
  33. Y.-N. Sun et al., Measurement of the inhomogeneous broadening of a bi-exciton state in a quantum dot using franson-type nonlocal interference, Opt. Express 25, 1778 (2017).
  34. J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).
  35. M. Peiris, K. Konthasinghe, and A. Muller, Franson Interference Generated by a Two-Level System, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 030501 (2017).
  36. S. Bounouar et al., Path-Controlled Time Reordering of Paired Photons in a Dressed Three-Level Cascade, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 233601 (2017).
  37. M. Gschrey et al., Highly indistinguishable photons from deterministic quantum-dot microlenses utilizing three-dimensional in situ electron-beam lithography, Nat. Commun. 6, 7662 (2015).
  38. E. Moreau, I. Robert, L. Manin, V. Thierry-Mieg, J. M. Gérard, and I. Abram, Quantum Cascade of Photons in Semiconductor Quantum Dots, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 183601 (2001).
  39. R. M. Stevenson, A. J. Hudson, A. J. Bennett, R. J. Young, C. A. Nicoll, D. A. Ritchie, and A. J. Shields, Evolution of Entanglement Between Distinguishable Light States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 170501 (2008).
  40. H. S. Nguyen, G. Sallen, M. Abbarchi, R. Ferreira, C. Voisin, P. Roussignol, G. Cassabois, and C. Diederichs, Photoneutralization and slow capture of carriers in quantum dots probed by resonant excitation spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 87, 115305 (2013).
  41. C. Santori, D. Fattal, J. Vučković, G. S. Solomon, E. Waks, and Y. Yamamoto, Submicrosecond correlations in photoluminescence from inas quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 69, 205324 (2004).
  42. M. Davanço, C. S. Hellberg, S. Ates, A. Badolato, and K. Srinivasan, Multiple time scale blinking in inas quantum dot single-photon sources, Phys. Rev. B 89, 161303(R) (2014).
  43. C. Sánchez Muñoz, F. P. Laussy, C. Tejedor, and E. Del Valle, Enhanced two-photon emission from a dressed biexciton, New J. Phys. 17, 123021 (2015).
  44. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L022060 for additional measurements and theoretical descriptions.
  45. J. D. Franson, Bell Inequality for Position and Time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2205 (1989).
  46. S. Aerts, P. Kwiat, J.-Å. Larsson, and M. Żukowski, Two-Photon Franson-Type Experiments and Local Realism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2872 (1999).
  47. J. Jogenfors and J.-Åke Larsson, Energy-time entanglement, elements of reality, and local realism, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 424032 (2014).
  48. J.-Å. Larsson and R. D. Gill, Bell's inequality and the coincidence-time loophole, Europhys. Lett. 67, 707 (2004).
  49. A. Cabello, A. Rossi, G. Vallone, F. De Martini, and P. Mataloni, Proposed Bell Experiment with Genuine Energy-Time Entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 040401 (2009).
  50. K. Barkemeyer, M. Hohn, S. Reitzenstein, and A. Carmele, Boosting energy-time entanglement using coherent time-delayed feedback, Phys. Rev. A 103, 062423 (2021).
  51. L. C. B. Ryff, Franson's experiment using polarized photons, Phys. Rev. A 48, 1020 (1993).
  52. K. Roszak, P. Machnikowski, and L. Jacak, Phonon-induced dephasing in quantum dots - interpretation in terms of information leakage, Acta Phys. Pol. A 110, 325 (2006).
  53. L. Monniello, C. Tonin, R. Hostein, A. Lemaitre, A. Martinez, V. Voliotis, and R. Grousson, Excitation-Induced Dephasing in a Resonantly Driven InAs/GaAs Quantum Dot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 026403 (2013).
  54. A. J. Ramsay, A. V. Gopal, E. M. Gauger, A. Nazir, B. W. Lovett, A. M. Fox, and M. S. Skolnick, Damping of Exciton Rabi Rotations by Acoustic Phonons in Optically Excited InGaAs/GaAs Quantum Dots, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 017402 (2010).
  55. F. Liu et al., High purcell factor generation of indistinguishable on-chip single photons, Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 835 (2018).
  56. G. Lima, G. Vallone, A. Chiuri, A. Cabello, and P. Mataloni, Experimental bell-inequality violation without the postselection loophole, Phys. Rev. A 81, 040101(R) (2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation