Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Compression algorithms reveal memory effects and static disorder in single-molecule trajectories

Kevin Song1, Dmitrii E. Makarov2,3,*, and Etienne Vouga1

  • 1Department of Computer Science, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
  • 2Department of Chemistry, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
  • 3Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA

  • *makarov@cm.utexas.edu

Phys. Rev. Research 5, L012026 – Published 27 February, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L012026

Abstract

A key challenge in single-molecule studies is deducing underlying molecular kinetics from low-dimensional data, as distinct physical scenarios can exhibit similar observable behaviors such as anomalous diffusion. We show that information-theoretic analysis of single-molecule time series can reliably differentiate Markov (memoryless) from non-Markov dynamics and static from dynamic disorder. This analysis is based on the idea that non-Markov time series can be compressed, using lossless compression algorithms and transmitted within shorter messages than appropriately constructed Markov approximations. In practice, this method detects differences between Markov and non-Markov trajectories even when they are much smaller than the errors of the compression algorithm.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (53)

  1. R. Zwanzig, Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001).
  2. K. Neupane, A. P. Manuel, and M. Woodside, Protein folding trajectories can be described quantitatively by one-dimensional diffusion over measured energy landscapes, Nat. Phys. 12, 700 (2016).
  3. H. A. Kramers, Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions, Physica 7, 284 (1940).
  4. A. B. Kolomeisky, Motor Proteins and Molecular Motors (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2015).
  5. I. M. Sokolov, Models of anomalous diffusion in crowded environments, Soft Matter 8, 9043 (2012).
  6. R. Metzler, J. H. Jeon, A. G. Cherstvy, and E. Barkai, Anomalous diffusion models and their properties: Non-stationarity, non-ergodicity, and ageing at the centenary of single particle tracking, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 24128 (2014).
  7. P. Debnath, W. Min, X. S. Xie, and B. J. Cherayil, Multiple time scale dynamics of distance fluctuations in a semiflexible polymer: A one-dimensional generalized Langevin equation treatment, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 204903 (2005).
  8. I. Grossman-Haham, G. Rosenblum, T. Namani, and H. Hofmann, Slow domain reconfiguration causes power-law kinetics in a two-state enzyme, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 513 (2018).
  9. X. Hu, L. Hong, M. D. Smith, T. Neusius, X. Cheng, and J. C. Smith, The dynamics of single protein molecules is non-equilibrium and self-similar over thirteen decades in time, Nat. Phys. 12, 171 (2016).
  10. S. C. Kou and X. S. Xie, Generalized Langevin Equation with Fractional Gaussian Noise: Subdiffusion within a Single Protein Molecule, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 180603 (2004).
  11. G. Luo, I. Andricioaei, X. S. Xie, and M. Karplus, Dynamic distance disorder in proteins is caused by trapping, J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 9363 (2006).
  12. W. Min, G. Luo, B. J. Cherayil, S. C. Kou, and X. S. Xie, Observation of a Power-Law Memory Kernel for Fluctuations within a Single Protein Molecule, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 198302 (2005).
  13. H. Yang, G. Luo, P. Karnchanaphanurach, T. M. Louie, I. Rech, S. Cova, L. Xun, and X. S. Xie, Protein conformational dynamics probed by single-molecule electron transfer, Science 302, 262 (2003).
  14. G. Muñoz-Gil, G. Volpe, M. A. Garcia-March, E. Aghion, A. Argun, C. B. Hong, T. Bland, S. Bo, J. A. Conejero, N. Firbas et al., Objective comparison of methods to decode anomalous diffusion, Nat. Commun. 12, 6253 (2021).
  15. H. Y. Aviram, M. Pirchi, Y. Barak, I. Riven, and G. Haran, Two states or not two states: Single-molecule folding studies of protein L, J. Chem. Phys. 148, 123303 (2018).
  16. J. N. Taylor, M. Pirchi, G. Haran, and T. Komatsuzaki, Deciphering hierarchical features in the energy landscape of adenylate kinase folding/unfolding, J. Chem. Phys. 148, 123325 (2018).
  17. J. S. t. Bryan, I. Sgouralis, and S. Presse, Inferring effective forces for Langevin dynamics using Gaussian processes, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 124106 (2020).
  18. Z. Kilic, I. Sgouralis, W. Heo, K. Ishii, T. Tahara, and S. Presse, Extraction of rapid kinetics from smFRET measurements using integrative detectors, Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2, 100409 (2021).
  19. Z. Kilic, I. Sgouralis, and S. Presse, Generalizing HMMs to continuous time for fast kinetics: Hidden Markov jump processes, Biophys. J. 120, 409 (2021).
  20. I. V. Gopich and A. Szabo, Decoding the pattern of photon colors in single-molecule FRET, J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 10965 (2009).
  21. A. M. Berezhkovskii and D. E. Makarov, Single-molecule test for Markovianity of the dynamics along a reaction coordinate, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 2190 (2018).
  22. R. Satija, A. M. Berezhkovskii, and D. E. Makarov, Broad distributions of transition-path times are fingerprints of multidimensionality of the underlying free energy landscapes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 27116 (2020).
  23. D. Hartich and A. Godec, Emergent Memory and Kinetic Hysteresis in Strongly Driven Networks, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041047 (2021).
  24. A. Lapolla and A. Godec, Toolbox for quantifying memory in dynamics along reaction coordinates, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, L022018 (2021).
  25. A. C. Titman and H. Putter, General tests of the Markov property in multi-state models, Biostatistics 23, 380 (2022).
  26. J. Stigler, F. Ziegler, A. Gieseke, J. C. M. Gebhardt, and M. Rief, The complex folding network of single Calmodulin molecules, Science 334, 512 (2011).
  27. C. E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379 (1948).
  28. R. Elber, D. E. Makarov, and H. Orland, Molecular Kinetics in Condensed Phases: Theory, Simulation, and Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2020).
  29. D. T. Gillespie, A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions, J. Comput. Phys. 22, 403 (1976).
  30. D. E. Makarov, The master equation approach to problems in chemical and biological physics, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, edited by A. L. Parrill and K. B. Lipkowitz, (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2017), Chap. 6.
  31. C. B. Li, H. Yang, and T. Komatsuzaki, Multiscale complex network of protein conformational fluctuations in single-molecule time series, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 536 (2008).
  32. J. Lee and S. Presse, A derivation of the master equation from path entropy maximization, J. Chem. Phys. 137, 074103 (2012).
  33. T. Schurmann and P. Grassberger, Entropy estimation of symbol sequences, Chaos 6, 414 (1996).
  34. Y. Aït-Sahalia, J. Fan, and J. Jiang, Nonparametric tests of the Markov hypothesis in continuous-time models, Ann. Stat. 38, 3129 (2010).
  35. https://tukaani.org/xz/.
  36. A. D. Wyner and J. Ziv, The sliding-window Lempel-Ziv algorithm is asymptotically optimal, Proc. IEEE 82, 872 (1994).
  37. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L012026 for additional data referenced in the main text.
  38. T. E. Harris, Diffusion with “collisions” between particles, J. Appl. Probab. 2, 323 (1965).
  39. J. L. Lebowitz and J. K. Percus, Kinetic equations and density expansions: Exactly solvable one-dimensional system, Phys. Rev. 155, 122 (1967).
  40. J. Shin, A. M. Berezhkovskii, and A. B. Kolomeisky, Biased random walk in crowded environment: Breaking uphill/downhill symmetry of transition times, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 4530 (2020).
  41. G. Hummer, J. C. Rasaiah, and J. P. Noworyta, Water conduction through the hydrophobic channel of a carbon nanotube, Nature (London) 414, 188 (2001).
  42. A. Lapolla and A. Godec, Single-file diffusion in a bi-stable potential: Signatures of memory in the barrier-crossing of a tagged-particle, J. Chem. Phys. 153, 194104 (2020).
  43. E. B. Stukalin and A. B. Kolomeisky, Transport of single molecules along the periodic parallel lattices with coupling, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 204901 (2006).
  44. M. L. Mugnai, M. A. Caporizzo, Y. E. Goldman, and D. Thirumalai, Processivity and velocity for motors stepping on periodic tracks, Biophys. J. 118, 1537 (2020).
  45. A. M. Berezhkovskii and D. E. Makarov, On the forward/backward symmetry of transition path time distributions in nonequilibrium systems, J. Chem. Phys. 151, 065102 (2019).
  46. S. Burov and E. Barkai, Time Transformation for Random Walks in the Quenched Trap Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 140602 (2011).
  47. R. Avinery, M. Kornreich, and R. Beck, Universal and Accessible Entropy Estimation Using a Compression Algorithm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 178102 (2019).
  48. J. Des Cloizeaux and G. Jannink, Polymers in Solution: Their Modelling and Structure (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1990).
  49. R. Bauerschmidt, H. Duminil-Copin, J. Goodman, and G. Slade, Lectures on self-avoiding walks, in Probability and Statistical Physics in Two and More Dimensions, edited by D. D. Ellwood, C. Newman, V. Sidoravicius, and W. Werner (Clay Mathematics Institute, Cambridge, 2012), Vol. 15, pp. 395.
  50. D. E. Makarov, Barrier crossing dynamics from single-molecule measurements, J. Phys. Chem. B 125, 2467 (2021).
  51. J. Klafter and I. M. Sokolov, First Steps in Random Walks: From Tools to Applications (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011).
  52. G. Boffetta, M. Cencini, M. Falcioni, and A. Vulpiani, Predictability: A way to characterize complexity, Phys. Rep. 356, 367 (2002).
  53. P. Gaspard and X.-J. Wang, Noise, chaos, and (ε,τ) entropy per unit time, Phys. Rep. 235, 291 (1993).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation