Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Coherence-enhanced quantum-dot heat engine

Jaegon Um1,*, Konstantin E. Dorfman2,3,4,†, and Hyunggyu Park5,6,‡

  • 1Department of Physics, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Korea
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
  • 3Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030006, People's Republic of China
  • 4Himalayan Institute for Advanced Study, Unit of Gopinath Seva Foundation, MIG 38, Avas Vikas, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand 249201, India
  • 5School of Physics, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul 02455, Korea
  • 6Quantum Universe Center, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul 02455, Korea

  • *slung@postech.ac.kr
  • †dorfmank@lps.ecnu.edu.cn
  • ‡hgpark@kias.re.kr

Phys. Rev. Research 4, L032034 – Published 25 August, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.L032034

Abstract

We show that quantum coherence can enhance the performance of a continuous quantum heat engine in the Lindblad description. We investigate the steady-state solutions of the particle-exchanging quantum heat engine, composed of degenerate double quantum dots coupled to two heat baths in parallel, where quantum coherence may be induced due to interference between relaxation channels. We find that the engine power can be enhanced by the coherence in the nonlinear response regime, when the symmetry of coupling configurations between dots and two baths is broken. In the symmetric case, the coherence cannot be maintained in the steady state, except for the maximum interference degenerate case, where initial-condition-dependent multiple steady states appear with a dark state.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (39)

  1. G. Benenti, G. Casati, K. Saito, and R. S. Whitney, Fundamental aspects of steady-state conversion of heat to work at the nanoscale, Phys. Rep. 694, 1 (2017).
  2. M. O. Scully, M. S. Zubairy, G. S. Agarwal, and H. Walther, Extracting work from a single heat bath via vanishing quantum coherence, Science 299, 862 (2003).
  3. R. Kosloff and A. Levy, Quantum heat engines and refrigerators: Continuous devices, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 65, 365 (2014).
  4. J. Jaramillo, M. Beau, and A. del Campo, Quantum supremacy of many-particle thermal machines, New J. Phys. 18, 075019 (2016).
  5. H.-B. Chen, P.-Y. Chiu, and Y.-N. Chen, Vibration-induced coherence enhancement of the performance of a biological quantum heat engine, Phys. Rev. E 94, 052101 (2016).
  6. R. S. Whitney, Quantum coherent three-terminal thermoelectrics: Maximum efficiency at given power output, Entropy 18, 208 (2016).
  7. B. K. Agarwalla, J.-H. Jiang, and D. Segal, Quantum efficiency bound for continuous heat engines coupled to noncanonical reservoirs, Phys. Rev. B 96, 104304 (2017).
  8. N. Brunner, M. Huber, N. Linden, S. Popescu, R. Silva, and P. Skrzypczyk, Entanglement enhances cooling in microscopic quantum refrigerators, Phys. Rev. E 89, 032115 (2014).
  9. M. T. Mitchison, M. P. Woods, J. Prior, and M. Huber, Coherence-assisted single-shot cooling by quantum absorption refrigerators, New J. Phys. 17, 115013 (2015).
  10. K. Hammam, Y. Hassouni, R. Fazio, and G. Manzano, Optimizing autonomous thermal machines powered by energetic coherence, New J. Phys. 23, 043024 (2021).
  11. M. O. Scully, K. R. Chapin, K. E. Dorfman, M. B. Kim, and A. Svidzinsky, Quantum heat engine power can be increased by noise-induced coherence, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 15097 (2011).
  12. Y. Yao, Spin-boson theory for charge photogeneration in organic molecules: Role of quantum coherence, Phys. Rev. B 91, 045421 (2015).
  13. C. L. Latune, I. Sinayskiy, and F. Petruccione, Thermodynamics from indistinguishability: Mitigating and amplifying the effects of the bath, Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033192 (2019).
  14. K. E. Dorfman, D. Xu, and J. Cao, Efficiency at maximum power of a laser quantum heat engine enhanced by noise-induced coherence, Phys. Rev. E 97, 042120 (2018).
  15. K. E. Dorfman, D. V. Voronine, S. Mukamel, and M. O. Scully, Photosynthetic reaction center as a quantum heat engine, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2746 (2013).
  16. E. R. Bittner and C. Silva, Noise-induced quantum coherence drives photo-carrier generation dynamics at polymeric semiconductor heterojunctions, Nat. Commun. 5, 3119 (2014).
  17. R. Uzdin, A. Levy, and R. Kosloff, Equivalence of Quantum Heat Machines, and Quantum-Thermodynamic Signatures, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031044 (2015).
  18. J. Klatzow, J. N. Becker, P. M. Ledingham, C. Weinzetl, K. T. Kaczmarek, D. J. Saunders, J. Nunn, I. A. Walmsley, R. Uzdin, and E. Poem, Experimental Demonstration of Quantum Effects in the Operation of Microscopic Heat Engines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 110601 (2019).
  19. Md. Qutubuddin and K. E. Dorfman, Incoherent control of optical signals: Quantum-heat-engine approach, Phys. Rev. Research 3, 023029 (2021); Incoherent control of two-photon induced optical measurements in open quantum systems Quantum heat engine perspective, 4, 023259 (2022).
  20. V. Holubec and T. Novotný, Effects of noise-induced coherence on the performance of quantum absorption refrigerators, J. Low Temp. Phys. 192, 147 (2018).
  21. U. Harbola, M. Esposito, and S. Mukamel, Quantum master equation for electron transport through quantum dots and single molecules, Phys. Rev. B 74, 235309 (2006).
  22. G. Schaller, G. Kießlich, and T. Brandes, Transport statistics of interacting double dot systems: Coherent and non-Markovian effects, Phys. Rev. B 80, 245107 (2009).
  23. G. B. Cuetara, M. Esposito, and G. Schaller, Quantum thermodynamics with degenerate eigenstate coherences, Entropy 18, 447 (2016).
  24. F. D. Ribetto, R. A. Bustos-Marún, and H. L. Calvo, Role of coherence in quantum-dot-based nanomachines within the Coulomb blockade regime, Phys. Rev. B 103, 155435 (2021).
  25. A similar result was reported in a cyclic bosonic QHE; see K. Brandner, M. Bauer, and U. Seifert, Universal Coherence-Induced Power Losses of Quantum Heat Engines in Linear Response, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 170602 (2017).
  26. V. V. Kozlov, Y. Rostovtsev, and M. O. Scully, Inducing quantum coherence via decays and incoherent pumping with application to population trapping, lasing without inversion, and quenching of spontaneous emission, Phys. Rev. A 74, 063829 (2006).
  27. H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, New York, 2002).
  28. R. Alicki and R. Kosloff, Introduction to quantum thermodynamics: History and prospects, in Thermodynamics in the Quantum Regime, edited by F. Binder et al. (Springer, Cham, 2018), pp. 1–33.
  29. For the additivity of baths in the QME, see, also, X.-Q. Li, J. Y. Luo, Y.-G. Yang, P. Cui, and Y. J. Yan, Quantum master-equation approach to quantum transport through mesoscopic systems, Phys. Rev. B 71, 205304 (2005); K. Ptaszyński, Coherence-enhanced constancy of a quantum thermoelectric generator, 98, 085425 (2018); M. T. Mitchison and M. B. Plenio, Non-additive dissipation in open quantum networks out of equilibrium, New J. Phys. 20, 033005 (2018).
  30. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.L032034 for the derivation of the QME, eigenfunction analysis of the Liouville operator, calculations of steady-state currents, and analysis of the fully symmetric case.
  31. M. Q. Weng, Decoherence and relaxation in the interacting quantum dot system, Europhys. Lett. 85, 17003 (2009).
  32. T. Hayashi, T. Fujisawa, H. D. Cheong, Y. H. Jeong, and Y. Hirayama, Coherent Manipulation of Electronic States in a Double Quantum Dot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 226804 (2003).
  33. J. Thingna, D. Manzano, and J. Cao, Dynamical signatures of molecular symmetries in nonequilibrium quantum transport, Sci. Rep. 6, 28027 (2016).
  34. M. Zanner, T. Orell, C. M. F. Schneider, R. Albert, S. Oleschko, M. L. Juan, M. Silveri, and G. Kirchmair, Coherent control of a multi-qubit dark state in waveguide quantum electrodynamics, Nat. Phys. 18, 538 (2022).
  35. A. A. Svidzinsky, K. E. Dorfman, and M. O. Scully, Enhancing photocell power by noise-induced coherence, Coher. Phenom. 1, 7 (2012).
  36. M. Josefsson, A. Svilans, A. M. Burke, E. A. Hoffmann, S. Fahlvik, C. Thelander, M. Leijnse and H. Linke, A quantum-dot heat engine operating close to the thermodynamic efficiency limits, Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 920 (2018).
  37. A. W. Holleitner, C. R. Decker, H. Qin, K. Eberl, and R. H. Blick, Coherent Coupling of Two Quantum Dots Embedded in an Aharonov-Bohm Interferometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 256802 (2001).
  38. A. W. Holleitner, R. H. Blick, A. K. Hüttel, K. Eberl, and J. P. Kotthaus, Probing and controlling the bonds of an artificial molecule, Science 297, 70 (2002).
  39. J. C. Chen, A. M. Chang, and M. R. Melloch, Transition between Quantum States in a Parallel-Coupled Double Quantum Dot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 176801 (2004).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation