Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Mean-field interactions in evolutionary spatial games

Dmitriy Antonov1, Evgeni Burovski1, and Lev Shchur1,2

  • 1HSE University, 101000 Moscow, Russia
  • 2Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics, 142432 Chernogolovka, Russia

Phys. Rev. Research 3, L032072 – Published 24 September, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L032072

Abstract

We introduce a mean-field term to an evolutionary spatial game model. Namely, we consider the game of Nowak and May, based on the Prisoner's dilemma, and augment the game rules by a self-consistent mean-field term. This way, an agent operates based on local information from its neighbors and nonlocal information via the mean-field coupling. We simulate the model and construct the steady-state phase diagram, which shows significant new features due to the mean-field term: while for the game of Nowak and May, steady states are characterized by a constant mean density of cooperators, the mean-field game contains steady states with a continuous dependence of the density on the payoff parameter. Moreover, the mean-field term changes the nature of transitions from discontinuous jumps in the steady-state density to jumps in the first derivative. The main effects are observed for stationary steady states, which are parametrically close to chaotic states: the mean-field coupling drives such stationary states into spatial chaos. Our approach can be readily generalized to a broad class of spatial evolutionary games with deterministic and stochastic decision rules.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. P. Weiss, L'hypothèse du champ moléculaire et la propriété ferromagnétique, J. Phys. Theor. Appl. 6, 661 (1907).
  2. G. Sordi, P. Sémon, K. Haule, and A. M. S. Tremblay, Strong Coupling Superconductivity, Pseudogap, and Mott Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 216401 (2012).
  3. A. V. Andreev and A. Kamenev, Itinerant Ferromagnetism in Disordered Metals: A Mean-Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3199 (1998).
  4. L. Santos, G. V. Shlyapnikov, P. Zoller, and M. Lewenstein, Bose-Einstein Condensation in Trapped Dipolar Gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1791 (2000).
  5. D. J. Gross, I. Kanter, and H. Sompolinsky, Mean-Field Theory of the Potts glass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 304 (1985).
  6. I. Bonamassa, B. Gross, M. M. Danziger, and S. Havlin, Critical Stretching of Mean-Field Regimes in Spatial Networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 088301 (2019).
  7. W. Engl, M. Roche, A. Colin, P. Panizza, and A. Ajdari, Droplet Traffic at a Simple Junction at Low Capillary Numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 208304 (2005).
  8. M. Schreckenberg, A. Schadschneider, K. Nagel, and N. Ito, Discrete stochastic models for traffic flow, Phys. Rev. E 51, 2939 (1995).
  9. Y.-H. Lin and J. S. Weitz, Spatial Interactions and Oscillatory Tragedies of the Commons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 148102 (2019).
  10. M. A. Nowak and R. M. May, Evolutionary games and spatial chaos, Nature (London) 359, 826 (1992).
  11. M. Perc, J. J. Jordan, D. G. Rand, Z. Wang, S. Boccaletti, and A. Szolnoki, Statistical physics of human cooperation, Phys. Rep. 687, 1 (2017).
  12. V. Capraro and M. Perc, Mathematical foundations of moral preferences, J. R. Soc. Interface 18, 20200880 (2021).
  13. M. A. Javarone and F. Battiston, The role of noise in the spatial public goods game, J. Stat. Mech. (2016) 073404.
  14. M. A. Javarone, Statistical physics of the spatial Prisoner's Dilemma with memory-aware agents, Eur. Phys. J. B 89, 42 (2016).
  15. M. A. Javarone, Statistical Physics and Computational Methods for Evolutionary Game Theory (Springer, Cham, 2018).
  16. J. Maynard Smith, Evolution and the Theory of Games (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1982).
  17. See, e.g., J. W. Weibull, Evolutionary Game Theory (MIT Press, Boston, MA, 1995) and references therein.
  18. J. Hofbauer and K. Sigmund, Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2008).
  19. C. Hauert and G. Szabó, Game theory and physics, Am. J. Phys. 73, 405 (2005).
  20. G. Szabó, J. Vukov, and A. Szolnoki, Phase diagrams for an evolutionary prisoner's dilemma game on two-dimensional lattices, Phys. Rev. E 72, 047107 (2005).
  21. M. A. Amaral, M. Perc, L. Wardil, A. Szolnoki, E. J. da Silva Júnior, and J. K. L. da Silva, Role-separating ordering in social dilemmas controlled by topological frustration, Phys. Rev. E 95, 032307 (2017).
  22. A. Szolnoki and M. Perc, Emergence of multilevel selection in the prisoner's dilemma game on coevolving random networks, New J. Phys. 11, 093033 (2009).
  23. S. Kolotev, A. Malyutin, E. Burovski, S. Krashakov, and L. Shchur, Dynamic fractals in spatial evolutionary games, Physica A 499, 142 (2018).
  24. M. H. Vainstein and J. J. Arenzon, Spatial social dilemmas: Dilution, mobility and grouping effects with imitation dynamics, Physica A 394, 145 (2014).
  25. E. Burovski, A. Malyutin, and L. Shchur, On the geometric structures in evolutionary games on square and triangular lattices, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1290, 012027 (2019).
  26. R. Moskalenko, E. Burovski, and L. Shchur, Spatial chaos in the Nowak-May game in three dimensions, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1740, 012057 (2021).
  27. M. H. Vainstein and J. J. Arenzon, Disordered environments in spatial games, Phys. Rev. E 64, 051905 (2001).
  28. M. A. Nowak and R. M. May, The spatial dilemmas of evolution, Int. J. Birurcation Chaos 3, 35 (1993).
  29. J.-M. Lasry and P.-L. Lions, Jeux à champ moyen. I. Le cas stationnaire, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 343, 619 (2006); Mean field games, Jpn. J. Math. 2, 229 (2007).
  30. I. Swiecicki, T. Gobron, and D. Ullmo, Schrödinger Approach to Mean Field Games, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 128701 (2016).
  31. R. Axelrod and W. D. Hamilton, The evolution of cooperation, Science 211, 1390 (1981).
  32. References [10, 23] also considered a modification of Eq. (2) to include a self-interaction term, s⃗xTĤs⃗x. This modification does not lead to any qualitative differences. We therefore follow Ref.  [28] and do not include self-interaction.
  33. At smaller values of L, some b realizations of initial conditions contain long-lived artifacts, which disappear as the field size is increased.
  34. At lower values of f0, there are initial states where all C are isolated at t=0 and thus immediately disappear at t=1, resulting in 〈fc〉=0. When these initial states are discarded, the steady-state observables are independent on f0.
  35. B. Derrida, A. J. Bray, and G. Godrèche, Non-trivial exponents in the zero temperature dynamics of the 1d Ising and Potts model, J. Phys. A 27, L357 (1994); A. J. Bray, B. Derrida, and G. Godrèche, Non-trivial algebraic decay in a soluble model of coarsening, Europhys. Lett. 27, 175 (1994).
  36. D. Stauffer, Ising spinodal decomposition at T=0 in one to five dimensions, J. Phys. A 27, 5029 (1994).
  37. S. N. Majumdar, Persistence in nonequilibrium systems, Curr. Sci. 77, 370 (1999).
  38. Fractals and Disordered Systems, edited by A. Bunde and S. Havlin (Springer-Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg, 1996).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation