Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Coherence of Rabi oscillations with spin exchange

C. Kiehl1,*, D. Wagner1, T.-W. Hsu1, S. Knappe2,3, C. A. Regal1, and T. Thiele1,†

  • 1JILA, National Institute of Standards and Technology and University of Colorado, and Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
  • 2Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
  • 3FieldLine Incorporated, Boulder, Colorado 80301, USA

  • *christopher.kiehl@colorado.edu
  • †Present address: Zurich Instruments AG, Technoparkstrasse 1, 8005 Zurich, Switzerland.

Phys. Rev. Research 5, L012002 – Published 10 January, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L012002

Abstract

Rabi measurements in atomic vapor cells are of current interest in a range of microwave imaging and sensing experiments, but are increasingly in a parameter space outside of theoretical studies of coherence defined by spin-exchange collisions. Here, we study the coherence of Rabi oscillations in vapor cells by employing continuous nondestructive readout of the hyperfine manifold of Rb87 using Faraday rotation. We develop a full model for spin-exchange coherence for hyperfine transitions that takes into account a nonstatic population distribution. In this regime, Rabi oscillations exhibit nontrivial time-domain signals that allow verification of vapor-cell parameters. We find excellent agreement between theory and experiment, which will aid in benchmarking sensitivities of Rabi measurement applications.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (36)

  1. J. Vanier and C. Audoin, The Quantum Physics of Atomic Frequency Standards (A. Hilger, Bristol, UK, 1989), Vol 1.
  2. W. Happer, Optical Pumping, Rev. Mod. Phys. 44, 169 (1972).
  3. J. Kong. R. Jiménez-Martínez, C. Troullinou, V. G. Lucivero, G. Tóth, and M. W. Mitchell, Measurement-induced, spatially-extended entanglement in a hot, strongly-interacting atomic system, Nat. Commun. 11, 2415 (2020).
  4. Y. Horowicz, O. Katz, O. Raz, and O. Firstenberg, Critical dynamics and phase transition of a strongly interacting warm spin gas, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2106400118 (2021).
  5. D. Budker and M. Romalis, Optical magnetometry, Nat. Phys. 3, 227 (2007).
  6. W. Happer and H. Tang, Spin-Exchange Shift and Narrowing of Magnetic Resonance Lines in Optically Pumped Alkali Vapors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 273 (1973).
  7. I. M. Savukov and M. V. Romalis, Effects of spin-exchange collisions in a high-density alkali-metal vapor in low magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. A 71, 023405 (2005).
  8. J. Vanier, Relaxation in Rubidium-87 and the Rubidium Maser, Phys. Rev. 168, 129 (1968).
  9. J. Vanier, J.-F. Simard, and J.-S. Boulanger, Relaxation and frequency shifts in the ground state of Rb85, Phys. Rev. A 9, 1031 (1974).
  10. Y.-Y. Jau, A. B. Post, N. N. Kuzma, A. M. Braun, M. V. Romalis, and W. Happer, Intense, Narrow Atomic-Clock Resonances, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 110801 (2004).
  11. A. Horsley, G.-X. Du, and P. Treutlein, Widefield microwave imaging in alkali vapor cells with sub-100µm resolution, New J. Phys. 17, 112002 (2015).
  12. A. Horsley and P. Treutlein, Frequency-tunable microwave field detection in an atomic vapor cell, Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 211102 (2016).
  13. P. Böhi and P. Treutlein, Simple microwave field imaging technique using hot atomic vapor cells, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 181107 (2012).
  14. T. Thiele, Y. Lin, M. O. Brown, and C. A. Regal, Self-Calibrating Vector Atomic Magnetometry through Microwave Polarization Reconstruction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 153202 (2018).
  15. E. C. Fear, S. C. Hagness, P. M. Meaney, M. Okoniewski, and M. A. Stuchly, Enhancing breast tumor detection with near-field imaging, IEEE Microwave Mag. 3, 48 (2002).
  16. N. K. Nikolova, Microwave imaging for breast cancer, IEEE Microwave Mag. 12, 78 (2011).
  17. R. Chandra, H. Zhou, I. Balasingham, and R. M. Narayanan, On the opportunities and challenges in microwave medical sensing and imaging, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 62, 1667 (2015).
  18. J. P. Wittke and R. Dicke, Redetermination of the Hyperfine Splitting in the Ground State of Atomic Hydrogen, Phys. Rev. 103, 620 (1956).
  19. D. Budker and D. F. J. Kimball, Optical Magnetometry (Cambridge University Press, Oxford, UK, 2013).
  20. J. C. Allred, R. N. Lyman, T. W. Kornack, and M. V. Romalis, High-Sensitivity Atomic Magnetometer Unaffected by Spin-Exchange Relaxation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 130801 (2002).
  21. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L012002 for details on the atom-microwave coupled Hamiltonian, atomic collisions, experiment modeling, and independent measurements of buffer-gas pressure.
  22. S. Appelt, A. B. Baranga, C. J. Erickson, M. V. Romalis, A. R. Young, and W. Happer, Theory of spin-exchange optical pumping of He3 and Xe129, Phys. Rev. A 58, 1412 (1998).
  23. D. K. Walter, W. M. Griffith, and W. Happer, Magnetic Slowing Down of Spin Relaxation due to Binary Collisions of Alkali-Metal Atoms with Buffer-Gas Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 093004 (2002).
  24. Y.-Y. Jau, New studies of optical pumping, spin resonances, and spin exchange in mixtures of inert gases and alkali-metal vapors, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, 2005.
  25. W. Franzen, Spin Relaxation of Optically Aligned Rubidium Vapor, Phys. Rev. 115, 850 (1959).
  26. A. Pouliot, G. Carlse, H. C. Beica, T. Vacheresse, A. Kumarakrishnan, U. Shim, S. B. Cahn, A. Turlapov, and T. Sleator, Accurate determination of an alkali-vapor-inert-gas diffusion coefficient using coherent transient emission from a density grating, Phys. Rev. A 103, 023112 (2021).
  27. S. Micalizio, A. Godone, F. Levi, and J. Vanier, Spin-exchange frequency shift in alkali-metal-vapor cell frequency standards, Phys. Rev. A 73, 033414 (2006).
  28. A. B.-A. Baranga, S. Appelt, M. Romalis, C. Erickson, A. Young, G. Cates, and W. Happer, Polarization of He3 by Spin Exchange with Optically Pumped Rb and K Vapors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2801 (1998).
  29. M. E. Wagshul and T. Chupp, Optical pumping of high-density Rb with a broadband dye laser and GaAlAs diode laser arrays: Application to He3 polarization, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4447 (1989).
  30. V. Shah, G. Vasilakis, and M. V. Romalis, High Bandwidth Atomic Magnetometery with Continuous Quantum Nondemolition Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 013601 (2010).
  31. S. Li, P. Vachaspati, D. Sheng, N. Dural, and M. V. Romalis, Optical rotation in excess of 100 rad generated by Rb vapor in a multipass cell, Phys. Rev. A 84, 061403(R) (2011).
  32. C. Affordbach, G. X. Du, T. Bandi, A. Horsley, P. Treutlein, and G. Mileti, Imaging microwave and dc magnetic fields in a vapor-cell Rb atomic clock, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 64, 3629 (2015).
  33. G. Liu, O. Be'er, Y. Margalit, M. Givon, D. Groswasser, Y. Japha, and R. Folman, Survival of the fittest in the coherent evolution of quantum ensembles, Phys. Rev. A 98, 013856 (2018).
  34. N. P. Wells, T. U. Driskell, and J. C. Camparo, in 2014 European Frequency and Time Forum (EFTF) (IEEE, New York, 2014), pp. 548–553.
  35. Q. Hao, W. Xue, F. Xu, K. Wang, P. Yun, and S. Zhang, Efforts towards a low-temperature-sensitive physics package for vapor cell atomic clocks, Satell. Navig. 1, 17 (2020).
  36. M. Salleras, E. Eklund, I. Prikhodko, and A. Shkel, Predictive thermal model for indirect temperature measurement inside atomic cell of nuclear magnetic resonance gyroscope, in TRANSDUCERS 2009 - International Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference (IEEE, New York, 2009), pp. 304–307.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation