Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Global minima optimization via mirror-rotation transformation

Yi-Rong Liu1,*, Yan Jiang2, Shuai Jiang1, Chun-Yu Wang1, and Teng Huang3

  • 1School of Information Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China
  • 2School of Vanadium and Titanium, Panzhihua University, Panzhihua, Sichuan 617000, China
  • 3Laboratory of Atmospheric Physico-Chemistry, Anhui Institute of Optics & Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, Anhui 230031, China

  • *yrliu@ustc.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Research 4, L042045 – Published 16 December, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.L042045

Abstract

Rapidly finding low-energy structures on high-dimensional potential energy surfaces remains a challenging problem for cluster science. We present a fast optimization method for structure prediction named mirror-rotation searching, which is inspired by the idea of symmetry and conservation. Our search algorithm can quickly converge to the minima of energy valley by continuously performing mirror-rotation transformation on the cluster, and we introduce the term vaminima to describe these minima. For the selected Lennard-Jones cluster of size N≤150, convergence to a vaminima on average takes 413 relaxations, and finding fullerene C60 from a random initial structure is 49-fold faster than the traditional genetic algorithm. The approach is general and flexible and can greatly improve the search efficiency of unbiased global optimization algorithms and be applied to different kinds of problems, such as molecular structure search, crystal structure prediction, and protein folding.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (32)

  1. A. R. Oganov, C. J. Pickard, Q. Zhu, and R. J. Needs, Structure prediction drives materials discovery, Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 331 (2019).
  2. D. J. Wales, Structure, dynamics, and thermodynamics of clusters: Tales from topographic potential surfaces, Science 271, 925 (1996).
  3. D. J. Wales, M. A. Miller, and T. R. Walsh, Archetypal energy landscapes, Nature (London) 394, 758 (1998).
  4. C. L. Brooks, J. N. Onuchic, and D. J. Wales, Taking a walk on a landscape, Science 293, 612 (2001).
  5. G. Rossi and R. Ferrando, Searching for low-energy structures of nanoparticles: A comparison of different methods and algorithms, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 21, 084208 (2009).
  6. J. Zhang and M. Dolg, ABCluster: The artificial bee colony algorithm for cluster global optimization, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 24173 (2015).
  7. Y. Wang, J. Lv, L. Zhu, and Y. Ma, Crystal structure prediction via particle-swarm optimization, Phys. Rev. B 82, 094116 (2010).
  8. C. Shang and Z. P. Liu, Stochastic surface walking method for structure prediction and pathway searching, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 1838 (2013).
  9. D. Deaven and K. Ho, Molecular Geometry Optimization with a Genetic Algorithm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 288 (1995).
  10. S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi, Optimization by simulated annealing, Science 220, 671 (1983).
  11. D. J. Wales and J. P. Doye, Global optimization by basin-hopping and the lowest energy structures of Lennard-Jones clusters containing up to 110 atoms, J. Phys. Chem. A 101, 5111 (1997).
  12. U. H. Hansmann and L. T. Wille, Global Optimization by Energy Landscape Paving, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 068105 (2002).
  13. K. A. Jackson, M. Horoi, I. Chaudhuri, T. Frauenheim, and A. A. Shvartsburg, Unraveling the Shape Transformation in Silicon Clusters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 013401 (2004).
  14. D. Cvijović and J. Klinowski, Taboo search: An approach to the multiple minima problem, Science 267, 664 (1995).
  15. D. Schebarchov and D. Wales, Structure Prediction for Multicomponent Materials Using Biminima, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 156102 (2014).
  16. R. H. Leary and J. P. K. Doye, Tetrahedral global minimum for the 98-atom Lennard-Jones cluster, Phys. Rev. E 60, R6320 (1999).
  17. A. Rapallo, G. Rossi, R. Ferrando, A. Fortunelli, B. C. Curley, L. D. Lloyd, G. M. Tarbuck, and R. L. Johnston, Global optimization of bimetallic cluster structures. I. Size-mismatched Ag−Cu, Ag−Ni, and Au−Cu systems, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 194308 (2005).
  18. G. Rossi, A. Rapallo, C. Mottet, A. Fortunelli, F. Baletto, and R. Ferrando, Magic Polyicosahedral Core-Shell Clusters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 105503 (2004).
  19. S. Goedecker, W. Hellmann, and T. Lenosky, Global Minimum Determination of the Born-Oppenheimer Surface within Density Functional Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 055501 (2005).
  20. M. T. Oakley, R. L. Johnston, and D. J. Wales, Symmetrisation schemes for global optimisation of atomic clusters, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 3965 (2013).
  21. Y. R. Liu, T. Huang, Y. B. Gai, Y. Zhang, Y. J. Feng, and W. Huang, Three-dimensional assignment of the structures of atomic clusters: an example of Au8M (M=Si, Ge, Sn) anion clusters, Sci. Rep. 5, 17738 (2015).
  22. V. A. Mandelshtam, P. A. Frantsuzov, and F. Calvo, Structural transitions and melting in LJ(74-78) Lennard-Jones clusters from adaptive exchange Monte Carlo simulations, J. Phys. Chem. A 110, 5326 (2006).
  23. W. Pullan, An unbiased population-based search for the geometry optimization of Lennard-Jones clusters: 2⇐N⇐372, J. Comput. Chem. 26, 899 (2005).
  24. J. Lee, I. H. Lee, and J. Lee, Unbiased Global Optimization of Lennard-Jones Clusters for N⇐201 Using the Conformational Space Annealing Method, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 080201 (2003).
  25. J. P. Neirotti, F. Calvo, D. L. Freeman, and J. D. Doll, Phase changes in 38-atom Lennard-Jones clusters. I. A parallel tempering study in the canonical ensemble, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 10340 (2000).
  26. J. P. K. Doye, D. J. Wales, and M. A. Miller, Thermodynamics and the global optimization of Lennard-Jones clusters, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 8143 (1998).
  27. J. P. K. Doye, M. A. Miller, and D. J. Wales, The double-funnel energy landscape of the 38-atom Lennard-Jones cluster, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 6896 (1999).
  28. B. Hourahine et al., DFTB+, a software package for efficient approximate density functional theory based atomistic simulations, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 124101 (2020).
  29. N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953).
  30. J. Elm, An atmospheric cluster database consisting of sulfuric acid, bases, organics, and water, ACS Omega 4, 10965 (2019).
  31. I. K. Ortega, O. Kupiainen, T. Kurten, T. Olenius, O. Wilkman, M. J. McGrath, V. Loukonen, and H. Vehkamaki, From quantum chemical formation free energies to evaporation rates, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 225 (2012).
  32. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.L042045 for the detailed coordinate information of SA-DMA system.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation