Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Deep vacancy induced low-density fluxional interfacial water

Keyang Liu

Jianqing Guo

Weizhong Fu

Ji Chen*

  • School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China

  • International Center for Quantum Materials, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China

  • School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China

  • School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China; Interdisciplinary Institute of Light-Element Quantum Materials and Research Center for Light-Element Advanced Materials, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China

  • *ji.chen@pku.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Research 3, L042014 – Published 29 October, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L042014

Abstract

Interfacial water on transition metal oxides such as TiO2 has been widely studied because of its structural complexity and scientific relevance in, e.g., photocatalysis and ice growth. Using ab initio molecular dynamics, we find that interfacial water on the anatase (101) surface features an unconventional fluxional structure with reduced contact layer density. The density reduction and flexibility of interfacial water are induced by oxygen vacancy defects located deep below the surface. Our study proposes a fresh perspective of the anatase-water interface, raising the importance of nontrivial long-range effects caused by deep defects. These often-neglected effects highlight the necessity and challenges of the state-of-the-art simulation and experimental probing of solid-liquid interfaces.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (52)

  1. A. Hodgson and S. Haq, Water adsorption and the wetting of metal surfaces, Surf. Sci. Rep. 64, 381 (2009).
  2. O. Björneholm, M. H. Hansen, A. Hodgson, L.-M. Liu, D. T. Limmer, A. Michaelides, P. Pedevilla, J. Rossmeisl, H. Shen, G. Tocci, E. Tyrode, M.-M. Walz, J. Werner, and H. Bluhm, Water at interfaces, Chem. Rev. 116, 7698 (2016).
  3. P. G. Debenedetti and M. L. Klein, Chemical physics of water, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 13325 (2017).
  4. H. Kuhlenbeck, S. Shaikhutdinov, and H.-J. Freund, Well-ordered transition metal oxide layers in model catalysis – A series of case studies, Chem. Rev. 113, 3986 (2013).
  5. G. C. Sosso, J. Chen, S. J. Cox, M. Fitzner, P. Pedevilla, A. Zen, and A. Michaelides, Crystal nucleation in liquids: Open questions and future challenges in molecular dynamics simulations, Chem. Rev. 116, 7078 (2016).
  6. A. Striolo, A. Michaelides, and L. Joly, The carbon-water interface: Modeling challenges and opportunities for the water-energy nexus, Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 7, 533 (2016).
  7. M. Fitzner, P. Pedevilla, and A. Michaelides, Predicting heterogeneous ice nucleation with a data-driven approach, Nat. Commun. 11, 4777 (2020).
  8. M. Sulpizi, M.-P. Gaigeot, and M. Sprik, The silica water interface: How the silanols determine the surface acidity and modulate the water properties, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 1037 (2012).
  9. J. A. Kattirtzi, D. T. Limmer, and A. P. Willard, Microscopic dynamics of charge separation at the aqueous electrochemical interface, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 13374 (2017).
  10. O. M. Magnussen and A. Gross, Toward an atomic-scale understanding of electrochemical interface structure and dynamics, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 4777 (2019).
  11. C. Zhang, J. Hutter, and M. Sprik, Coupling of surface chemistry and electric double layer at TiO2 electrochemical interfaces, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 3871 (2019).
  12. F. De Angelis, C. Di Valentin, S. Fantacci, A. Vittadini, and A. Selloni, Theoretical studies on anatase and less common TiO2 phases: Bulk, surfaces, and nanomaterials, Chem. Rev. 114, 9708 (2014).
  13. S. Selcuk and A. Selloni, Facet-dependent trapping and dynamics of excess electrons at anatase TiO2 surfaces and aqueous interfaces, Nat. Mater. 15, 1107 (2016).
  14. C. N. R. Rao and S. Dey, Solar thermochemical splitting of water to generate hydrogen, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 13385 (2017).
  15. G. Tocci, M. Bilichenko, L. Joly, and M. Iannuzzi, Ab initio nanofluidics: Disentangling the role of the energy landscape and of density correlations on liquid/solid friction, Nanoscale 12, 10994 (2020).
  16. B. C. Stipe, M. A. Rezaei, and W. Ho, Single-molecule vibrational spectroscopy and microscopy, Science 280, 1732 (1998).
  17. M. A. Henderson, The interaction of water with solid surfaces: Fundamental aspects revisited, Surf. Sci. Rep. 46, 1 (2002).
  18. Y. R. Shen and V. Ostroverkhov, Sum-frequency vibrational spectroscopy on water interfaces: Polar orientation of water molecules at interfaces, Chem. Rev. 106, 1140 (2006).
  19. C.-Y. Li, J.-B. Le, Y.-H. Wang, S. Chen, Z.-L. Yang, J.-F. Li, J. Cheng, and Z.-Q. Tian, In situ probing electrified interfacial water structures at atomically flat surfaces, Nat. Mater. 18, 697 (2019).
  20. J. Carrasco, A. Hodgson, and A. Michaelides, A molecular perspective of water at metal interfaces, Nat. Mater. 11, 667 (2012).
  21. J. Cheng, X. Liu, J. VandeVondele, M. Sulpizi, and M. Sprik, Redox potentials and acidity constants from density functional theory based molecular dynamics, Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 3522 (2014).
  22. M. F. C. Andrade, H.-Y. Ko, L. Zhang, R. Car, and A. Selloni, Free energy of proton transfer at the water TiO2 interface from ab initio deep potential molecular dynamics, Chem. Sci. 11, 2335 (2020).
  23. U. Aschauer and A. Selloni, Structure of the Rutile TiO2(011) Surface in an Aqueous Environment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 166102 (2011).
  24. C. L. Pang, R. Lindsay, and G. Thornton, Structure of clean and adsorbate-covered single-crystal rutile TiO2 surfaces, Chem. Rev. 113, 3887 (2013).
  25. U. Diebold, Perspective: A controversial benchmark system for water-oxide interfaces: H2O/TiO2(110), J. Chem. Phys. 147, 040901 (2017).
  26. O. Bikondoa, C. L. Pang, R. Ithnin, C. A. Muryn, H. Onishi, and G. Thornton, Direct visualization of defect-mediated dissociation of water on TiO2(110), Nat. Mater. 5, 189 (2006).
  27. Y. Li and Y. Gao, Interplay Between Water and TiO2 Anatase (101) Surface with Subsurface Oxygen Vacancy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 206101 (2014).
  28. N. A. Deskins, G. A. Kimmel, and N. G. Petrik, Observation of molecular hydrogen produced from bridging hydroxyls on anatase TiO2(101), J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 9289 (2020).
  29. N. A. Deskins, R. Rousseau, and M. Dupuis, Defining the role of excess electrons in the surface chemistry of TiO2, J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 5891 (2010).
  30. C. M. Yim, J. Chen, Y. Zhang, B.-J. Shaw, C. L. Pang, D. C. Grinter, H. Bluhm, M. Salmeron, C. A. Muryn, A. Michaelides, and G. Thornton, Visualization of water-induced surface segregation of polarons on rutile TiO2(110), J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 4865 (2018).
  31. J. Chen, C. Penschke, A. Alavi, and A. Michaelides, Small polarons and the Janus nature of TiO2(110), Phys. Rev. B 101, 115402 (2020).
  32. R. Car and M. Parrinello, Unified Approach for Molecular Dynamics and Density-Functional Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2471 (1985).
  33. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
  34. J. Klimeš, D. R. Bowler, and A. Michaelides, Chemical accuracy for the van der Waals density functional, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 22, 022201 (2010).
  35. J. Klimeš, D. R. Bowler, and A. Michaelides, Van der Waals density functionals applied to solids, Phys. Rev. B 83, 195131 (2011).
  36. J. Sun, A. Ruzsinszky, and J. P. Perdew, Strongly Constrained and Appropriately Normed Semilocal Density Functional, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 036402 (2015).
  37. H. Peng, Z.-H. Yang, J. P. Perdew, and J. Sun, Versatile van der Waals Density Functional Based on a Meta-Generalized Gradient Approximation, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041005 (2016).
  38. S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study, Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505 (1998).
  39. G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).
  40. M. Setvin, C. Franchini, X. Hao, M. Schmid, A. Janotti, M. Kaltak, C. G. Van de Walle, G. Kresse, and U. Diebold, Direct View at Excess Electrons in TiO2 Rutile and Anatase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 086402 (2014).
  41. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L042014 for additional data, convergence tests, computational details, and extended analyses.
  42. A. Tilocca and A. Selloni, DFT-GGA and DFT+U simulations of thin water layers on reduced TiO2 anatase, J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 9114 (2012).
  43. Z. Zhao, Z. Li, and Z. Zou, Structure and properties of water on the anatase TiO2(101) surface: From single-molecule adsorption to interface formation, J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 11054 (2012).
  44. U. J. Aschauer, A. Tilocca, and A. Selloni, Ab initio simulations of the structure of thin water layers on defective anatase TiO2(101) surfaces, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 115, 1250 (2015).
  45. D. Selli, G. Fazio, G. Seifert, and C. Di Valentin, Water multilayers on TiO2 (101) anatase surface: Assessment of a DFTB-based method, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 3862 (2017).
  46. I. M. Nadeem, J. P. W. Treacy, S. Selcuk, X. Torrelles, H. Hussain, A. Wilson, D. C. Grinter, G. Cabailh, O. Bikondoa, C. Nicklin, and A. Selloni, Water dissociates at the aqueous interface with reduced anatase TiO2 (101), J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 3131 (2018).
  47. G. S. Herman, Z. Dohnálek, N. Ruzycki, and U. Diebold, Experimental investigation of the interaction of water and methanol with anatase-TiO2(101), J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 2788 (2003).
  48. A. Dahal and Z. Dohnálek, Formation of metastable water chains on anatase TiO2(101), J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 20413 (2017).
  49. M. F. Calegari Andrade, H.-Y. Ko, R. Car, and A. Selloni, Structure, polarization, and sum frequency generation spectrum of interfacial water on anatase TiO2, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 6716 (2018).
  50. Y. He, A. Tilocca, O. Dulub, A. Selloni, and U. Diebold, Local ordering and electronic signatures of submonolayer water on anatase TiO2(101), Nat. Mater. 8, 585 (2009).
  51. M. Otani, I. Hamada, O. Sugino, Y. Morikawa, Y. Okamoto, and T. Ikeshoji, Structure of the water/platinum interface—A first principles simulation under bias potential, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 3609 (2008).
  52. L.-M. Liu, C. Zhang, G. Thornton, and A. Michaelides, Structure and dynamics of liquid water on rutile TiO2(110), Phys. Rev. B 82, 161415(R) (2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation